OGG1 in the Kidney: Beyond Base Excision Repair

Zhao, Fan; Zhu, Jiefu; Shi, Lang; Wu, Xiongfei

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5774641

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 5774641 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5774641

OGG1 in the Kidney: Beyond Base Excision Repair

Fan Zhao,¹Jiefu Zhu,²Lang Shi,¹and Xiongfei Wu¹

Academic Editor: Liang-Jun Yan

Received22 Jul 2022

Revised07 Dec 2022

Accepted08 Dec 2022

Published30 Dec 2022

Abstract

8-Oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (OGG1) is a repair protein for 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) in eukaryotic atopic DNA. Through the initial base excision repair (BER) pathway, 8-oxoG is recognized and excised, and subsequently, other proteins are recruited to complete the repair. OGG1 is primarily located in the cytoplasm and can enter the nucleus and mitochondria to repair damaged DNA or to exert epigenetic regulation of gene transcription. OGG1 is involved in a wide range of physiological processes, such as DNA repair, oxidative stress, inflammation, fibrosis, and autophagy. In recent years, studies have found that OGG1 plays an important role in the progression of kidney diseases through repairing DNA, inducing inflammation, regulating autophagy and other transcriptional regulation, and governing protein interactions and functions during disease and injury. In particular, the epigenetic effects of OGG1 in kidney disease have gradually attracted widespread attention. This study reviews the structure and biological functions of OGG1 and the regulatory mechanism of OGG1 in kidney disease. In addition, the possibility of OGG1 as a potential therapeutic target in kidney disease is discussed.

1. Introduction

Renal inflammatory diseases are a group of diseases that occur in the kidney and involve the inflammation of cells, including obstructions, tumors, metabolism, heredity, or injury [1]. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is the clinical manifestation of most acute kidney diseases, with chronic kidney disease (CKD) being the final outcome [2]. Although there has been a great deal of advancements in the understanding of biomarkers for the clinical diagnosis of AKI and advances in pathophysiological understanding, the transformation of molecular-based research into clinical therapy lacks effective targets. The multifactorial etiology of AKI and the complexity of the patient population introduces spatiotemporal and individual differences into the search for effective treatments [3]. In hospital settings [4], renal ischemia-reperfusion injury due to sepsis, surgery, trauma, or nephrotoxin injury is the leading cause of AKI. However, infections, toxins, and dehydration associated with acute illness are common causes of community-acquired AKI. Under oxidative stress conditions [5], reactive oxygen species (ROS) [6] or toxin [7] stimulation aggravates the damage to renal tubular epithelial cells (TECs) and vascular endothelial cells, further activating inflammatory pathways [8]. This leads to an imbalance of cellular homeostasis and abnormal repair [9], eventually leading to irreversible kidney damage and progression to CKD or renal tumors. Therefore, identification of novel effective targets and agents is of great importance for the prevention and treatment of kidney injury.

ROS, the most common cell damage factor in AKI, can be generated either externally or through the cellular environment from the metabolism of cells themselves [10]. Guanine has a low-redox potential [11] due to its unsaturated N7-C8 bond and is easily oxidized by reactive oxygen species to produce its most common oxidation product, 8-oxoG. 8-oxoG constitutes the most frequent base lesion observed in DNA, with an estimated frequency of 0.3–4 lesions per 106 bases [12]. The arrangement of the H-bond donor and acceptor is changed in 8-oxoG, and this characteristic miscoding gives 8-oxoG its special mutagenic properties [13]. In addition to Watson-Crick pairing with cytosine, 8-oxoG can form a stable Hoogsteen pairing with adenine, which can lead to a G:C to T:A conversion after replication [14]. Considering the high-mutagenic potential of 8-oxoG, 8-oxyguanine DNA glycosylase is produced in living organisms. The first step of the catalytic basic excision repair pathway is the detection and removal of 8-oxoG from oxidative DNA damage [15]. Removal of 8-oxoG through the action of OGG1 is essential to prevent genomic instability and allow correct gene transmission from one generation to the next.

OGG1 can bind to promoter regions rich in 8-O guanine, causing changes in DNA conformation, the recruitment of transcription factors, and the activation of downstream gene transcription [16]. The mechanism of OGG1 involvement in renal inflammatory diseases is as follows: OGG1 can enhance NF-κB/RelA binding to cis-elements and thereby induce the rapid expression of chemokines/cytokines and inflammatory cell accumulation in airways [17]. OGG1 also directly interacts with other pathway proteins and affects downstream biological processes. OGG1 promotes TGF-β1-induced cell transformation through interacting with Smad7, activates SMAD2/3, and promotes fibrosis by interacting with the TGF-β/Smad axis [18]. Recent studies have indicated that OGG1 participates in autophagy and mitophagy regulation [19]. In hyperoxygen-induced lung injury, OGG1 interacts with molecular proteins of the autophagy pathway to negatively regulate the release of inflammatory cytokines [20].

OGG1 has been extensively studied in tumors, but less commonly in renal tumors. OGG1 is a common mutation site in renal tumors such as renal clear cell carcinoma [21]. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a multifactorial chronic disease characterized by genetic abnormalities. Studies have found that the OGG1 gene is associated with DNA damage in patients with CKD, and that OGG1 may be involved in the pathological process of CKD [22]. Studies have indicated that OGG1 promotes fibrosis progression in CKD by interacting with Smad7 to promote TGF-β1-induced cell transformation [18].

2. Structural Features and Biological Functions of OGG1

OGGs belong to the helix-hairpin-helix superfamily of base excision repair DNA glycosylases [23]. The helix-hairpin-helix structure [24] is comprised of amino acids at position 245-270 which serves as the catalytic region of the OGG family. OGGs also contain a glycine/proline-enriched region and a conserved aspartic acid motif. This motif contains lysine 249 and aspartic acid 268 and binds DNA to exert the catalytic activity of OGG1. OGG members are divided into three subfamilies: OGG1, OGG2, and AGOG. OGG1 exists mainly in eukaryotes and a few bacteria [25]. OGG2 is present in bacteria and archaea, while AGOG is present in archaeal organisms. The most significant difference between OGG1, OGG2, and AGOG is the additional N-terminal A domain, which is formed by an antiparallel twisted β-slice and is found only in the OGG1 enzyme. Since OGG2 and AGOG enzymes can cleave 8-oxoG from DNA in the absence of the A domain, this suggests that the N-terminal domain has other functions that are not specifically enzymatic digestive functions. In addition, human OGG1 is present as two major alternative splice isomers, hOGG1α and hOGG1β [26], which have different C-terminal domains. The human OGG1α isoform is expressed in the cytoplasm, nucleus, and mitochondria, whereas the human OGG1β isoform is only expressed in the mitochondria. The absence of mitochondrial translocation signals in the A domain of the hOGG1 N-terminus seems to prevent its localization to mitochondria [27] and supports the role of the N-terminal A domain in protein localization. The STRING database lists several protein-protein interactions of hOGG1, including protein kinase C, XRCC1, and PARP1 [28]. Therefore, the N-terminal A domain of OGG1 may be an anchor point involved in protein interactions.

OGG1 is a DNA glycosylase enzyme with apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site lytic activity which removes ROS-induced 8-oxoG [29]. OGG1 can bind to the promoter region of the inflammatory cytokine Cxcl2 [30] to activate transcription independently of its digestion activity. Various protein-protein interactions may modulate OGG1 activity. For example, in in vitro experiments, with an increase in APE1 [31], OGG1 AP lyase activity increased, and the binding and modification of OGG1 to PARP1 [32] reduced BER function. OGG1 can regulate gene transcription of the fibrosis factor VEGF through the presence of a putative G-quadruplex sequence in the promoter of the binding VEGF-coding chain [33]. OGG1 binds to oncosuppressor gene promoters and recruits chromodomain helicase-DNA-binding protein 4 (CHD4), which is associated with cancer. Finally, OGG1-mediated RAS activation can induce MEK, ERK, and PI3K to activate the NF-κB signaling pathway and induce downstream inflammatory gene expression [34, 35].

