Review Article

The Relationship between Military Combat and Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 2

Relative outcomes investigated for included studies and their direction of findings.

YearCardiovascular mortalityCHD-mortalityCHD/MIStrokeAbdominal aortic aneurysmsCarotid Intimal thicknessDiabetes mellitusHTNMetabolic syndromeIncreased lipid profile

Combat + Traumatic injury
Hrubec and Ryder [9]1980--------
Labouret et al. [35]1983---------
Rose et al. [36]1987--------
Vollmar et al. [34]1989------
Yekutiel et al. [26]1989-------
Lorenz et al. [25]1994----
Peles et al. [43]1995-------
Modan et al. [19]1998---
Kunnas et al. [24]2011-------
Shariar et al. [37]2009-------
Stewart et al. [27]2015------
Ejtahed et al. [46]2017-------

Combat only
Bullman et al. [20]1990---------
O’Toole et al. [40]1996-------
MacFarlane et al. [21]2000---------
Eisen et al. [42]2005--------
Granado et al. [41]2009----
Kang et al. [28]2009------
Johnson et al. [33]2010-------
Johnson et al. [44]2010-----
Crum-Cianflone et al. [30]2014-------
Schlenger et al. [22]2015--------
Barth et al. [23]2016---------
Sheffler et al. [32]2016------
Thomas et al. [31]2017-----
Hinojosa [29]2018-------

CHD, coronary heart disease; MI, myocardial infarction; HTN, hypertension; Number refer to study findings in terms of direction of effect in relation to combat/injury versus control population: ↑, significantly increased/positive; ↔, no significant difference; ↓ lower risk; - unreported.