Characterization of an Endophytic Antagonistic Bacterial Strain <i>Bacillus halotolerans</i> LBG-1-13 with Multiple Plant Growth-Promoting Traits, Stress Tolerance, and Its Effects on Lily Growth

Gao, Jun-lian; Khan, Mohammad Sayyar; Sun, Yu-chen; Xue, Jing; Du, Yunpeng; Yang, Chunhong; Chebotar, Vladimir K.; Tikunov, Vladimir S.; Rubanov, Ivan N.; Chen, Xuqing; Zhang, Xiuhai

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5960004

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 5960004 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5960004

Characterization of an Endophytic Antagonistic Bacterial Strain Bacillus halotolerans LBG-1-13 with Multiple Plant Growth-Promoting Traits, Stress Tolerance, and Its Effects on Lily Growth

Jun-lian Gao,¹Mohammad Sayyar Khan,²Yu-chen Sun,¹Jing Xue,¹Yunpeng Du,¹Chunhong Yang,³Vladimir K. Chebotar,⁴Vladimir S. Tikunov,⁵Ivan N. Rubanov,⁵Xuqing Chen,¹and Xiuhai Zhang¹

Academic Editor: Periasamy Anbu

Received31 Dec 2021

Revised20 Jul 2022

Accepted09 Aug 2022

Published25 Aug 2022

Abstract

Microbial inoculants are an important tool for increasing arable land productivity and decreasing mineral fertilizer application. This study was aimed at isolating and identifying endophytic antagonistic bacteria from lily (Lilium davidii var. unicolor) roots grown in Northwestern China and at evaluating their antifungal activity and plant growth-promoting characteristics. For this purpose, endophytic bacteria were isolated from plant roots, and plant growth-promoting strains were identified. One bacterial strain, isolated from the root part, was identified as Bacillus halotolerans based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and was designated as LBG-1-13. The strain showed antagonistic activities against important plant pathogens of lily including Botrytis cinerea, Botryosphaeria dothidea, and Fusarium oxysporum. The highest percentage of growth inhibition, i.e., %, was observed for LBG-1-13 against Botryosphaeria dothidea followed by % and % against Botrytis cinerea and Fusarium oxysporum, respectively. Meanwhile, the isolated strain also showed plant growth-promoting traits such as the production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), siderophore, ACC deaminase, and phosphate solubilization activity. The strain showed ACC deaminase activity and was able to cleave nmol α-ketobutyrate (mg protein)^-1 min^-1. The strain exhibited tolerance to salt and drought stress in an in vitro experiment. The strain LBG-1-13 was able to grow in the presence of 10% NaCl and 20% polyethylene glycol (PEG) in the growth medium. Inoculation of Lilium varieties, Tresor and Bright Diamond, with LBG-1-13 enhanced plant growth under greenhouse and field conditions, respectively. All these results demonstrated that Bacillus halotolerans LBG-1-13 could be utilized as a good candidate in the biocontrol of lily disease and plant growth promotion in sustainable agriculture.

1. Introduction

The world population is growing at an alarming rate and is expected to reach 9.2 billion in 2050. This means that global agricultural production has to be increased by 60-70% from the current levels to keep pace with the growing food demand in the next 30 years [1]. Enhanced agricultural production can be achieved through stimulating the yield potential of crop plants as well as protecting them from phytopathogens. Commercial fertilizers and pesticides have been extensively used to maximize agricultural production in the past. However, due to the growing concerns regarding the adverse effects of synthetic agrochemicals on human and environmental health, more environment-friendly alternatives are encouraged to be utilized by farmers [2]. In addition, the excessive use of synthetic agrochemicals may trigger the development of resistance in the phytopathogens that further necessitates the need for alternative approaches [3].

The utilization of biofertilizers and biopesticides has become a preferred alternative of synthetic-based chemical products for pest biocontrol and plant growth improvement. The market turnover of these products exceeded 4 billion US dollars and has been growing by 5-10% per year [4]. Bioinoculants are especially important for China where freshwaters are strongly polluted with nitrogen and phosphorous leached from hilly arable lands with intensive agriculture systems and where eutrophication is an urgent problem [5]. Endophytic microorganisms dwell inside various plant tissues and play an important role in the overall plant development and adaptation to biotic and abiotic stresses [6]. Endophytes use the endosphere of the plant as a unique ecological niche that protects them from environmental changes. This association between the endophytes and their host plants has been established as a result of millions of years of evolution [7, 8]. Endophytic bacteria colonize the same ecological niche as pathogens and work as biocontrol agents against plant pathogens [9–11].

Endophytic bacteria and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) have direct and indirect beneficial effects on plants through different underlying mechanisms [12]. They assist the associated plants in mineral acquisition, fight against phytopathogens, and confer tolerance against drought and salt stresses [13, 14]. The key mechanisms lying at the core of PGPR-mediated plant growth-promoting effects and disease resistance in the associated plants include the synthesis of plant growth hormones, ACC deaminase, organic acids, siderophore, nitrogen fixation, and phosphate solubilization [15]. There have been several reports that described the isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteria and PGPR with the potential of plant growth-promoting and disease resistance traits. These beneficial effects are mainly due to the production of enzymes and hormones directly involved in plant growth promotion and the synthesis of antimicrobial secondary metabolites and defense-related compounds [16, 17]. The microbial-based pathogen resistance is conferred through various mechanisms such as the secretion of antimicrobial compounds that degrade cell walls of pathogens and block the rhizosphere colonization of pathogens [18]. Besides plant growth-promoting and antimicrobial potential, the role of plant-associated endophytic bacteria in plant abiotic stress tolerance has been well documented [19–21]. Several endophytic bacteria isolated from diverse hosts conferred salt and drought tolerance to inoculated plants [22–24].

