Research Article

Hypertriglyceridemic Waist Phenotype and Lipid Accumulation Product: Two Comprehensive Obese Indicators of Waist Circumference and Triglyceride to Predict Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Chinese Population

Table 3

Hazard ratios for the incidence of T2DM in different metabolic groups.

T2DM casesIncidence densityUnadjusted modelMultivariable adjusted model#
HR (95% CI) valuesHR (95% CI) values

High LAP
 No9,6952553.5931.000 (ref)1.000 (ref)
 Yes5,65259714.7104.243 (3.660-4.913)<0.0014.094 (3.530-4.755)<0.001
HTGW
 No13,6625765.7811.000 (ref)1.000 (ref)
 Yes2,05529119.9583.611 (3.136-4.158)<0.0013.387 (2.929-3.916)<0.001
Central obesity
 No10,2083074.1061.000 (ref)1.000 (ref)
 Yes5,50956014.1923.585 (3.119-4.121)<0.0013.671 (3.163-4.260)<0.001
Increased BP
 No8,7053114.8581.000 (ref)1.000 (ref)
 Yes7,01255611.0752.281 (1.986-2.621)<0.0012.111 (1.820-2.448)<0.001
Increased FPG
 No12,9434034.2591.000 (ref)1.000 (ref)
 Yes2,77446423.6685.747 (5.028-6.567)<0.0015.532 (4.829-6.337)<0.001
Increased TG
 No12,0694805.4591.000 (ref)1.000 (ref)
 Yes3,64838714.7152.777 (2.429-3.175)<0.0012.719 (2.375-3.114)<0.001
Reduced HDL-C
 No12,3966407.1441.000 (ref)1.000 (ref)
 Yes3,3212279.2121.194 (1.026-1.390)0.0221.209 (1.034-1.413)0.017
MS
 No13,1204734.9371.000 (ref) (ref)1.000 (ref) (ref)
 Yes2,59739421.4024.419 (3.866-5.052)<0.0014.224 (3.671-4.860)<0.001
Number of MS components
 04,250541.7261.000 (ref)1.000 (ref)
 14,9091253.4962.014 (1.463-2.771)<0.0011.996 (1.441-2.763)<0.001
 23,5082489.7545.704 (4.249-7.656)<0.0015.728 (4.238-7.741)<0.001
 32,03223916.3819.589 (7.137-12.884)<0.0019.437 (6.962-12.793)<0.001
 484714924.80914.423 (10.564-19.691)<0.00114.846 (10.774-20.458)<0.001
 51715244.73426.219 (17.914-38.372)<0.00124.652 (16.612-36.583)<0.001

Incidence density, per 1000 person-years; BP: blood pressure; FPG: fast plasma glucose; TG: triglyceride; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MS: metabolic syndrome. #Adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, family history of T2DM, family income, and education. Grouped by optimal cutoff value () calculating through ROC curve analysis, 370 (247 for men and 123 for women) subjects were excluded because of LAP less than 0.