miRNAs-Based Molecular Signature for <i>KRAS</i> Mutated and Wild Type Colorectal Cancer: An Explorative Study

Milanesi, Elena; Dobre, Maria; Bucuroiu, Alina Ioana; Herlea, Vlad; Manuc, Teodora Ecaterina; Salvi, Alessandro; De Petro, Giuseppina; Manuc, Mircea; Becheanu, Gabriel

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4927120

Journal of Immunology Research

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Inflammation in Cancer: Part of the Problem or Part of the Solution? 2020

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 4927120 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4927120

miRNAs-Based Molecular Signature for KRAS Mutated and Wild Type Colorectal Cancer: An Explorative Study

Elena Milanesi,¹Maria Dobre,¹Alina Ioana Bucuroiu,²Vlad Herlea,³Teodora Ecaterina Manuc,^2,3Alessandro Salvi,⁴Giuseppina De Petro,⁴Mircea Manuc,^2,3and Gabriel Becheanu^1,2,3

Guest Editor: Donato Zipeto

Received27 Mar 2020

Revised19 May 2020

Accepted27 May 2020

Published23 Jun 2020

Abstract

microRNAs (miRNAs) have been proposed as promising molecular biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and responsive therapeutic targets in different types of cancer, including colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study, we evaluated the expression levels of 84 cancer-associated miRNAs in a cohort of 39 human samples comprising 13 peritumoral and 26 tumoral tissues from surgical specimens of CRC patients. KRAS mutations were detected in 11 tumoral samples. In a first analysis, we found 5 miRNAs (miR-215-5p, miR-9-5p, miR-138-5p, miR378a-3p, and miR-150-5p) that were significantly downregulated and one upregulated (miR-135b-5p) in tumoral tissues compared with the peritumoral tissues. Furthermore, by comparing miRNA profile between KRAS mutated CRC tissues respect to wild type CRC tissues, we found 7 miRNA (miR-27b-3p, miR-191-5p, miR-let7d-5p, miR-15b-5p, miR-98-5p, miR-10a-5p, and miR-149-5p) downregulated in KRAS mutated condition. In conclusion, we have identified a panel of miRNAs that specifically distinguish CRC tissues from peritumoral tissue and a different set of miRNAs specific for CRC with KRAS mutations. These findings may contribute to the discovering of new molecular biomarkers with clinic relevance and might shed light on novel molecular aspects of CRC.

1. Introduction

According to GLOBOCAN 2018 (Global Cancer Observatory), colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide and the fourth most incident cancer in the world, with a higher incidence among men [1]. Although advances in early detection and treatment options have reduced CRC mortality in developed nations, these countries remain those at the highest risk. 70-80% of cases of CRC occur sporadically and depend on risk factors that include history ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease [2], but also constellation of modifiable environmental factors, more frequent in western countries, which include obesity, physical inactivity, poor diets, alcohol drinking, and smoking [3]. Approximately 25% of CRC patients have a positive family history of CRC, suggesting a specific contribution of inherited genetic factors [4]. Multiple whole-genome sequencing studies have been performed so far; however, only a small number of genetic variants have been successfully replicated in independent cohorts [5]. Moreover, it has been estimated that only 5%–10% of CRC are due to inherited mutations in well-known cancer-related genes [6]. Three canonical major distinct genetic pathways have been attributed to the development of sporadic CRC. These are not mutually exclusive and include the chromosomal instability pathway (CIN), the microsatellite instability pathway (MSI), and the CpG island methylator phenotype pathway (CIMP) [7]. The CIN pathway is the most frequent; it involves the classic adenoma-carcinoma sequence and genetic alterations in adenomatous polyposis coli—APC—(30–70%) and Kirsten Rat Sarcoma viral antigen homolog—KRAS—(30–50%). The CIMP pathway, reported in the 20-30% of sporadic CRC [8], involves the serrated neoplasia pathway and mutations in KRAS 10% (usually B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase—BRAF—wild type) and BRAF~70% [9]. The MSI pathway can involve both serrated neoplasia or adenoma-carcinoma sequence, which is characterized by mutations in KRAS 10%, BRAF~70% [10], and mutations in mismatch repair genes for Lynch syndrome.

