Review Article

Natural Antioxidant Activity of Commonly Consumed Plant Foods in India: Effect of Domestic Processing

Table 3

Effect of domestic processing on polyphenol content of commonly consumed green leafy vegetables.

Sl. no.Common nameBotanical namePhenolic content (mg/100 g Gallic acid Eq.)
RawConventionalPressure Microwave

1AmaranthAmaranthus gangeticus 253.0a
(100)
275b
(108)
355c
(140)
312d
(123)
2Ambat chukkaRumex vesicarius 100.3 
(100)
90 
(89)
93 
(92)
91
(91)
3Coriander leavesCoriandrum sativum 239.6a
(100)
417b
(174)
451c
(188)
506d
(211)
4Curry leavesMurraya koenigii 1077.0a
(100)
1434b
(133)
1184c
(109)
1377d
(127)
5Fennel leavesFoeniculum vulgare 251.3 
(100)
268 
(106)
265 
(105)
312
(124)
6Fenugreek leavesTrigonella foenum-graecum 163.3a
(100)
180a
(110)
176a
(107)
220b
(134)
7Purslane leavesPortulaca oleracea 94.6a
(100)
128b
(135)
138b
(146)
128b
(135)
8Sorrel leavesHibiscus cannabinus 191.3 
(100)
194 
(101)
211 
(107)
213
(111)
9MintMentha spicata 440.3a
(100)
657b
(149)
796c
(180)
761c
(172)
10Water amaranthAlternanthera sessilis 136.3 
(100)
122 
(89)
110 
(80)
123
(90)
11SpinachSpinacia oleracea 77.0a
(100)
96b
(125)
125c
(162)
117c
(152)

Mean values were compared by nonparametric Kruskal Wallis one way ANOVA. Differences in alphabets are significantly different at P < 0.05. Percent gain or loss calculated when raw value taken as 100%. Percent recovery values are given in parentheses. Decimal points are not given due to higher numbers.