Preoperative CD52 Level Predicts Graft Survival following Kidney Transplantation

Ramouz, Ali; Nikbakhsh, Rajan; Khajeh, Elias; Sadeghi, Mahmoud; Daniel, Volker; Schmitzler, Paul; Morath, Christian; Zeier, Martin; Mehrabi, Arianeb; Oweira, Hani

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8949919

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 8949919 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8949919

Preoperative CD52 Level Predicts Graft Survival following Kidney Transplantation

Ali Ramouz,¹Rajan Nikbakhsh,¹Elias Khajeh,¹Mahmoud Sadeghi,²Volker Daniel,²Paul Schmitzler,³Christian Morath,⁴Martin Zeier,⁴Arianeb Mehrabi,¹and Hani Oweira⁵

Academic Editor: Maria Irene Bellini

Received04 Jul 2022

Accepted05 Sept 2022

Published16 Sept 2022

Abstract

Several factors have been reported to affect graft survival following kidney transplantation. CD52 molecules may increase T cell proliferation and activation, which may contribute to acute graft rejection and graft survival. In the current study, we studied the possible value of preoperative CD52 levels in predicting graft survival following renal transplantation. Ninety-six patients with end-stage renal disease who had kidney transplantation were included in the study from our prospective cohort. Blood samples were taken one day before surgery, and plasma CD52 levels were measured using ELISA (Cloud-Clone Corp., Houston, TX, USA). Acute rejection, acute tubular necrosis, delayed graft function, graft loss, BK infection, cytomegalovirus infection, and graft survival were evaluated. The mean age of recipients was , and 64.6% were male. The incidence of delayed graft function, acute rejection, graft loss (), BK virus infection, and serum creatinine levels were significantly higher in recipients with high preoperative CD52 levels six months after transplantation (). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that three-year graft survival was significantly higher in patients with low preoperative CD52 levels (). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that serum creatinine levels (, ), acute rejection (, ), and preoperative CD52 levels (, ) were independent prognostic factors for graft survival after kidney transplantation. We showed that high preoperative CD52 levels are associated with higher rates of acute rejection, delayed graft function, and BK virus infection and lower rates of graft survival after kidney transplantation.

1. Introduction

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are optimally treated with kidney transplantation (KTx) [1] because it is associated with better quality of life and longer life expectancy [2]. Although patient and graft survival have considerably increased following KTx in recent decades, KTx recipients still have a lower survival rate than healthy individuals because of organ dysfunction and graft loss [3]. Acute graft rejection is one of the main causes of long-term graft loss after KTx, so understanding the pathophysiology of graft rejection is crucial for improving graft survival [4–6].

Recent research has suggested that graft survival can be predicted in KTx recipients by examining immunological markers in peripheral blood before and after KTx [7]. For example, significantly higher numbers of regulatory T cells, CD19+CD24highCD27+B regulatory cells, and CD19+CD24highCD38high transitional B cells were reported in the peripheral blood of tolerant KTx recipients than in recipients with chronic rejection after KTx [8–10]. Another study reported that high preoperative CD200 levels increase the risk of immunosuppression and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and that higher preoperative CD200R1/CD200 ratios predict the risk of acute rejection following KTx [11].

CD52 is a nonmodulating cell membrane glycoprotein [12, 13] that is expressed in immune cells such as lymphocytes, monocytes, and dendritic cells [14]. Soluble CD52 binds to B cells and T cells to reduce cell growth and induce apoptosis [15]. CD52-presenting cells eliminate CD4+ and CD8+ T cells via complement- and noncomplement-mediated mechanisms, and the anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab reduces graft rejection by increasing the number of CD4+ and CD25+ regulatory T cells [15–17].

CD52 promotes the activation and proliferation of T cells [14, 18, 19]. However, the ability of preoperative CD52 levels to predict transplant outcomes and graft survival after KTx has not been evaluated [16]. In this study, we investigated the correlation between preoperative CD52 levels and other risk factors and acute graft rejection and graft survival following KTx.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

In this prospective cohort, we collected data of 96 consecutive ESRD patients who underwent KTx in our center between January 2015 and December 2017. The study was carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. Study participation did not affect the management or treatment of patients. The study was approved by the University of Heidelberg’s ethical committee (S-225/2014). Patients under the age of 18 at the time of transplantation, as well as those who received a combined organ transplant (simultaneous transplantation of kidney and liver, heart, or pancreas), were excluded from the study. Patients who lost their kidney graft within 30 days of receiving KTx were also excluded from the study.