In general, mutations of KRAS gene have been detected in approximately 40% of patients with CRC [11, 12]. These mutations are single nucleotide point variations and the most frequent are G12D, G12A, G12R, G12C, G12S, G12V, and G13D. In the codon 12, the mutations, G12D and G12V, are the most frequent, whereas in codon 13, the most frequent is G13D [13]. However, KRAS mutations also occur in codons 18, 61, 117, and 146, but at low frequencies compared with codons 12/13. The evaluation of KRAS mutation status in CRC patients has a crucial prognostic role, since patients carrying KRAS mutations have a poor response to anti-EGFR therapy [14, 15] and show an increased cumulative incidence of metastatic disease [16].

microRNAs are 19-22 nucleotide-long noncoding RNAs that regulate gene expression mainly at posttranscriptional level by binding to the 3 untranslated region (3’UTR) of target mRNAs. Dysregulation of micro-RNAs expression levels has been observed in several human diseases, including cancers [17].

As the oncogene KRAS has been found upregulated in many human malignancies [18], the regulation of KRAS by miRNAs has drawn attention in the field, since specific miRNAs can act as tumor suppressor by targeting KRAS [19] also in CRC [20]. Indeed, even though miRNAs are not directly involved in mutagenesis mechanism nor modify the onset of mutations, they are key actors in inhibiting overexpressed mRNAs of genes harboring activating mutations such as APC, TP53, KRAS, and BRAF [21].

In this study, we aim to: (1) identify miRNAs differentially expressed between tumoral and peritumoral tissues from patients with CRC and (2) identify miRNAs differentially expressed in KRAS mutated patients versus Wild Type patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Human Tissue Samples

Twenty-six tumoral and thirteen corresponding peritumoral surgical specimens were collected from patients with primary CRC who underwent tumor surgical resection at “Fundeni” Clinical Institute in Bucharest, Romania. The specimens have been preserved in RNA later. The present study has been approved by the local ethics committee (registration number 291 of 8^th March 2016) and carried out in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki). All the patients recruited have signed a written informed consent. All samples were examined by one experienced pathologist, and the socio-demographic and clinical information of the considered cohort are listed in Table 1.

2.2. KRAS Mutation Detection and miRNAs Expression Analysis

DNA has been isolated with QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Total RNA, including miRNAs, has been isolated from RNA later preserved tissues using miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Both isolations have been performed using the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA and DNA quality and quantity were assessed by spectrophotometric method (NanoDrop 2000, Thermo Scientific) with both 260/280 nm and 260/230 nm parameters >1.8. KRAS mutations (in codons 12, 13, 61) were identified through pyrosequencing analysis using CEIVD marked PyroMark KRAS kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocols on PyroMark Q24 instrument (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and analyzed by Pyro Mark Q24 1.0.6.3 software as previously reported [22]. Reverse transcription of 500 ng of total RNA was performed with the miScript II RT Kit (Qiagen), and the expression of a panel including 84 miRNAs was evaluated with miScript™ miRNA PCR ArrayHuman Cancer PathwayFinder (MIHS-102Z, Qiagen) and miScript SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen). This panel includes miRNAs previously correlated with the diagnosis, staging, progression, or prognosis of various cancers or tumors. Each array contains several control assays: six different snoRNA/snRNA as a normalization control for the array data (SNORD61, SNORD68, SNORD7, SNORD95, SNORD96A, RNU6B/RNU6-2), miRNA reverse transcription control (RTC) and positive PCR control (PPC). The miRNA expression was calculated by the 2−ΔCT method normalizing on the geometric mean of three controls (SNORD61, SNORD95, and SNORD96A) [23]. These three miRNAs have been chosen based on the RefFinder algorithm [24].

2.3. In Silico microRNA Target Identification

miRNA target identification has been performed using miRTarBase that comprises more than three hundred and sixty thousand miRNA-target interactions which are experimentally validated by reporter assay, western blot, microarray, and next-generation sequencing experiments [25]. A pathway analysis on the validated targets has been performed with KEGG through Enrichr, a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server [26]. The analysis of the predicted oncogenes and tumor suppressors targeted by the selected miRNAs has been performed using miRWalk 2.0 (http://mirwalk.umm.uni-heidelberg.de/), and the total number of significantly enriched genes was calculated using Fisher’s exact test ().