3. OGG1 in Cellular Homeostasis

OGG1 is mainly located in the cytoplasm and can enter the nucleus and mitochondria to repair DNA and activate multiple transcriptional pathways to regulate cellular homeostasis during cell injury. OGG1 regulates homeostasis through a variety of pathways, including DNA repair [36], oxidative stress [37], inflammatory responses, fibrosis, mitophagy [38], apoptosis, and energy metabolism (Figure 1). In addition to conventional DNA base excision and repair, OGG1 regulates downstream gene transcription as a key regulator of cellular homeostasis, mainly in the following three ways: (1) G-quadruplexes mediated by the BER pathway affect gene expression. (2) The BER pathway recruits topoisomerase to promote gene expression. (3) OGG1 recruits chromatin modification complexes to influence gene expression.

4. DNA Repair

The main types of DNA damage [39] include base deletions, mismatches, DNA crosslinking, and DNA strand breaks, which consist of DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs) and DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The base excision repair [40] pathway involves the repair of various types of DNA damage affecting the nuclear genome and is the most basic and important DNA repair method. OGG1 is a key enzyme that initiates the base excision repair pathway in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells [36]. OGG1 has 8-oxoG DNA N-glycosylase activity [41]. OGG1 is also a double-edged sword in the process of base excision repair. Converting 8-oxoG into an AP site carries risk. First, there is the risk of information loss and mutations. Second, AP sites have strong effects on DNA secondary structure, protein binding, and G-quadruplex folding [42]. Third, AP sites stall transcription and replication [31] and the reactive aldehyde group of the AP site may react with amino groups to form DNA-protein crosslinks with potentially deleterious consequences for genome integrity [43]. Lastly, the related injured site and repair-associated conversion to single-strand breaks carry the risk of damage acceleration towards DNA double-strand breaks, resulting in genome instability, mutation, translocation, and loss of information. 8-oxoG accumulation may be connected to the DNA secondary structure of G-quadruplex folds, leading to higher sensitivity towards base modification or impaired excision by OGG1 in some secondary structures at the telomeres [44]. Antioxidant-mediated upregulation of OGG1 via NRF2 induction is associated with the inhibition of oxidative DNA damage [45] (Figure 2).

Figure 2

The role of OGG1 in regulation gene transcription in the promoter region. ROS oxidizes guanine in the DNA promoter region and recruits OGG1 to DNA promoter region, and OGG1 interacts with PARP1 and XRCC1 to remove 8-oxoG. At the same time, the G-quadruplex structure is opened up and the transcription factors NF-κB, VEGF, and ATG7 are recruited to activate downstream inflammatory, fibrosis, and autophagy pathways. Then, Polβ, PCNA, FEN1, and Ligase 3 work together to repair DNA double strands. ROS: reactive oxygen species; PARP1: polyADP-ribose polymerase 1; XRCC1: X-ray repair cross complementing 1; NF-κB: nuclear factor kappa-B; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; ATG7: autophagy-related 7; Polβ: DNA polymeraseβ; PCNA: proliferating cell nuclear antigen; FEN1: flap structure-specific endonuclease 1.

OGG1-deficient cells exhibit enhanced spontaneous mutagenesis [46, 47]. Upregulation of OGG1 may improve the ability of base excision repair to combat DNA damage and rescue genomic instability [48]. Upon PARP1 overexpression in cells, OGG1 forms an immunoprecipitable complex with PARP1, and inhibition of PARP1 or OGG1 results in DNA damage and decreased viability, which enhances DSB repair [49]. Under oxidative stress, OGG1 interacts with the mediator subunits CDK8 and MED12 on chromatin to maintain genomic stability [50]. Transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair factor, Cockayne syndrome protein B (CSB), has been suggested to function in the repair of oxidative DNA damage. CSB promotes XRCC1 recruitment to oxidative DNA damage to maintain genome stability by OGG1 and interacts with PARP1 [51]. Chip assay results showed that when levels of 8-oxoG in the G-quadruplex structure of DNA were increased through H₂O₂ exposure, OGG1 was recruited to the KRAS promoter and further recruited the downstream nuclear factors MAZ and hnRNPA1, which are critical for transcription, reflecting the transcriptional regulation of OGG1 in the folding and stability of DNA promoter regions [52]. During gene damage, CHD4 helps maintain transcriptional silencing associated with DNA hypermethylation. CHD4 is recruited by OGG1 upon oxidative damage and interacts with 8-oxoG, which plays an important role in inhibiting tumor proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and in DNA stability [53]. Genome-wide mapping of AP site damage, BER protein binding, and G-quadruplex structures revealed that oxidative base-induced AP site damage was consistent with the binding and localization of OGG1 and APE1 in G-quadruplex structures, suggesting that the interaction between APE1 and OGG1 plays an important role in the regulation of G-quadruplex structure formation in the genome [54]. Additionally, acute oxidative stress leads to increased RECQL4 acetylation and its interaction with OGG1 participates in base excision repair. The NAD+-dependent protein SIRT1 deacetylates RECQL4 in vitro and in cells, thereby controlling the interaction between OGG1 and RECQL4 after DNA repair by maintaining RECQL4 in a low-acetylated state. The stimulation of human α-OGG1 catalytic activity by AP endonuclease-APE1 was proposed to enhance turnover and bypass of AP lyase activity [55]. Owing to the interaction between OGG1 and APE-1, stimulation of human α-OGG1 activity was also observed in the presence of the scaffold protein XRCC1 [56]. Human α-OGG1 also physically interacts with PARP1 to stimulate polyADP-ribosylation [32]. This suggests that OGG1 plays a critical role in DNA repair.

OGG1 knockout mice are viable, fertile, and do not show marked pathological defects in adulthood. However, a third study reported significantly higher lung tumorigenesis in OGG1 knockout mice at 18 months after birth than in WT mice. Furthermore, OGG1-/- mice accumulate 8-oxoG in the liver nucleus and mitochondrial DNA in an age-dependent manner [57]. Strong cancer susceptibility was observed in OGG1 and Mutyh double-knockdown mice, in which 8-oxoG accumulated in the liver, lung, and small intestine but not in the brain, kidney, and spleen, showing organ specificity [58].

Abnormal base excision repair pathways of OGG1 and OGG1 polymorphisms are associated with a variety of tumors in humans [59]. The OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism may be a risk factor for cancers of the lungs, digestive system, and head and neck [60]. Additionally, a significant association was observed between OGG1 germline mutations and breast cancer risk, which are considered promising targets for the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of breast cancer [61]. Defective OGG1 regulates the coordination between innate and adaptive immunity through excessive oxidative stress and cytokine dysregulation, which are important targets in lung cancer treatment [62]. The OGG1 gene has somatic mutations in some human cancer cells, which are highly polymorphic in the human population. The repair activity of the mutant OGG1 protein is significantly lower than that of the wild-type form and is thus involved in many types of tumorigenesis [63].

5. Mitochondrial Homeostasis

The most important factor in maintaining the balance of mitochondrial homeostasis is the stable repair of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). OGG1, a key enzyme involved in mtDNA repair, is important for mitochondrial homeostasis. OGG1 decreases mitochondrial fragmentation and improves mitochondrial function in H9C2 cells under oxidative stress conditions [64]. The levels of the mitochondrial proteins involved in fission, DRP1 and FIS1, have been reported to be reduced in cells overexpressing mouse OGG1. Another study [65] found that overexpression of α-OGG1 protected the mitochondrial network from fragmentation after exposure to menadione. Targeting the human mutant protein MTS-OGG1-R229Q to the mitochondria results in decreased mtDNA integrity and cellular survival after exposure to oxidative agents when compared to the wild-type MTS-OGG1, and catalytically inactive α-OGG1 mutants did not preserve the mitochondrial morphology in the cells exposed to oxidative stress [66]. In addition, an increase in OGG1 acetylation, an increase in mitochondrial ROS, and a decrease in SIRT3 are all related to mtDNA deletion [67]. Mitochondria-targeted human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase and aconitase-2 reduce oxidant-induced alveolar epithelial cell apoptosis, preventing oxidant-induced mitochondrial dysfunction, p53 mitochondrial translocation, and intrinsic apoptosis [68]. Nrf2 can bind to the antioxidant response element in the promoter of OGG1, participate in mtDNA repair, and maintain mitochondrial homeostasis [69].