In the recent past, a large number of Bacillus species have been characterized as important producers of plant growth-promoting substances, secondary metabolites, and bioactive compounds [25, 26]. The endospore-forming potential of Bacillus species is also very important for agriculture development as these have long shelf lives and are resistant to desiccation and heat exposure. Moreover, they have negligible or no side effects on the diversity and compositions of root-associated plant microbial communities [27, 28]. On the contrary, a recent study conducted on the impact of coinoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Bacillus megaterium revealed changes in bacterial diversity in the rhizosphere of turmeric [29]. However, changes in the microbial activities and diversity were positive in coinoculated treatments as compared to treatments with a sole application of AM and B. megaterium. Some endophytic isolates of the genus Bacillus including Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus subtilis, and Bacillus licheniformis have been evaluated for their positive impact on plant growth and fungal disease resistance [30–32]. Due to the immense potential of Bacillus species as agents of plant growth promotion and defense against phytopathogens, several Bacillus-based products are used as bioinoculants and biocontrol agents in sustainable agriculture [33]. In addition to the use of existing PGPR and endophytes, research should be focused on the utilization of diverse sources of soil and plant hosts for new strains with multiple beneficial effects on plant development and disease resistance. Medicinal plants are known to harbor potential endophytic microbes, due to their bioactive compounds, and these microbes are responsible for the host’s pharmaceutical properties [34, 35]. Therefore, medicinal plants should be investigated for isolation and characterization of more effective PGPR and endophytes.

Lilies (genus Lilium L.) belong to a group of perennial, herbaceous, bulbiferous, and large flowering plants growing from bulbs. The Lilium species are cultivated as ornamental plants throughout the world as well as used as important edible plants and biological medicinal products [36]. They are important both as garden plants and as pot cultured and cut flowers [37]. Several studies reported that the agrochemical characteristics of soil were changed and the microbial functional diversity was suppressed in soils under continuous cropping of lily [37, 38]. Microbial composition and functional diversity were changed in the rhizosphere of L. davidii under continuous monoculture [39]. Recent research revealed that plants can shape their rhizosphere microbiome and affect the diversity and structure of the microorganism community in the rhizosphere [40].

During a survey on endophytic antagonistic bacteria against pathogenic fungi of lily, we found that a strain, designated strain LBG-1-13 isolated from the root of lily, had obvious antagonistic activities against a variety of lily pathogenic fungi. Considering its potential value in the biological control of lily diseases, we further studied this strain in the present study. The purposes of the present study were as follows: (i) to isolate and identify endophytic antagonistic bacteria from the roots of Lilium davidii var. unicolor, (ii) to determine the characters of plant growth-promoting and tolerances to salt and drought of this strain, and (iii) to investigate its effects on growth of lilies under greenhouse and field conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation of Endophytic Bacteria from Lily Roots and Their Antagonistic Activity Against Pathogenic Fungi of Lily

In summer of 2016, three seedlings of lily (L. davidii var. unicolor) were collected in the District of Qilihe (35^°508.38N, 103^°5355.40E) of Lanzhou City in Gansu Province, China. The roots were cut off and mixed. Then, endophytic bacteria were isolated from the surface-sterilized roots of lily plants. Root sterilization was done with 70% ethanol for 1 min and 2% sodium hypochlorite for 10 min, followed by rinsing in a sterile distilled water for 10 min. For evaluation of the efficacy of the surface sterilization, the samples were inoculated on tryptic soy agar (TSA) (BD Diagnostics, Sparks, Maryland, USA) triplicate plates. The surface contamination-free samples were cut into smaller pieces (~1 cm) and inoculated on LB agar [41]. After aerobic incubation for 3 days at 30°C, single colonies were picked up and tested their antagonistic activity against pathogenic fungi of lily, using the method described previously [42]. The pathogenic fungi included Botryosphaeria dothidea (ACCC 37263), which causes leaf dieback/lily leaf tip blight disease in lily plants, Botrytis cinerea (ACCC 36423), which causes gray mold disease on lily, and Fusarium oxysporum (ACCC 37279), which causes root and bulb rot disease on lily. These fungal strains were provided by the Agricultural Culture Collection of China.

2.2. Molecular Identification of Endophytic Bacterial Isolate

Molecular identification of the endophytic bacterial isolates was done with amplification and sequencing of 16S rRNA gene. Bacterial genomic DNA was extracted from bacterial colonies. A bacterial colony was scraped off the LB medium plate and was suspended in 100 μl ddH₂O and lysed for 10 min boiling and subsequent freezing for 5 min. The sample was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 2 min, and the supernatant was used as the PCR template. Universal 27F and 1492R were used for 16S rRNA gene amplification [43]. The 25 μl PCR reaction contained 1 μl (0.5–10.0 ng) template DNA, 12.5 μl of Premix Taq Version 2.0 (TaKaRa Bio Group), 0.5 μl (10 μM) of primers 27F and 1492R each, and 10.5 μl of ddH₂O. The thermocycler conditions were set as initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 40 s, annealing at 55°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 2 min, and a final overall extension at 72°C for 10 min. Purification of PCR product was done with the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The purified PCR product was then sequenced through the ABI 3730 sequencer following the manufacturer’s protocols through Beijing Biomed Gene Technology Co. Ltd. The endophytic bacterial sequences of the 16S rRNA gene were then compared with the available homologous sequences in the EzBioCloud database (http://www.ezbiocloud.net/) for phylogenetic analysis [44].