2.2. Data Collection and Extraction

Demographic and baseline characteristics were collected for all participants. Patient information was extracted from the university hospital’s database. Preoperative factors included serum creatinine, serum CD52, previous transplantation, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches. Intraoperative factors included cold ischemia time, and postoperative outcomes comprised acute tubular necrosis, acute allograft rejection, delayed graft function, CMV (re)activation, BK virus infection, and serum creatinine (measured at three, six, and 12 months after transplantation). Preoperative CD52 levels were analyzed in the serum of all recipients to determine whether preoperative CD52 can predict posttransplant events and graft survival. Six postoperative months and one year later, the CMV pp65 antigen levels of patients who received organs from CMV-negative donors were measured. As prophylaxis, patients receiving kidneys from CMV-positive donors were given 900 mg of valganciclovir daily for three months. Following surgery, all patients received conventional treatment with methylprednisolone, mycophenolate mofetil, and a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) and were followed up for at least two years.

2.3. Obtaining Blood Samples and Measuring CD52 Plasma Levels

On the day before KTx, blood samples were taken from each patient. Plasma was centrifuged at 1.550xg for 10 minutes to separate it from blood cells within two hours of collection and plasma was snap-frozen and stored at −30°C. Plasma CD52 levels were measured using ELISA in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (Cloud-Clone Corp., Houston, TX, USA).

2.4. Detection of Active CMV Infection by CMV pp65 Antigen

CMV pp65 antigen was measured by drawing 8 mL of blood into an EDTA tube and spinning 500,000 leukocytes down onto a slide using a cytospin centrifuge. Cells were fixed and stained with an anti-CMV pp65 mouse monoclonal antibody and then incubated in an antimouse immunoglobulin G FITC-labeled antibody [20]. The number of CMV pp65-positive cells was counted using ultraviolet light microscopy. A positive result was defined as more than three out of 500,000 CMV pp65-positive cells [21].

2.5. Detection of Active BK Virus Infection by Real-Time PCR

DNA was extracted from 200 μL of untreated plasma using the QIAamp kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The main T-antigen in the BK virus genome was quantified from 5 mL of extracted DNA using TaqMan real-time PCR [22]. The detection limit was set at 50 copies/mL. A BK viral load of more than 10,000 copies/mL was considered an active infection [23].

2.6. Quantifying Posttransplant Outcomes

Acute transplant rejection was determined by the presence of necrotic renal tubules in renal biopsies [24]. Delayed graft function was determined by the temporary requirement for one or more dialysis treatments during the first postoperative week. Graft loss was determined by the need for retransplantation or permanent dialysis during follow-up.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted utilizing IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 27.0 (IBM Corp. Released 2013. Armonk, NY) and GraphPad Prism version 9. Continuous variables were presented as mean and standard deviation, and categorical data were shown as percentages. Normal distribution of the data was determined by the Shapiro–Wilk test. For normally distributed variables, unpaired tests were used to analyze continuous variables and the chi-squared test was used to analyze categorical variables. Variables that were not normally distributed were analyzed by Mann–Whitney and Fisher’s exact nonparametric tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated by plotting sensitivity against . The optimal cutoff values for ROC curves and area under the curves (AUCs) were calculated using the Youden index (). The effect of different factors on graft survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier curves. In the Kaplan–Meier curve analysis, differences between subgroups were determined using a log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used in the Cox regression model to examine the prognostic value of the factors, and the results were presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was defined as a .

3. Results

3.1. Patient Characteristics

The demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics of KTx recipients are shown in Table 1. The average age of recipients was , and 64.6% of recipients were male. Glomerulonephritis was the most common etiology of ESRD (53 recipients; 55.2%), followed by autoimmune and polycystic kidney diseases (21 recipients; 21.9%). Almost all recipients (96.9%) had previously undergone dialysis, with a mean duration of months. A repeat KTx was performed in 14.6% of recipients. The preoperative CD52 plasma level was , and the preoperative serum creatinine level was . CMV reactivation was found in 13 (13.5%) patients and BK virus infection in 17 (17.7%) patients. Delayed graft function was observed in 20 patients (20.8%), acute allograft rejection in 17 patients (17.7%), and acute tubular necrosis in three patients (3.1%) after KTx. Finally, graft loss was observed in 22 recipients (22.9%) following KTx (Table 1).