6. Oxidative Stress

Under oxidative stress, the repair of 8-oxoG by the BER enzymes OGG1 and APE1 perturbs the structural equilibrium of the VEGF promoter DNA sequence between duplex and G-quadruplex structures, resulting in epigenetic modifications of gene expression [70]. Binding of APE1 to the AP site of OGG1 on the putative G-quadruplex sequence promoter element of VEGF enhances gene transcription to improve oxidative stress damage [71]. Studies have shown that OGG1 can activate the Nrf2 signaling pathway to protect renal tubular epithelial cells from oxidative DNA damage [72]. Long-term oxidative stress can lead to the continuous expression of OGG1-mediated inflammatory genes, leading to an excessive inflammatory response, which may lead to a series of diseases, such as cancer [73].

In addition to targeting DNA, oxidative stress can also affect proteins such as OGG1. Studies [74] have shown that under oxidative stress, OGG1 is sensitive to oxidants, and cysteine sites can be targeted to modify the response of OGG1 to alter its downstream cellular functions. The DNA repair function of OGG1 decreases under oxidative stress, and the main reason for this may be the cysteine-based enzymatic inactivation of OGG1. OGG1 can regain its repair activity after the redox balance is reestablished [75–77].

7. Inflammation

OGG1 plays an important regulatory role in the immune inflammatory response. OGG1-deficient mice had good survival and showed significant resistance to acute and systemic inflammation. Visnes et al. [78] developed a selective active site inhibitor of OGG1, TH5487, which obstructs the binding and repair functions of OGG1 and 8-oxoG, and has obvious anti-inflammatory effects under the stimulation of oxidative stress, which is well-tolerated in mice. TH5487 prevents tumor necrosis factor-α-induced OGG1-DNA interactions at guanine-rich promoters of proinflammatory genes. NF-κB is an important inflammatory transcription factor that enables downstream NLRP3 signaling and TNF-α expression, further promoting the release of IL-18, IL-1β, and other inflammatory cytokines [79]. This decreases the DNA occupancy of NF-κB [80] and proinflammatory gene expression, resulting in decreased immune cell recruitment to the mouse lungs. Promoter-associated OGG1 enhances NF-κB/RelA binding to cis-elements and facilitates the recruitment of specificity protein 1, transcription initiation factor II-D, and p-RNA polymerase II, resulting in the rapid expression of chemokines/cytokines and the accumulation of inflammatory cells in mouse airways [17]. OGG1-/- mice showed significantly higher expression of type I IFN genes such as Isg15, Irf9, and Ifnb. OGG1 regulates Ifnb expression through the cGAS-STING pathway [81]. Biochemical studies have shown that STAT1 plays a key role in endotoxin-induced OGG1 expression and inflammatory responses. OGG1 acts as a STAT1 coactivator and has transcriptional activity in the presence of endotoxins, resulting in the induction of the expression of proinflammatory mediators at the transcriptional level [82] (Figure 3).

Figure 3

The role of OGG1 in the regulation of inflammation and fibrosis. OGG1 can act as a positive regulator of NF-κB to prompt P50, P65, and TNF-α expression and further prompt the release of pro-IL-1β and the upstream inflammatory factors IL-1β. Furthermore, OGG1 regulates cGAS-STING pathway to increase the expression of the proinflammatory genes P50, P65, and PIRF3. Fibrosis is the main pathological process of various chronic diseases at the end stage and can be driven by inflammation. OGG1 can activate TGF-β to promote Smad2/3, notch, PI3K/AKT, and MAPK/mTOR signaling pathway and prompt the expression of fibrosis genes α-SMA, FN, and MMPs/TIMPs and downstream ZO-1. OGG1 can also positively regulate Wnt/β-catenin, VEGF, and CTGF, thus aggravating fibrosis. TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-α; PIRF3: phosphointerferon regulatory factor 3; TGF-β: transforming growth factor beta; α-SMA: alpha-smooth muscle actin; FN: fibronectin; MMPs: matrix metalloproteinases; TIMPs: tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases; ZO-1: zonula occludens-1. PI3K: phosphoinositide 3-kinase; MAPK: mitogen-activated protein kinase; mTOR: mammalian target of rapamycin; RTK: receptor tyrosine kinase.

8. Fibrosis

OGG1 appears to be involved in activating the WNT pathway and promoting the accumulation of nuclear β-catenin [83]. Studies [84] have shown that mtDNA damage and mutation are related to various pathological conditions, including the fibrosis of a variety of organs. Therefore, mtDNA repair is particularly important [85]. Deacetylase SIRT3 is located in the mitochondrial matrix and can bind to OGG1 in fibrosis, contribute to mtDNA repair, protect against apoptosis, and reduce fibrosis under oxidative stress [86]. In addition, SIRT3 can regulate OGG1 protein expression and activate DNA repair to prevent apoptosis and fibrosis [87, 88]. TGF-β1 is involved in the phenotypic transformation of fibroblasts. Induction of human lung fibroblasts with TGF-β1 increased the expression levels of fibrosis markers, smooth muscle α-actin collagen-1, and fibronectin [89]. TGF-β1 can also activate the PI3K/AKT [90] and MAPK [91] signaling pathways to regulate fibrosis. TGF-β1 treatment depletes SIRT3, further inducing increased production of ROS and DNA damage and decreased OGG1 levels [92]. However, overexpression of SIRT3 reverses the damage of fibrosis and induces mitophagy [93]. Inhibition of VEGF receptor signaling attenuates kidney microvascular rarefaction and fibrosis [94], and OGG1 can temporarily modify the hypoxia-response element of the VEGF gene under oxidative stress to regulate VEGF expression [95]. Although an association between OGG1 and the fibrosis pathway was found, the role of OGG1 in promoting fibrosis was more clearly demonstrated in the OGG1 knockdown mouse model. Wang et al. [18] observed that OGG1 promoted TGF-β1-induced cell transformation and activated Smad2/3 by interacting with Smad7 and that the interaction between OGG1 and the TGF-β/Smad axis modulates the cell transformation process in fibroblasts. Additionally, they demonstrated that OGG1 deficiency relieved pulmonary fibrosis and decreased the expression level of Smad7 and the phosphorylation of SMAD2/3 in BLM-treated mice (Figure 3). The role of OGG1 in promoting fibrosis is consistent with its role in promoting inflammation under oxidative stress as found by Visnes et al. [78], which further demonstrates the importance of OGG1 as a clinical target.

9. Autophagy

Autophagy is an important mechanism for cell homeostasis and is closely associated with cell repair. However, the exact relationship between DNA repair and autophagy remains unclear. OGG1 influences autophagy by binding to proteins or genes involved in the autophagy pathway. Ye et al. [20] found that OGG1 deficiency downregulates autophagy both in vitro and in vivo by decreasing lc3-I to LC3-II conversion, LC3 spot staining, and Atg7 expression. Additionally, they found that OGG1 binds to the promoter of Atg7 and that OGG1 can decrease the gene expression level of Atg7. Finally, OGG1 negatively regulates the release of inflammatory cytokines through molecular interactions that coordinate autophagy pathways in hyperoxygen-induced lung injury [96].

