Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Clinical Isolates of <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> in Two Kenyan Facilities: A National Referral and a Level Five Hospital

Maveke, Sylvia M.; Aboge, Gabriel O.; Kanja, Laetitia W.; Mainga, Alfred O.; Gachau, Naftaly; Muchira, Beatrice W.; Moriasi, Gervason A.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7463899

International Journal of Microbiology

On this page

Abstract Background Methods Results Discussion Limitations Conclusions Abbreviations Data Availability Additional Points Ethical Approval Disclosure Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2024 | Article ID 7463899 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7463899

Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Clinical Isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Two Kenyan Facilities: A National Referral and a Level Five Hospital

Sylvia M. Maveke,¹Gabriel O. Aboge,¹Laetitia W. Kanja,¹Alfred O. Mainga,¹Naftaly Gachau,²Beatrice W. Muchira,¹and Gervason A. Moriasi^3,4

Academic Editor: Karl Drlica

Received19 Sept 2023

Revised10 Jan 2024

Accepted07 Feb 2024

Published14 Feb 2024

Abstract

Background. The emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and multidrug resistance (MDR) among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, especially through the production of extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), limits therapeutic options and poses a significant public health threat. Objective. The aim of this study was to assess the phenotypic and genetic determinants of antimicrobial resistance of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from patient samples in two Kenyan Hospitals. Methods. We collected 138 E. coli and 127 K. pneumoniae isolates from various clinical specimens at the two health facilities from January 2020 to February 2021. The isolates’ ESBL production and antibiotic susceptibility were phenotypically confirmed using a standard procedure. Molecular analysis was done through conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with appropriate primers for gadA, rpoB, bla_TEM, bla_SHV, bla_OXA, bla_{CTX-M-group-1}, bla_{CTX-M-group-2}, bla_{CTX-M-group-9}, and bla_{CTX-M-group-8/25} genes, sequencing and BLASTn analysis. Results. Most E. coli (82.6%) and K. pneumoniae (92.9%) isolates were ESBL producers, with the highest resistance was against ceftriaxone (69.6% among E. coli and 91.3% among K. pneumoniae) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (70.9% among K. pneumoniae). The frequency of MDR was 39.9% among E. coli and 13.4% among K. pneumoniae isolates. The commonest MDR phenotypes among the E. coli isolates were CRO-FEP-AZM-LVX and CRO-AZM-LVX, while the FOX-CRO-AMC-MI-TGC-FM, FOX-CRO-FEP-AMC-TZP-AZM-LVX-MI and CRO-AMC-TZP-AZM-MI were the most frequent among K. pneumoniae isolates. Notably, the FOX-CRO-FEP-AMC-TZP-AZM-LVX-MI phenotype was observed in ESBL-positive and ESBL-negative K. pneumoniae isolates. The most frequent ESBL genes were bla_TEM (42%), bla_SHV (40.6%), and bla_OXA (36.2%) among E. coli, and bla_TEM (89%), bla_SHV (82.7%), bla_OXA (76.4%), and bla_{CTX-M-group-1} (72.5%) were most frequent ESBL genes among K. pneumoniae isolates. The bla_SHV and bla_OXA and bla_TEM genotypes were predominantly associated with FOX-CRO-FEP-MEM and CRO-FEP multidrug resistance (MDR) and CRO antimicrobial resistance (AMR) phenotypes, among E. coli isolates from Embu Level V (16.7%) and Kenyatta National Hospital (7.0%), respectively. Conclusions. The high proportion of ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates increases the utilization of last-resort antibiotics, jeopardizing antimicrobial chemotherapy. Furthermore, the antimicrobial resistance patterns exhibited towards extended-spectrum cephalosporins, beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, fluoroquinolones, and macrolides show the risk of co-resistance associated with ESBL-producing isolates responsible for MDR. Hence, there is a need for regular surveillance and implementation of infection prevention and control strategies and antimicrobial stewardship programs.

1. Background

Microbial infections are the leading cause of high morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a disproportionately high burden in sub-Saharan African Countries [1]. Despite the marked progress in antimicrobial chemotherapy, the rapid emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) threatens the effective prevention and treatment of infectious diseases, posing severe public health challenges [2]. Recently, Algammal et al. [3] demonstrated that persistence, resistance, and tolerance of bacterial strains are the major factors associated with AMR. Moreover, significantly increased minimum inhibitory concentrations of major antibiotics are observed in resistant bacterial pathogens, while prolonged minimum microbiocidal duration has been noted in most tolerant and persistent bacterial colonies [3].

Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae are predominant Gram-negative bacteria among the top three priority antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains listed by the World Health Organisation (WHO) [4]. E. coli has been identified as the commonest cause of urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections and the second leading cause of bloodstream infections in humans. K. pneumoniae is the second commonest cause of community-acquired urinary tract infections, and the hypervirulent subtype causes severe liver abscesses in healthy and immunocompromised subjects, which may result in deleterious sequelae [5]. Research has shown that these bacteria possess chromosomally encoded resistance genes against various antibiotics, including aminoglycosides, β lactams, and quinolones [6, 7]. This resistance is mediated by the production of antibiotic-degrading enzymes, especially the β-lactamases, which hydrolyse β-lactam antibiotics [8]. As a result, the extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae strains are considered significant causes of nosocomial and community-acquired infections, which render the available therapeutic options clinically useless [9].

The multidrug resistance (MDR) of ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae has considerably increased the global burden of infections, especially at the community level, characterised by therapeutic failure, increased healthcare costs due to prolonged hospitalisation, high morbidity, and mortality [10, 11]. Globally, the risk factors associated with ESBL production include antimicrobial misuse or overuse, prolonged hospitalisation, paramedical use of herbs, inadequate laboratory capacity for routine surveillance, and international travel to ESBL endemic regions [12]. Consequently, antimicrobial therapeutic decisions should be governed by clinical guidelines derived from local data [13], considering the regional differences in the distribution and proportions of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains, especially E. coli and K. pneumoniae, the most frequent causes of nosocomial and community-acquired illnesses with demonstrable resistance to common categories of antibiotics [14].

To address the escalating global threat of antibiotic resistance, surveillance, and determination of antimicrobial resistance patterns in ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae, the main causes of nosocomial and community-acquired infections are imperative [15]. These data help to actively monitor the prevalence and distribution of ESBL-producing strains, by enabling early detection of emerging resistance trends, and foster the implementation of targeted interventions and optimization of antibiotic use to minimize the spread of resistant strains within healthcare settings and communities [12]. In these endeavours, the determination of phenotypic and genotypic determinants of ESBL-associated resistance in E. coli and K. pneumoniae, among other clinically important, provides invaluable information that can help healthcare practitioners to formulate effective strategies for antimicrobial chemotherapy [16, 17]. Additionally, identifying the specific genes responsible for resistance empowers clinicians to prescribe targeted, personalized antibiotic treatments, thereby improving patient outcomes and reduces further risk of resistance development [18, 19]. Furthermore, understanding genetic diversity within these determinants of resistance fosters development of new antibiotics and alternative therapeutic approaches to combat global challenges associated with antimicrobial resistance and ensuring continued antimicrobial chemotherapeutic efficacy [16, 20–23].

