Assessment of Bacterial Diversity of Industrial Poultry Wastewater by Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) and the Cultivation Method in Order to Inform Its Reuse in Agriculture

Oueslati, Amira; Hassen, Wafa; Ellafi, Ali; Alibi, Sana; Jaziri, Ahlem; Bachkouel, Sarra; Oueslati, Imen; Snoussi, Mejdi; Adnan, Mohd; Patel, Mitesh; Elasbali, Abdelbaset Mohamed; Mansour, Hedi Ben

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6065305

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results and Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 6065305 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6065305

Assessment of Bacterial Diversity of Industrial Poultry Wastewater by Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) and the Cultivation Method in Order to Inform Its Reuse in Agriculture

Amira Oueslati,^1,2Wafa Hassen,¹Ali Ellafi,^3,4Sana Alibi,¹Ahlem Jaziri,¹Sarra Bachkouel,⁵Imen Oueslati,⁵Mejdi Snoussi,^6,7Mohd Adnan,⁶Mitesh Patel,⁸Abdelbaset Mohamed Elasbali,⁹and Hedi Ben Mansour¹

Academic Editor: Fazul Nabi

Received06 Apr 2022

Revised07 Aug 2022

Accepted24 Aug 2022

Published20 Sept 2022

Abstract

Effluents discharged by poultry meat industries are heavily polluted with raw materials, such as fat, blood residues, and proteins. Thus, untreated effluents directly discharged into the environment may constitute a public health threat. This study aims to evaluate the bacterial diversity of three water qualities: industrial poultry wastewater (PWW), tap water (TW), and PWW diluted with TW (50 : 50) (V/V) (TWPWW) by the combination of culture-independent and culture-dependent approaches. The total bacterial DNA was extracted using phenol/chloroform method. The hypervariable 16S rRNA region V3-V5 was amplified by PCR using universal primers. The amplicons were separated by vertical electrophoresis on a polyacrylamide gel of increasing denaturing gradient according to their richness in GC bases. Selected bands were reamplified and sequenced. Pure isolated bacteria from nutrient agar medium were characterized according to their morphological and biochemical characteristics. Genomic DNA from pure strains was extracted by boiling method, and a molecular amplification of the 16S–23S ITS region of the 16S rRNA gene was performed using the universal primers. Selected isolates were identified by sequencing. Results showed a high bacterial load and diversity in PWW in comparison with TW and TWPWW. A collection of 44 strains was obtained, and 25 of them were identified by sequencing. Proteobacteria represented 76% of isolated bacteria Gamma-Proteobacteria was the predominate isolate (68%). Other isolates were Firmicutes (8%), Bacteroidetes (12%), and Actinobacteria (8%). These isolates belong to different genera, namely, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Proteus, Empedobacter, Corynebacterium, Enterobacter, Comamonas, Frondibacter, Leclercia, Staphylococcus, Atlantibacter, Klebsiella, and Microbacterium.

1. Introduction

The increase in population means an increase for food demand. Currently, the poultry meat and egg products industries are considered as one of the most important and fastest growing agri-food industries [1–3]. Generally, industrial process activities are associated with the use of large amount of freshwater given that all production operations require hygiene and quality control [4–6]. It has been estimated that the water consumption average is around 26.5 L per bird, which remains dependent on the degree of automation [7, 8]. As a consequence, large quantities of highly polluted wastewater are generated [2, 9]. These effluents were classified among the most polluted discharges, due to the high concentration of physico-chemical properties including chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and total suspended solids (TSS), as well as nutritive elements (nitrogen and phosphorus) and organic matter including proteins from blood residues and fats from slaughtering and cleaning activities [9–13]. Besides their organic and inorganic load, poultry slaughter houses have shown the presence of a high load of pathogenic (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Shigella, Salmonella, Escherichia coli, Vibrio cholerae, and Brucella) [14–16] and nonpathogenic bacteria such as total and fecal coliforms of which Aeromonas spp. and Clostridium spp. are the two main indicators, as well as strains belonging to the group of Streptococcus [17, 18]. It has been reported that in developing countries, abattoirs are generally located near rivers [19, 20], and untreated effluents directly released into the environment without any treatment or after primary treatment only [21], allowing to reduce the effluent load of fats and suspended solids [17], but not the microbiological risk [22, 23]. This direct discharge increases the contamination level by pathogenic bacteria, leading to a serious environmental problems and human pathogens’ transmission [24].

Currently, in order to investigate the microbial diversity in a given ecosystem, culture-dependent or culture-independent approaches can be applied [25]. However, the use of molecular techniques for microbial community characterization is recommended over the traditional methods, which allows only the identification of cultivable microorganisms. In fact, the use of artificial homogenous medium disadvantage is allowing the growth of only a small fraction of cultivable microorganisms. Moreover, enumerating bacterial results may be inaccurate, since the bacteria can only be cultivated under optimal growth conditions [25–27]. In contrast, especially uncultivable bacteria can be detected by molecular techniques, such as 16S rRNA-based methods, as well as those present in low abundance or growing so slowly that traditional culture-based protocols cannot determine them [28].