2.3. Detection of Indole Acetic Acid (IAA)

Quantitative detection of indole acetic acid (IAA) was done according to the method of Libbert and Risch [45]. Briefly, the bacterial strain was cultivated in fresh King’s B medium (peptone/tryptone 20 g, K₂HPO₄ 1.15 g, MgSO₄·7H₂O 1.5 g, l-tryptophan 0.5 g, glycerol 15 ml, and distilled water 1000 ml; pH 6.8~7.0) at 30°C for 24~48 hr. Then, 2 ml bacterial culture was mixed with 2 ml of Salkowski’s reagent (0.5 M FeCl₃ and 35% HClO₄, 2 : 100) in a glass tube, and the mixture was left in the dark for 30 min at room temperature. A noninoculated medium was used as a negative control, and the IAA solution (100 mg/L) was used as a positive control. The formation of pink color in the tube indicated indole production by the organism.

2.4. Phosphate Solubilization Assay

Phosphate solubilization of the endophytic bacterial strain was conducted qualitatively as previously described by Mehta and Nautiyal [46]. The endophytic strain was cultivated in Pikovskaya medium (1% glucose, 0.05% (NH₄)₂SO₄, 0.01% MgSO₄·7H₂O, 0.02% KCl, 0.02% NaCl, 0.05% yeast extract, 0.0002% FeSO₄·7H₂O, 0.0002% MnSO₄·H₂O, and 1.5% agar 1.5). The strain was evaluated for its ability to grow on Pikovskaya medium using either tricalcium phosphate (Ca₃(PO₄)₂) or Aluminium phosphate (Al₃PO₄) as the sole source of phosphate. Halos around the colonies indicating solubilization of inorganic phosphate were observed after 7 days of cultivation.

2.5. Siderophore Detection

Siderophore production in the endophytic strain was determined on chrome azurol S (CAS) medium according to the previously described method [47]. For the preparation of 1 l blue agar, 60.5 mg CAS was dissolved in 50 ml water and mixed with 10 ml iron (III) solution (0.001 mol l^-1 FeCl₃·6H₂O, and 0.01 mol l^-1 HCl). This solution was slowly added to 72.9 mg CTAB dissolved in 40 ml water, and the resultant dark blue solution was autoclaved. A mixture of 780 ml H₂O, 100 ml 10 times MM9 salts (3 g l^-1 KH₂PO₄, 10 g l^-1 NH₄Cl, and 5 g l^-1 NaCl), 30.24 g Pipes, and 15 g agar was prepared with pH 6.8 adjusted with NaOH and was autoclaved. Upon cooling to 50°C, 10 ml glucose (20% ), 1 ml CaCl₂ (100 mol l^-1), 1 ml MgSO₄ (1 mol l^-1), 4 ml thiamine (500 mg ml^-1), 4 ml nicotinic acid (500 mg ml^-1), and 100 ml of the above mentioned dark-blue solution were added. The overnight bacterial culture was spotted on the CAS medium thus obtained. Siderophore production was evidenced by the formation of orange to yellow halos around the colonies after 7 days of incubation at 30°C.

2.6. ACC Deaminase Activity Assay

The ability of the strain to show ACC deaminase activity was determined quantitatively through a colorimetric microplate assay as previously described by Penrose and Glick [48]. Total protein content in the sample was determined following Bradford [49], with a standard curve of bovine serum albumin ranging between 0 and 4 mg ml^-1 by measuring the absorbance at 595 nm.

2.7. In Vitro Salt and Drought Tolerance Assay of LBG-1-13

Salt tolerance of the strain LBG-1-13 was determined through an in vitro test. Ten salt (NaCl) concentrations, i.e., from 1% to 10%, were used in the experiment. The overnight bacterial culture was inoculated to fresh LB medium supplemented with various salt concentrations. The samples were incubated at 28°C for 24 hr, 48 hr, and 72 hr. Bacterial growth was checked spectrophotometrically by measuring OD at 600 nm at the mentioned salt concentrations in the LB medium. Drought stress tolerance of the strain LBG-1-13 was assayed in LB medium supplemented with different concentrations, i.e., 0% to 20% of polyethylene glycol (PEG). Samples were kept at 28°C for one, two, and three days, after which the OD of each sample was measured at 600 nm.

2.8. Plant Growth Promotion in Pot Experiment

The effects of the strain LBG-1-13 were evaluated on Tresor, a commercially cultivated Lilium variety in China. A greenhouse experiment was conducted using the method described previously [42] with minor modification. The modification included the following: the strain LBG-1-13 was inoculated after sowing for 45 days. The optical density (OD) of the bacterial suspension was measured at 600 nm with a spectrophotometer and adjusted to an OD₆₀₀ of 1 that corresponded to 10⁹ colony-forming units (CFUs). The culture was diluted 2 times with normal water and then added to Lilium seedlings, each pot added with 200 ml. After inoculation, the plants were further grown for 43 days; then the root system was washed from the pots and was analyzed using the same statistical analysis method just as described previously [45].