Therefore, considering the complexity and high variability of ESBL-associated drug resistance, and a dearth of empirical information about the ESBL-associated resistance in E. coli and K. pneumoniae, our study aimed at phenotypic and genotypic characterisation of the ESBL-producing clinical isolates of E. coli and K. pneumoniae in Embu Level Five Hospital and Kenyatta National Hospital, Kenya.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Settings

The samples used in our study were obtained from Embu Level V Hospital (ELVH) and Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH) in Kenya. ELVH is the main public referral hospital in Embu County, located 130 kilometres North-East of Nairobi along the Nairobi-Meru highway. It has a 580-bed capacity comprising specialised departments (paediatric, surgical, internal medicine, psychiatry, maternity, renal, obstetrics/gynaecology, and intensive care units). KNH is a Level VI National Referral Hospital located in Nairobi City County, with an 1800-bed capacity. The KNH boasts of highly specialised clinical departments which regularly carry out medical research and specialist training and contribute to the national treatment guidelines.

2.2. Study Design and Clinical Isolates

A case-control study design was adopted whereby the ESBL-producing bacterial isolates were the cases while non-ESBL producers were the control group. We collected the clinical isolates of E. coli and K. pneumoniae from various biological samples collected from patients at the Embu Level Five Hospital (ELVH) laboratory from January to December 2020 and the Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH) microbiology laboratory from January to February 2021. The isolates obtained from ELVH were positively identified and confirmed using conventional biochemical techniques, indole, methyl red, Voges- Proskauer and Citrate (IMVIC), and transported in screw-capped sterile containers containing nutrient agar slants. The bacterial isolates from KNH were positively analysed using VITEK®2 compact and MALDITOF MS and transported in a 20% glycerol-brain heart infusion (BHI) broth. The study was performed at the Department of Public Health, Pharmacology, and Toxicology, University of Nairobi, where the isolates were stored in cryovials containing skimmed milk at −20°C. The antibiotic profiles were investigated according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [24]. Resistant strains of both pathogens were characterised phenotypically and genotypically using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing techniques. Ethical approval for the study was granted by the Kenyatta National Hospital University of Nairobi Ethics and Research Committee (KNH-UoN ERC) (P866/10/2019) and the National Commission for Science Technology and Innovation (NACOSTI) (NACOSTI/P/20/4019).

2.3. Sample Size and Sampling

The formula described by Dohoo et al. [25] presented in equation (1) was used to determine the ideal sample size for this study.where n = sample size; Zα = the statistic confidence level (1.96); Zβ = type 2 error at 20% (−0.84); , which was the estimated pooled proportion of ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae established in East African hospitals [16]; p1 = proportion at risk in the case group which was assumed to be 60% (0.6) for this study; p2 = proportion at risk in the control group which was assumed to be 40% (0.4); and p1-p2 = effect size which was assumed to be 20% (0.2).

Therefore,

Thus, we sampled and characterised 138 E. coli and 127 K. pneumoniae clinical isolates derived from patients in the ELVH and KNH.

2.4. Molecular Identification of the Clinical Isolates

2.4.1. DNA Extraction

The bacterial isolates were revived on trypticase soy agar at 37°C for 16–18 hours. As previously described, the boiling method was applied for DNA extraction [26]. A loopful of a single bacterial colony was boiled after suspension in 100 µl of distilled water in sterile Eppendorf tubes at 100°C for 30 minutes. Centrifugation of the mixture was done at 15,000 rpm for 5 minutes, and the DNA extracted from the supernatant portion was transferred to fresh sterile Eppendorf tubes.

2.4.2. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

Briefly, we isolated and analysed the DNA of the bacterial isolates through PCR using a set of primers for the gadA gene in E. coli (Forward: 5′-GATGAAATGGCGTTGGCGCAAG-3′; Reverse: 5′-GGCGGAAGTCCCAGACGATATCC-3′) and rpoB gene in K. pneumoniae (Forward: 5′-GTCGTCACGGTAACAAGGGT-3′; Reverse: 5′-GACCACCGAACTGTGCCTTA-3′) using a 96 well T100™ thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA, USA). The PCR assays for E. coli were performed in 40 µl reaction mixtures comprising 20 µl of 1X OneTaq® Master Mix (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), 10 µM concentration of each primer, 5 µl of the DNA template, and 9.88 µl of nuclease-free water at conditions of initial 94°C for 4 minutes (initial denaturation), 30 cycles of the 30 s at 94°C (denaturation), 30 s at 65°C (annealing), and 30 s at 72°C (initial elongation), and final elongation at 72°C for 5 minutes [27]. Besides, the PCR reaction mixture (32 µl) for K. pneumoniae samples comprised 16 µl of 1X OneTaq® Master Mix (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) 10 µM concentration of each primer, 5 µl of the DNA template, and 7.8 µl of nuclease-free water, and amplification was performed at 95°C for 7 min (initial denaturation); then, 35 cycles of the 40 s at 94°C (denaturation), 40 s at 57°C (annealing), and 90 s at 72°C (initial elongation), and final elongation step at 72°C for 7 min. This PCR protocol is summarised in Supplementary Table 1 (ST-1).

2.4.3. Agarose Gel Electrophoresis

The gel was prepared by dissolving 1.5 g of agarose powder in 100 ml of 1X Tris-acetate EDTA (TAE) buffer solution. The mixture was boiled, cooled to about 55°C, 0.5 µg/ml of ethidium bromide added, poured onto clean gel trays fitted with combs, and solidified at room temperature in a laminar flow hood. After that, the combs were carefully removed, and 12 µl of the PCR products and 2 µl of the GeneRuler™ 100 bp DNA ladder (ThermoScientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) were loaded onto the respective wells. The DNA extracted from K. pneumoniae (ATCC® 700603) and E. coli (ATCC® 25922) was used as positive controls, while nuclease-free water was used as the negative control. Then, the grooves were filled with the TAE buffer solution, and the tanks were carefully covered and connected to a power source set at 100 V and run for 45 minutes. The electrophoretic bands were captured using a UVP GelMax® 125 imager (Upland, CA, USA). Moreover, we randomly selected 21 E. coli and 21 K. pneumoniae positively identified isolates from each hospital (ELVH and KNH) for sequencing and BLAST analysis. The sequences were deposited in the GenBank database (https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/), and their Accession Numbers are summarised in Supplementary Tables ST2 and ST3, respectively.

2.5. Phenotypic Characterisation of ESBLs

This study adopted the standard disk diffusion technique described by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [28]. Briefly, standard ceftazidime (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), ceftazidime/clavulanic acid (30 µg/10 µg), and cefotaxime-clavulanic inoculated with 0.5 McFarland standard suspension of the bacterial isolates then incubated at 37°C for 18 hours in an incubator. Also, standard antibiotic discs were placed on MHA plates streaked with the standard E. coli (ATCC® 25922) and K. pneumoniae (ATCC® 700603), served as positive controls for quality control, and incubated at 37°C for 18 hours. Afterward, microbial growth inhibition zone diameters were measured using a vernier calliper, whereby diameters measuring ≥5 mm for any antimicrobial-clavulanic acid combination compared with those of individual antimicrobials (without clavulanic acid) on the isolates depicted ESBL production [28]. The quality control (QC) inhibition zone diameters for the standard E. coli (ATCC® 25922) and K. pneumoniae (ATCC® 700603) for the selected antibiotics were deduced as per the standard guidelines [28] and are summarised in Supplementary Table ST-4.