OGG1 can influence autophagy through several molecules that act as bridges. OGG1, p53, and TNF-α may jointly or independently repair DNA oxidative damage and/or induce apoptosis [97]. Studies have shown that DNA double-strand breaks can induce the coactivation of P53 and OGG1, and that they functionally coordinate [98]. The P53 protein is a key molecule in DNA damage-induced apoptosis and can play a bidirectional regulatory role in autophagy through its subcellular localization [99]. For example, P53 induces autophagy by activating AMPK, inactivating mTOR, and promoting the transcriptional expression of damage-regulated autophagy modulators [100–102]. Under glucose starvation, AMPK promotes autophagy by directly activating Ulk1 through the phosphorylation of Ser317 and Ser777. In response to injury, K63 ubiquitination of TAK1 activates AMPK in damaged lysosomes to trigger autophagy [103]. Under nutrient sufficiency, high-mTOR activity prevents Ulk1 activation by phosphorylating Ulk1 Ser757 and disrupting the interaction between Ulk1 and AMPK [104–106]. On the other hand, P53 can also promote the expression of phosphatidylinositol phosphate PTEN and then inhibit the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway to activate autophagy [107]. Furthermore, Muñoz-Gámez et al. found that OGG1 binds directly to PARP1 through the N-terminal region of OGG1, and that this interaction is enhanced by oxidative stress [108]. PARP1 and OGG1 act in the same regulatory pathway and PARP1 activity is required for OGG1-mediated repair of oxidative DNA damage in G1-arrested cells. ROS-induced DNA damage and PARP1 are required for the optimal induction of starvation-induced autophagy [109]. Finally, PARP1 can induce ATP depletion and suppress the mTOR pathway to regulate autophagy initiation [110].

Autophagy also regulates OGG1 expression and DNA repair. Some studies [111] have shown that autophagy can also promote the degradation of DNA damage repair proteins, thereby facilitating cell death. Other studies [112, 113] have shown that the inhibition of the autophagy pathway protein mTOR by rapamycin suppresses the repair of DSBs. In response to a nutrient starvation model, autophagy activation was shown to degrade OGG1 in cardiomyocytes [114]. This study found that OGG1 was activated by the autophagy inhibitor bafilomycin in autophagy-deficient Atg5(-/-) mouse cell models under nutrient deprivation. Nevertheless, the pharmacological activation of autophagy did not induce OGG1 loss. There may be a feedback mechanism between autophagy and OGG1 activation in specific injury models. In summary, the study of the relationship between OGG1 and autophagy is of great significance for exploring the regulatory relationship between DNA damage repair and autophagy, and many more studies are needed to fully explore this area (Figure 4).

Figure 4

The role of OGG1 in the regulation of autophagy. DNA single- or double-strand oxidative damage recruits OGG1 excision repair 8-oxoG. OGG1 interacts with PARP1 and induces ATP depletion and the activation of AMPK. AMPK promotes TAK1/JNK pathway and ULK1 to regulate autophagy process. Additionally, OGG1 binds to the promoter region of ATG7 to induce autophagy. AMPK and TSC2 activation may negatively affect the expression of OGG1. On the other hand, OGG1 is found to inhibit autophagy by activating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in specific damage models. ATP: adenosine triphosphate; AMPK: adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase; TAK1: transforming growth factor β-activated kinase 1; JNK: c-jun N-terminal kinase; ULK1: Unc-51-like autophagy-activating kinase 1; TSC2: tuberous sclerosis complex 2.

10. Apoptosis and Energy Metabolism

The effect of OGG1 on apoptosis remains controversial. There is a view that mitochondria-targeted OGG1 overexpression can prevent mitochondria-regulated apoptosis caused by oxidative stress, including alveolar epithelial cell apoptosis following asbestos exposure [115]. However, after excessive oxidative damage, the BER pathway further increases the level of ROS-induced DNA damage by producing repair intermediates, leading to PARP1 overactivation and cell death [116]. OGG1-deficient mice exhibit excellent inflammatory resistance and a good survival ability, which seems to blur this controversy.

Researchers have found some metabolic differences in OGG1-deficient mice. Dr. Lloyd’s laboratory found that OGG1+/+ OGG1-/- mice fed with a high-fat diet showed inconsistent gene expression in liver and muscle cells, suggesting that OGG1 may be related to gene expression in cellular metabolism [117]. After a high-fat diet for 12-week stress tests in relatively young animals, OGG1-/- mice became significantly heavier and accumulated more adipose tissue than WT counterparts. Levels of dynamin-related protein-1 and fission-1 were significantly increased in the muscles of OGG1-/- mice. In OGG1-overexpressing mice, following 12 weeks of a hypercaloric high-fat diet consumption, body weight and composition analyses revealed that OGG1 Tg mice were significantly protected from increased body weight and fat mass after the imposed high-fat diet relative to WT animals [118].

Chronic exposure to elevated levels of free fatty acids impairs pancreatic beta cell function and contributes to a decline in insulin secretion in type 2 diabetes. Overexpression of hOGG1 in the mitochondria can reduce FFA-induced inhibition of ATP production and reduce apoptosis of islet β cells, suggesting that OGG1 may be a new target for intervention in type 2 diabetes mellitus [119].

11. OGG1 in Kidney Disease

11.1. Kidney Tumors

The OGG1 gene is located at 3p25 on chromosome 3, and a heterozygous deletion in the 3p25 region was found in 85% of 99 cases of renal tumor loci, including renal clear cell carcinoma. Hence, this is a common mutation site [21]. Chevillard et al. [120] identified homozygous mutations in renal tumors when screening for changes in OGG1 cDNA in human tumors, including two transitions (GC to TA and TA to AT) and one transition (GC to AT) with a base substitution. All three of these substitutions led to amino acid changes in the human OGG1 protein.

In addition, the incidence of multiorgan tumors observed at 34 weeks in OGG1 knockout mice showed that the incidence of colon adenomas and total colon tumors showed a trend with a sharp increase, with bladder hyperplasia and an increased rate of tubular hyperplasia also observed [121]. Rapamycin-mediated activation of AMPK and inhibition of mTOR upregulates OGG1, which may be a viable therapeutic target for renal tumors [19]. Chromatin immunoprecipitation identified transcription factor AP4 as a positive regulator of the OGG1 promoter. In the kidneys of patients with tuberous sclerosis, loss of a protein encoded by tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (Tsc2) can downregulate OGG1 protein expression by regulating transcription factor AP4 binding to the OGG1 promoter, thereby increasing the incidence of tumors.

12. OGG1 in AKI

12.1. Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

OGG1 has been widely studied in brain and lung ischemia-reperfusion injury but less so in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. In a renal ischemia-reperfusion experiment in rats [122], high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrum analysis of the nuclear DNA revealed an immediate accumulation of 8-oxo-dG in nuclear DNA prepared from the cortex and outer medulla of the kidney 1 h after ischemia-reperfusion. An RNase protection assay showed a high level of OGG1 mRNA in the normal kidney, which decreased within 3 h only in the outer medulla and increased after 1-7 days of ischemia-reperfusion both in the cortex and outer medulla. They also found that the accumulation of 8-oxoG in mtDNA, rather than in nuclear DNA, may be involved in renal tubular cell injury and other pathological reactions caused by renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. In cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury model studies, mtDNA damage repaired by OGG1 base excision seemed to have no significant effect on cardiac function [123, 124]. In an ischemia-reperfusion model, the DNA repair function of OGG1 is inhibited under oxidative stress, and the upregulated OGG1 levels may also have other transcriptional regulatory effects, which require further study.

The DNA repair function of OGG1 is decreased in ischemia-reperfusion injury, yet the function of inducing the NF-κB pathway to activate the inflammatory response is not weakened. Inhibition of OGG1 with TH5487 interferes with OGG1 incision activity, resulting in fewer DNA double-strand breaks in cells exposed to oxidative stress and reducing the DNA mutation rate caused by OGG1 exposure to AP sites, which may reduce the incidence of cancer in cases of oxidative stress damage [125]. In addition, the anti-inflammatory function of TH5487 reduces inflammatory damage caused by oxidative stress and may contribute to ischemia-reperfusion in a more meaningful way [126].