Recent studies recommended the use of molecular techniques based on fingerprinting characteristics to target the diversity of the universal gene 16S rRNA, and they seem to be ideal for community comparison [29, 30, 31]. Among these techniques, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) has been previously adopted by many scientists for microbial analysis of wastewater and poultry abattoir effluents. It was considered as a potential fingerprinting technique of microbial community composition, diversity, and dynamics [29, 32]. This work was aimed to study and assess the bacterial diversity of industrial poultry wastewater by the combination of culture-independent and culture-dependent techniques. This work was carried out within the framework of a valorization of industrial wastewater in the irrigation of olive trees. Indeed, previous studies have shown that the reuse of industrial wastewater from the food industry contributes to the stimulation of the vegetative growth of young olive trees and to the germination of wheat seeds [33, 34]. The microbial characterization of this industrial wastewater will be compared with the water used as control.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Sampling and Preparation

Samples were collected from a poultry slaughter house located in the Government of Mahdia, in the Middle East of Tunisia (N35° 28 11, E10° 57 23). The samples of wastewater (PWW; collected in the morning, when the slaughtering was performed) and tap water (TW) were, respectively, collected in a sterile glass bottles. Wastewater sample was diluted with tap water V/V (50 : 50) (TWPWW). It should be mentioned that the industrial wastewater collected is not treated, but a blood separation was carried out before discharging. Samples were transferred to the laboratory immediately and stored at +4°C.

2.2. Culture-Independent Approach

2.2.1. Extraction of Total DNA and PCR Amplification

For each sample, 800 ml was filtered immediately after sampling in sterile conditions through a sterile cellulose nitrate membrane using different pore sizes (0.8, 0.45, and 0.22 μm). The aim of using different pore sizes filters was to sequester different sizes of bacteria. Total DNA was extracted as described with slight modifications [35]. Ethanol was used to wash the extracted DNA. Then, the DNA was dissolved in Tris EDTA buffer. The molecular size and the concentration of DNA were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis.

The amplification of a hypervariable 16S rRNA V3-V5 region was performed in a final volume reaction of 30 μl containing 15 μl of commercialized mix (Gene On, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany), 0.24 μl of forward primer F-357-GC5-TACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3, 0.24 μl of reverse primer R-9075-CCGTCAATTCCTTTGAGTTT-3 [36], and 1 μl of appropriately diluted template DNA. The initial denaturing step was performed at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 10 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 61°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min, 20 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 56°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. Amplicon (620 bp) was migrated in 2% agarose gel in 0.5× TBE buffer and visualized under UV light.

2.2.2. Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) Analysis

DGGE analysis was conducted with kuroGEL 2020 (VWR International bvba, USA). Amplified DNA was posed on 7% polyacrylamide gel in Tris-acetate-EDTA buffer (TAE 1×). The denaturing gradient (formamide/urea) ranged from 40 to 60%. Gels were run in constant conditions of temperature (60°C) and voltage (99 V) for 20 hours. After electrophoresis, visualizing was performed by staining the gel in ethidium bromide solution for 15 min and then washed with sterile distilled water, and gel photos were photographed under UV. Obtained DNA bands were cut and eluted in 80 μl of sterile distilled water and preserved at -20°C for further utilization. Before sequencing, the eluted DNA fragments were again reamplified using unclamped 907R and 357F primers [31]. Obtained sequences were submitted in the GenBank. DGGE profiles were exploited to create matrices indicating the presence or absence of bands, and a dendrogram was built by multivariate statistical package software (MVSP), which uses the UPGMA algorithm (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean) and the Jaccard’s coefficient.

2.2.3. Culture-Dependent Approach

(1) Bacterial Isolation. In order to isolate a pure bacterial strain, 1 ml of each sample (TW, PWW, and TWPWW) was diluted from 10^-1 to 10^-8 in sterile NaCl 0.9% (w/v) and spread out in duplicate for greater accuracy in solid nutrient agar. Petri dishes were subsequently incubated for 48 h at 30°C. The number of colonies were counted and expressed as colony-forming unit (CFU) per ml. Purified individual colonies were selected according to their morphological characteristics. For all the isolates, Gram staining and catalase and oxidase tests were performed and were finally stored in 25% glycerol solution at -20°C.

(2) Taxonomical Identification of Bacterial Isolates. Genomic DNA from pure strains was extracted by boiling method with minor modifications [37]. Briefly, the bacterial pellets were suspended in 200 μl of TE buffer (Tris-HCl [10 mM]: EDTA [1 mM]), followed by vigorous homogenization by vortexing for 30 s. The suspensions were subjected at 100°C in a boiling water-bath for 10 min. Immediately after boiling, the microfuge tubes were placed in an ice-bath for 5 minutes. After centrifugation, the supernatant containing DNA was transferred to another clean tube and stored at –20°C until analysis. Molecular amplification of the 16S–23S ITS region and the 16S rRNA gene was performed as described [38, 39], using the universal primers S-D-Bact-1494-a-20 (GTCGTAACAAGGTAGCCGTA), L-D-Bact-0035-a-15 (CAAGGCATCCACCGT), S-D-Bact-0008-a-S-20 (CTACGGCTACCTTGTTACGA), and S-D-Bact-1495-a-S-20 (AGATTTGATCCTGGCTCAG). All the PCR products (ITS and 16S rRNA amplicons) were migrated, respectively, on standard 2% agarose gels in 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA buffer and stained for 20 min in ethidium bromide solution (0.5 mg/l). Amplification of 16S rRNA fragments was followed by sequencing, and then, obtained sequences were aligned and identified by comparing with those available at the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) using the BLAST program [40]. Neighbor joining method was used to construct a phylogenetic dendrogram, and tree topology was evaluated by performing boot-strap analysis of 1,000 data sets using MEGA 6 software [41]. The sequences reported in this study have been submitted to NCBI GenBank, and the accession numbers are listed in Table 1.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Bacterial Community Structure of the Poultry Wastewater