3.2. Graft Survival and Serum CD52 Levels

Recipients were divided into a graft loss group and no graft loss group, and the preoperative CD52 levels were compared between these two groups. The Mann–Whitney U test showed that recipients with graft loss had significantly greater CD52 levels than recipients without graft loss did (, Figure 1). A cutoff value of 260 pg/mL was determined as the optimal CD52 level for predicting postoperative graft loss using a time-dependent ROC curve. Based on this cutoff value, we stratified patients into two groups: a low CD52 group (<260 pg/mL, ) and a high CD52 group (≥260 pg/mL, ). The AUC for CD52 serum levels was 0.701 (95% CI: 0.593–0.809, , Figure 2). The mean age of patients was significantly higher in the high CD52 group than in the low CD52 group (52.73 ± 11.71 vs 46.91 ± 13.7, ). The etiology of ESRD was not significantly different between the low CD52 and high CD52 groups. Serum creatinine levels were significantly higher in the high CD52 group six months after KTx ().

We also compared postoperative outcomes between the high CD52 and low CD52 groups. The rate of delayed graft function was significantly higher in the high CD52 group than in the low CD52 group (14/20, 35.9% vs 6/20, 10.5%; ). The rate of acute rejection was also higher in the high CD52 group (), and BK virus infection occurred more frequently in the high CD52 group (28.2%) than in the low CD52 group (10.5%) (), whereas no differences were observed in the rate of CMV infection between the two groups. The graft loss rate was also significantly higher in the high CD52 group () (Table 1). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed better graft survival in the low CD52 group than in the high CD52 group (, Figure 3).

3.3. Preoperative Level of CD52 Can Predict Graft Survival following Renal Transplantation

Cox regression analysis was carried out to determine whether the examined factors could predict graft survival following KTx. In univariate analyses, six-month postoperative serum creatinine, acute allograft rejection, delayed graft function, BK virus infection, and CD52 plasma levels were found to predict graft loss after KTx (Table 2). Interestingly, in multivariate analysis, only serum CD52 levels, six-month creatinine levels, and acute rejection were found to be independent prognostic factors of graft survival (Table 2).

4. Discussion

It has been shown that alemtuzumab, an anti-CD52 antibody, can induce lymphocyte depletion [14, 25]. Both T cells and B cells could eventually reconstitute in the peripheral blood, resulting in the recovery of their initial population. Reconstitution of T cells and B cells may shift the immune system toward an anti-inflammatory pattern, which may be associated with a more stable and effective graft function [26]. However, the ability of preoperative CD52 levels to predict KTx outcomes such as rate of acute rejection and graft survival has not been investigated [14]. We measured preoperative CD52 serum levels in patients undergoing KTx and assessed the effect of these serum levels and other preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors on surgical outcomes and graft survival. We found that acute rejection and post-transplant serum creatinine six months after KTx and preoperative serum CD52 levels predicted graft survival following KTx. Interestingly, BK virus infection, acute allograft rejection, delayed graft function, and graft loss were more frequent in recipients with higher levels of preoperative CD52.

Our findings that high preoperative CD52 levels can predict poor KTx outcomes supports findings that the anti-CD52 antibody alemtuzumab can reduce acute graft rejection and improve survival outcomes after KTx [25]. Numerous studies have shown that alemtuzumab improves survival and reduces rejection in recipients at high risk for graft rejection. These high-risk patients include older patients, patients with more than two HLA mismatches, and patients with a history of transplantation [16]. Alemtuzumab improves KTx outcomes by modulating CD4 and CD8 expression on the T cell surface and by expanding CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells [18, 27, 28]. It was recently shown that successive targeting of CD52 and TNF-α minimized early immunosuppressive therapy following KTx [18]. In this study, we showed that higher preoperative CD52 levels are associated with delayed graft function, suggesting that CD52 levels can be measured before KTx to predict graft outcomes. We also found that acute graft rejection predicts poor graft survival after KTx. Another study demonstrated that HLA mismatches, delayed graft function, and acute graft function were associated with lower graft survival and that higher levels of CD52 could activate CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to increase graft rejection [14]. Another study showed that 20% of regulatory T cells were CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ after alemtuzumab treatment compared with 4% of cells in recipients not treated with the antibody and 3% of cells in healthy controls. This indicates that alemtuzumab reduces graft rejection by increasing CD4, CD25, and FoxP3 expression in regulatory T cells [29–31].