2.9. Plant Growth Promotion in Field Experiment

The isolated bacterial strain LBG-1-13 was further tested for plant growth promotion effects on the selected Lilium variety, Bright Diamond, a commercial variety cultivated in China. From May 2018 to August 2018, a field experiment was conducted in the Fangshan District of Beijing, China. The soil physicochemical characteristics of the field were as follows: pH value was 7.4, total nitrogen was 0.132%, fast-acting potassium was 145 mg/kg, available phosphorus was 71.9 mg/kg, EC value (Electrical Conductivity) was 576 μS/cm, and organic matter was 20.1 g/kg. Each field plot had an area of 40 m² (). More than 1000 lilies grew in a plot, with 8 rows of plants spaced 0.15 m apart. Three plots were employed for both the treatment and the control. Fertilizers at a concentration of were applied as a basal dose to all the plots before sowing. Before inoculation, the overnight culture of LBG-1-13 in 5 ml LB was further inoculated in 200 ml LB and was cultured for 24 hr at 30°C with 220 rpm shaking, then inoculated in 1000 ml LB, and was kept to grow for 2-3 days until the bacterial suspension reached a concentration of or OD₆₀₀ about 3.0. The culture was then diluted 10 times with normal water, and the lily bulbs were soaked for half an hour in the diluted bacterial solution. The plots were arranged in a randomized block design with each treatment replicated three times. The plants were irrigated daily with tap water. After 3 months, the growth status of the lilies in the field was observed qualitatively.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

The collected data were analyzed through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) using SAS 9.4 software and means were compared by Student’s -test and Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) at ().

3. Results

A total of 40 endophytic bacterial strains were isolated from the roots of Lilium davidii var. unicolor. After screening for the antagonistic activities against three kinds of common lily pathogenic fungi, an endophytic bacterial strain with multiple antagonistic activities designated strain LBG-1-13 was found.

The endophytic bacterial strain LBG-1-13 showed significantly high potential of mycelial growth inhibition of the test fungal pathogens, B. cinerea (ACCC 36423), B. dothidea (ACCC 37263), and F. oxysporum (ACCC 37279) (Figure 1). The growth inhibition of pathogenic fungi on PDA plates was measured as zones of inhibition in percentage values. The LBG-1-13 strain exhibited the highest percentage of growth inhibition, i.e., % against B. dothidea followed by % and % against B. cinerea and F. oxysporum, respectively. These results suggested that the endophytic strain LBG-1-13 is highly effective against the tested disease-causing phytopathogens.

Figure 1

Antagonistic activity of the endophytic bacterial strain LBG-1-13 against three fungal pathogens. A fungus plug was inoculated into the center of the potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium surrounded by four spots of bacterial inoculum. Plates (A1), (B1), and (C1) are controls of Botrytis cinerea (ACCC 36423), Botryosphaeria dothidea (ACCC 37263), and Fusarium oxysporum (ACCC 37279), respectively. Plates (A2), (B2), and (C2) contain dual cultures of strain LBG-1-13 and the corresponding fungal pathogens.

The strain LBG-1-13 was further identified as a member of the genus Bacillus based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. A 1408 bp long 16S rRNA gene sequence was obtained and then submitted to GenBank under accession number MW199064. A total of 25 homologous 16S rRNA sequences including the query sequence of strain LBG-1-13 were aligned, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed (Figure 2). In the phylogenetic tree, the strain LBG-1-13 formed a separate group together with B. halotolerans ATCC 25096^T and Bacillus mojavensis RO-H-1^T and shared the highest sequence similarities (99.93%) with B. halotolerans.

The endophytic strain LBG-1-13 was further evaluated for plant growth-promoting traits through several qualitative and quantitative tests which included the detection of indole acetic acid (IAA), siderophores, phosphate solubilization, and ACC deaminase. Production of IAA in the isolate was confirmed through a qualitative test showing a change of color of the culture supernatant from yellow to pink (Figure 3(a)). Phosphate solubilization potential of the isolated strain B. halotolerans LBG-1-13 was assayed on solid PVK medium supplemented with either Ca₃(PO₄)₂ or Al₃PO₄ as the sole source of inorganic phosphate. The endophytic strain LBG-1-13 showed continued growth on both media for a longer incubation time and produced halos around the colonies indicating the ability of the strain to utilize inorganic phosphate in the medium (Figure 3(b)). Siderophore production in the isolate was assayed by a qualitative test that confirmed siderophore production through a change of color from blue to orange-yellow (Figure 3(c)). The potential of the isolated B. halotolerans LBG-1-13 to produce 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase was assayed through a quantitative test. The strain showed ACC deaminase activity and was able to cleave nmol α-ketobutyrate (mg protein)^-1 min^-1. It has been reported that >20 nmol α-ketobutyrate (mg protein) ^-1 min^-1 is sufficient to initiate plant-growth-promoting effects [41].

(a)

(b)

(c)

Salt tolerance potential of LBG-1-13 was determined in LB medium supplemented with various NaCl concentrations. Salt stress negatively affected the bacterial growth after 24 hr of incubation in a medium with 1% NaCl (Figure 4). Further increase in salt concentration up to 6% NaCl had a nonsignificant effect on the growth of LBG-1-13. However, the effect of high salt concentrations was more pronounced from 7% to 10% NaCl concentrations. Drought stress tolerance of LBG-1-13 was tested by measuring growth in a medium supplemented with various PEG concentrations. Bacterial growth was checked after 24 hr, 48 hr, and 72 hr of incubation (Figure 5). PEG concentration of 2.5% in the medium had no significant effect on bacterial growth as compared to bacterial growth on 0% PEG. Further increase in PEG concentration reduced the bacterial growth and this trend continued till 10% PEG concentration. Further reduction in bacterial growth was observed in medium supplemented with 12.5% to 20% concentration. These results indicated the potential of LBG-1-13 to tolerate even a high concentration of PEG in the growth medium.