2.6. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

We adopted the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion technique described by the CLSI [28]. Briefly, a single colony of each clinical isolate was suspended in hyposaline (0.85%) and diluted accordingly to obtain inoculums with opacity equivalent (OE) of 0.5 McFarland. The suspensions were used to inoculate the MHA plates (Oxoid Ltd) using sterile swabs to ensure confluent growth. Similarly, the standard E. coli (ATCC 25922) and K. pneumoniae (ATCC® 700603) suspensions were inoculated on MHA plates as positive controls and for quality control. After that, standard antibiotic discs (ceftriaxone (CRO) (30 µg), piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) (100/10 µg), cefoxitin (FOX) (30 µg), cefepime (FEP) (30 µg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC) (20/10 µg), meropenem (MEM) (10 µg), tigecycline (TGC) (15 µg), levofloxacin (LVX) (5 µg), amikacin (AN) (30 µg), nitrofurantoin (FM) (300 µg), azithromycin (AZM) (15 µg), and minocycline (MI) (30 µg)) were radially placed on the inoculated plates and incubated at 37°C for 18 hours in an incubator. Afterwards, the antimicrobial susceptibility of the clinical isolates was categorised as resistant, intermediate, or susceptible based on the measured inhibition zone diameters according to the CLSI guidelines [28]. The susceptibility of the clinical isolates of E. coli and K. pneumoniae to TGC was categorised based on the measured growth inhibition zones according to previously described criteria [29], as summarised in Supplementary Table ST-5. We then phenotypically classified bacterial isolates showing resistance to three or more antimicrobial classes as multidrug-resistant isolates (strains).

2.7. Genotypic Characterisation of ESBL

The phenotypically confirmed ESBL-producing antimicrobial-resistant isolates of E. coli and K. pneumoniae were further analysed using multiplex PCR to determine the ESBL-associated resistance genes (bla_CTX-M, bla_TEM, bla_SHV, and bla_OXA) using a previously described procedure [30]. In brief, using a standard procedure, the DNA of the ESBL-producing isolates was extracted using the boiling method [26]. Then, a master mix and primers for the ESBL-associated target genes (Table 1) were added, and the mixture was amplified using a multiplex PCR at conditions of 94°C (initial denaturation) for 10 minutes; 30 cycles of 40 seconds at 94°C (denaturation), 40 seconds at 60°C (primer annealing), and 1 minute at 72°C (initial elongation); and the final elongation for 7 minutes at 72°C [30]. The amplicons were further separated using agarose electrophoresis with a 100-base pair GeneRuler™ DNA ladder (ThermoScientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) as a molecular marker according to the procedure described in Section 2.4.3 and then visualised using Ultraviolet (UV). The resultant electrophoretic bands were photographed using a UVP GelMax® 125 imager (Upland, CA, USA).

Furthermore, 100 isolates were randomly sampled, purified, and sequenced using Sanger dideoxy sequencing method at Macrogen Europe. After that, we analysed the sequences through a basic sequence alignment technique using the BLASTn tool provided by the National Centre Biotechnology Information (NCBI) to determine the presence of ESBL-associated resistance genes, the bla_TEM, bla_SHV, bla_OXA, bla_CTXMgp1, bla_CTXMgp2, and bla_CTXMgp9.

3. Results

3.1. Characterisation of Patients and Clinical Isolates

We collected 138 clinical isolates of E. coli and 127 clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae from the two hospitals and characterised them based on the patient’s gender, the admission type, and the biological specimen from which they were isolated, as shown in Table 2. Notably, most E. coli (76.5%) and K. pneumoniae (41.6%) isolates were obtained from female patients in ELVH, while most E. coli (49.0%) and K. pneumoniae (50.4%) were obtained from male and female patients, respectively, in the KNH (Table 2). Besides, most E. coli isolates (70.6%) from the ELVH were obtained from the outpatient unit, while in KNH, most E. coli (77.9%) and K. pneumoniae (96.5%) isolated were obtained from the inpatient unit (Table 2).

Besides, most E. coli isolates (76.5%), and K. pneumoniae (75.0%) from the ELVH were obtained from urine samples (Table 3). In the KNH, most E. coli isolates were obtained from pus swabs (49.0%) and urine (32.7%), while most K. pneumoniae isolates were derived from blood cultures (58.3%) (Table 3).

3.2. Proportion of ESBLs

The results showed that most E. coli isolates collected from the ELVH (91.2%) and KNH (79.8%), and all K. pneumoniae isolates from the ELVH (100%), and most from KNH (92.2%) were ESBL producers (ESBL positive) (Table 4). Overall, 114 (82.6%) E. coli and 118 (92.9%) K. pneumoniae isolates from the two hospitals were ESBL producers (Table 4). Moreover, no significant relationships/associations were observed between the ESBL traits of the E. coli () and K. pneumoniae () isolates obtained from ELVH and KNH were observed in this study (Table 4).

3.3. ESBL-Associated Antimicrobial Resistance

Our results showed the overall resistance pattern of the E. coli samples towards conventional antibiotics was as follows: ceftriaxone (69.6%) > levofloxacin (50.7%) > azithromycin (44.2%) > cefepime (34.1%) > amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (26.1%) > piperacillin/tazobactam (17.4%) > cefoxitin (15.9%) > minocycline (14.5%) > nitrofurantoin (10.3%) > meropenem (8.7%) > amikacin (2.9%) > tigecycline (0.72%) (Table 5). The overall multidrug resistance of the clinical isolates from the two hospitals was 39.9% (Table 5).

Besides, we characterised the relationship between the ESBL-associated antimicrobial resistance of the studied K. pneumoniae isolates. The results showed that all the ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates from the ELVH were resistant to all the test antibiotics (Table 6). Likewise, all ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates derived from the KNH were resistant to all the tested antibiotics in this study; however, between one and three non-ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates exhibited resistance to all antibiotics except amikacin, meropenem, tigecycline, and nitrofurantoin (Table 6).

Generally, the ESBL-associated resistance of K. pneumoniae to the tested antibiotics demonstrated a characteristic pattern as follows: ceftriaxone (91.3%) > amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (70.9%) > cefepime (60.6%) > nitrofurantoin (45.5%) > azithromycin (22%) > levofloxacin (12.6%) = piperacillin/tazobactam (12.6%) > minocycline (11.8%) > cefoxitin (9.4%) > tigecycline (6.2%) > meropenem (2.4%) > amikacin (0.8%) (Table 5). Additionally, the overall multidrug resistance of the K. pneumoniae samples at the two facilities was 13.4% (Table 6).

Furthermore, the results revealed no significant relationships between the ESBL-associated antimicrobial resistance of the K. pneumoniae isolates obtained from the ELVH, and KNH to all the tested antibiotics (; Table 6).

3.4. Multidrug Resistance (MDR) Phenotypes

The most frequent MDR phenotype in E. coli isolates at the ELVH (11.8%) was CRO-FEP-AZM-LVX and CRO-AZM-LVX at the KNH (7.7%) (Table 7). The FOX-CRO-AMC-MI-TGC-FM MDR phenotype was the most common in K. pneumoniae isolates obtained from the ELVH, while FOX-CRO-FEP-AMC-TZP-AZM-LVX-MI and CRO-AMC-TZP-AZM-MI were the most frequent at the KNH (Table 7). Notably, the FOX-CRO-FEP-AMC-TZP-AZM-LVX-MI MDR phenotype was observed in the ESBL-positive and the ESBL-negative isolates, whereas all the other phenotypes were present in ESBL-positive K. pneumoniae isolates only (Table 7).

3.5. Genotypic Characterisation

The ESBL-resistance genes in the E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates targeted in this study were analysed by PCR and gel electrophoresis (representative electropherograms are shown in Supplementary Figures 1A–F), sequenced, and the data were deposited in the GenBank database (https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/), vide Accession Numbers summarised in Supplementary Tables ST-6 and ST-7, respectively.