The V3-V5 hypervariable region analyzed by DGGE method gave a general idea of the bacterial community of PWW and TWPWW samples, and the DGGE analysis targeting the V3–V5 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA was performed. The different sample profiles obtained after filtration through different filters diameters are shown in Figure 1. In this study, we detected many bands with different migration distances and intensities. Based on the visual analysis, DGGE profiles can be divided into three sections: short migration (I) strains with nonrich GC bonds, medium migration (II) strains moderately rich in GC bonds, and long migration (III) strains rich in GC bonds. Some bands were common in all samples, especially in the third section of TWPWW. In fact, fragments of 16S rRNA, obtained by long migration, seemed to be predominant (Figure 1).

In order to estimate the DGGE profile similarity between PWW and TWPWW, a cluster analysis was performed. Results showed two definite clusters with 0.197 of similarity according to Jaccard’s coefficient. The two profiles obtained after filtration of the samples through 0.22- and 0.45-μm filters presented the greatest similarities. These results could be in part due to the sequestration of bacteria during filtration through the 0.45-μm diameter filter, due to clogging of the filter by the colloidal material (Figure 2). Five bands were excised from the gel and were sequenced and analyzed (Figure 1, Table 1). The selected bands were common in different samples. The five DGGE bands were identified as Proteocatella sphenisci (B1), Comamonas jiangduensis (B2), Acidovorax monticola (B3), Chryseobacterium aahli (B4), and Acidovorax monticola (B5) (Figure 3). B1 was excised from PWW sample, and it was common in all different filter diameter profiles with a low intensity. Results indicated that it was affiliated to Proteocatella sphenisci, which belongs to Peptostreptococcaceae family characterized by anaerobes and fermentative metabolism [42]. Few bibliographic databases are available on P. sphenisci; however, it has been isolated from a sample of guano of the Magellanic penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus) in Chilean Patagonia. The study mentioned the tolerance of this strain to low temperature degrees (down to +2°C) [43]. This tolerance may be the origin of its persistence even after meat cooling, which may explain its presence in PWW effluent. The same study described different profiles of resistance to antibiotics of P. sphenisci, and the results showed a high resistance to ampicillin (250 μg/ml) versus a sensitivity to tetracycline, kanamycin, rifampicin, gentamicin, vancomycin (250 μg/ml), and chloramphenicol (125 μg/ml). In a previous work, two strains (Peptostreptococcus russellii and Peptostreptococcus anaerobius) belonging to Peptostreptococcaceae family were identified in red meat abattoir wastewater by DGGE approach [32].

B2 was detected in PWW sample, and it was a common band in 0.22 and 0.45 μm profiles, and the results indicated that was affiliated to Comamonas jiangduensis. The genus belongs to Comamonadaceae family. The species was isolated for the first time from agricultural soil [44]. B3 and B5 were a common band in PWW and TWPWW samples. The BLAST results affiliated the nucleotide sequence to Acidovorax monticola. The strain belongs also to Comamonadaceae family, and it has been considered as biotrophic pathogen [45, 46]. The Comamonas genus has been described as one of the most abundant members of microbial communities in different natural environments [47–49]. In South Africa, two previous studies mentioned the presence of Comamonas sp. and C. denitrificans in poultry slaughter house effluents by applying, respectively, classic isolation and the fingerprinting technique DGGE [9, 32]. Few bibliographic data have evaluated the pattern of antibiotic resistance in Comamonas species. C. jiangduensis was found to be highly resistant to erythromycin with a minimum inhibitory concentration of 512 μg/ml [50]. In general cases, bacteria belonged to the genus Comamonas which is a nonpathogenic bacterium, rarely opportunistic. However, some species were reported as responsible of severe diseases such as bacteremia, appendicitis, and meningitis [51–53].

B4 was common in all TWPWW profiles, and the sequence was affiliated to Chryseobacterium aahli with 99.82% of similarity. The genus Chryseobacterium belongs to Flavobacteriaceae family, and it was isolated from various natural environments [54–56] including plants, soil, water, sludge, and human [57–59] and a common colonizer of some foods, like milk, fish, meat, and poultry [57, 60]. It has been reported that the genus Chryseobacterium was generally associated to food deterioration [61, 62], which implies extracellular enzymes like proteases and lipases [63], and this may explain its occurrence in food environment. It has reported that poultry feathers have been shown as a shelter for Chryseobacterium strains with very high keratinolytic activity [64]. Previous studies showed the presence of Chryseobacterium genus in raw chicken [60, 65] and apparently in living and healthy chicken [66]. The strains of Flavobacteriaceae family can be associated to many infections especially in birds [67] and humans [68].