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were tested by means of the chi-square test and continuous variables with the -test. The normality of data distribution of each miRNA level was evaluated using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Since data were not normally distributed, differences in miRNA expression between Tumoral and Peritumoral tissues were assessed using the Mann–Whitney test. A further analysis for the 13 tumoral samples with the matched peritumoral tissues has been performed using a paired-sample -test. miRNAs expression differences among the three groups were evaluated using the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test followed by pairwise tests. miRNA levels changes were considered significant between the groups when the value was <0.05 and the fold regulation (FR) was FR >2 or FR <-2. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS version 17.0).

3. Results

In this study, we evaluated the expression of 84 cancer-associated miRNAs known to play a pivotal role in tumor onset and progression. The general expression of each miRNA in terms of Ct range is shown in Supplementary data (Table S1). In a first analysis, we compared the miRNAs expression profile between peritumoral and tumoral CRC tissues from surgical specimens (including those with and without KRAS mutations). KRAS mutations were not identified in peritumoral tissues. The two groups were homogenous for age and sex. We found six miRNAs differentially expressed, five downregulated and one upregulated in tumoral tissues compared to peritumoral tissues (Table 2). The graphic representation of the significant miRNAs is shown in Figure 1. We further performed a paired analysis for the 13 tumoral samples with the matched peritumoral tissues. The results showed that miR-215-5p was significantly downregulated also in the small group (, ). miR-9-5p, miR-138-5p, miR-378a-3p, miR-150-5p, and miR-135b-5p maintained the same trend of expression obtained considering all the cases, with a fold regulation of -1.49, -1.92, -1.73, -1.77, and +3.82, respectively. However, for these miRNAs, the statistical significance was lost.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

In a second analysis, we focused on the differences of miRNA profile between wild type and KRAS mutated tumoral tissues performing a comparison between the two groups. We found that 7 miRNAs were downregulated in patients carrying KRAS mutations compared to wild type patients. These results are reported in Table 3 and in Figure 2.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

3.1. microRNA Target Identification and Pathway Analysis

The identification of the mRNA targets has been performed for the most significant miRNAs up- and downregulated in the comparison between tumoral and peritumoral tissues, miR-135b-5p and miR-215-5p, respectively, and for the most downregulated miRNA in tumoral tissues with KRAS mutations vs tumoral wild type tissues (miR-27b-3p). Only experimentally validated targets have been considered. Among the validated targets, we reported those directly involved in CRC pathway according to KEGG pathway analysis (Table 4). We have also reported the total number of the significantly enriched oncogenes and tumor suppressors predicted to be targeted by the selected miRNAs using miRWalk.

4. Discussion

In this exploratory study, we analyzed a cohort of 39 samples representing 13 peritumoral and 26 tumoral tissues from surgical specimens of CRC patients, in order to identify a specific miRNAs molecular signature of CRC able to discriminate PT tissues from CRC tissues and CRC KRAS mutated tissues from CRC wild type tissues, by analyzing 84 candidate miRNAs by qPCR array. This analysis identified 5 miRNA (miR-215-5p, miR-9-5p, miR-138-5p, miR378a-3p, and miR-150-5p) that were significantly downregulated and one upregulated (miR-135b-5p) in tumoral tissues compared with the peritumoral control group. We further stratified the tumoral tissues according to the presence (T_M) or lack (T_WT) of KRAS mutations, and we compared the miRNAs profile of the two groups to assess the miRNAs differentially expressed in CRC mutated respect to CRC wild type. We identified 7 miRNAs (miR-27b-3p, miR-191-5p, miR-let7d-5p, miR-10a-5p, miR-15b-5p, miR-98-5p, and miR-149-5p) all downregulated in KRAS mutation carriers compared to the wild type patients.