12.2. Septic AKI

Staphylococcus aureus is an opportunistic pathogen and is one of the leading causes of life-threatening sepsis [127]. Staphylococcus aureus sepsis induces early renal mtDNA damage, upregulates the expression of inflammatory factors, such as TNF-α, IL-10, and Ngal mRNA, and activates OGG1 [128]. OGG1, an early septic mitochondrial reactive protein, is regulated by the nuclear transcription factors NRF-1 and NRF-2α and the activation of inflammation [129, 130]. Mabley et al. investigated the role of OGG1 in inflammation using an endotoxic shock model and found that OGG1-/- mice are resistant to endotoxin-induced organ dysfunction, neutrophil infiltration, and oxidative stress when compared with the response observed in wild-type controls (OGG1+/+) [131]. Furthermore, deficiency of OGG1 protects against inflammation and the mutagenic effects of H. pylori infection in mouse models [132]. These results indicate that OGG1 regulates the moderate activation of inflammation in septic AKI.

13. OGG1 in CKD

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a multifactorial chronic disease characterized by genetic abnormalities. Genome-wide association studies [133] have identified hundreds of loci in which genetic variants are associated with kidney function. However, causal genes and pathways involved in CKD remain unknown. In a study on the relationship between DNA damage, genomic instability, and gene polymorphisms in patients with CKD, it was found that genes such as OGG1 and XRCC1 involved in base excision repair are related to DNA damage [22]. OGG1 promotes fibrosis progression in chronic kidney disease by interacting with Smad7 to promote TGF-β1-induced cell transformation [18]. Another study showed the role of the Ser326Cys polymorphism in the OGG1 gene, which modulates the level of 8-oxoG in the leukocytes of CKD patients [134]. OGG1 has also been widely studied in the context of tumors and lung injuries. Recent studies have found that the regulation of gene transcription of OGG1 seems to be as important as the effect of base excision and repair [135]. How OGG1 regulates downstream gene transcription in patients with CKD is worthy of further exploration (Figure 5).

14. Conclusions and Prospects

Previous studies have shown that OGG1 inhibits tumorigenesis via base excision and repair. In recent years, studies have found that OGG1 participates in the regulation of renal inflammatory diseases by upregulating certain inflammatory cytokines, inducing oxidative stress and inflammation, promoting fibrosis, and regulating autophagy. The powerful anti-inflammatory effect of the OGG1 specific inhibitor TH5487 has been verified. As an emerging target, OGG1 has new prospects for the clinical treatment of inflammatory diseases of the kidney.

Data Availability

The data will be available on request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Fan Zhao, Jiefu Zhu, and Xiongfei Wu put forward the concept; Fan Zhao performed a review of the article and wrote the manuscript. Jiefu Zhu contributed to language modification and content adjustment. Fan Zhao participated in the revision of this manuscript. All authors have read the article and approved the final version.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Youth Science Foundation of China (grant number 82100803), the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (grant number 2021CFB101), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant number 2042021kf0097).