3.2. Isolation and Identification of Bacterial Isolates

Water samples were enumerated by cultivating the isolates on nutrient agar medium. Results showed that the number of cultivable bacteria was higher in PWW sample () and lower in TW sample (). TWPWW sample presented an intermediate value (Table 2). The microbiological richness of the industrial wastewater compared to the other two samples TWPWW and TW may be attributed to the high concentration of physico-chemical parameters (TSS, COD, DOB, TOC, and NO₃^-) of this effluent, which is already carried out in a previous study [69]. The high level of BOD is a marker of the biological oxidation of organic compounds due to the high bacterial load [70]. In fact, the wastewater generated from the slaughter houses was classified as heavily polluted wastes, due to their high physico-chemical parameters concentration as well as nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and organic matter including proteins from blood residues and fats [70–72]. According to one study, the organic matter plays the role of a growth medium for bacterial multiplication [73]. Besides, a positive correlation was established between total nitrogen and total phosphorus concentration and the microbial load [74]. In addition, it has been described that TSS serve as adsorption surface for microorganism [75–79] by establishing van der Waals and electrostatic forces [80]. The results obtained are in agreement with those already found in a previous study, where the use of PWW in the irrigation of young olive trees showed a decrease in the organic matter content in the soil in comparison with the soil irrigated with TW. These results have been attributed to the increased biological activity [81].

A collection of 44 strains was obtained. The selection of pure strains was based on their morphological characteristics and catalase and oxidase activities, as well as the Gram reaction (Table 3). ITS-PCR fingerprinting was used to elucidate the diversity of bacterial collection. In this work, 24 different haplotypes were obtained indicating an important bacterial diversity and including four strains recovered from TW, fifteen strains from PWW, and five strains from TWPWW samples (Figure 4(a)). The ITS-PCR profiles contained 1–5 reproducible bands with sizes ranging from 250 to about 1000 bp. Sequencing of partial 16S rRNA gene was executed for representative bacterial isolates of each distinct haplotype () and was analyzed by BLAST algorithm (Table 3). The majority of bacterial isolates (76%) belonged to Proteobacteria (with a predominance of Gamma-Proteobacteria, 68%), while the remaining isolates were affiliated with Firmicutes (8%), Bacteroidetes (12%), and Actinobacteria (8%). These isolates were affiliated to 13 different genera including Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Proteus, Empedobacter, Corynebacterium, Enterobacter, Comamonas, Frondibacter, Leclercia, Staphylococcus, Atlantibacter, Klebsiella, and Microbacterium.

Figure 4

Phylogenetic diversity of bacterial isolates based on 16S rRNA partial sequences. (a) Phylogenetic dendrogram of 25 partial 16S rRNA sequences was evaluated by performing bootstrap analysis of 1,000 data sets using MEGA 6. Accession numbers of the reference strains 16S rRNA sequences are in parenthesis. (b) 16S–23S rRNA ITS haplotypes of 25 representative isolates as resolved on 2% agarose gels. ITS haplotype numbers and the number of isolates per ITS haplotype are indicated. M: molecular size marker 1Kb.

Based on the phylogenetic analysis (Figure 4(b)), the strains TW1, TW6, and TW9 were affiliated to the genus Acinetobacter. Acinetobacter species are ubiquitous, and they occupy diverse environments such as soils, fresh water, oceans, sediments, and contaminated sites [82–86]. In the past, this genus was considered to be an organism of low virulence [87]; however, it has recently attracted the attention of scientists and clinicians, in terms of their fundamental biological properties and pathogenic potential [88]. Previous studies showed the presence of four isolates in surface waters belonging to Acinetobacter genus with multiresistance to antibiotics [89]. The presence of Pseudomonas oryzihabitans was previously mentioned in the environment; however, its presence on suspended particulate water matters was described for the first time in 2000 with a high resistance to chlorine [90]. This bacterium does not belong to the normal human flora. Nowadays, this bacterium is considered as a pathogenic human bacterium, and several studies indicated that bacterium’s transition is through environment [91–95].

Wastewater generated by slaughter houses is potentially contaminated with bacteria resistant to antibiotics [17]. In this study, the occurrence of the different isolate families from PWW samples showed the dominance of Enterobacteriaceae (40%) followed by Flavobacteriaceae (20%) and Staphylococcaceae (13.3%) (Figure 5). According to the bibliography, genus belonging to Enterobacteriaceae family has been detected either in poultry meat or in poultry slaughter house wastewater. Those results are expected since most of them are part of the intestinal microbial flora of healthy animals [96]. German studies have recently demonstrated the occurrence of colistin resistant Enterobacteriaceae (E. cloacae complex, E. coli, and K. pneumoniae) in process waters and wastewater from poultry slaughter houses [96, 97]. Several authors reported the presence of Pseudomonas mirabilis in poultry meat and chicken droppings [98–100]. P. mirabilis is known as an opportunistic pathogen that causes human urinary tract and nosocomial and wound infections [101]. Skin chilled poultry was a reservoir for Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella sp., Leclercia adecarboxylata, and Pseudomonadaceae (P. fragi and P. putida) [102]. In Selangor, Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from poultry slaughter house wastewater with high antimicrobial resistance [103].

In the light of the results found, the dependent culture technique made it possible to isolate a greater number of bacteria than the independent culture technique which belongs to several families. However, the adoption of the DGGE technique revealed that the sequenced strains belong to only three families, of which the P. sphenisci strain was the only strain detected among the two techniques. In addition, this technique showed an abundance of strains belonging to Comamonadaceae contrary to culture-dependent technique where Enterobacteriaceae was the dominant family. In general context, recent microbial molecular approaches can be adopted in order to have an exceptional information about microbial communities [104].

4. Conclusion

This research demonstrated that the combination of two approaches, culture-dependent and culture-independent techniques, provides a more precise idea of the microbial community and diversity. The findings showed that the situation is alarming, since pathogenic bacteria may contaminate downstream water source, which can be the cause of environment and food contamination. The governmental authorities are invited to better control the quality of these discharges before their evacuation in the receiving environment by the establishment of sophisticated treatment processes which allow the elimination of pathogenic bacterial strains.