Because CD52 regulates immune cells and the anti-CD52 antibody alemtuzumab reduces immunosuppression after transplantation, we hypothesized that increased CD52 serum levels might be linked to a higher incidence of infection after transplantation. Indeed, we found that the rate of BK virus infection was higher in patients with high preoperative CD52 levels. In agreement with our findings, other studies have shown higher rates of posttransplant infection in patients with immunosuppression. Epstein–Barr virus infection was strongly associated with T cell depletion and was predicted by cell-mediated immunity and hematological parameters [32, 33]. Similarly, Fernández-Ruiz et al. reported that high CD30 serum levels considerably increased the rate of infection following KTx [34].

Infection with the BK virus was recently shown to decrease graft survival and increase the rate of acute allograft rejection after KTx [35]. In present study, patients with BK viremia had also higher level of preoperative CD52. It can be hypothesized that higher level of CD52 might reflect the highly immunologically active milieu in patients with acute rejection. These patients receive more intensive types and dosage of immunosuppressive agents in response to the acute rejection. Considering the higher risk of BK viremia in association with intense immunosuppression, particularly alemtuzumab induction, the higher rate of BK viremia might actually be related to increased immunosuppression resulting from the treatment of the more frequent acute rejection episodes in these recipients, rather than a direct effect of high pretransplant CD52 level [20, 22].

There are some limitations to this prospective cohort investigation. The patient population was heterogenous, and there was no control group with comparable features. In addition, the sample size was small. Therefore, further studies with larger sample sizes are required to confirm whether preoperative serum CD52 levels can predict graft rejection and survival in the long term.

5. Conclusions

We found that acute allograft rejection, serum creatinine levels six months after KTx, and serum CD52 levels before KTx are independent prognostic factors affecting surgical outcomes and graft survival. We showed for the first time that higher serum CD52 levels are associated with higher rates of acute rejection, delayed graft function, and BK virus infection.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this study.