The overall expression pattern of ESBL-associated resistance genes in E. coli isolates in this study was bla_TEM > bla_SHV > bla_OXA > bla_{CTX-M-group-1} > bla_{CTX-M-group-9} > bla_{CTX-M-group-2} > bla_{CTX-M-group-8/25} (Table 8). We observed that most ESBL-positive E. coli isolates obtained from the ELVH (82.4%) expressed the bla_SHV gene, while those obtained from the KNH (44.2%) expressed the bla_TEM gene (Table 8).

Generally, the expression frequency pattern of the ESBL-associated antimicrobial resistance genes in the studied K. pneumoniae isolates was as follows; bla_TEM > bla_SHV > bla_OXA > bla_{CTX-M-group-1} > bla_{CTX-M-group-9} > bla_{CTX-M-group-2} > bla_{CTX-M-group-8/25} (Table 8). We also observed that all (12; 100%) K. pneumoniae isolates derived from the ELVH, and most of those obtained from the KNH (94; 81.7%) expressed the bla_TEM gene (Table 8). Notably, the expression of ESBL genes was higher in ESBL-positive isolates than in ESBL-negative isolates (Table 8).

The results further revealed no significant relationship between the expression frequencies of the bla_TEM (), bla_SHV (), bla_OXA (), and bla_{CTX-M-group-1} () genes in E. coli (Table 8). Likewise, the expression frequencies of the bla_TEM, bla_SHV, bla_OXA, bla_{CTX-M-group-1}, bla_{CTX-M-group-9}, and bla_{CTX-M-group-2} genes in K. pneumoniae isolates were not significant (; Table 8). Notably, the bla_{CTX-M-group-8/25} gene was not expressed in any of the E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates from both hospitals (Table 8).

3.6. Characterisation of the ESBL Genotypes with MDR Phenotypes

We characterised the ESBL genotypes associated with the MDR phenotypes observed in the studied isolates. The results showed that the bla_SHV and bla_OXA genotypes in E. coli isolates (16.7%) obtained from the ELVH were predominantly associated with FOX-CRO-FEP-MEM and CRO-FEP resistance, respectively (Table 9). Among the E. coli isolates obtained from the KNH, the bla_TEM genotype was the most frequently (7.0%) observed and was associated with CRO resistance (Table 9).

The K. pneumoniae isolates showed a general trend that combined two or more ESBL genes associated with the MDR phenotypes at both facilities (Table 9). The FOX-CRO-AMC phenotype had three isolates (50%) with the bla_TEM + bla_SHV + bla_CTX-M-gp-1 OR + bla_CTX-M-gp-2 genotypes from the ELVH (Table 9). At the KNH, two isolates (18.2%) expressed the CRO-AMC-TZP phenotype and the bla_TEM + bla_SHV + bla_CTX-M-gp-1 genotypes (Table 9).

4. Discussion

The occurrence and transmission of antimicrobial-resistant strains of commensal and pathogenic bacteria have significantly hampered global efforts to mitigate infectious diseases [31, 32]. The World Health Organisation (WHO) report shows there are insufficient data to guide policy formulation and recommendations on antimicrobial resistance (AMR), especially in Africa [33]. Moreover, AMR rates are increasing in Kenya and across East Africa, partly due to the lack of sufficient antimicrobial stewardship programs in hospitals, inadequate laboratory infrastructure, poor pharmacovigilance systems, and lack of updated treatment guidelines based on local antimicrobial susceptibility patterns at the national and community facility levels [31, 34, 35].

Kenya enrolled in the Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) by the end of 2021 but has yet to report on AMR or antimicrobial consumption data, unlike neighbouring countries Uganda, Tanzania, and Ethiopia [33, 36]. Each of the 47 counties in Kenya is mandated to carry out antimicrobial stewardship programs as set out in the country’s National Action Plan [37]. Consequently, there is need for routine antimicrobial surveillance through diagnostic stewardship and reporting systems to curb the transmission of AMR within and outside the country. Therefore, we performed a phenotypic and genotypic characterization of the ESBL-associated AMR and MDR of E. coli and K. pneumoniae clinical isolates obtained from two Kenyan hospitals (Embu Level Five Hospital and Kenyatta National Hospital) due to a paucity of current data on AMR patterns, and its significance in guiding therapeutic interventions fostering antimicrobial stewardship programs.

The findings showed that the frequency of ESBL production among the E. coli isolates was elevated in both facilities, corroborating a previous report where over 50% of the E. coli clinical isolates were ESBL producers [38]. Additionally, surveys conducted in other countries, including Rwanda [39], Tanzania [4], Ethiopia [40], Uganda [41, 42], Nigeria [43], Burkina Faso [44], Chad [45], and Nepal [46, 47] revealed a similar pattern of ESBL production in E. coli isolates. However, the proportion of ESBL-producing E. coli isolates in this study was lower than that reported in Kenya [48, 49], Uganda [50, 51], Tanzania [5], Canada [52], Thailand [53], Brazil [18], Iran [14], Nepal [54], the USA, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America [55]. Besides, our findings indicated a high proportion of K. pneumoniae isolates were ESBL producers, which corroborates earlier reports from Kenya [56, 57], Uganda [41, 42, 58], Tanzania [4], Ethiopia [40], and Nepal [46, 47]. Notably, previous reports from Kenya [38, 59], Tanzania [5], Uganda [51], Ethiopia [60], Nigeria [43], Burkina Faso [44], Chad [45], Iran [14], Nepal [54], Thailand [53], Brazil [18], and the USA [61] showed that the proportion of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates was lower than that which we report herein. These differences may be due to disparities in infection prevention control protocols, local antimicrobial treatment guidelines, abuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics and third generation cephalosporins, geographical dynamics, hospitalisation, and the presence and effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship committees at various health facilities in various territories [62].

Over 50% of the studied ESBL-producing E. coli isolates demonstrated high resistance to ceftriaxone, levofloxacin, azithromycin, and susceptibility to meropenem, amikacin, and tigecycline, with the urine-derived isolates being sensitive to nitrofurantoin. These findings corroborate previous reports from Kenya [38, 56, 63, 64], Rwanda [39], Chad [45], Nepal [46, 54], Brazil [18], and Canada [52]. Moreover, some studies showed high resistance of E. coli samples to carbapenems in Nigeria [43] and Nepal [47] which can be associated with the production of carbapenemases. Conversely, our findings differ from those reported in Uganda [50], which showed low resistance of E. coli isolates derived from outpatients to Ceftriaxone and levofloxacin. Besides, the results demonstrated high resistance of K. pneumoniae isolates to Ceftriaxone, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and cefepime, with most isolates being sensitive to amikacin, tigecycline, meropenem, and urine-derived isolates exhibiting some resistance to nitrofurantoin. These results are consistent with those reported at a tertiary hospital in Eldoret [65], a private hospital in Nairobi [63], Kilifi County Hospital [57] and KNH [64] in Kenya, and from Thailand [53], Ethiopia [40], Nepal [54], and Iran [66]. However, some reports from Nigeria [43] and Nepal [47] showed that K. pneumoniae isolates were resistant to carbapenems. These differences may be attributed to patient factors, specific antimicrobial therapy regimens in various hospitals, the environment, and specific selective pressures, which affect the microbial characteristics associated with diverse resistance patterns [48, 49]. Moreover, the high resistance frequencies of the studied isolates depict the severity of the AMR burden, which limits treatment options leading to life-threatening sequelae [67, 68].