Consistent with our findings, most of the miRNAs identified in the first comparison have been previously reported to be significantly dysregulated in CRC, and they play important roles in tumor development. Recently, Falzone and collaborators performed an integrated analysis of 10 miRNAs datasets carrying out a bioinformatics analysis on 703 samples (262 normal tissues and 441 samples of colorectal carcinoma) [18]. They identified 20 significant differentially expressed miRNAs (10 downregulated and 10 upregulated) between colorectal cancer samples and normal tissues in at least 3 of 10 datasets. Among these miRNAs, in line with our findings, the authors identified miR-135b-5p (upregulated), and miR-378-3p, miR-150-5p, miR-215-5p (downregulated). The miR-215-5p has been predicted to target CXCL2 in CRC cell lines (HT29) [27]. Interestingly, CXCL2 has been found upregulated in inflamed mucosa compared to not inflamed mucosa of patients with ulcerative colitis [28], a condition that increases the risk of CRC. Another study demonstrated that miR-138-5p was significantly downregulated in CRC tissue samples and cell lines and showed that its overexpression delayed cell proliferation, reduced colony formation, and increased apoptosis in CRC cell lines [29, 30]. No studies showing differential expression of miR-9-5p between peritumoral and tumoral tissues are reported. However, miR-9-5p has been indicated a prognostic biomarker in CRC [31, 32].

Regarding the seven miRNAs, we found downregulated in KRAS mutation carriers compared to the WT, they have been all found implicated in CRC onset and progression, but no study has directly linked them to KRAS mutations. miR-27b-3p promoted migration and invasion in colorectal cancer cells by targeting HOXA10/integrin β1 cell signal axis [33]. A decrease of its levels has been observed in oxaliplatin-resistant cell lines suggesting this miRNA as valuable therapeutic target for CRC, especially for patients with chemoresistance [34]. Moreover, miR-27b-3p has also been found associated with other types of cancer showing a significant downregulation in gastric cancer cell lines and tissues compared with the normal group [35].

A single study associated a dysregulation of miR-191-5p in colon adenocarcinoma, suggesting this miRNA as possible prognostic marker [36], miR-191-5p has a relevant role in other types of cancer, including renal cell carcinoma [37] and osteosarcoma [38]. miRNAs let-7 family members generally promote differentiation during development and function as tumor suppressors in various cancers [39], and Let-7d regulation of KRAS has previously been shown [40]. Recent data indicated that let-7d-5p increases sensitivity to trifluridine, a key component of the antitumor drug trifluridine/tipiracil for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies, suggesting this miRNA as a potential clinical marker of treatment sensitivity [41]. Moreover, miR-let-7d-5p was found upregulated in paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples of CRC patients compared to controls [42], without any data being reported in KRAS mutated samples. Recently, an in situ hybridization array approach, using paraffin-embedded biopsies of colorectal primary tumors, studied the expression levels of 1436 miRNAs in 192 samples. The miRNA profile has been associated with clinical and histopathological features indicating that miR-10a-5p is correlated with relevant histopathological features, including stroma abundance, tumor grade, peritumoral inflammatory infiltrates, mucin type, and tumor location [43]. Moreover, this miRNA was found associated with tumor localization being less abundant in the right colon compared to the left colon and rectum [44].

MiR-15b-5p was associated with different types of cancer, such as ovarian cancer [45], liver cancer [46], neuroblastoma [47]. In CRC, this miRNA has been suggested as potential therapeutic target for CRC treatment, particularly for 5-FU-resistant CRC [48] and potential target for metastatic CRC therapy [49]. Also, its levels could be useful to distinguish between CRC or its precancerous lesion (advanced adenomas) and healthy individuals controls [50]. MiR-98-5p levels have been found dysregulated in different types of cancer cells, such as nonsmall cell lung carcinoma [51], prostate cancer [52], and breast cancer [53]. In relation to CRC, this miRNA has been identified in human colon carcinoma cell line LIM1863--shed microvesicles [54]. Moreover, this miRNA is a member of a panel of six miRNAs that seem to predict treatment response to fluoropyrimidine containing first-line systemic treatment in patients with mCRC when combined with four clinicopathological factors [55]. In our study, miR-149-5p resulted downmodulated in KRAS mutated samples vs wild type; it has been demonstrated that LncRNA PCAT-1 regulated cell proliferation, invasion, migration, and apoptosis in colorectal cancer through targeting miR-149-5p [56], and according to our results, miR-149-5p resulted downregulated in CRC, likely acting as a tumor suppressor in CRC [57].