The effects of B. halotolerans LBG-1-13 inoculation on the Tresor lily variety were evaluated in the pot experiments under greenhouse conditions. Several growth parameters were checked between the inoculated and noninoculated control plants (Table 1). Among the tested growth parameters, plant height, leaf length, and leaf width were observed as nonsignificant between the inoculated and noninoculated plants. However, the inoculated plants showed significantly higher root length and root dry weight than those of the noninoculated control plants. The LBG-1-13-inoculated plants of the Tresor variety showed significantly higher () root length than that of noninoculated control plants (Table 1 and Figures 6(a) and 6(b)). Root dry weight was also found to be significantly different between the inoculated and noninoculated control plants of the Tresor variety. Inoculated plants showed significantly higher () root dry weight ( g) as compared to that of noninoculated control plants which showed g root dry weight. As a whole, the LBG-1-13-inoculated Tresor variety showed significant improvement in root growth as compared to that of the noninoculated control.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

The effects of inoculation on the Lilium variety, Bright Diamond, in the field experiments were observed phenotypically. In general, the strain LBG-1-13 showed a tendency toward promoting lily growth and extending its growth period. In the entire field experiment, the inoculated lily grew significantly better than the noninoculated control plants during the seedling stage and the flowering period. After the lily flowering period (after inoculation of the strain for more than 3 months), all noninoculated control plants turned yellowish and died (Figure 6(c)), whereas most of the plants inoculated with strain LBG-1-13 were still green and had much more green leaves than the uninoculated controls (Figure 6(d)). These results suggest that the inoculated strain LBG-1-13 extended the growth period of lily plants.

4. Discussion

A new endophytic bacterial strain LBG-1-13 was isolated from the root of a Lilium variety, L. davidii var. unicolor, grown in Lanzhou, Gansu Province, Northwestern China. The strain was identified as B. halotolerans through molecular analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence. The strain showed antagonistic activity against some important fungal phytopathogens. Further tests confirmed that the isolated strain harbored plant growth-promoting effects and practically improved the root growth of the tested lily varieties.

In the present study, the B. halotolerans LBG-1-13 exhibited variable antagonistic potential against fungal phytopathogens, i.e., B. dothidea, B. cinerea, and F. oxysporum. These phytopathogens were previously reported as agents of serious diseases in several crop plants including species of Lilium [50]. The antimicrobial nature of B. halotolerans strain isolated from various hosts has been demonstrated in previous studies. Therefore, the antagonistic effects of the isolated strain LBG-1-13 against the phytopathogens causing diseases in the genus Lilium would be of high interest. Slama et al. [51] reported screening of B. halotolerans isolates, designated as BFOA1 and BFOA4, which were highly active against F. oxysporum f. sp. albedinis. The strains were also found to be very active against several Fusarium species. The isolated bacterial strains also showed strong activities against Botrytis cinerea and other major phytopathogens including Phytophthora infestans, Alternaria alternata, and Rhizoctonia bataticola. The study concluded that B. halotolerans could be used as an effective warden against fungal infection, particularly Fusarium infection in plants. Furthermore, a recent study demonstrated the biocontrol potential of B. halotolerans QTH8 against Fusarium pseudograminearum, the causal agent of wheat crown rot disease [52]. The isolated strain QTH8 also inhibited the mycelial growth of Hainesia lythri, Pestalotiopsis sp., Botrytis cinerea, Curvularia lunata, Phyllosticta theaefolia, Fusarium graminearum, Phytophthora nicotianae, and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. This enhanced fungal resistance might be due to the production of plant defense-related compounds and bioactive secondary metabolites. Previous studies have revealed the production of secondary metabolites including bacteriocins, fengycin, surfactin, iturin, bacillibactin, and acetoin in Bacillus species [53–55].

Members of the genus Bacillus are well known for their potential of possessing plant growth-promoting characteristics. Several Bacillus species characterized from diverse hosts showed the potential of plant growth promotion through the production of ACC (deaminase), IAA, siderophore, and phosphate solubilization [56]. The isolated strain LBG-1-13 showed the production of IAA that directly stimulates plant growth. Previous studies reported indole production in the rhizospheric byendophytic Bacillus isolates [57, 58]. El-Akhdar et al. [59] reported the production of IAA in the strain B. halotolerans MSR-H4, isolated from the rhizospheric soil of wheat plants. The isolated strain LBG-1-13 in the present study showed a phosphate solubilization potential. Previous studies have demonstrated phosphate solubilization as one of the key mechanisms of Bacillus species to stimulate plant growth promotion under normal and stress conditions [60, 61]. The isolated strain LBG-1-13 showed siderophore production. In the microbe-plant association, siderophores play a crucial role as iron chelators and ensure the availability of traces of iron to the associated plants. Several Bacillus species were found with siderophore production that assisted plant growth promotion [62, 63]. The production of ACC deaminase is an important trait of plant growth-promoting PGPR and endophytic bacteria. ACC deaminase breaks ACC into ammonia and α-ketobutyrate. Some studies reported a reduction in the ethylene concentrations when plants were inoculated with ACC deaminase that in turn alleviated the negative effects of stress conditions on plants [64]. The overproduction of ethylene leads to growth reduction in plants under stress conditions [65]. Other studies reported the isolation of Bacillus strains with the production of ACC deaminase that improved the growth of inoculated plants [66, 67].