References

K. U. Eckardt, J. Coresh, O. Devuyst et al., “Evolving importance of kidney disease: from subspecialty to global health burden,” The Lancet, vol. 382, no. 9887, pp. 158–169, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
R. L. Mehta, J. Cerdá, E. A. Burdmann et al., “International Society of Nephrology's 0by25 initiative for acute kidney injury (zero preventable deaths by 2025): a human rights case for nephrology,” The Lancet, vol. 385, no. 9987, pp. 2616–2643, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
J. A. Kellum, P. Romagnani, G. Ashuntantang, C. Ronco, A. Zarbock, and H. J. Anders, “Acute kidney injury,” Nature Reviews. Disease Primers, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 52, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Zuk and J. V. Bonventre, “Acute kidney injury,” Annual Review of Medicine, vol. 67, pp. 293–307, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
A. van der Pol, W. H. van Gilst, A. A. Voors, and P. van der Meer, “Treating oxidative stress in heart failure: past, present and future,” European Journal of Heart Failure, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 425–435, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. J. Fu, Z. Y. Wang, L. Xu et al., “HIF-1α-BNIP3-mediated mitophagy in tubular cells protects against renal ischemia/reperfusion injury,” Redox Biology, vol. 36, article 101671, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Zhang, W. Dong, Z. Li et al., “Effect of forkhead box O1 in renal tubular epithelial cells on endotoxin-induced acute kidney injury,” American Journal of Physiology. Renal Physiology, vol. 320, no. 3, pp. F262–F272, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Maekawa, T. Inoue, H. Ouchi et al., “Mitochondrial damage causes inflammation via cGAS-STING signaling in acute kidney injury,” Cell Reports, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1261–1273.e6, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. G. Kim, J. Yang, Y. S. Ko et al., “Impact of aging on transition of acute kidney injury to chronic kidney disease,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 18445, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sen and J. A. Imlay, “How microbes defend themselves from incoming hydrogen peroxide,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 12, article 667343, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
R. F. Anderson, S. S. Shinde, A. Maroz, and J. Reynisson, “The reduction potential of the slipped GC base pair in one-electron oxidized duplex DNA,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 642–646, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Duan, X. Han, M. Akbari, D. L. Croteau, L. J. Rasmussen, and V. A. Bohr, “Interaction between RECQL4 and OGG1 promotes repair of oxidative base lesion 8-oxoG and is regulated by SIRT1 deacetylase,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 6530–6546, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. V. Endutkin, E. P. Panferova, A. E. Barmatov, and D. O. Zharkov, “DNA glycosylases for 8-oxoguanine repair in Staphylococcus aureus,” DNA Repair (Amst), vol. 105, article 103160, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kanvah, J. Joseph, G. B. Schuster, R. N. Barnett, C. L. Cleveland, and U. Landman, “Oxidation of DNA: damage to nucleobases,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 280–287, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Faucher, S. Doublié, and Z. Jia, “8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylases: one lesion, three subfamilies,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 6711–6729, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Wang, W. Hao, L. Pan, I. Boldogh, and X. Ba, “The roles of base excision repair enzyme OGG1 in gene expression,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 75, no. 20, pp. 3741–3750, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Ba, A. Bacsi, J. Luo et al., “8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase-1 augments proinflammatory gene expression by facilitating the recruitment of site-specific transcription factors,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 192, no. 5, pp. 2384–2394, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, T. Chen, Z. Pan et al., “8-Oxoguanine DNA glycosylase modulates the cell transformation process in pulmonary fibrosis by inhibiting Smad2/3 and interacting with Smad7,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 13461–13473, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
S. L. Habib, B. S. Kasinath, R. R. Arya, S. Vexler, and C. Velagapudi, “Novel mechanism of reducing tumourigenesis: upregulation of the DNA repair enzyme OGG1 by rapamycin-mediated AMPK activation and mTOR inhibition,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 46, no. 15, pp. 2806–2820, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Ye, P. Lin, W. Zhang et al., “DNA repair interacts with autophagy to regulate inflammatory responses to pulmonary hyperoxia,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 198, no. 7, pp. 2844–2853, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Audebert, S. Chevillard, C. Levalois et al., “Alterations of the DNA repair gene OGG1 in human clear cell carcinomas of the kidney,” Cancer Research, vol. 60, no. 17, pp. 4740–4744, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Corredor, M. I. da Silva Filho, L. Rodríguez-Ribera et al., “Loci associated with genomic damage levels in chronic kidney disease patients and controls,” Mutation Research, Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, vol. 852, article 503167, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Jain, S. Dhiman, and D. W. Grogan, “Genetic control of oxidative mutagenesis in Sulfolobus acidocaldarius,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 202, no. 16, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
D. P. Norman, S. J. Chung, and G. L. Verdine, “Structural and biochemical exploration of a critical amino acid in human 8-oxoguanine glycosylase,” Biochemistry, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1564–1572, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Iyama and D. M. Wilson 3rd, “DNA repair mechanisms in dividing and non-dividing cells,” DNA Repair (Amst), vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 620–636, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kapor, V. Čokić, and J. F. Santibanez, “Mechanisms of hydroxyurea-induced cellular senescence: an oxidative stress connection,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2021, Article ID 7753857, 16 pages, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Mizuno, N. Abolhassani, G. Mazzei et al., “MUTYH actively contributes to microglial activation and impaired neurogenesis in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2021, Article ID 8635088, 30 pages, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. E. Sedykh, V. V. Prinz, V. N. Buneva, and G. A. Nevinsky, “Bispecific antibodies: design, therapy, perspectives,” Drug Design, Development and Therapy, vol. 12, pp. 195–208, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Córdoba-Cañero, T. Roldán-Arjona, and R. R. Ariza, “Arabidopsis ZDP DNA 3'-phosphatase and ARP endonuclease function in 8-oxoG repair initiated by FPG and OGG1 DNA glycosylases,” The Plant Journal, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 824–834, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
K. B. Knudsen, H. Northeved, P. E. Kumar et al., “In vivo toxicity of cationic micelles and liposomes,” Nanomedicine, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 467–477, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Allgayer, N. Kitsera, S. Bartelt, B. Epe, and A. Khobta, “Widespread transcriptional gene inactivation initiated by a repair intermediate of 8-oxoguanine,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 44, no. 15, pp. 7267–7280, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Noren Hooten, K. Kompaniez, J. Barnes, A. Lohani, and M. K. Evans, “Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) binds to 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase (OGG1),” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 52, pp. 44679–44690, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Sun, L. Shi, T. Xiao et al., “MicroRNA-21, via the HIF-1α/VEGF signaling pathway, is involved in arsenite- induced hepatic fibrosis through aberrant cross-talk of hepatocytes and hepatic stellate cells,” Chemosphere, vol. 266, article 129177, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Boldogh, G. Hajas, L. Aguilera-Aguirre et al., “Activation of ras signaling pathway by 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase bound to its excision product, 8-oxoguanine,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 25, pp. 20769–20773, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Aguilera-Aguirre, A. Bacsi, Z. Radak et al., “Innate inflammation induced by the 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase-1-KRAS-NF-κB pathway,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 193, no. 9, pp. 4643–4653, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Boiteux, F. Coste, and B. Castaing, “Repair of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells: properties and biological roles of the Fpg and OGG1 DNA N -glycosylases,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 107, pp. 179–201, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. C. Pao, D. Patnaik, L. A. Watson et al., “HDAC1 modulates OGG1-initiated oxidative DNA damage repair in the aging brain and Alzheimer's disease,” Nature Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2484, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Pei, Y. Liu, S. Liu et al., “FUNDC1 insufficiency sensitizes high fat diet intake-induced cardiac remodeling and contractile anomaly through ACSL4-mediated ferroptosis,” Metabolism, vol. 122, article 154840, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Aleksandrov, R. Hristova, S. Stoynov, and A. Gospodinov, “The chromatin response to double-strand DNA breaks and their repair,” Cell, vol. 9, no. 8, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Hu, Z. Wang, C. Carmone, J. Keijer, and D. Zhang, “Role of oxidative DNA damage and repair in atrial fibrillation and ischemic heart disease,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 22, no. 8, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
J. L. Quiñones, U. Thapar, S. H. Wilson, D. A. Ramsden, and B. Demple, “Oxidative DNA-protein crosslinks formed in mammalian cells by abasic site lyases involved in DNA repair,” DNA Repair (Amst), vol. 87, article 102773, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
A. M. Fleming, J. Zhu, Y. Ding, and C. J. Burrows, “8-Oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine in the context of a gene promoter G-quadruplex is an on-off switch for transcription,” ACS Chemical Biology, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 2417–2426, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
J. T. Sczepanski, R. S. Wong, J. N. McKnight, G. D. Bowman, and M. M. Greenberg, “Rapid DNA-protein cross-linking and strand scission by an abasic site in a nucleosome core particle,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 52, pp. 22475–22480, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
D. B. Rhee, A. Ghosh, J. Lu, V. A. Bohr, and Y. Liu, “Factors that influence telomeric oxidative base damage and repair by DNA glycosylase OGG1,” DNA Repair (Amst), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 34–44, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Singh, A. Chatterjee, A. M. Ronghe, N. K. Bhat, and H. K. Bhat, “Antioxidant-mediated up-regulation of OGG1 via NRF2 induction is associated with inhibition of oxidative DNA damage in estrogen-induced breast cancer,” BMC Cancer, vol. 13, p. 253, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
M. de Padula, G. Slezak, P. Auffret van Der Kemp, and S. Boiteux, “The post-replication repair RAD18 and RAD6 genes are involved in the prevention of spontaneous mutations caused by 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 32, no. 17, pp. 5003–5010, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
