The Influence of Outer Membrane Protein on Ampicillin Resistance of <i>Vibrio parahaemolyticus</i>

Meng, Xiangyu; Huang, Danyang; Zhou, Qing; Ji, Fan; Tan, Xin; Wang, Jianli; Wang, Xiaoyuan

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8079091

Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2023 | Article ID 8079091 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8079091

The Influence of Outer Membrane Protein on Ampicillin Resistance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus

Xiangyu Meng,¹Danyang Huang,²Qing Zhou,¹Fan Ji,¹Xin Tan,²Jianli Wang,³and Xiaoyuan Wang^1,2,3

Academic Editor: Mohd Adnan

Received19 Jul 2022

Revised13 Dec 2022

Accepted24 Dec 2022

Published13 Jan 2023

Abstract

The antibiotic resistance of the food-borne pathogen Vibrio parahaemolyticus has attracted researchers’ attention in recent years, but its molecular mechanism remains poorly understood. In this study, 7 genes encoding outer membrane proteins (OMPs) were individually deleted in V. parahaemolyticus ATCC33846, and the resistance of these 7 mutants to 14 antibiotics was investigated. The results revealed that the resistance of the 7 mutants to ampicillin was significantly increased. Further exploration of 20-gene transcription changes by real time-qPCR (RT-qPCR) demonstrated that the higher ampicillin resistance might be attributed to the expression of β-lactamase and reduced peptidoglycan (PG) synthesis activity through reduced transcription of penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), increased transcription of L,D-transpeptidases, downregulated D,D-carboxypeptidase, and alanine deficiency. This study provides a new perspective on ampicillin resistance in OMP mutants with respect to PG synthesis.

1. Introduction

Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a Gram-negative bacterium causing intestinal infections. It is commonly found in seafood, such as blood clams and shrimp [1], causing significant economic losses as an aquatic pathogen [2]. Due to the overuse of antibiotics, multidrug-resistant V. parahaemolyticus has been isolated in recent years. The strains have demonstrated resistance to ampicillin, cefazolin, penicillin, and so on [3].

Studies investigating the mechanism of ampicillin resistance mainly focus on three points: drug permeation, peptidoglycan (PG) synthesis, and β-lactamase. In Neisseria meningitidis, a single point mutation in the porin PorB can strongly affect the binding and permeation of β-lactam antibiotics [4]. Affinity binding studies of four transformants revealed decreased affinity of PBP4 for ampicillin [5]. In Enterococcus faecium, L,D-transpeptidase-mediated resistance may emerge in various pathogens [6]. In V. parahaemolyticus, a novel class A carbenicillin-hydrolyzing β-lactamase, bla (CARB-17), was responsible for the intrinsic penicillin resistance [7].

The role of outer membrane protein (OMP) in antibiotic resistance is usually related to permeation [8] as antibiotic susceptibility is related to OMP channel size [9]. Ampicillin enters E. coli through OmpF [10]. In carbapenem-resistantEnterobacter aerogenes, the expression of OMPs is deficient due to overexpressed sRNA or decreased due to single-point mutation [11]. In addition, performing gene knockout in V. parahaemolyticus is challenging, so few studies have reported antibiotic resistance in OMP mutants.

In this work, VP_RS22195, VP_RS23020, VP_RS16800, VP_RS16465, VP_RS20840, VP_RS03765, and VP_RS11205 were knocked out by ATCC33846. Subsequently, the growth, outer membrane (OM) permeability, and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of OMP deletion mutants were evaluated. In total, 14 antibiotics targeting different sites in cells were selected, including β-lactams (ampicillin), aminoglycosides (streptomycin, kanamycin, gentamicin, tobramycin), quinolones (ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid), furans (nitrofurantoin), cationic antimicrobial peptides (polymyxin B), rifampicin, clarithromycin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and novobiocin. After ampicillin treatment, the transcriptional changes of 20 genes in each mutant were further detected. This study gives a better understanding of the role of OMPs in V. parahaemolyticus OM and the cell wall.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strain and Growth Condition

Table 1 lists all strains and plasmids used in this study. V. parahaemolyticus ATCC33846 was used to construct OMP deletion strains. The bacteria were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth medium containing 10 g/L NaCl, 10 g/L trypsin (OXOID), and 5 g/L yeast extract (OXOID) at 37°C and 200 rpm for liquid culture.