Research shows that MDR E. coli and K. pneumoniae significantly complicate antimicrobial chemotherapy by reducing treatment options [11]. In this study, E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates demonstrated <50% MDR to the tested antibiotics, corroborating earlier studies [59, 69]. However, varied MDR rates among E. coli and K. pneumoniae in hospital settings have been reported globally, where >50% MDR against a considerable range of antibiotics has been observed in Kenya [57, 65], Portugal [70], Canada [71], and Nepal [47]. Despite their collection from similar setups, the varied resistance patterns exhibited by the studied isolates can be attributed to the frequency of specific antibiotic administration, among other factors such as those reported previously [72, 73]. The lack of proper antimicrobial resistance surveillance and stewardship, compounded by inadequate testing and documentation capacity, may be responsible for the high resistance rates [10, 74]. Thus, identifying multidrug-resistance (MDR) patterns exhibited by pathogenic bacterial strains can help guide the course of therapy [75, 76].

We further investigated the phenotypic MDR patterns exhibited by the clinical isolates, where the CRO-FEP-AZM-LVX and CRO-AZM-LVX were the most prevalent among E. coli isolates in ELVH and KNH, respectively. These findings differ from studies conducted in Portugal [70] and Canada [77] which reported the AMC-CTX-CAZ-TE-TOB-CIP-CN and CRO-CIP-SXT MDR phenotypes, respectively as the most prevalent among ESBL-producing E. coli. Besides, the CRO-AMC-TZP-AZM-MIN was the most frequent MDR phenotype among K. pneumoniae isolates obtained from the ELVH, and the FOX-CRO-FEP-AMC-TZP-AZM-LVX-MI and CRO-AMC-TZP-AZM-MI phenotypes were the most frequent among K. pneumoniae isolates obtained from KNH, contrary to reports from Portugal [70] where the carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem, and ertapenem) formed part of the MDR phenotypes. The variations in MDR phenotypes and resistance patterns are attributable to specific gene mutations and resistance gene combinations [21, 78]. AMR, including MDR, exhibited by E. coli and K. pneumoniae, is primarily driven by a plasmid-mediated β-lactamase, which hydrolyses and inactivates β-lactam antibiotics, including monobactams and cephalosporins, among a wide array of other antibiotics, rendering them ineffective [79–81].

Molecular studies have revealed various ESBL variants in E. coli and K. pneumoniae based on the gene or gene combinations they express [18, 82, 83]. Upon genotypic characterisation, the bla_TEM gene was the most profoundly expressed in E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates, followed by bla_SHV, bla_OXA, and bla_{CTX-M-group-1} depicting a similar pattern as that reported in Uganda [51], Iran [14], Kenya [49, 57], and Tanzania [16]. However, our results differ from those reported in Burkina Faso [44], Chad [45], Brazil [18], and Canada [52] where bla_CTX-M was the most frequent ESBL gene associated with resistance phenotypes. Moreover, recent data indicate that the bla_CTX-M is the widespread ESBL gene variant, and in some regions, it transcends the bla_TEM and bla_SHV ESBLs [81, 84]. These differences are partly attributable to geographic and environmental differences and specific gene factors, such as inherent mutations [85]. Besides, previous research indicates that single or multiple ESBL genes may drive MDR phenotypes [4, 86]. Accordingly, we explored the relationship between ESBL genotypes and MDR phenotypes in E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates from ELVH and KNH. We observed diverse ESBL gene combinations in various MDR phenotypes, which were like those reported in Kenya [49], Tanzania [4], and Rwanda [39]. These findings demonstrate the diverse and intricate mechanisms these microbes employ to evade antibacterial action, including the acquisition of resistance genes from other bacterial strains and the expression of these genes in various combinations induced by antimicrobial stress [10, 16]. Similar resistance patterns and genetic traits in isolates collected from the KNH and ELVH denote an active distribution of resistant pathogens, and the proximity of the two hospitals may have facilitated the transfer of resistant strains.

Various ESBL-associated genes may have other functional roles besides the plasmid-mediated β-lactamase hydrolysis of antibiotics [84]. For instance, the bla_CTX-M gene reduces the sensitivity of E. coli and K. pneumoniae strains to various antibiotics like carbapenems and cephalosporins [87]. Besides, plasmids carrying the bla_OXA gene harbour other non-ESBL genes like the bla_CYM, bla_NDM, and bla_VIM, which confer enhanced Metallo-β-lactamase activity, alteration of porin synthesis, and the acquisition of other drug-degrading enzymes [88]. Notably, ESBL-associated genes are diverse and present varied characteristics [89, 90]. The various genetic combinations in E. coli and K. pneumoniae observed in the present study probably contributed to high resistance rates toward single antibiotics and modified the activity of multiple antibiotics leading to MDR. The resistance detected in some non-ESBL-producing clinical isolates of E. coli and K. pneumoniae may be due to porin loss and the acquisition of other resistance mechanisms [81]. However, further molecular characterisation to discern specific genetic interactions among and between E. coli and K. pneumoniae strains and mutations in resistance-associated genes, especially in the synthesis and action of ESBLs, may help us understand their dynamic functioning and develop more efficacious therapies.

Proper surveillance mechanisms are imperative considering the intricate nature of antimicrobial resistance, especially in E. coli and K. pneumoniae, which are notorious sources of nosocomial infections [72, 76, 91–93]. Appropriate characterisation of resistance patterns and genetic traits in these enterobacteria may help redefine treatment regimens and avert further exacerbation and distribution of resistant strains [94]. Thus, considering the dynamic nature of AMR and the high burden of MDR in sub-Saharan African Countries, especially Kenya, close stewardship and regular surveillance programs in health facilities are necessary [75]. This may include policy formulation and implementation, development of testing, documentation, reporting infrastructure, and adequate staff training, among others [10, 35].

5. Limitations

The smaller sample size, especially that of K. pneumoniae isolates obtained from the ELVH, may limit the generalizability of the reported results. Besides, incomplete patient data in laboratory registers hindered the investigation of the association between patient characteristics and the AMR and MDR resistance traits of the studied microbes.

6. Conclusions and Recommendations

In this study, many E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates obtained from the two hospitals were ESBL producers. The ESBL-producing E. coli isolates exhibited a higher prevalence of resistance to ceftriaxone and levofloxacin with notable sensitivity to meropenem, amikacin, and tigecycline. Similarly, the K. pneumoniae isolates showed high resistance frequency to ceftriaxone, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and cefepime with susceptibility to cefoxitin, tigecycline, amikacin and meropenem noted. Notably, the E. coli isolates exhibited more MDR phenotypes than K. pneumoniae isolates, where the CRO-FEP-AZM-LVX and CRO-AZM-LVX were the most prevalent MDR phenotypes among E. coli isolates obtained from the ELVH and KNH, respectively. The CRO-AMC-TZP-AZM-MI was the most frequent MDR phenotype among K. pneumoniae isolates obtained from the ELVH, while the FOX-CRO-FEP-AMC- TZP-AZM-LVX-MI and CRO-AMC-TZP-AZM-MI MDR phenotypes were the most frequent among K. pneumoniae isolates obtained from KNH. Moreover, the blaTEM gene was the most frequently expressed in E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates, followed by blaSHV, blaOXA, and blaCTX-M-group-1, and were deemed responsible for the observed AMR and MDR phenotypes. Therefore, based on this study’s findings, routine phenotypic and genotypic characterization of pathogenic bacterial isolates should be embraced to discern the AMR and MDR patterns, to inform treatment regimens and improve therapeutic outcomes. Further extensive large-scale characterisation of AMR and MDR traits of E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and other notorious pathogenic microbes should be performed at local, national, and regional levels to establish their patterns. The gathered information would be instrumental in guiding the formulation and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship and infection control protocols to curb antimicrobial resistance locally and internationally. Additionally, empirical investigations on gene-encoded virulence factors, aiding biofilm formation and associated pathogenicity of the studied bacterial strains, are encouraged to establish their role in AMR and MDR and help design and tailor therapeutic interventions.

