Review Article

Yoga for Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials

Table 1

Characteristics of eligible studies investigating the effects of yoga-based programs in adults with diabetes (25 controlled trials, including 12 randomized (RCTs) and 13 nonrandomized (NRCTs)).

NRCTs ()RCTs ()Total
%

Participant characteristics
 Target population: adults with
  Type 2 diabetes only12122496.0%
  Unspecified diabetes1014.0%
 One gender only specified0228.0%
 Excluding those on DM meds
  Yes2028.0%
  Not specified0114.0%
 Excluding those with DM complications
  Yes9101976.0%
  No1128.0%
  Not specified31416.0%
 Age range in years
  ≥18–26 03312.0%
  30/35–55/60/6562832.0%
  40/45–55/6032520.0%
  40/45–65/70/7532520.0%
  50–70/>60 y0228.0%
  Not specified1128.0%
 Years since DM diagnosis
  ≥0-1 year0228.0%
  1/2 years1014.0%
  2–5 years0114.0%
  5–10 years0114.0%
  0/1–10 years71832.0%
  >15 years0228.0%
  Not specified551040.0%
 Sample size
  <250228.0%
  25–4022416.0%
  41–6044832.0%
  >60741144.0%
 Location
  India1372080.0%
  UK0228.0%
  Cuba0228.0%
  Iran 0114.0%
 Year published
  2010–2014771456.0%
  2005–200923520.0%
  2000–2004 31416.0%
  Prior to 20001128.0%
 Yoga intervention
  Yoga-based program alone
   Including asanas11102184.0%
   Not including asanas0228.0%
  Yoga combined with other interventions
   Including asanas30312.0%
   Not including asanas0000.0%
 Duration
  <8 weeks61728.0%
  12 weeks/3 months571248.0%
  4–6 months22416.0%
  >6 months0228.0%
 Frequency of practice
  <3x/week0114.3%
  3x/week13417.4%
  4-5x/week21313.0%
  6-7x/week871565.2%
 Program structure
  Classes only971669.6%
  Classes combined with home practice15626.1%
  Training session combined with home practice1014.3%
 Comparison condition
  Usual care/no treatment1181976.0%
  Attention control0114.0%
  Active comparator35832.0%
  >1 control12312.0%

Including two yoga-based interventions tested within the same study [38].
Practice frequency not specified in 2 NRCTs [39, 40].
Information on program structure lacking in two NRCT’s [39, 41].
Numbers add up to more than 25, as 3 studies included more than one comparator.