Data Availability

All data are presented in this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this work through the project number “375213500”. The authours would also like to extend their sincere appreciation to the central laboratory at Jouf University for support this study.

References

N. S. Bolan, A. A. Szogi, T. Chuasavathi, B. Seshadri, M. J. Rothrockand, and P. Panneerselvam, “Uses and management of poultry litter,” World’s Poultry Science Journal, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 673–698, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Mottet and G. Tempio, “Global poultry production: current state and future outlook and challenges,” World’s Poultry Science Journal, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 245–256, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Berkhout, “Poultry world-popularity of poultry continues globally poult,” World’s Poultry, 2020, https://www.poultryworld.net/Meat/Articles/2020/7/Popularity-of-poultry-continues-globally-615517E/#:~:text=In%202019%2C%20the%20global%20poultry,40%25%20share%20of%20global%20consumption.
View at: Google Scholar
Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), The environmental impacts of trade liberalization and potential flanking measures. Stage 1 of a Report to DEFRA, IEEP, London, 2005.
UE, Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control: Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for Intensive Rearing of Poultry and Pigs, European Commission, Brussels, 2003.
M. S. Kuyeli, Assessment of Industrial Effluent and their Impact on Water Quality of Streams in Blantyre [M.S. thesis], Unima, Zomba, 2007.
M. R. Kosseva and C. Webb, Food industry wastes: assessment and recuperation of commodities, Academic Press., 2020.
R. Bailone, R. Roça, H. Fukushima, and L. Kluwe de Aguiar, “Sustainable water management in slaughterhouses by cleaner production methods—a review,” Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 215–224, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Dlangamandla, S. A. Dyantyi, Y. P. Mpentshu, S. K. O. Ntwampe, and M. Basitere, “Optimisation of bioflocculant production by a biofilm forming microorganism from poultry slaughterhouse wastewater for use in poultry wastewater treatment,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 73, no. 8, pp. 1963–1968, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Mercado, Technical Report, Bachoco S.A. de C. V, Mexico, 1995.
A. K. B. Amorim, I. R. De Nardi, and V. Del Nery, “Water conservation and effluent minimization: case study of a poultry slaughterhouse,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 93–100, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. B. Awang, M. J. K. Bashir, S. R. M. Kutty, and M. H. Isa, “Post-treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater using electrochemical oxidation,” Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment, vol. 15, pp. 229–237, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
H. A. Aziz, N. N. A. Puat, M. Y. D. Alazaiza, and Y. T. Hung, “Poultry slaughterhouse wastewater treatment using submerged fibers in an attached growth sequential batch reactor,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1734–1746, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. A. Pachepsky and D. R. Shelton, “Escherichia coli and fecal coliforms in freshwater and estuarine sediments,” Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1067–1110, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Zarei, H. Biglari, M. Mobini et al., “Disinfecting poultry slaughterhouse wastewater using copper electrodes in the electrocoagulation process,” Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1907–1912, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. E. Shannon, D. Y. Lee, J. T. Trevors, and L. A. Beaudette, “Application of real-time quantitative PCR for the detection of selected bacterial pathogens during municipal wastewater treatment,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 382, no. 1, pp. 121–129, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. S. Mittal, “Characterization of the effluent wastewater from abattoirs for land application,” Food Review International, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 229–256, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. McMahan, A. M. Grunden, A. A. Devine, and M. D. Sobsey, “Evaluation of a quantitative H₂S MPN test for fecal microbes analysis of water using biochemical and molecular identification,” Water Research, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1693–1704, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Adelegan, “Environmental Policy and Slaughterhouse Waste in Nigeria,” in Proceedings of the 28th WEDC Conference, pp. 3–6, Calcutta, India, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
I. B. M. Kosamu, J. Mawenda, and H. W. T. Mapoma, “Water quality changes due to abattoir effluent: a case on Mchesa stream in Blantyre, Malawi,” African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 589–594, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. B. Rabah, U. J. J. Ijah, S. B. Manga, and M. L. Ibrahim, “Assessment of physico-chemical and microbiological qualities of abattoir wastewater in Sokoto,” Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 16, pp. 149–154, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
M. A. Van der Gaag, F. Vos, H. W. Saatkamp, M. Van Boven, P. Van Beek, and R. B. M. Huirne, “A state-transition simulation model for the spread of Salmonella in the pork supply chain,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 156, no. 3, pp. 782–798, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Bonardi, F. Brindani, G. Pizzin et al., “Detection of _Salmonella_ spp., Yersinia enterocolitica and verocytotoxin- producing Escherichia coli O157 in pigs at slaughter in Italy,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 85, no. 1-2, pp. 101–110, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Saidu and J. J. Musa, “Impact of abattoir effluent on river Landzu, Bida, Nigeria,” Journal of Chemical, Biological and Physical Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 132–136, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