Abbreviations

AMR:	Antimicrobial resistance
MDR:	Multidrug resistance
ESBL:	Extended spectrum beta-lactamase
ELVH:	Embu Level V hospital
KNH:	Kenyatta National Hospital
PCR:	Polymerase chain reaction
CLSI:	Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute
CRO:	Ceftriaxone
CTX:	Cefotaxime
CAZ:	Ceftazidime
TZP:	Piperacillin/tazobactam
FOX:	Cefoxitin
FEP:	Cefepime
AMC:	Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid
MEM:	Meropenem
TGC:	Tigecycline
LVX:	Levofloxacin
CN:	Gentamicin
SXT:	Sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim
TOB:	Tobramycin
TE:	Tetracycline
AN:	Amikacin
FM:	Nitrofurantoin
AZM:	Azithromycin
MI:	Minocycline.

Data Availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this manuscript (and its supplementary information files); however, the authors may provide additional information upon reasonable request.

Additional Points

Implication for Research/Policy. This study’s findings demonstrate the need for regular molecular surveillance of ESBL-associated resistance of E. coli and K. pneumoniae to guide the formulation, review, and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship policies and infection prevention and control protocols in clinical setups.

Ethical Approval

The Kenyatta National Hospital-University of Nairobi Ethics and Research Committee approved this study (KNH-UoN ERC) (P866/10/2019), and the National Commission for Science Technology and Innovation granted a research permit (NACOSTI) (NACOSTI/P/20/4019).

Disclosure

A preprint of this manuscript has previously been published [95].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Sylvia M. Maveke, Gabriel A. Aboge, Laetitia W. Kanja, Gervason A. Moriasi, and Alfred O. Mainga conceived the research idea. Naftaly G. Mureithi and Sylvia M. Maveke collected the samples. Sylvia M. Maveke, Naftaly G. Mureithi, and Beatrice W. Muchira performed the experiments. Sylvia M. Maveke, Alfred O. Mainga, and Gervason A. Moriasi optimised the methods, performed data analysis, and drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version for submission and publication.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge and appreciate the technical support offered by laboratory technologists at Kenyatta National Hospital, Embu Level V hospital, and the Department of Public Health, Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Nairobi.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figures 1 A–F: This material shows representative electropherograms of the detected ESBL genes in the E. coli and K. pneumoniae clinical isolates on 1.5% Agarose gel, with a characteristic banding pattern. Supplementary Table ST-1: This table presents a summary of the PCR protocol used in identifying the E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates. Supplementary Tables ST-2 and ST-3: These tables present a summary of identities of selected E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates based on sequencing and BLAST analysis using the BLASTn tool and accession numbers for each sequence deposited in the GenBank database (https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). Supplementary Tables ST-4: This supplementary table shows a summary of the quality control zone diameter ranges of E. coli (ATCC® 25922) and K. pneumoniae (ATCC® 700603) for the selected antimicrobial agents. Supplementary Table ST-5: This table summarises the zone diameter interpretative standard breakpoints according to the CLSI guidelines (2020). Supplementary Tables ST-6 and ST-7: These tables present a summary of identities of ESBL genes that were detected in K. pneumoniae and E. coli isolates and their respective accession numbers for sequences we deposited in the GenBank database (https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). (Supplementary Materials)