References

M. Lemoine, D. T. Beauport, T. Lobbedez et al., “Risk factors for early graft failure and death after kidney transplantation in recipients older than 70 years,” Kidney International Reports, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 656–666, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Lim, J. Kohli, and R. D. Bloom, “Immunosuppression for kidney transplantation: where are we now and where are we going?” Transplantation Reviews, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 10–17, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Oweira, A. Ramouz, O. Ghamarnejad et al., “Risk factors of rejection in renal transplant recipients: a Narrative Review,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 1392, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Foroutan, E. L. Friesen, K. E. Clark et al., “Risk factors for 1-year graft loss after kidney transplantation: systematic review and meta-analysis,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1642–1650, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. D. Schold, J. J. Augustine, A. M. Huml, R. Fatica, S. Nurko, and A. Wee, “Effects of body mass index on kidney transplant outcomes are significantly modified by patient characteristics,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 751–765, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Naderi, A. Azadfar, S. R. Yahyazadeh, F. Khatami, and S. M. K. Aghamir, “Impact of the donor-recipient gender matching on the graft survival from live donors,” BMC Nephrology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 5–7, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Liu, X. Liu, S. Zhou et al., “Single-cell profiling of kidney transplant recipients with immunosuppressive treatment reveals the dynamic immune characteristics,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 12, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Braza, E. Dugast, I. Panov et al., “Central role of CD45RA−Foxp3hi memory regulatory T cells in clinical kidney transplantation tolerance,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1795–1805, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. E. Becker, F. de Oliveira Biazotto, H. Conrad et al., “Cellular infiltrates and NFκB subunit c-Rel signaling in kidney allografts of patients with clinical operational tolerance,” Transplantation, vol. 94, no. 7, pp. 729–737, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Nova-Lamperti, P. Chana, P. Mobillo et al., “Increased CD40 ligation and reduced BCR signalling leads to higher IL-10 production in B cells from tolerant kidney transplant patients,” Transplantation, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 541–547, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Oweira, E. Khajeh, S. Mohammadi et al., “Pre-transplant CD200 and CD200R1 concentrations are associated with post-transplant events in kidney transplant recipients,” Medicine, vol. 98, no. 37, article e17006, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Oko, L. S. Wyrwicz, M. Glyda et al., “CD52 gene polymorphism and its potential effect on the response to alemtuzumab in renal transplant recipients,” Annales Academiae Medicae Stetinensis, pp. 22–26, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
G. J. C. Hale, “The CD52 antigen and development of the CAMPATH antibodies,” Cytotherapy, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 137–143, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhao, H. Su, X. Shen, J. Du, X. Zhang, and Y. Zhao, “The immunological function of CD52 and its targeting in organ transplantation,” Inflammation Research, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 571–578, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. L. Zhang, S. K. Malek, J. W. Prichard et al., “Acute cellular rejection predominated by monocytes is a severe form of rejection in human renal recipients with or without Campath-1H (alemtuzumab) induction therapy,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 604–607, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhang, H. Huang, S. Han, S. Fu, and L. J. T. I. Wang, “Alemtuzumab induction in renal transplantation: a meta-analysis and systemic review,” Transplant Immunology, vol. 27, no. 2-3, pp. 63–68, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Bommireddy, S. J. Engle, I. Ormsby, G. P. Boivin, G. F. Babcock, and T. Doetschman, “Elimination of both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells but not B cells eliminates inflammation and prolongs the survival of TGFβ1-deficient mice,” Cellular Immunology, vol. 232, no. 1-2, pp. 96–104, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Morales, M. Bono, A. Fierro et al., “Alemtuzumab induction in kidney transplantation: clinical results and impact on T-regulatory cells,” pp. 3223–3228, Elsevier.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Zhou, J. Lin, S. Chen et al., “Use of the ImmuKnow assay to evaluate the effect of alemtuzumab-depleting induction therapy on cell-mediated immune function after renal transplantation,” Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 304–309, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Korneffel, G. Mitro, K. Buschor, M. Rees, and J. Ortiz, “Low dose valganciclovir as cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in post-renal transplant recipients induced with alemtuzumab: A single-center study,” Transplant Immunology, vol. 56, article 101226, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
O. K. Serrano, P. Friedmann, S. Ahsanuddin, C. Millan, A. Ben-Yaacov, and L. K. Kayler, “Outcomes associated with steroid avoidance and alemtuzumab among kidney transplant recipients,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 2030–2038, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
J. F. Magliocca and S. J. Knechtle, “The evolving role of alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) for immunosuppressive therapy in organ transplantation,” Transplant International, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 705–714, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. J. Bechert, V. J. Schnadig, D. A. Payne, and J. Dong, “Monitoring of BK viral load in renal allograft recipients by real-time PCR assays,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 242–250, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. C. Racusen, K. Solez, R. B. Colvin et al., “The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology,” Kidney International, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 713–723, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Hanaway, E. S. Woodle, S. Mulgaonkar et al., “Alemtuzumab induction in renal transplantation,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 364, no. 20, pp. 1909–1919, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
C. A. Chukwu, H. V. Spiers, R. Middleton et al., “Alemtuzumab in renal transplantation. Reviews of literature and usage in the United Kingdom,” Transplantation Reviews, vol. 36, article 100686, 2022.
View at: Google Scholar
A. D. Dick, P. Meyer, T. James et al., “Campath-1H therapy in refractory ocular inflammatory disease,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 107–109, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. W. Cheung, G. Y. Hwang, E. Tse, and Y. L. Kwong, “Alemtuzumab induced complete remission of autoimmune hemolytic anemia refractory to corticosteroids, splenectomy and rituximab,” Haematologica, vol. 91, 5_Supplement, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. F. Shou, Q. Zhou, J. R. Cai et al., “Efficacy and safety of induction therapy with alemtuzumab in kidney transplantation: a meta-analysis,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 122, no. 14, pp. 1692–1698, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
P. L. Zhang, S. K. Malek, J. W. Prichard et al., “Monocyte-mediated acute renal rejection after combined treatment with preoperative Campath-1H (alemtuzumab) and postoperative immunosuppression,” Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 209–213, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Supe‐Markovina, J. J. Melquist, D. Connolly et al., “Alemtuzumab with corticosteroid minimization for pediatric deceased donor renal transplantation: a seven-yr experience,” Pediatric Transplantation, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 363–368, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Yajima, K. I. Imadome, A. Nakagawa et al., “T cell-mediated control of Epstein-Barr virus infection in humanized mice,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 200, no. 10, pp. 1611–1615, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Landais, X. Saulquin, and E. Houssaint, “The human T cell immune response to Epstein-Barr virus,” International Journal of Developmental Biology, vol. 49, no. 2-3, pp. 285–292, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Fernández‐Ruiz, P. Parra, F. López‐Medrano et al., “Serum sCD 30: a promising biomarker for predicting the risk of bacterial infection after kidney transplantation,” Transplant Infectious Disease, vol. 19, no. 2, article e12668, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. J. P. Funahashi, “BK virus-associated nephropathy after renal transplantation,” Pathogens, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 150, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Ali Ramouz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

224

Downloads

343

Citations