T. T. Ni, G. T. Marsischky, and R. D. Kolodner, “MSH2 and MSH6 are required for removal of adenine misincorporated opposite 8-oxo-guanine in S. cerevisiae,” Molecular Cell, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 439–444, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. B. Higgs, R. Godschalk, S. Langie, F. J. van Schooten, and N. J. Hodges, “Upregulation of mNEIL3 in Ogg1-null cells is a potential backup mechanism for 8-oxoG repair,” Mutagenesis, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 437–444, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Tempka, P. Tokarz, K. Chmielewska et al., “Downregulation of PARP1 transcription by CDK4/6 inhibitors sensitizes human lung cancer cells to anticancer drug-induced death by impairing OGG1-dependent base excision repair,” Redox Biology, vol. 15, pp. 316–326, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Lebraud, G. Pinna, C. Siberchicot et al., “Chromatin recruitment of OGG1 requires cohesin and mediator and is essential for efficient 8-oxoG removal,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 48, no. 16, pp. 9082–9097, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Menoni, F. Wienholz, A. F. Theil et al., “The transcription-coupled DNA repair-initiating protein CSB promotes XRCC1 recruitment to oxidative DNA damage,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 46, no. 15, pp. 7747–7756, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Cogoi, A. Ferino, G. Miglietta, E. B. Pedersen, and L. E. Xodo, “The regulatory G4 motif of the Kirsten ras (KRAS) gene is sensitive to guanine oxidation: implications on transcription,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 661–676, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Xia, W. Huang, M. Bellani et al., “CHD4 has oncogenic functions in initiating and maintaining epigenetic suppression of multiple tumor suppressor genes,” Cancer Cell, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 653–668.e7, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Roychoudhury, S. Pramanik, H. L. Harris et al., “Endogenous oxidized DNA bases and APE1 regulate the formation of G-quadruplex structures in the genome,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 117, no. 21, pp. 11409–11420, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. E. Vidal, I. D. Hickson, S. Boiteux, and J. P. Radicella, “Mechanism of stimulation of the DNA glycosylase activity of hOGG1 by the major human AP endonuclease: bypass of the AP lyase activity step,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1285–1292, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Marsin, A. E. Vidal, M. Sossou et al., “Role of XRCC1 in the coordination and stimulation of oxidative DNA damage repair initiated by the DNA glycosylase hOGG1,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 45, pp. 44068–44074, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Sakumi, Y. Tominaga, M. Furuichi et al., “Ogg1 knockout-associated lung tumorigenesis and its suppression by Mth1 gene disruption,” Cancer Research, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 902–905, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
M. T. Russo, G. De Luca, P. Degan et al., “Accumulation of the oxidative base lesion 8-hydroxyguanine in DNA of tumor-prone mice defective in both the Myh and Ogg1 DNA glycosylases,” Cancer Research, vol. 64, no. 13, pp. 4411–4414, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Hao, J. Wang, Y. Zhang et al., “Enzymatically inactive OGG1 binds to DNA and steers base excision repair toward gene transcription,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 7427–7441, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Wang, L. Gan, W. Nie, and Y. Geng, “TheOGG1Ser326Cys polymorphism and the risk of esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis,” Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 780–785, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Ali, I. Mahjabeen, M. Sabir, H. Mehmood, and M. A. Kayani, “OGG1 mutations and risk of female breast cancer: meta-analysis and experimental data,” Disease Markers, vol. 2015, Article ID 690878, 16 pages, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Vlahopoulos, M. Adamaki, N. Khoury, V. Zoumpourlis, and I. Boldogh, “Roles of DNA repair enzyme OGG1 in innate immunity and its significance for lung cancer,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 194, pp. 59–72, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Shinmura and J. Yokota, “The OGG1 gene encodes a repair enzyme for oxidatively damaged DNA and is involved in human carcinogenesis,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 597–609, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Torres-Gonzalez, T. Gawlowski, H. Kocalis, B. T. Scott, and W. H. Dillmann, “Mitochondrial 8-oxoguanine glycosylase decreases mitochondrial fragmentation and improves mitochondrial function in H9C2 cells under oxidative stress conditions,” American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology, vol. 306, no. 3, pp. C221–C229, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. W. Hyun, J. Y. Choi, H. H. Zeng et al., “Leukemic cell line, KG-1 has a functional loss of hOGG1 enzyme due to a point mutation and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine can kill KG-1,” Oncogene, vol. 19, no. 39, pp. 4476–4479, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Chatterjee, E. Mambo, and D. Sidransky, “Mitochondrial DNA mutations in human cancer,” Oncogene, vol. 25, no. 34, pp. 4663–4674, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Y. Chen, Y. Wang, R. Terkeltaub, and R. Liu-Bryan, “Activation of AMPK-SIRT3 signaling is chondroprotective by preserving mitochondrial DNA integrity and function,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1539–1550, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
S. J. Kim, P. Cheresh, D. Williams et al., “Mitochondria-targeted Ogg1 and aconitase-2 prevent oxidant-induced mitochondrial DNA damage in alveolar epithelial cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 289, no. 9, pp. 6165–6176, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Piao, K. C. Kim, K. A. Kang, P. Fernando, H. Herath, and J. W. Hyun, “Phloroglucinol attenuates ultraviolet B-induced 8-oxoguanine formation in human HaCaT keratinocytes through Akt and Erk-mediated Nrf2/Ogg1 signaling pathways,” Biomolecules & Therapeutics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 90–97, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Lagerwerf, M. G. Vrouwe, R. M. Overmeer, M. I. Fousteri, and L. H. Mullenders, “DNA damage response and transcription,” DNA Repair (Amst), vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 743–750, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Fleming, Y. Ding, and C. J. Burrows, “Oxidative DNA damage is epigenetic by regulating gene transcription via base excision repair,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 114, no. 10, pp. 2604–2609, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. Habib, A. Yadav, D. Kidane, R. H. Weiss, and S. Liang, “Novel protective mechanism of reducing renal cell damage in diabetes: activation AMPK by AICAR increased NRF2/OGG1 proteins and reduced oxidative DNA damage,” Cell Cycle, vol. 15, no. 22, pp. 3048–3059, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Hanna, T. Helleday, and O. Mortusewicz, “OGG1 inhibitor TH5487 alters OGG1 chromatin dynamics and prevents incisions,” Biomolecules, vol. 10, no. 11, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Wang, M. Maayah, J. B. Sweasy, and K. S. Alnajjar, “The role of cysteines in the structure and function of OGG1,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 296, article 100093, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Pan, B. Zhu, W. Hao et al., “Oxidized guanine base lesions function in 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase-1-mediated epigenetic regulation of nuclear factor κB-driven gene expression,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 291, no. 49, pp. 25553–25566, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Bravard, A. Campalans, M. Vacher et al., “Inactivation by oxidation and recruitment into stress granules of hOGG1 but not APE1 in human cells exposed to sub-lethal concentrations of cadmium,” Mutation Research, vol. 685, no. 1-2, pp. 61–69, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Morreall, K. Limpose, C. Sheppard, Y. W. Kow, E. Werner, and P. W. Doetsch, “Inactivation of a common OGG1 variant by TNF-alpha in mammalian cells,” DNA Repair (Amst), vol. 26, pp. 15–22, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Visnes, A. Cázares-Körner, W. Hao et al., “Small-molecule inhibitor of OGG1 suppresses proinflammatory gene expression and inflammation,” Science, vol. 362, no. 6416, pp. 834–839, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Tang and W. H. Yiu, “Innate immunity in diabetic kidney disease,” Nature Reviews. Nephrology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 206–222, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
P. G. Wells, Y. Bhuller, C. S. Chen et al., “Molecular and biochemical mechanisms in teratogenesis involving reactive oxygen species,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 207, Supplement 2, pp. 354–366, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Tumurkhuu, S. Chen, E. N. Montano et al., “Oxidative DNA damage accelerates skin inflammation in pristane-induced lupus model,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 11, article 554725, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
H. S. Kim, B. H. Kim, J. E. Jung et al., “Potential role of 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase 1 as a STAT1 coactivator in endotoxin-induced inflammatory response,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 93, pp. 12–22, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
A. P. Femia, C. Luceri, P. V. Soares, M. Lodovici, and G. Caderni, “Multiple mucin depleted foci, high proliferation and low apoptotic response in the onset of colon carcinogenesis of the PIRC rat, mutated in Apc,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 136, no. 6, pp. E488–E495, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
D. C. Wallace, “A mitochondrial bioenergetic etiology of disease,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 1405–1412, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
M. V. Nastase, J. Zeng-Brouwers, M. Wygrecka, and L. Schaefer, “Targeting renal fibrosis: mechanisms and drug delivery systems,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 129, pp. 295–307, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Cheng, X. Ren, A. S. Gowda et al., “Interaction of Sirt3 with OGG1 contributes to repair of mitochondrial DNA and protects from apoptotic cell death under oxidative stress,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 4, no. 7, article e731, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
A. S. Bause and M. C. Haigis, “SIRT3 regulation of mitochondrial oxidative stress,” Experimental Gerontology, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 634–639, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Kim, P. Cheresh, R. P. Jablonski, D. B. Williams, and D. W. Kamp, “The role of mitochondrial DNA in mediating alveolar epithelial cell apoptosis and pulmonary fibrosis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 21486–21519, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Loboda, M. Sobczak, A. Jozkowicz, and J. Dulak, “TGF-β1/Smads and miR-21 in renal fibrosis and inflammation,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2016, Article ID 8319283, 12 pages, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhang, X. Chen, P. Xue, X. Ma, J. Li, and J. Zhang, “FN1 promotes chondrocyte differentiation and collagen production via TGF-β/PI3K/Akt pathway in mice with femoral fracture,” Gene, vol. 769, article 145253, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Deng, W. Yang, D. Wang et al., “Peptide DR8 suppresses epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition via the TGF-β/MAPK signaling pathway in renal fibrosis,” Life Sciences, vol. 261, article 118465, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
