Implementation of TAGE Method Using Seikkala Derivatives Applied to Two-Point Fuzzy Boundary Value Problems

Table 2

Comparison of three parameters between GS, AGE, and TAGE methods at .

		Methods	n
			512	1024	2048	4096	8192
Problem	Number of iterations	GS	682475	2434982	8560953	29529307	99262033
		AGE	96840	354815	1281323	4555751	15908020
		TAGE	77449	279746	876948	2882382	10399116
	Execution time	GS	49.07	211.36	991.23	5874.81	32551.12
		AGE	9.00	39.00	202.00	1301.00	8164.00
		TAGE	7.00	31.00	141.00	827.00	5402.00
	Hausdorff distance	GS
		AGE
		TAGE
Problem	Number of iterations	GS	476030	1694502	5939547	20404350	68202066
		AGE	67704	247701	892745	3165828	11015151
		TAGE	53543	187435	672208	2124610	7514448
	Execution time	GS	35.26	155.79	756.06	4465.35	25999.98
		AGE	6.00	27.00	142.00	903.00	5652.00
		TAGE	5.00	21.00	106.00	605.00	3893.00
	Hausdorff distance	GS
		AGE
		TAGE