Clearly, there are some limitations for this study. Firstly, data regarding cancer evolution are not yet available, so the prognostic value of the identified miRNAs cannot be assessed. Secondly, another limitation is the relatively small sample size of the subgroup of the KRAS mutated samples.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the novelty of our work is the identification of a panel of miRNAs that resulted in dysregulated in CRC tissues compared to their normal adjacent tissues. The specific identification of a different set of miRNAs (all downregulated) in KRAS mutated CRC tissues respect to wild type CRC tissues could suggest their putative role as responsive molecular targets (i.e., by ectopically modifying their expression levels). These data could help to identify novel strategies to improve the efficacy of the therapy, mainly in the subgroup of patients with KRAS mutations. More studies and a wide cohort are needed to support the conclusions of our explorative study.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article and in the Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contributions

Elena Milanesi and Maria Dobre contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the patients involved in the study for the generous collaboration. This work was funded by the Ministry of Education and Research in Romania under grants no. 7PFE/16.10.2018 and PN 1N/2019_19.29.01.05.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1: gene expression range of all the 84 miRNAs measured in tumoral CRC and peritumoral samples. The expression is reported as qPCR Ct range value. (Supplementary Materials)

References

F. Bray, J. Ferlay, I. Soerjomataram, R. L. Siegel, L. A. Torre, and A. Jemal, “Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 394–424, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. W. Stidham and P. D. R. Higgins, “Colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease,” Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 168–178, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Keum and E. Giovannucci, “Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 713–732, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Montazeri, X. Li, C. Nyiraneza et al., “Systematic meta-analyses, field synopsis and global assessment of the evidence of genetic association studies in colorectal cancer,” Gut, pp. 1–12, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Tanskanen, L. van den Berg, N. Välimäki et al., “Genome-wide association study and meta-analysis in Northern European populations replicate multiple colorectal cancer risk loci,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 142, no. 3, pp. 540–546, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yamagishi, H. Kuroda, Y. Imai, and H. Hiraishi, “Molecular pathogenesis of sporadic colorectal cancers,” Chinese Journal of Cancer, vol. 35, no. 1, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fischer, L. C. Walker, B. A. Robinson, F. A. Frizelle, J. M. Church, and T. W. Eglinton, “Clinical implications of the genetics of sporadic colorectal cancer,” ANZ Journal of Surgery, vol. 89, no. 10, pp. 1224–1229, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. L. Cionca, M. Dobre, C. M. Dobrea, C. I. Iosif, M. V. Comănescu, and C. M. Ardeleanu, “Mutational status of KRAS and MMR genes in a series of colorectal carcinoma cases,” Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 121–129, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
D. J. Weisenberger, K. D. Siegmund, M. Campan et al., “CpG island methylator phenotype underlies sporadic microsatellite instability and is tightly associated with BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer,” Nature Genetics, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 787–793, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. H. Russo, C. A. Bellía, and A. W. Bodas, “Exercise-induced asthma (EIA): its prevention with the combined use of ipratropium bromide and fenoterol,” Respiration, vol. 50, Supplement 2, no. 2, pp. 258–261, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Tosi, E. Magni, A. Amatu et al., “Effect of KRAS and BRAF mutations on survival of metastatic colorectal cancer after liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Clinical Colorectal Cancer, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. e153–e163, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Dinu, M. Dobre, E. Panaitescu et al., “Prognostic significance of KRAS gene mutations in colorectal cancer--preliminary study,” Journal of Medicine and Life, vol. 7, pp. 581–587, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Neumann, E. Zeindl-Eberhart, T. Kirchner, and A. Jung, “Frequency and type of KRAS mutations in routine diagnostic analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer,” Pathology, Research and Practice, vol. 205, no. 12, pp. 858–862, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Van Cutsem, A. Cervantes, R. Adam et al., “ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1386–1422, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Dobre, D. E. Dinu, E. Panaitescu et al., “KRAS gene mutations - prognostic factor in colorectal cancer?” Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology, vol. 56, 2, Supplement, pp. 671–678, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