2.2. Construction of Deletion Plasmid pOTC-SB

The deletion plasmid pOTC-SB was composed of genes CmR, p15A, traJ, oriT, and cre. The CmR and p15A gene fragment (1) was amplified from template pACYC184 with primers Cm-p15A-F and Cm-p15A-R, and then digested with FastDigest enzymes SpeI and PstI (Thermo Scientific). The traJ and oriT gene fragment (2) was amplified from template pDS132 with primers traJ-oriT-F and traJ-oriT-R and then digested with FastDigest enzymes SalI and SpeI (Thermo Scientific). The cre gene fragment (3) was amplified from template pDTW109 by primers Ptac-cre-F and Ptac-cre-R. The sacB gene fragment was amplified from template pDS132 by primers sacB-F and sacB-R. Finally, the ligation product of (1) and (2) was connected to (3) by using one-step cloning (ClonExpress II One Step Cloning Kit, Vazyme). The resulting plasmid was named pOTC as it contained oriT and cre. Linearized pOTC by BstZ17I and sacB were combined by one-step cloning to construct pOTC-SB.

2.3. Construction of OMP Deletion Mutants

Upstream and downstream homology arms were amplified from the chromosomal DNA of V. parahaemolyticus ATCC33846 by the corresponding U/D-(target gene)-F/R primers, as displayed in Table 2. The loxL-Gm-loxR fragment was amplified from pWJW101 [15] by primers Gm-R and Gm-F, and the homology arms and loxL-Gm-loxR were integrated by fusion PCR (4). Then, the pDS132 plasmid and (4) were separately digested with the FastDigest enzymes XbaI or SalI and ligated by T4 ligase (VP_RS23020 was connected to pDS132 by one-step cloning). E. coli CC118 was transformed with products and cultured on LB plates containing 30 μg·ml⁻¹ gentamicin, and the plasmid extracted from E. coli CC118 was electrotransformed into E. coliS17-l (λpir).

After conjugation of V. parahaemolyticus ATCC33846 and E. coliS17-l (λpir) with the relevant plasmid, 5 μg·ml⁻¹ polymyxin B and 10 μg·ml⁻¹ chloramphenicol were used to select transformants of V. parahaemolyticus. Then, 10% (W/V) sucrose and gentamicin (10 μg·ml⁻¹) were used to select deletion mutants. The mutants were verified by colony PCR and genome verification.

Following knockout, Gm was removed by Cre in pOTC-SB. The deletion mutants were conjugated with S17-1 containing pOTC-SB and then spread-plated with 30 μg·ml⁻¹ chloramphenicol. Agarose gel electrophoresis revealed three results. The first result indicated a single band with the length of homology arms plus Gm; the second result showed a single band with the length of homology arms plus 100 bp; the third result displayed a combination of the above two types of bands. To ensure thorough Cre, the strains of the first and third colonies were cultured again in LB with chloramphenicol until the second result appeared. Then, negative selection was performed on an LB plate with gentamicin to ensure the removal of Gm from the genome by Cre. The pOTC-SB was removed by culturing in LB with 10% sucrose without antibiotics. The negative selection was performed on an LB plate with chloramphenicol to verify the removal of pOTC-SB, which has chloramphenicol resistance. The verification of OMP deletion mutants by agarose gel electrophoresis is shown in Figure 1.

After OMP deletion mutants were constructed, mutants and wild-type strains were streaked and purified on the LB plate 5 times, then cultured in LB liquid overnight and stored at −70°C. Before each assay, strains were streaked and activated on the LB plate for 25 h, and then a single colony was cultured in LB liquid for 14 h. A bacterial solution was then used in each assay.

2.4. Growth Curve

The overnight cultured strains were added to 50 ml of LB broth medium with an initial OD₆₀₀ of 0.02. The mixture was cultured at 37°C and 200 rpm. All assays were performed in triplicate.

2.5. Permeation Assay

The OD₆₀₀ of overnight-cultured strains was adjusted to 0.5. The sediments were washed twice and suspended in 10 mmol·L⁻¹ pH 7.4 PBS. Subsequently, 48 μl NPN solution was added to 1152 μl of the bacteria solution before being observed with the fluorescence spectrophotometer. The detection was carried out under excitation light at 350 nm, emission light at 428 nm, and a 2.5 mm slit width. All assays were carried out in triplicates, and three parallels were performed in each group.