Earlier studies have confirmed the significant role of Bacillus species as bioinoculants and biocontrol agents in plant growth promotion [68]. Other than direct effects on plant growth, the rhizospheric and endophytic bacteria may also have an essential role in adaptation of plants to environmental stress conditions. Zhang et al. [69] reported the complete genome sequence of B. halotolerans ZB201702 that revealed many putative gene clusters involved in defense mechanisms. The isolated strain ZB201702 exhibited drought and salt stress tolerance. The ACC deaminase-producing bacterium Bacillus licheniformis HSW-16 and an endophytic halotolerant Bacillus velezensis FMH2 were reported to confer salt stress tolerance in wheat and tomato plants, respectively [70, 71]. Both strains protected the plants from growth inhibition by NaCl and increased plant growth. Other studies demonstrated growth promotion in inoculated plants with Bacillus strains [72, 73]. Parallel to the above studies, the isolated strain LBG-1-13 in the present study demonstrated growth improvement in Tresor and Bright Diamond under greenhouse and field levels, respectively. Especially, the LBG-1-13-inoculated plants of the Tresor variety showed improved growth performance, particularly that of root growth development. In in vitro studies, the strain exhibited enhanced tolerance to salt and drought stresses. Also, the strain LBG-1-13 was found with the activity of ACC deaminase production, which might be responsible for its high tolerance to salt and drought stresses. Therefore, this strain has the potential to be used as a microbial agent under drought and saline conditions due to its property of longer roots. This possibility could be tested in the follow-up study. Some previous studies have demonstrated the important role of B. halotolerans in plant growth promotion and alleviation of stress conditions. El-Akhdar et al. [59] characterized two isolated species, B. halotolerans and Lelliottia amnigena, as PGPR. The strains were further tested for stress tolerance in wheat plants under pot and field experiments, which showed promising results. Recently, Jiménez-Gómez et al. [74] described that B. halotolerans SCCPVE07 and R. laguerreae PEPV40 strains could be used as efficient bioinoculants for escarole crops. In this study, an in silico genome study of the isolated strains showed the identification of coding regions involved in mechanisms governing plant growth promotion. Both strains conferred plant growth promotion under normal and saline stress conditions. In the light of these studies, the isolated strain LBG-1-13 could further be used to evaluate its potential of conferring lily’s and other plants’ stress tolerance.

Furthermore, the result of the lily field experiment showed that the strain LBG-1-13 had the function of extending the growth period of the lily compared to uninoculated control plants. For lily production, the plants usually complete the vegetative growth stage and mainly grow above the ground before the flowering stage. While after the flowering stage, it is in the reproductive growth stage in which lily mainly grows the underground bulb part. Therefore, this feature of extending the growth period is very important for lily production, as it has the potential of increasing the yield of Lily. The present study, therefore, generates valuable information towards the application of plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria as bioinoculants and biocontrol agents.

5. Conclusion

The screening of endophytic bacteria capable of antifungal and plant growth promotion traits is important for the overall growth improvement and biocontrol of various lily diseases. We obtained one endophytic bacterial strain, B. halotolerans LBG-1-13, from the lily roots which not only antagonized against three kinds of fungal pathogens of lily but also simultaneously had multiple PGP characters including production of IAA, phosphate solubilization, production of siderophores, and ACC-deaminase activity. The strain showed a high potential for salt and drought tolerance. The lily plants inoculated with the isolated bacterial strain showed an improved growth under greenhouse and field conditions. Owing to the antifungal nature and PGP traits, particularly, the ACC deaminase production ability and potential of conferring salt and drought stress tolerance, make this strain a strong candidate as a biocontrol and bioinoculant agent.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the special projects for capacity-building in scientific and technological innovation of Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (KJCX20200103), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFD1000400), and the Youth Fund Project of Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry (QNJJ201910).