V. B. Pillai, S. Bindu, W. Sharp et al., “Sirt3 protects mitochondrial DNA damage and blocks the development of doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy in mice,” American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 310, no. 8, pp. H962–H972, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Li, T. Xin, D. Li, C. Wang, H. Zhu, and H. Zhou, “Therapeutic effect of sirtuin 3 on ameliorating nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: the role of the ERK-CREB pathway and Bnip3-mediated mitophagy,” Redox Biology, vol. 18, pp. 229–243, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. Lin, F. C. Chang, C. Schrimpf et al., “Targeting endothelium-pericyte cross talk by inhibiting VEGF receptor signaling attenuates kidney microvascular rarefaction and fibrosis,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 178, no. 2, pp. 911–923, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. V. Ruchko, O. M. Gorodnya, V. M. Pastukh et al., “Hypoxia-induced oxidative base modifications in the VEGF hypoxia-response element are associated with transcriptionally active nucleosomes,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 352–359, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Sureshbabu, M. Syed, P. Das et al., “Inhibition of regulatory-associated protein of mechanistic target of rapamycin prevents hyperoxia-induced lung injury by enhancing autophagy and reducing apoptosis in neonatal mice,” American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 722–735, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Dezor, J. Dorszewska, J. Florczak et al., “P3-186: expression of 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase 1 (OGG1) and the level of p53 and TNF-alpha proteins in peripheral lymphocytes in patients with Alzheimer's disease,” Folia Neuropathologica, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 123–131, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhang, L. Misiara, G. J. Samaranayake et al., “OGG1 co-inhibition antagonizes the tumor-inhibitory effects of targeting MTH1,” Redox Biology, vol. 40, article 101848, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
S. K. Anand, A. Sharma, N. Singh, and P. Kakkar, “Entrenching role of cell cycle checkpoints and autophagy for maintenance of genomic integrity,” DNA Repair (Amst), vol. 86, article 102748, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Crighton, J. O'Prey, H. S. Bell, and K. M. Ryan, “p73 regulates DRAM-independent autophagy that does not contribute to programmed cell death,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1071–1079, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Liu, J. Lou, T. Wen et al., “Depending on the stage of hepatosteatosis, p53 causes apoptosis primarily through either DRAM-induced autophagy or BAX,” Liver International, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1566–1574, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Crighton, S. Wilkinson, J. O'Prey et al., “DRAM, a p53-induced modulator of autophagy, is critical for apoptosis,” Cell, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 121–134, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Jia, B. Bissa, L. Brecht et al., “AMPK, a regulator of metabolism and autophagy, is activated by lysosomal damage via a novel galectin-directed ubiquitin signal transduction system,” Molecular Cell, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 951–969.e9, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Li, S. He, and B. Ma, “Autophagy and autophagy-related proteins in cancer,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 12, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Noda, “Regulation of autophagy through TORC1 and mTORC1,” Biomolecules, vol. 7, no. 3, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Zachari and I. G. Ganley, “The mammalian ULK1 complex and autophagy initiation,” Essays in Biochemistry, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 585–596, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Maiuri, L. Galluzzi, E. Morselli, O. Kepp, S. A. Malik, and G. Kroemer, “Autophagy regulation by p53,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 181–185, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Muñoz-Gámez, J. M. Rodríguez-Vargas, R. Quiles-Pérez et al., “PARP-1 is involved in autophagy induced by DNA damage,” Autophagy, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 61–74, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Yoon, S. G. Ahn, B. H. Lee, S. H. Jung, and S. H. Oh, “Role of autophagy in chemoresistance: regulation of the ATM-mediated DNA-damage signaling pathway through activation of DNA-PKcs and PARP-1,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 747–757, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
J. M. Rodríguez-Vargas, M. J. Ruiz-Magaña, C. Ruiz-Ruiz et al., “ROS-induced DNA damage and PARP-1 are required for optimal induction of starvation-induced autophagy,” Cell Research, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1181–1198, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Robert, F. Vanoli, I. Chiolo et al., “HDACs link the DNA damage response, processing of double-strand breaks and autophagy,” Nature, vol. 471, no. 7336, pp. 74–79, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Shen, D. Oswald, D. Phelps et al., “Regulation of FANCD2 by the mTOR pathway contributes to the resistance of cancer cells to DNA double-strand breaks,” Cancer Research, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 3393–3401, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Chen, Z. Ma, R. P. Vanderwaal et al., “The mTOR inhibitor rapamycin suppresses DNA double-strand break repair,” Radiation Research, vol. 175, no. 2, pp. 214–224, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Siggens, N. Figg, M. Bennett, and R. Foo, “Nutrient deprivation regulates DNA damage repair in cardiomyocytes via loss of the base-excision repair enzyme OGG1,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 2117–2124, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Liu, R. Beri, A. Mueller, and D. W. Kamp, “Molecular mechanisms of asbestos-induced lung epithelial cell apoptosis,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 188, no. 2, pp. 309–318, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Wang, C. Li, P. Qiao et al., “OGG1-initiated base excision repair exacerbates oxidative stress-induced parthanatos,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 9, no. 6, p. 628, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Vartanian, J. Tumova, P. Dobrzyn et al., “8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (OGG1) deficiency elicits coordinated changes in lipid and mitochondrial metabolism in muscle,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 7, article e0181687, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Komakula, J. Tumova, D. Kumaraswamy et al., “The DNA repair protein OGG1 protects against obesity by altering mitochondrial energetics in white adipose tissue,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, article 14886, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
L. I. Rachek, N. P. Thornley, V. I. Grishko, S. P. LeDoux, and G. L. Wilson, “Protection of INS-1 cells from free fatty acid-induced apoptosis by targeting hOGG1 to mitochondria,” Diabetes, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 1022–1028, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Chevillard, J. P. Radicella, C. Levalois et al., “Mutations in OGG1 , a gene involved in the repair of oxidative DNA damage, are found in human lung and kidney tumours,” Oncogene, vol. 16, no. 23, pp. 3083–3086, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kakehashi, N. Ishii, T. Okuno, M. Fujioka, M. Gi, and H. Wanibuchi, “Enhanced susceptibility of Ogg1 mutant mice to multiorgan carcinogenesis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 18, no. 8, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Tsuruya, M. Furuichi, Y. Tominaga et al., “Accumulation of 8-oxoguanine in the cellular DNA and the alteration of the OGG1 expression during ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat kidney,” DNA Repair (Amst), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 211–229, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Liu, X. Liu, J. Zhou, and T. Li, “Mitochondrial DNA is a vital driving force in ischemia-reperfusion injury in cardiovascular diseases,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2022, Article ID 6235747, 19 pages, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Bliksøen, A. Baysa, L. Eide et al., “Mitochondrial DNA damage and repair during ischemia-reperfusion injury of the heart,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 78, pp. 9–22, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Hanna, M. Michel, T. Helleday, and O. Mortusewicz, “NEIL1 and NEIL2 are recruited as potential backup for OGG1 upon OGG1 depletion or inhibition by TH5487,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 22, no. 9, p. 4542, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Qin, P. Lin, Q. Wu et al., “Small-molecule inhibitor of 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase 1 regulates inflammatory responses during Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 205, no. 8, pp. 2231–2242, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Kwiecinski and A. R. Horswill, “Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: pathogenesis and regulatory mechanisms,” Current Opinion in Microbiology, vol. 53, pp. 51–60, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. R. Bartz, P. Fu, H. B. Suliman et al., “Staphylococcus aureus sepsis induces early renal mitochondrial DNA repair and mitochondrial biogenesis in mice,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 7, article e100912, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Ba, L. Aguilera-Aguirre, Q. T. Rashid et al., “The role of 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase-1 in inflammation,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 16975–16997, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. R. Bartz, H. B. Suliman, P. Fu et al., “Staphylococcus aureus sepsis and mitochondrial accrual of the 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase DNA repair enzyme in mice,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 183, no. 2, pp. 226–233, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. G. Mabley, P. Pacher, A. Deb, R. Wallace, R. H. Elder, and C. Szabó, “Potential role for 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase in regulating inflammation,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 290–292, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Touati, V. Michel, J. M. Thiberge et al., “Deficiency in OGG1 protects against inflammation and mutagenic effects associated with H. pylori infection in mouse,” Helicobacter, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 494–505, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Gu, H. Yang, X. Sheng et al., “Kidney disease genetic risk variants alter lysosomal beta-mannosidase (MANBA) expression and disease severity,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 13, no. 576, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. C. Tarng, T. J. Tsai, W. T. Chen, T. Y. Liu, and Y. H. Wei, “Effect of human OGG1 1245C-->G gene polymorphism on 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine levels of leukocyte DNA among patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 2338–2347, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Ma, H. Ming, L. Liu et al., “OGG1 in lung-more than base excision repair,” Antioxidants (Basel), vol. 11, no. 5, p. 933, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Fan Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

725

Downloads

586

Citations