2.6. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Assay

All antibiotics except ampicillin were diluted by a two-fold dilution method to adjust the concentration to 0.0078125–256 μg·ml⁻¹ in 96-well plates. As the 2-fold dilution of high-concentration solutions would result in large intervals, another concentration setting was used for ampicillin. For solutions with a concentration under 100 μg·ml⁻¹, a 2-fold dilution method was used to achieve a concentration range of 0.98–125 μg·ml⁻¹. For solutions with a concentration range of 100–1000 μg·ml⁻¹, the resulting concentration was set to 100, 200, 300, …, 1000 μg·ml⁻¹. In the concentration range between 1000 and 2000 μg·ml⁻¹, the concentration points were set as 1000, 1250, 1500, and 1750 μg·ml⁻¹. In addition, for concentrations above 2000 μg·ml⁻¹, final concentrations of 2000, 2500, and 3000 μg·ml⁻¹ were set up. The strains cultured overnight were then transferred to 5 ml LB test tubes with an initial OD₆₀₀ of 0.02 for 4-5 h. Then, the OD₆₀₀ of freshly cultured strains was adjusted to 0.001. Then, 100 μl of diluted bacteria solution was added to each well, and the culture was incubated at 37°C for 18 h. OD₆₀₀ was measured by BioTek Cytation 5. All assays were carried out in duplicate and performed three times in parallel in each group.

2.7. Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR)

The overnight cultured strains were transferred into 5 ml LB test tubes with an initial OD₆₀₀ of 0.02 for 4–5 h. Half of the bacterial solution was taken out into a sterilized empty test tube. Ampicillin was added to the experimental groups at the final concentration of 16 μg·ml⁻¹, and sterilized water with the same volume of ampicillin was added to tubes as the control. After incubating at 37°C and 200 rpm for 0.5 h, the sediment was used for RNA extraction. The methods used for RNA extraction, reverse transcription, and RT-qPCR were the same as those described in [17]. All assays were performed in triplicates.

3. Results

3.1. Deletion of OMP Affects Cell Growth, OM Permeation, and Antibiotic Resistance

Bacterial growth has four phases, including the lag phase, the exponential phase, the stationary phase, and the decline phase. In the lag phase, bacteria produce new enzymes to digest, build biomass, and prepare for cell division [18]. ATCC33846 started to grow after a lag phase of 2 hours following the inoculum. Compared to ATCC33846, some OMP mutants demonstrated a shorter lag phase, including ΔVP_RS22195, ΔVP_RS16800, ΔVP_RS16465, and ΔVP_RS20840 (Figure 2). The shorter lag phase indicated that the OMPs were the proteins prepared in the lag phase. Deletion of OMPs lightened the burden of preparation for cells in the lagged phase. In the exponential phase, ΔVP_RS16800, ΔVP_RS16465, ΔVP_RS20840, and ΔVP_RS03765 (Figures 2(c)–2(f)) had a higher growth rate than ATCC33846. Furthermore, ΔVP_RS22195, ΔVP_RS16800, ΔVP_RS16465, ΔVP_RS20840, and ΔVP_RS03765 entered the decline phase directly, without an obvious stationary phase. In contrast, ΔVP_RS23020 and ΔVP_RS11205 showed poor growth (Figures 2(b) and 2(g)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

The N-Phenyl-1-naphthylamine (NPN) probe was used to test the OM permeability of OMP deletion mutants. NPN can be excited to form green fluorescence in the bacterial inner membrane, a hydrophobic environment [19]. A decreased OM permeability was observed in ΔVP_RS16465 (Figure 3).

Fourteen antibiotics were selected for the MIC assay (Figure 4). In ΔVP_RS23020, increased resistance to antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid, and novobiocin) inhibiting DNA synthesis was observed. Rifampicin inhibits RNA synthesis, and a 4-fold increase in the rifampicin MIC was observed in ΔVP_RS22195. Resistance to antibiotics (clarithromycin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, streptomycin, kanamycin, gentamicin, and tobramycin) inhibiting protein synthesis was all increased in ΔVP_RS22195 and ΔVP_RS20840. Among protein synthesis-inhibiting antibiotics, resistance to 3 aminoglycosides (streptomycin, kanamycin, and gentamicin) was increased, whereas the fold change of tobramycin MIC was not obvious. Notably, ΔVP_RS11205 was more resistant to aminoglycosides than other mutants, and the tetracycline susceptibility of ΔVP_RS23020 was increased 2-fold. Nitrofurantoin inhibits carbohydrate metabolism enzymes and interferes with cell wall synthesis [20]. Resistance to nitrofurantoin was not decreased after OMP deletion. In addition, resistance to β-lactams, which act on peptidoglycan (PG) synthesis, showed a general increase. Polymyxin B damages Gram-negative bacterial OM and resistance to polymyxin B was increased 2.8-fold in ΔVP_RS20840. All OMP mutants showed at least a 64-fold increase in ampicillin resistance.