References

G. Silva, Feeding the World in 2050 and Beyond – Part 1: Productivity Challenges, Michigan State University, 2018.
R. K. Chandini, R. Kumar, and P. Om, “The impact of chemical fertilizers on our environment and ecosystem,” in In: Research trends in environmental sciences, pp. 71–86, New Delhi: AkiNik Publications, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Hahn, “The rising threat of fungicide resistance in plant pathogenic fungi: botrytis as a case study,” Journal of Chemical Biology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 133–141, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. I. Rubanov and A. A. Fomin, “Market of bioproducts in crop production,” Moscowe Maga, vol. 3, pp. 76–96, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
N. I. Rubanov and A. A. Fomin, “Market of bioproducts,” Int. Agricul. Maga, vol. 5, pp. 56–60, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Schulz and C. Boyle, “What are endophytes?” Microbial Root Endophytes, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 191–206, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Redecker, R. Kodner, and L. E. Graham, “Glomalean fungi from the Ordovician,” Science, vol. 289, no. 5486, pp. 1920-1921, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Krings, T. N. Taylor, H. Hass, H. Ker, N. Dotzler, and E. J. Hermsen, “Fungal endophytes in a 400-million-yr-old land plant: infection pathways, spatial distribution, and host responses,” New Phytologist, vol. 174, no. 3, pp. 648–657, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Berg, L. Eberl, and A. Hartmann, “The rhizosphere as a reservoir for opportunistic human pathogenic bacteria,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1673–1685, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. F. Lima, J. M. Pizauro, M. Macari, and E. B. Malheiros, “Efeito do uso de probiótico sobre o desempenho e atividade de enzimas digestivas de frangos de corte,” Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 200–207, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Koumoutsi, X. H. Chen, A. Henne et al., “Structural and functional characterization of gene clusters directing nonribosomal synthesis of bioactive cyclic lipopeptides inBacillus amyloliquefaciensstrain FZB42,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 186, no. 4, pp. 1084–1096, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Backer, J. S. Rokem, G. Ilangumaran et al., “Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: context, mechanisms of action, and roadmap to commercialization of biostimulants for sustainable agriculture,” Frontier in Plant Science, vol. 9, p. 1473, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ifigeneia and K. Katerina, “Unlocking PGPR-mediated abiotic stress tolerance: what lies beneath,” Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, vol. 6, 2022.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Ahemad and M. Kibret, “Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: current perspective,” Journal of King Saud University - Science, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. R. Glick, “Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world,” Microbiological Research, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 30–39, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ongena and P. Jacques, “_Bacillus_ lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 115–125, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Beneduzi, A. Ambrosini, and L. M. P. Passaglia, “Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents,” Genetics and Molecular Biology, vol. 35, 4 suppl 1, pp. 1044–1051, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. C. Kim, J. Leveau, B. B. Mcspadden Gardener, E. A. Pierson, L. S. Pierson, and C. M. Ryu, “The multifactorial basis for plant health promotion by plant-associated bacteria,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 1548–1555, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Vaishnav, A. K. Shukla, and D. K. Choudhary, “Endophytic bacteria in plant salt stress tolerance: current and future prospects,” Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 650–668, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Hanaka, E. Ozimek, E. Reszczynska, J. Jaroszuk-Scisel, and M. Stolarz, “Plant tolerance to drought stress in the presence of supporting bacteria and fungi: an efficient strategy in horticulture,” Horticulturae, vol. 7, no. 10, p. 390, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Verma, D. Kumar, V. Kumar et al., “The potential application of endophytes in management of stress from drought and salinity in crop plants,” Microorganisms, vol. 9, no. 8, p. 1729, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. K. P. Vurukonda, S. Vardharajula, M. Shrivastava, and A. Skz, “Enhancement of drought stress tolerance in crops by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria,” Microbiological Research, vol. 184, pp. 13–24, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, C. Cheng, and D. An, “Characterisation of endophytic bacteria from a desert plant Lepidium perfoliatum L,” Plant Protection Science, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 32–43, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. A. Jhuma, J. Rafeya, S. Sultana, M. T. Rahman, and M. M. Karim, “Isolation of endophytic salt-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria from Oryza sativa and evaluation of their plant growth-promoting traits under salinity stress condition,” Frontier in Sustainable Food Systems, vol. 5, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wang, J. Liu, H. Chen, and J. Yao, “Characterization of Fusarium graminearum inhibitory lipopeptide from Bacillus subtilis IB,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 889–894, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Akinrinlola, G. Y. Yuen, R. A. Drijber, and A. O. Adesemoye, “Evaluation of bacillus strains for plant growth promotion and predictability of efficacy by in vitro physiological traits,” International Journal of Microbiology, vol. 2018, 11 pages, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. P. Chowdhury, K. Dietel, M. Rändler et al., “Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 on lettuce growth and health under pathogen pressure and its impact on the rhizosphere bacterial community,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 7, article e68818, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wu, J. Wang, W. Huang et al., “Plant-microbe rhizosphere interactions mediated by _Rehmannia glutinosa_ root exudates under consecutive monoculture,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 15871, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Sarathambal, R. Dinesh, V. Srinivasan, T. E. Sheeja, V. Jeeva, and M. Manzoor, “Changes in bacterial diversity and composition in response to co-inoculation of Arbuscular mycorrhizae and zinc-solubilizing bacteria in turmeric rhizosphere,” Current Microbiology, vol. 79, no. 1, p. 4, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Romero, A. Perez-Garcia, M. E. Rivera, F. M. Cazorla, and A. de Vicente, “Isolation and evaluation of antagonistic bacteria towards the cucurbit powdery mildew fungus Podosphaera fusca,” Appied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 263–269, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Shafi, H. Tian, and M. Ji, “Bacillusspecies as versatile weapons for plant pathogens: a review,” Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 446–459, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Hashem, B. Tabassum, and E. F. Abd Allah, “_Bacillus subtilis_ : a plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium that also impacts biotic stress,” Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1291–1297, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Perez-Garcia, D. Romero, and A. de Vicente, “Plant protection and growth stimulation by microorganisms: biotechnological applications of Bacilli in agriculture,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 187–193, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Egamberdieva, S. Wirth, U. Behrendt, P. Ahmad, and G. Berg, “Antimicrobial activity of medicinal plants correlates with the proportion of antagonistic endophytes,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 8, p. 199, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Rat, H. D. Naranjo, N. Krigas et al., “Endophytic bacteria from the roots of the medicinal plant Alkanna tinctoria Tausch (Boraginaceae): exploration of plant growth promoting properties and potential role in the production of plant secondary metabolites,” Frontiers in microbiology, vol. 12, p. 633488, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Wang, J. Li, F. A. K. Attia et al., “A critical review on chemical constituents and pharmacological effects of _Lilium_,” Food Science and Human Wellness, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 330–336, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. P. Pelkonen and A. M. Pirttila, “Taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus Lilium,” Floriculture and Ornamental Biotechnology, vol. 6, pp. 1–8, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Yu, J. Yu, P. Cao et al., “Agrochemical characteristics of soil for continuous cropping lily,” Chinese Journal of Soil Science, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 377–379, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