M. A. Nadkarni, F. E. Martin, N. Hunter, and N. A. Jacques, “Methods for optimizing DNA extraction before quantifying oral bacterial numbers by real-time PCR,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 296, no. 1, pp. 45–51, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Besnard, M. Federighi, and J. M. Cappelier, “Development of a direct viable count procedure for the investigation of VBNC state in listeria monocytogenes,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 77–81, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Daniele, P. Sonia, R. Armelle, C. Jérôme, and P. Florence, “Evolution of microbiological analytical methods for dairy industry needs,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 5, pp. 1–6, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Redford, R. M. Bowers, R. Knight, Y. Linhart, and N. Fierer, “The ecology of the phyllosphere: geographic and phylogenetic variability in the distribution of bacteria on tree leaves,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 2885–2893, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ziembińska-Buczyńska, A. Banach, T. Bacza, and M. Pieczykolan, “Diversity and variability of methanogens during the shift from mesophilic to thermohilic conditions while biogas production,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 3047–3053, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Ballesté and A. R. Blanch, “Bifidobacterial diversity and the development of new microbial source tracking indicators,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 77, no. 10, pp. 3518–3525, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Hassen, S. Alibi, and H. Ben Mansour, “Assessment of the physico-chemical and microbiol pollution of wastewater and seawater collected from five Mediterranean countries,” Arabian Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 1, pp. 1–10, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
O. Smidt, “The use of PCR-DGGE to determine bacterial fingerprints for poultry and red meat abattoir effluent,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 62, pp. 1–8, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Sdiri, H. Ben Mansour, A. Albergamo, and G. Di Bella, “Effectiveness of dairy treated wastewater and different irrigation systems on the growth, biomass and fruiting of a Tunisian olive orchard (Olea europaea L., cv Chemlali),” Natural Product Research, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 183–186, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Sioud, A. Beltifa, N. Ayeb, and H. B. Mansour, “Characterization of industrial dairy wastewater and contribution to reuse in cereals culture: study of phytotoxic effect,” Austin Journal of Environmental Toxicology, vol. 2, pp. 1013–1018, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Yoshida, Y. Seo, S. Suzuki et al., “Actinomycetal community structures in seawater and freshwater examined by DGGE analysis of 16S rRNA gene fragments,” Marine Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 554–563, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Hassen, Biodegradation of Pesticides Used in Agricultural Soils, Book published by European University Edition, 2020.
J. C. Ribeiro Junior, R. Tamanini, B. Fritegoto Soares et al., “Efficiency of boiling and four other methods for genomic DNA extraction of deteriorating spore-forming bacteria from milk,” Semina: Ciências Agrárias, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 3069–3078, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Rouibah, W. Hassen, O. F. Sallem, N. Khellaf, A. Hassen, and H. Ben Mansour, “Photocatalytic and biodegradation treatments of paracetamol: investigation of the in vivo toxicity,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 14530–14545, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Dellai, D. Dridi, S. Sakouhi et al., “Cytotoxic effect of chlorpyrifos ethyl and its degradation derivatives by Pseudomonas peli strain isolated from the Oued Hamdoun River (Tunisia),” Toxicology and Industrial Health, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 707–713, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. F. Altschul, W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman, “Basic local alignment search tool,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 215, no. 3, pp. 403–410, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Hassen, M. Neifar, H. Cherif et al., “Assessment of genetic diversity and bioremediation potential of pseudomonads isolated from pesticide contaminated artichoke farm soils,” Biotech, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 263–274, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Slobodkin, “The family Peptostreptococcaceae,” The Prokaryotes, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
E. V. Pikuta, R. B. Hoover, D. Marsic et al., “Proteocatella sphenisci gen. nov., sp. nov., a psychrotolerant, spore-forming anaerobe isolated from penguin guano,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 2302–2307, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. N. Sun, J. Zhang, Q. Chen, J. He, Q. F. Li, and S. P. Li, “Comamonas jiangduensis sp. nov., a biosurfactant-producing bacterium isolated from agricultural soil,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 63, no. Part_6, pp. 2168–2173, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Willems, E. Falsen, B. Pot et al., “Acidovorax, a new genus for Pseudomonas facilis, pseudomonas delafieldii, E. Falsen (EF) group 13, EF group 16, and several clinical isolates, with the species Acidovorax facilis comb. nov., Acidovorax delafieldii comb. nov., and Acidovorax temperans sp. nov,” International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 384–398, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. R. Giordano, A. M. Chaves, N. A. Mitkowski, and J. M. Vargas, “Identification, characterization, and distribution of Acidovorax avenaesubsp. avenae associated with creeping bentgrass etiolation and decline,” Plant Disease, vol. 96, no. 12, pp. 1736–1742, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Auguet, M. Pijuan, H. Guasch-Balcells, C. M. Borrego, and O. Gutierrez, “Implications of downstream nitrate dosage in anaerobic sewers to control sulfide and methane emissions,” Water Research, vol. 68, pp. 522–532, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Guo, H. Gong, and X. Guo, “Rhizosphere bacterial community of Typha angustifolia L. and water quality in a river wetland supplied with reclaimed water,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 2883–2893, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sotres, M. Cerrillo, M. Viñas, and A. Bonmatí, “Nitrogen removal in a two-chambered microbial fuel cell: establishment of a nitrifying–denitrifying microbial community on an intermittent aerated cathode,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 284, pp. 905–916, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sajid and S. Yahya, Biotransformation of Pharmaceuticals by Comamonas and Aeromonas Species, Research Square, 2021.
