Research Article
Dynamic Simulations of the Allam Cycle Power Plant Integrated with an Air Separation Unit
Table 2
Comparison of stream flow conditions at steady state [
5,
20,
21].
| Stream name | Mass flow rate (kg/s) | Pressure (bar) | Temperature (°C) | Allam et al. | Fernandes et al. | Allam et al. | Fernandes et al. | Allam et al. | Fernandes et al. |
| TURBINE INLET | 923 | 930.4 | 1000–2000 | 1110 | 100–500 | 300 | EXHAUST | 923 | 930.4 | 500–1000 | 745 | 30–70 | 47 | REOUT | 923 | 930.4 | 30–45 | 45 | 30–70 | 47 | COMP IN | 909 | 909.5 | 17–50 | 16.6 | 29 | 29 | COOL 1 OUT | 909 | 909.5 | 23 | 23.1 | 40–100 | 101 | CO2 TO EOR | 28 | 28.1 | 23 | 23.1 | 100 | 101 | RECYCLE CO2 | 881 | 881.4 | 16 | 15.9 | 100 | 101 | CO2 TO COMB | 689 | 690 | 717 | 710 | 100–500 | 315.9 | CO2 + O2TO COMB | 233 | 230 | 717 | 711 | 100–500 | 312 |
|
|