K. W. Brudvik, S. E. Kopetz, L. Li, C. Conrad, T. A. Aloia, and J.-N. Vauthey, “Meta-analysis of KRAS mutations and survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases,” The British Journal of Surgery, vol. 102, no. 10, pp. 1175–1183, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Peng and C. M. Croce, “The role of MicroRNAs in human cancer,” Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, vol. 1, no. 1, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Falzone, L. Scola, A. Zanghì et al., “Integrated analysis of colorectal cancer microRNA datasets: identification of microRNAs associated with tumor development,” Aging, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1000–1014, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. A. Mokhlis, R. Bayraktar, N. N. Kabil et al., “The modulatory role of MicroRNA-873 in the progression of KRAS-driven cancers,” Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids, vol. 14, pp. 301–317, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. A. Mokhlis, R. Bayraktar, N. N. Kabil et al., “Concurrent Targeting of KRAS and AKT by MiR-4689 Is a Novel Treatment Against Mutant KRAS Colorectal Cancer,” Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids, vol. 4, article e231, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Shen, X. Han, J. Wang et al., “Prognostic impact of mutation profiling in patients with stage II and III colon cancer,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 24310, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Dobre, M. Comănescu, D. Arsene, C. Iosif, and G. Bussolati, “K-ras gene mutation status in colorectal cancer: comparative analysis of pyrosequencing and PCR-RFLP,” Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 567–574, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Faranda, I. Grossi, M. Manganelli et al., “Differential expression profiling of long non-coding RNA GAS5 and miR-126-3p in human cancer cells in response to sorafenib,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 9118, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Xie, P. Xiao, D. Chen, L. Xu, and B. Zhang, “miRDeepFinder: a miRNA analysis tool for deep sequencing of plant small RNAs,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-H. Chou, S. Shrestha, C. D. Yang et al., “miRTarBase update 2018: a resource for experimentally validated microRNA-target interactions,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 46, no. D1, pp. D296–D302, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. V. Kuleshov, M. R. Jones, A. D. Rouillard et al., “Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 44, no. W1, pp. W90–W97, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Wu, M. Zikusoka, A. Trindade et al., “MicroRNAs Are Differentially Expressed in Ulcerative Colitis and Alter Expression of Macrophage Inflammatory Peptide-2α,” Gastroenterology, vol. 135, no. 5, pp. 1624–1635.e24, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Dobre, E. Milanesi, T. E. Mănuc et al., “Differential intestinal mucosa transcriptomic biomarkers for Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis,” Journal of Immunology Research, vol. 2018, Article ID 9208274, 10 pages, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, Y. Zhao, W. Cao et al., “miR-138-5p acts as a tumor suppressor by targeting hTERT in human colorectal cancer,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 11516–11525, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Zhao, H. Yu, S. Yi et al., “The tumor suppressor miR-138-5p targets PD-L1 in colorectal cancer,” Oncotarget, vol. 7, no. 29, pp. 45370–45384, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Yang, Y. Zhang, and J. Yang, “A five-microRNA signature as prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer by bioinformatics analysis,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 9, p. 1207, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Nishiuchi, S. Hisamori, M. Sakaguchi et al., “MicroRNA-9-5p-CDX2 Axis: A Useful Prognostic Biomarker for Patients with Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer,” Cancers, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 1891, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Yang, J. Chen, Y. Liao et al., “MiR-27b-3p promotes migration and invasion in colorectal cancer cells by targeting HOXA10,” Bioscience Reports, vol. 39, no. 12, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Sun, J. Li, L. Zhou et al., “The c-Myc/miR-27b-3p/ATG10 regulatory axis regulates chemoresistance in colorectal cancer,” Theranostics, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1981–1996, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Zhang, Y. Zou, and D.-Q. Dai, “Downregulation of microRNA-27b-3p via aberrant DNA methylation contributes to malignant behavior of gastric cancer cells by targeting GSPT1,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 119, p. 109417, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X.-Y. Chen, J. Zhang, L. D. Hou et al., “Upregulation of PD-L1 predicts poor prognosis and is associated with miR-191-5p dysregulation in colon adenocarcinoma,” International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology, vol. 32, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Chen, X. Pan, L. Zhao et al., “MicroRNA-191-5p exerts a tumor suppressive role in renal cell carcinoma,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1686–1693, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Chen, Z.-Y. Zheng, J.