T. Tsui, S. Tsao, K. Liu et al., “Comamonas testosteroni infection in Taiwan: reported two cases and literature review,” Journal of Microbiology, Immunology, and Infection, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 67–71, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Opota, B. Ney, G. Zanetti, K. Jaton, G. Greub, and G. Prod’hom, “Bacteremia caused by Comamonaskerstersii in a patient with diverticulosis,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1009–1012, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. H. Zhou, H. X. Ma, Z. Y. Dong, and M. H. Shen, “Comamonas kerstersii bacteremia in a patient with acute perforated appendicitis,” Medicine, vol. 97, no. 13, article e9296, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. E. Kirk, J. A. Hoffman, K. A. Smith et al., “Chryseobacterium angstadtii sp. nov., isolated from a newt tank,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 63, no. Part_12, pp. 4777–4783, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Kämpfer, U. Dreyer, A. Neef, W. Dott, and H. J. Busse, “Chryseobacterium defluvii sp. nov., isolated from wastewater,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 93–97, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Sang, H. S. Kim, I. S. Myung, C. M. Ryu, B. S. Kim, and K. D. Kim, “Chryseobacterium kwangjuense sp. nov., isolated from pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) root,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 63, no. Part_8, pp. 2835–2840, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. J. Hugo, P. Segers, B. Hoste, M. Vancanneyt, and K. Kersters, “Chryseobacterium joostei sp. nov., isolated from the dairy environment,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 771–777, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. F. Bernardet, M. Vancanneyt, O. Matte-Tailliez et al., “Polyphasic study of Chryseobacterium strains isolated from diseased aquatic animals,” Systematic and Applied Microbiology, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 640–660, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. J. Hugo and P. J. Jooste, “Culture media for food associated genera in the family Flavobacteriaceae,” Handbook of Culture Media for Food and Water Microbiology, RSC, Cambridge, UK, pp. 508–556, 3rd ed. edition, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
H. De Beer, J. C. Hugo, J. P. Jooste et al., “Chryseobacterium vrystaatense sp. nov., isolated from raw chicken in a chicken-processing plant,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 2149–2153, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Vandamme, J. F. Bernardet, P. Segers, K. Kersters, and B. Holmes, “New perspectives in the classification of theflavobacteria: description of Chryseobacterium gen. nov., Bergeyella gen. nov., and Empedobacter nom. rev,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 827–831, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Forsythe, “The microbial flora of food,” The Microbiology of Safe Foods, Blackwell Science Publishers, Abingdon, pp. 96–98, 1st 12th ed. edition, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gilmour and W. T. Rowe, “Microorganisms associated with milk,” Dairy Microbiology, Elsevier Applied Science, London, vol. 1, pp. 37–75, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Casarin, F. Cladera-Olivera, and A. Brandelli, “Use of poultry byproduct for production of keratinolytic enzymes,” Food and Bioprocess Technology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 301–305, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Charimba, P. J. Jooste, J. Albertyn, and C. Hugo, “Chryseobacterium carnipullorum sp. nov., isolated from raw chicken,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 63, no. Part_9, pp. 3243–3249, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Kämpfer, M. T. Poppel, G. Wilharm, H. J. Busse, J. A. McInroy, and S. P. Glaeser, “Chryseobacterium gallinarum sp. nov., isolated from a chicken, and Chryseobacterium contaminans sp. nov., isolated as a contaminant from a rhizosphere sample,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 64, no. Part_4, pp. 1419–1427, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Segers, W. Mannheim, M. Vancanneyt et al., “Riemerella anatipestifer gen. Nov., comb. nov., the causative agent of septicemia Anserum exsudativa, and its phylogenetic affiliation within the flavobacterium-cytophaga rRNA homology group,” International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 768–776, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Benedetti, M. Rassu, G. Pavan, A. Sefton, and G. Pellizzer, “Septic shock, pneumonia, and soft tissue infection due to Myroides odoratimimus: report of a case and review of Myroides infections,” Infection, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 161–165, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Oueslati, G. Montevecchi, A. Antonelli, and H. Ben Mansour, “Short-time irrigation on young olive tree (Olea europaea L. cv. Chemlali) with untreated industrial poultry wastewater: investigation of growth parameters and leaves chemical composition,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 28, no. 36, pp. 50420–50429, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Yaakob, R. M. S. R. Mohamed, A. A. S. Al-Gheethi, and A. H. M. Kassim, “Characteristics of chicken slaughterhouse wastewater,” Chemical Engineering Transactions, vol. 63, pp. 637–642, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
C. P. E. Santos and D. M. R. S. Robbins, Low-Cost Innovative Solutions for Treating Public Market Wastewater in the Philippines: Deploying Hybrid Anaerobic/Aerobic Coco Peat Filtration Systems, PADCO, Makati, 2004.
C. Bustillo-Lecompte, M. Mehrvar, and E. Quinones-Bolanos, “Slaughterhouse wastewater characterization and treatment: An economic and public health necessity of the meat processing industry in Ontario, Canada,” Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, vol. 4, pp. 175–186, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Coulibaly, G. Gourene, and N. S. Agathos, “Utilization of fungi for biotreatment of raw wastewaters,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 620–630, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. F. Pahazri, R. M. S. R. Mohamed, A. A. Al-Gheethi, and H. Amir, “Production and harvesting of microalgae biomass from wastewater: a critical review,” Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 39–56, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Ruijuan, Y. Xueyan, and D. Xinqiang, “Coupled effects of bacteria and suspended solids on clogging during managed aquifer recharge,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 600, article 126543, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. E. Schillinger and J. J. Gannon, “Bacterial adsorption and suspended particles in urban Stormwater,” Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation, vol. 57, pp. 384–389, 1985.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Viklander, “Particle size distribution and metal content in street sediments,” Journal of Environmental Engineering, vol. 124, no. 8, pp. 761–766, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Vaze and F. H. S. Chiew, “Nutrient loads associated with different sediment sizes in urban stormwater and surface pollutants,” Journal of Environmental Engineering, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 391–396, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. A. C. Jeng, A. J. Englande, R. M. Bakeer, and H. B. Bradford, “Impact of urban stormwater runoff on estuarine environmental quality,” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 513–526, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Denkhaus, S. Meisen, U. Telgheder, and J. Wingender, “Chemical and physical methods for characterisation of biofilms,” Microchimica Acta, vol. 158, no. 1-2, pp. 1–27, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Oueslati, S. Alibi, and H. Ben Mansour, “Examining the effects of untreated wastewater irrigation on the productivity of Chemlali olive cultivar and soil physico- chemical properties,” Arab Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 2, no. 13, pp. 1–7, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
