Review Article

Natural Antioxidant Activity of Commonly Consumed Plant Foods in India: Effect of Domestic Processing

Table 4

Effect of domestic processing on DPPH activity of commonly consumed green leafy vegetables.

Sl. no.Common nameBotanical nameDPPH (mg/100 g Trolox Eq.)
RawConventionalPressure Microwave

1AmaranthAmaranthus gangeticus 405.6a
(100)
520b
(128)
527b
(129)
476b
(117)
2Ambat chukkaRumex vesicarius 85.3 
(100)
87
(101)
83
(97)
94
(110)
3Coriander leavesCoriandrum sativum 471.0a
(100)
886b
(181)
948b
(201)
1100c
(233)
4Curry leavesMurraya koenigii 1020.6a
(100)
950b
(93)
1724c
(168)
1418d
(138)
5Fennel leavesFoeniculum vulgare 545.3
(100)
592
(108)
540
(99)
746
(136)
6Fenugreek leavesTrigonella foenum-graecum 144.3
(100)
142
(98)
127
(87)
193
(134)
7Purslane leavesPortulaca oleracea 138.3
(100)
162
(117)
165
(119)
151
(109)
8GoguHibiscus cannabinus 346.0
(100)
365
(105)
334
(96)
456
(131)
9MintMentha spicata 1368.6
(100)
2055
(150)
1856
(135)
2020
(147)
10PonnagantiAlternanthera sessilis 173.0
(100)
172
(99)
203
(117)
198
(114)
11SpinachSpinacia oleracea 21.6a  
(100)
69b
(321)
85c
(393)
104d
(481)

Mean values were compared by nonparametric Kruskal wallis one way ANOVA. Differences in alphabets are significantly different at P < 0.05. Percent gain or loss calculated when raw value taken as 100%. Percent recovery values are given in parentheses. Decimal points are not given due to higher numbers.