-Z. Yang, and X.-G. Li, “MicroRNA-191-5p promotes the development of osteosarcoma via targeting EGR1 and activating the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 3611–3620, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Lee, S. Han, C. S. Kwon, and D. Lee, “Biogenesis and regulation of the let-7 miRNAs and their functional implications,” Protein & Cell, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 100–113, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. B. Choo, Y. L. Soon, P. N. N. Nguyen, M. S. Y. Hiew, and C.-J. Huang, “MicroRNA-5p and -3p co-expression and cross-targeting in colon cancer cells,” Journal of Biomedical Science, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 95, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Tsunekuni, M. Konno, A. Asai et al., “MicroRNA profiles involved in trifluridine resistance,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 32, pp. 53017–53027, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Ozcan, M. Kara, O. Yumrutas, E. Bozgeyik, I. Bozgeyik, and O. I. Celik, “MTUS1 and its targeting miRNAs in colorectal carcinoma: significant associations,” Tumour Biology, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 6637–6645, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. C. Moreno, A. Pascual, D. Prieto-Cuadra et al., “Novel Molecular Characterization of Colorectal Primary Tumors Based on miRNAs,” Cancers, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 346, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Schee, S. Lorenz, M. M. Worren et al., “Deep sequencing the MicroRNA transcriptome in colorectal cancer,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 6, article e66165, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Miao, J. Wang, L. Xuan, and X. Liu, “LncRNA TTN-AS1 acts as sponge for miR-15b-5p to regulate FBXW7 expression in ovarian cancer,” BioFactors, pp. 1–8, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Dong, N. Zhang, S. Zhao, X. Chen, F. Li, and X. Tao, “miR-221-3p and miR-15b-5p promote cell proliferation and invasion by targeting Axin 2 in liver cancer,” Oncology Letters, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 6491–6500, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Chava, C. P. Reynolds, A. S. Pathania et al., “miR-15a-5p, miR-15b-5p, and miR-16-5p inhibit tumor progression by directly targeting MYCN in neuroblastoma,” Molecular Oncology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 180–196, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Zhao, Q. Zhao, C. Zhang et al., “miR-15b-5p resensitizes colon cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil by promoting apoptosis via the NF-κB/XIAP axis,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 4194, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L.-N. Sun, Z. Zhi, L.-Y. Chen et al., “SIRT1 suppresses colorectal cancer metastasis by transcriptional repression of miR-15b-5p,” Cancer Letters, vol. 409, pp. 104–115, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Marcuello, S. Duran-Sanchon, L. Moreno et al., “Analysis of A 6-Mirna Signature in Serum from Colorectal Cancer Screening Participants as Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Advanced Adenoma and Colorectal Cancer Detection,” Cancers, vol. 11, no. 10, p. 1542, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-B. Ke, H. Qiu, J.-M. Chen et al., “ALG3 contributes to the malignancy of non-small cell lung cancer and is negatively regulated by MiR-98-5p,” Pathology, Research and Practice, vol. 216, no. 3, p. 152761, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Guo, C. He, F. Yang, L. Qin, X. Lu, and J. Wu, “Long non-coding RNA-NEAT1, a sponge for miR-98-5p, promotes expression of oncogene HMGA2 in prostate cancer,” Bioscience Reports, vol. 39, no. 9, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X.-Y. Shi, H. Wang, W. Wang, and Y.-H. Gu, “MiR-98-5p regulates proliferation and metastasis of MCF-7 breast cancer cells by targeting Gab 2,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 2847–2855, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ji, M. Chen, D. W. Greening et al., “Deep sequencing of RNA from three different extracellular vesicle (EV) subtypes released from the human LIM1863 colon cancer cell line uncovers distinct miRNA-enrichment signatures,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 10, article e110314, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Neerincx, D. Poel, D. L. S. Sie et al., “Combination of a six microRNA expression profile with four clinicopathological factors for response prediction of systemic treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 8, article e0201809, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A.-H. Wang, W.-J. Fan, L. Fu, and X.-T. Wang, “LncRNA PCAT-1 regulated cell proliferation, invasion, migration and apoptosis in colorectal cancer through targeting miR-149-5p,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 23, no. 19, pp. 8310–8320, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Lian, C. Yan, H. Xu et al., “A novel lncRNA, LINC00460, affects cell proliferation and apoptosis by regulating KLF2 and CUL4A expression in colorectal cancer,” Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acid, vol. 12, pp. 684–697, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elena Milanesi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

958

Downloads

852

Citations