J. E. Kostka, O. Prakash, W. A. Overholt et al., “Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria and the bacterial community response in gulf of Mexico beach sands impacted by the deepwater horizon oil spill,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 77, no. 22, pp. 7962–7974, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mahjoubi, A. Jaouani, A. Guesmi et al., “Hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria isolated from petroleum contaminated sites in Tunisia: isolation, identification and characterization of the biotechnological potential,” New Biotechnology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 723–733, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Maravić, M. Skočibušić, Ž. Fredotović et al., “Urban riverine environment is a source of multidrug-resistant and ESBL-producing clinically important Acinetobacter spp,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 3525–3535, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Y. Choi, G. Ko, W. Jheong et al., “Acinetobacter kookii sp. nov., isolated from soil,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 63, no. Part_12, pp. 4402–4406, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Hrenovic, D. Goran, G. Ivana, and A. Kovacic, “Occurrence of an environmental Acinetobacter baumannii strain similar to a clinical isolate in paleosol from Croatia,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 80, no. 9, pp. 2860–2866, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Rathinavelu, Y. Zavros, and J. L. Merchant, “Acinetobacter lwoffii infection and gastritis,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 651–657, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Visca, H. Seifert, and K. J. Towner, “Acinetobacter infection – an emerging threat to human health,” IUBMB life, vol. 63, pp. 1048–1054, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Akbulut, F. Yilmaz, and B. Icgen, “Surface water isolates of hemolytic and non-hemolytic Acinetobacter with multiple drug and heavy metal resistance ability,” Journal of Water and Health, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Dussart, J. P. Dupont, I. Zimmerlin et al., “Occurrence of sessile Pseudomonas oryzihabitans from a karstified chalk aquifer,” Water Research, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1593–1600, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. N. Panagopoulos, P. D. Megaloikonomos, M. Liontos et al., “Pseudomonas oryzihabitans infected total hip arthroplasty,” Journal of Bone and Joint Infection, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 54–58, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. S. Woo, J. L. Choi, B. R. Kim et al., “Outbreak of Pseudomonas oryzihabitans pseudobacteremia related to contaminated equipment in an emergency room of a tertiary hospital in Korea,” Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 42–44, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Owusu, E. Owusu-Dabo, G. Acheampong et al., “Pseudomonas oryzihabitans sepsis in a 1-year-old child with multiple skin rashes: a case report,” Journal of Medical Case Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 77–81, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Hellou, S. Artul, S. Omari, M. Taha, Z. Armaly, and W. Nseir, “Noncatheter-related bacteremia caused by Pseudomonas oryzihabitans in a patient undergoing hemodialysis,” Hemodialysis International, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 711–713, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Tena and C. Fernández, “Pseudomonas oryzihabitans: an unusual cause of skin and soft tissue infection,” Infectious Diseases, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 820–824, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Homeier-Bachmann, S. E. Heiden, P. K. Lübcke et al., “Antibiotic-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in wastewater of abattoirs,” Antibiotics, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 568–584, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Savin, G. Bierbaum, K. Blau et al., “Colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolated from process waters and wastewater from German poultry and pig slaughterhouses,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 11, article 575391, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Y. Wong, H. Y. Wan, and S. Chen, “Characterization of multidrug-resistant Proteus mirabilis isolated from chicken carcasses,” Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 177–181, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Kim, C. I. Wei, and H. An, “Molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant Proteus mirabilis isolates from retail meat products,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 1408–1413, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Nahar, M. Siddiquee, S. Nahar, K. S. Anwar, and S. Islam, “Multidrug resistant-Proteus mirabilis isolated from chicken droppings in commercial poultry farms: bio-security concern and emerging public health threat in Bangladesh,” Journal of Biosafety & Health Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 120–125, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Jacobsen, D. J. Stickler, H. L. Mobley, and M. E. Shirtliff, “Complicated catheter-associated urinary tract infections due to Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 26–59, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. Bunkova, F. B. Bunka, P. A. Klcovska, V. C. Mrkvicka, D. B. Magda, and S. D. Kracmar, “Formation of biogenic amines by gram-negative bacteria isolated from poultry skin,” Food Chemistry, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 203–206, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Abidatul, N. M. J. Nur, R. Noramirah, S. Ling, C. Y. New, and R. Son, “Prevalence and classification of high antimicrobial resistant Staphylococcus aureus in wastewater eluted from poultry slaughterhouse,” Food Research, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 201–207, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Pooja, B. Ambreen, P. S. Surendra, K. D. Nawal, C. Ram, and M. N. I. Hafiz, “Microbial fingerprinting techniques and their role in the remediation of environmental pollution,” Cleaner Chemical Engineering, vol. 2, article 100026, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Amira Oueslati et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

315

Downloads

489

Citations