Q. Shang, G. Yang, Y. Wang et al., “Illumina-based analysis of the rhizosphere microbial communities associated with healthy and wilted Lanzhou lily (Lilium davidii var. unicolor) plants grown in the field,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 32, no. 6, p. 95, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. L. Berendsen, C. M. J. Pieterse, and P. A. H. M. Bakker, “The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 478–486, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Miller, Experiments in Molecular Genetics, Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, New York, 1972.
M. S. Khan, J. L. Gao, X. Q. Chen et al., “Isolation and characterization of plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria Paenibacillus polymyxa SK1 from Lilium lancifolium,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2020, 17 pages, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Lane, “16S/23S rRNA sequencing,” Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematic, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 115–175, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
S. H. Yoon, S. M. Ha, S. Kwon et al., “Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA and whole genome assemblies,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1613–1617, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Libbert and H. Risch, “Interactions between plants and epiphytic bacteria regarding their auxin metabolism,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 1969.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Mehta and C. S. Nautiyal, “An efficient method for qualitative screening of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria,” Current Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Schwyn and J. B. Neilands, “Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 47–56, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Penrose and B. R. Glick, “Methods for isolating and characterizing ACC deaminase-containing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 10–15, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Bradford, “A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 72, no. 1-2, pp. 248–254, 1976.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. K. Horst, Field Manual of Diseases on Fruits and Vegetables, Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site
H. B. Slama, H. Cherif-Silini, A. Chenari Bouket et al., “Screening for fusarium antagonistic bacteria from contrasting niches designated the endophyte Bacillus halotolerans as plant warden against fusarium,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 9, p. 3236, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Li, J. Xu, L. Fu et al., “Biocontrol of wheat crown rot using Bacillus halotolerans QTH8,” Pathogens, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 595, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Chaabouni, A. Guesmi, and A. Cherif, “Secondary metabolites of Bacillus: potentials in biotechnology in biotechnology,” Bacillus Thuringiensis Biotechnology, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 347–366, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Kaspar, P. Neubauer, and M. Gimpel, “Bioactive secondary metabolites fromBacillus subtilis: a comprehensive review,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 82, no. 7, pp. 2038–2053, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Sansinenea and A. Ortiz, “Secondary metabolites of soil Bacillus spp,” Biotechnology Letters, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1523–1538, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Lopes, S. Tsui, P. J. R. O. Gonçalves, and M. V. de Queiroz, “A look into a multifunctional toolbox: endophytic Bacillus species provide broad and underexploited benefits for plants,” World Journal of Microbiology Biotechnology, vol. 34, no. 7, p. 94, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. E. Idris, D. J. Iglesias, M. Talon, and R. Borriss, “Tryptophan-dependent production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) affects level of plant growth promotion byBacillus amyloliquefaciensFZB42,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 619–626, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. F. Chagas Junior, A. G. De Oliveira, L. A. De Oliveira et al., “Production of indole-3-acetic acid by bacillus isolated from different soils,” Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, vol. 21, pp. 282–287, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
I. El-Akhdar, T. Elsakhawy, and H. A. Abo-Koura, “Alleviation of salt stress on wheat (Triticum aestivum L) by plant growth promoting bacteria strains bacillus halotolerans MSR-H4 and Lelliottia amnigena MSR-M49,” Journal of Advances in Microbiology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 44–58, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Cherif-Silini, A. Silini, M. Ghoul, B. Yahiaoui, and F. Arif, “Solubilization of phosphate by the Bacillus under salt stress and in the presence of osmoprotectant compounds,” African Journal of Microbiology Research, vol. 7, pp. 4562–4571, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Saeid, E. Prochownik, and J. Dobrowolska Iwanek, “Phosphorus solubilization by Bacillus species,” Molecules, vol. 23, no. 11, p. 2897, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Kesaulya, J. V. Hasinu, and G. N. C. Tuhumury, “Potential of Bacillus spp produces siderophores in suppressing the wilt disease of banana plants,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environment Science, vol. 102, no. 1, article 12016, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
C. M. H. Ferreira, A. Vilas-Boas, C. A. Sousa, H. M. V. M. Soares, and E. V. Soares, “Comparison of five bacterial strains producing siderophores with ability to chelate iron under alkaline conditions,” AMB Express, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 78, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. R. Glick, Z. Cheng, J. Czarny, and J. Duan, “Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria,” European Journal of Plant Pathology, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 329–339, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. B. Abeles, P. W. Morgan, and M. E. Saltveit Jr., Ethylene in Plant Biology, Academic Press, San Diego, 2nd edn edition, 1992.
Q. Meng, H. Jiang, and J. J. Hao, “Effects of _Bacillus velezensis_ strain BAC03 in promoting plant growth,” Biological Control, vol. 98, pp. 18–26, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Xu, J. Sheng, L. Chen et al., “Bacterial community compositions of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill) seeds and plant growth promoting activity of ACC deaminase producing Bacillus subtilis (HYT-12-1) on tomato seedlings,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 835–845, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Borriss, “Use of plant-associated bacillus strains as biofertilizers and biocontrol agents,” Bacteria in Agrobiology, Plant Growth Responses, Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 41–76, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhang, L. Yin, X. Li, C. Zhang, C. Liu, and Z. Wu, “The complete genome sequence of _Bacillus halotolerans_ ZB201702 isolated from a drought- and salt-stressed rhizosphere soil,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 123, pp. 246–249, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. P. Singh and P. N. Jha, “A halotolerant bacterium Bacillus licheniformis HSW-16 augments induced systemic tolerance to salt stress in wheat plant (Triticum aestivum),” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 7, p. 1890, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Masmoudi, S. Tounsi, C. A. Dunlap, and M. Trigui, “Endophytic halotolerant _Bacillus velezensis_ FMH2 alleviates salt stress on tomato plants by improving plant growth and altering physiological and antioxidant responses,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 165, pp. 217–227, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Fan, C. Wang, X. Song et al., “Bacillus velezensis FZB42 in 2018: the gram-positive model strain for plant growth promotion and biocontrol,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 9, p. 2491, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, X. Gao, S. Wang, C. Zhu, R. Li, and Q. Shen, “Application of Bacillus velezensis NJAU-Z9 enhanced plant growth associated with efficient Rhizospheric colonization monitored by qPCR with primers designed from the whole genome sequence,” Current Microbiology, vol. 75, no. 12, pp. 1574–1583, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Jiménez-Gómez, I. García-Estévez, M. T. Escribano-Bailón, P. García-Fraile, and R. Rivas, “Bacterial fertilizers based on Rhizobium laguerreae and Bacillus halotolerans enhance Cichorium endivia L. phenolic compound and mineral contents and plant development,” Food, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 424, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Jun-lian Gao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

787

Downloads

665

Citations