References

K. S. Ikuta, L. R. Swetschinski, G. R. Aguilar et al., “Global mortality associated with 33 bacterial pathogens in 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019,” The Lancet, vol. 400, no. 10369, pp. 2221–2248, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
European Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators, “The burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in the WHO European region in 2019: a cross-country systematic analysis,” The Lancet Public Health, vol. 7, 2022.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Algammal, H. F. Hetta, M. Mabrok, and P. Behzadi, “Editorial: emerging multidrug- resistant bacterial pathogens superbugs: a rising public health threat,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 14, Article ID 1135614, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Silago, D. Kovacs, H. Samson et al., “Existence of multiple esbl genes among phenotypically confirmed esbl producing klebsiella pneumoniae and escherichia coli concurrently isolated from clinical, colonization and contamination samples from neonatal units at bugando medical center,” Mwanza, tanzania, Antibiotics, vol. 10, no. 5, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Letara, J. S. Ngocho, N. Karami et al., “Prevalence and patient related factors associated with Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae carriage and infection among pediatric patients in Tanzania,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Wang, G. Zhao, X. Chao, L. Xie, and H. Wang, “The characteristic of virulence, biofilm and antibiotic resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 17, pp. 1–17, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Karampatakis, K. Tsergouli, and P. Behzadi, “Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: virulence factors, molecular epidemiology and latest updates in treatment options,” Antibiotics, vol. 12, no. 2, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Jose and A. A. Cesar, “Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance,” Microbiology Spectrum, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–37, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Bairán, G. Rebollar-Pérez, E. Chávez-Bravo, and E. Torres, “Treatment processes for microbial resistance mitigation: the technological contribution to tackle the problem of antibiotic resistance,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 17, no. 23, pp. 1–20, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Elton, M. J. Thomason, J. Tembo et al., “Antimicrobial resistance preparedness in sub-Saharan African countries,” Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, vol. 9, no. 1, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Who, “Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System,” Tech. Rep., Who, Geneva, Switzerland, 2021, GLASS Report.
View at: Google Scholar
O. G. Onduru, R. S. Mkakosya, S. Aboud, and S. F. Rumisha, “Genetic determinants of resistance among ESBL-producing enterobacteriaceae in community and hospital settings in East, central, and southern Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence,” The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology, vol. 2021, Article ID 5153237, 9 pages, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Sonda, H. Kumburu, M. Van Zwetselaar et al., “Meta-analysis of proportion estimates of extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae in East Africa hospitals,” Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, vol. 5, no. 1, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Y. Sharahi, A. Hashemi, A. Ardebili, and S. Davoudabadi, “Molecular characteristics of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated from hospitalized patients in Tehran, Iran,” Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, vol. 20, no. 1, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. L. Paterson and R. A. Bonomo, “Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: a clinical update,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 657–686, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Sonda, H. Kumburu, M. Van Zwetselaar et al., “Molecular epidemiology of virulence and antimicrobial resistance determinants in Klebsiella pneumoniae from hospitalised patients in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1901–1914, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Rodríguez-Baño, B. Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, I. Machuca, and A. Pascual, “Treatment of Infections Caused by Extended-Spectrum-Beta-Lactamase-, AmpC-, and Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 31, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Pereira, L. M. Volcão, G. B. Klafke et al., “Antimicrobial resistance and molecular characterization of extended-spectrum β-lactamases of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. isolates from urinary tract infections in southern Brazil,” Microbial Drug Resistance, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 173–181, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Yasir, A. M. Ajlan, S. Shakil et al., “Molecular characterization, antimicrobial resistance and clinico-bioinformatics approaches to address the problem of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in western Saudi Arabia,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO), Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance, Who, Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
M. M. E. Meybodi, A. R. Foroushani, M. Zolfaghari et al., “Antimicrobial resistance pattern in healthcare-associated infections: investigation of in-hospital risk factors,” Iranian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 13, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Schar, A. Sommanustweechai, R. Laxminarayan, and V. Tangcharoensathien, “Surveillance of antimicrobial consumption in animal production sectors of low- and middle-income countries: optimizing use and addressing antimicrobial resistance,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1–9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. J. Murray, K. S. Ikuta, F. Sharara et al., “Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis,” The Lancet, vol. 399, no. 10325, pp. 629–655, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Analysis and Presentation of Cumulative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Data; Approved CLSI Guideline Document M39-A4, Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Wayne PA, 2022.
L. Dohoo, W. Martin, and H. Stryhn, Veterinary Epidemiologic Research. Prince Edward Island, Canada, CIA 4P3, National Library of Canada Cataloguing in Publication, Canada, 2003.
D. S. Holmes and M. Quigley, “A Rapid Boiling Method for the Preparation of Bacterial Plasmids,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 114, 1981.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Doumith, M. J. Day, R. Hope, J. Wain, and N. Woodford, “Improved multiplex PCR strategy for rapid assignment of the four major Escherichia coli phylogenetic groups,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 3108–3110, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), “Clinical laboratory standards Institute (CLSI)-CLSI M100 ED30:2020,” 2020, https://www.nih.org.pk/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/CLSI-2020.pdf.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Shankar, L. E. B. Nabarro, S. Anandan, and B. Veeraraghavan, “Minocycline and tigecycline: what is their role in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative organisms?” Microbial Drug Resistance, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 437–446, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Dallenne, A. da Costa, D. Decré, C. Favier, and G. Arlet, “Development of a set of multiplex PCR assays for the detection of genes encoding important β-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 490–495, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hailemariam, T. Alemayehu, B. Tadesse et al., “Major bacterial isolate and antibiotic resistance from routine clinical samples in Southern Ethiopia,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Jain, A. K. Bepari, P. K. Sen et al., “High prevalence of multiple antibiotic resistance in clinical E. coli isolates from Bangladesh and prediction of molecular resistance determinants using WGS of an XDR isolate,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
WHO, AMR-SORT it 2021 Annual Report: The Structured Operational Research and Training Initiative on Tackling Antimicrobial Resistance in Africa, Asia and Latin America; Progress, Achievements, Challenges, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
M. Abebe, S. Tadesse, G. Meseret, and A. Derbie, “Type of bacterial isolates and antimicrobial resistance profile from different clinical samples at a Referral Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: Five years data analysis,” BMC Research Notes, vol. 12, no. 1, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Ministry of Health, in Republic of Kenya National Policy on Prevention and Containment of Antimicrobial Resistance, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, 2017.
Who, “Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System,” Who, Geneva, Switzerland, 2022, (GLASS) Report 2022.
View at: Google Scholar
WHO, Kenya National Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance Review of Progress in the Human Health Sector Antimicrobial Resistance Policy Information and Action Brief Series, Who, Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.
D. Maina, P. Makau, A. Nyerere, and G. Revathi, “Antimicrobial resistance patterns in extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in a private tertiary hospital,” Kenya, Microbiology Discovery, vol. 1, p. 5, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Sutherland, C. Mpirimbanyi, E. Nziyomaze et al., “Widespread antimicrobial resistance among bacterial infections in a Rwandan referral hospital,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1–15, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. S. Teklu, A. A. Negeri, M. H. Legese, T. L. Bedada, H. K. Woldemariam, and K. D. Tullu, “Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production and multi-drug resistance among Enterobacteriaceae isolated in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia,” Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Andrew, A. Kagirita, and J. Bazira, “Prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases-producing microorganisms in patients admitted at KRRH, southwestern Uganda,” The Internet Journal of Microbiology, vol. 2017, Article ID 3183076, 5 pages, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. F. Najjuka, D. P. Kateete, H. M. Kajumbula, M. L. Joloba, and S. Y. Essack, “Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from outpatients in urban and rural districts of Uganda,” BMC Research Notes, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. C. Mofolorunsho, H. O. Ocheni, R. F. Aminu, C. A. Omatola, and O. O. Olowonibi, “Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of extended-spectrum beta lactamases-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated in selected hospitals of anyigba, Nigeria,” African Health Sciences, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 505–512, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Ouedraogo, M. Sanou, A. Kissou et al., “High prevalence of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase producing enterobacteriaceae among clinical isolates in Burkina Faso,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. O. Mahamat, M. Lounnas, M. Hide et al., “High prevalence and characterization of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae in Chadian hospitals,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Nepal, N. D. Pant, B. Neupane et al., “Extended spectrum beta-lactamase and metallo beta-lactamase production among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from different clinical samples in a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal,” Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Koirala, S. Khadka, S. Sapkota et al., “Prevalence of CTX-M β-lactamases producing multidrug resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae among patients attending bir hospital, Nepal,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2021, Article ID 9958294, 11 pages, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kiiru, S. Kariuki, B. M. Goddeeris, and P. Butaye, “Analysis of-lactamase phenotypes and carriage of selected-lactamase genes among Escherichia coli strains obtained from Kenyan patients during an 18-year period,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 12, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. W. Muriuki, L. Ogonda, C. Kyanya et al., “Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates from Kenya,” Microbial Drug Resistance, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 31–38, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. J. Stanley, H. Kajumbula, J. Bazira, C. Kansiime, I. B. Rwego, and B. B. Asiimwe, “Multidrug resistance among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae carried in the gut of out-patients from pastoralist communities of Kasese district, Uganda,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1–12, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Mbyemeire, K. Ssekatawa, C. D. Kato, and E. M. Wampande, “Molecular characterization and distribution of cephalosporin resistance determinants in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from patients attending Kampala International University Teaching Hospital in Bushenyi, Western Uganda,” Alexandria Journal of Medicine, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 205–214, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Denisuik, J. A. Karlowsky, H. J. Adam et al., “Dramatic rise in the proportion of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae among clinical isolates identified in Canadian hospital laboratories from 2007 to 2016,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 74, pp. IV64–IV71, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Sawatwong, P. Sapchookul, T. Whistler et al., “High burden of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia in older adults: a seven-year study in two rural Thai Provinces,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 943–951, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Shilpakar, M. Ansari, K. R. Rai, G. Rai, and S. K. Rai, “Prevalence of multidrug-resistant and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Gram-negative isolates from clinical samples in a tertiary care hospital of Nepal,” Tropical Medicine and Health, vol. 49, no. 1, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Castanheira, P. J. Simner, and P. A. Bradford, “Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: an update on their characteristics, epidemiology and detection,” JAC-Antimicrobal Resistance, vol. 3, no. 3, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. I. Magale, I. A. Kassim, S. A. Odera, M. J. Omolo, and W. G. Jaoko, “Antibiotic susceptibility of organisms causing urinary tract infection in patients presenting at Kenyatta national hospital, Nairobi,” East African Medical Journal, vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 333–337, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
S. P. Henson, C. J. Boinett, M. J. Ellington et al., “Molecular epidemiology of Klebsiella pneumoniae invasive infections over a decade at Kilifi County Hospital in Kenya,” International Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 307, no. 7, pp. 422–429, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Turugurwa, J. Mwesigye, K. Kassaza, F. Byarugaba, T. Kabanda, and B. Musinguzi, “Antimicrobial resistance patterns and molecular characterization of Klebsiella pneumoniae in clinical isolates at mbarara regional referral hospital,” Advances in Infectious Diseases, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 197–225, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
C. R. Taitt, T. A. Łęski, D. P. Erwin et al., “Antimicrobial resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae stool isolates circulating in Kenya,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 6, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Abayneh, G. Tesfaw, and A. Abdissa, “Isolation of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL-) producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from patients with community-onset urinary tract infections in jimma university specialized hospital, southwest Ethiopia,” The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology, vol. 2018, Article ID 4846159, 8 pages, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. McDanel, M. L. Schweizer, V. Crabb et al., “Incidence of extended-spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli and klebsiella infections in the United States: a systematic literature review,” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 1209–1215, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kettani Halabi, F. A. Lahlou, I. Diawara et al., “Antibiotic resistance pattern of extended spectrum beta lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolated from patients with urinary tract infection in Morocco,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 11, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Lord, A. Gikonyo, A. Miwa, and A. Odoi, “Antimicrobial resistance among Enterobacteriaceae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas spp. isolates from clinical specimens from a hospital in Nairobi, Kenya,” PeerJ, vol. 9, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. K. Wangai, M. Masika, L. Gn et al., “Bridging antimicrobial resistance knowledge gaps: the East African perspective on a global problem,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. E. Apondi, O. C. Oduor, B. K. Gye, and M. K. Kipkoech, “High prevalence of multi- drug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in a tertiary teaching hospital in Western Kenya,” African Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 89–95, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Ahmadi, Z. Noormohammadi, R. Ranjbar, and P. Behzadi, “Prevalence of tetracycline resistance genes tet (A, B, C, 39) in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from tehran, Iran,” Iranian Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 141–147, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Leopold, F. van Leth, H. Tarekegn, and C. Schultsz, “Antimicrobial drug resistance among clinically relevant bacterial isolates in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 2337–2353, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. T. Tadesse, E. A. Ashley, S. Ongarello et al., “Antimicrobial resistance in Africa: a systematic review,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 17, no. 1, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Arana, M. Rubio, and J. I. Alós, “Evolución de la multirresistencia a los antibióticos en Escherichia coli y Klebsiella pneumoniae aislados de infecciones del tracto urinario. Un análisis de 12 años (2003-2014),” Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 293–298, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Carvalho, J. M. De Carvalho, S. Martínez-Álvarez et al., “Characterization of esbl-producing escherichia coli and klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from clinical samples in a northern Portuguese hospital: predominance of ctx-m-15 and high genetic diversity,” Microorganisms, vol. 9, no. 9, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Karlowsky, A. Walkty, A. Golden et al., “ESBL-Positive Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates from across Canada: CANWARD Surveillance Study,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 76, pp. 2007–2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. San, M. S. Aung, N. San et al., “Bacterial species and antimicrobial resistance of clinical isolates from pediatric patients in yangon, Myanmar,” Infectious Disease Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 26–32, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, J. Yang, L. Ye et al., “Characterization of clinical multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia isolates, 2007-2009, China,” Microbial Drug Resistance, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 465–470, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Wang and O. Ogunseitan, “Assessment of college students knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding antibiotics stewardship,” International Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 116, pp. S14–S15, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Seale, N. C. Gordon, J. Islam, S. J. Peacock, and J. A. G. Scott, “AMR surveillance in low and middle-income settings-a roadmap for participation in the Global Antimicrobial Surveillance System (GLASS),” Wellcome Open Res, vol. 2, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Who, Diagnostic Stewardship A Guide to Implementation in Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Sites, Who, Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.
J. A. Karlowsky, A. Walkty, A. Golden et al., “ESBL-positive Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from across Canada: CANWARD surveillance study, 2007-18,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 2815–2824, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Saravanan and V. Raveendaran, “Antimicrobial resistance pattern in a tertiary care hospital: an observational study,” Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 56, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Boonyasiri, E. Jauneikaite, L. Brinkac et al., “Genomic and clinical characterisation of multidrug-resistant carbapenemase-producing ST231 and ST16 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates colonising patients at Siriraj hospital, Bangkok, Thailand from 2015 to 2017,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 21, no. 1, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Dela, B. Egyir, A. O. Majekodunmi et al., “Diarrhoeagenic E. coli occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamases isolated from diarrhoea patients attending health facilities in Accra, Ghana,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 5, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Khalifa, A. M. Abd El-Aziz, R. Hassan, and E. S. Abdelmegeed, “β-lactam resistance associated with β-lactamase production and porin alteration in clinical isolates of E. coli and K. pneumoniae,” PLoS One, vol. 16, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. I. Aronin, M. W. Dunne, K. C. Yu, J. A. Watts, and V. Gupta, “Increased rates of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase isolates in patients hospitalized with culture-positive urinary enterobacterales in the United States: 2011–2020,” Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, vol. 103, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Na, D. C. Moon, M. Choi et al., “Antimicrobial resistance and molecular characterization of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolated from ducks in South Korea,” Foodbourne Pathogens & Disease, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 799–806, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ejaz, “Analysis of diverse β-lactamases presenting high-level resistance in association with OmpK35 and OmpK36 porins in ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae,” Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 3440–3447, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Shawky, W. B. Suleiman, and A. A. Farrag, “Antibacterial resistance pattern in clinical and non-clinical bacteria by phenotypic and genotypic assessment,” Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 2270–2279, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Maina, G. Revathi, and A. C. Whitelaw, “Molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli harbouring extended spectrum beta-lactamases and carbapenemases genes at a tertiary hospital,” Kenya, Microbiologia Medica, vol. 32, no. 4, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Sakkas, P. Bozidis, A. Ilia, G. Mpekoulis, and C. Papadopoulou, “Antimicrobial resistance in bacterial pathogens and detection of carbapenemases in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from hospital wastewater,” Antibiotics, vol. 8, no. 3, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ur Rahman, T. Ali, I. Ali, N. A. Khan, B. Han, and J. Gao, “The growing genetic and functional diversity of extended spectrum beta-lactamases,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2018, Article ID 9519718, 14 pages, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. O. Adekanmbi, M. O. Akinpelu, A. V. Olaposi, and A. A. Oyelade, “Diversity of extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) genes in Escherichia coli isolated from wastewater generated by a sick bay located in a university health care facility,” Gene Reports, vol. 20, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Castanheira, P. J. Simner, and P. A. Bradford, “Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: an update on their characteristics, epidemiology and detection,” JAC Antimicrob Resist, vol. 3, no. 3, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Suresh, A. Ranjan, S. Jadhav et al., “Molecular genetic and functional analysis of pks-Harboring, extra-intestinal pathogenic escherichia colifrom India,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Isgren, N. Williams, O. D. Fletcher et al., “Antimicrobial resistance in clinical bacterial isolates from horses in the UK,” Equine Veterinary Journal, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 390–414, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Karki, S. Lamichhane, B. B. Basnet, A. Dahal, B. K. Awal, and S. K. Mishra, “In vitro antimicrobial synergy testing of extensively drug-resistant clinical isolates at an organ transplant center in Nepal,” Infection and Drug Resistance, vol. 14, pp. 1669–1677, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. F. Berhe, G. T. Beyene, B. Seyoum et al., “Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and its clinical implications in Ethiopia: a systematic review,” Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, vol. 10, p. 1, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Maveke, G. O. Aboge, L. W. Kanja et al., Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Extended Spectrum Beta- Lactamase-Producing Clinical Isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Two Kenyan Facilities: A National Referral and a Level Five Hospital, Research Square, Durham, North Carolina, 2023.

Copyright

Copyright © 2024 Sylvia M. Maveke et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

446

Downloads

267

Citations