3.2. Changes in the Transcription of 20 Genes in OMP Deletion Mutants under the Absence and Stimulation of Ampicillin

RT-qPCR was performed to detect the transcriptional changes of 20 genes to further study the causes of increased ampicillin resistance in OMP deletion mutants (Table 3). These genes can be divided into five types: OMP genes, β-lactamase genes, PG synthesis-related genes, stress-regulation-related genes, and lipid A synthesis genes. VP_RS17515 expresses β-lactamase. VP_RS13510, mrcB, mrdA, VP_RS02165, VP_RS03450, VP_RS22785, dacB, VP_RS22200, VP_RS09310, VP_RS15980 were selected as PG synthesis-related genes through BLASTp in NCBI, and the proteins were homologous with PBP1A, PBP1B, PBP2, PBP3, PBP5, PBP4, LdtA, LdtD, and LdtF, respectively, in E. coli. In order to directly observe gene regulation under membrane stress, uhpA and VP_RS14060, which are homologous to the response regulator proteins rcsB and cpxR in E. coli, respectively, were selected. lpxA is a lipid A synthesis gene. β-lactams inhibit bacterial growth by binding to penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) and interfering with PG synthesis [27]. According to the growth curve, bacteria in the initial exponential phase were used as the experiment sample. The ampicillin MIC value of ATCC33846 was 3.90625–15.625 μg·mL⁻¹, while the MIC values of OMP mutants were above 600 μg·mL⁻¹. Therefore, 16 μg·mL⁻¹ ampicillin, which would not kill ATCC33846 and have a better effect on mutants, was set as the pretreatment.

Figure 5 shows the transcription changes of 20 genes in mutants compared to ATCC33846. In ΔVP_RS23020 (Figure 5(b)), all genes exhibited transcriptional upregulation except for VP_RS11205. In ΔVP_RS16465 and ΔVP_RS20840 (Figures 5(d) and 5(e)), VP_RS23020 was upregulated over 9-fold. The transcription of VP_RS17515 was also upregulated over 9-fold in ΔVP_RS23020 but downregulated in ΔVP_RS22195, ΔVP_RS16800, ΔVP_RS20840, ΔVP_RS03765,and ΔVP_RS11205 (Figures 5(a), 5(c), 5(e)–5(g)). Most PG synthesis genes were downregulated in mutants except for ΔVP_RS23020. However, in ΔVP_RS23020, the transcription of VP_RS22200, VP_RS09310, and VP_RS15980 (Ldts) were all upregulated. Among PG synthesis genes, the transcriptional changes of VP_RS22785 and VP_RS09310 showed an interesting phenomenon. These two genes were downregulated over 2-fold in ΔVP_RS22195, ΔVP_RS16800, ΔVP_RS16465, and ΔVP_RS20840. In contrast, they were upregulated over 2-fold in ΔVP_RS23030 and ΔVP_RS11205, VP_RS22785, and VP_RS09310. In ΔVP_RS03765, these two genes showed no obvious downregulation compared to other genes. Moreover, VP_RS20840 showed the same trend as VP_RS22785 in all mutants. Moreover, the transcription of lpxA was downregulated in all mutants except for ΔVP_RS23020.

Figure 5

Comparison of transcription of 20 genes in the 7 V. parahaemolyticus OMP deletion mutants, using wild-type ATCC33846 as a control. Five kinds of genes are divided by dotted line: OMP genes, β-lactamase genes, PG synthesis-related genes, stress-regulation-related genes, and lipid A synthesis genes. VP_RS17515 expresses β-lactamase. The transcription change fold is calculated by 2^−ΔΔCt. Each bar represents the mean value of three biological replicates, and error bars represent standard deviations calculated from three biological replicates.

Figure 6 displays the transcription changes of OMP genes of ATCC33846 and mutants under ampicillin stimulation compared to the untreated group. All OMP genes were downregulated in ΔVP_RS22195, ΔVP_RS23020, and ΔVP_RS20840 (Figures 6(b)6(c), and 6(f)). Furthermore, VP_RS16800 was downregulated over 2-fold in ATCC33846, ΔVP_RS23020, ΔVP_RS20840, and ΔVP_RS03765 (Figures 6(a), 6(c), 6(f), and 6(g)), and over 4-fold in ΔVP_RS22195 and ΔVP_RS11205 (Figures 6(b) and 6(h)). VP_RS17515 demonstrated over 2-fold upregulation in ATCC33846, ΔVP_RS16800, and ΔVP_RS16465 (Figures 6(a), 6(d), and 6(e)). In addition, transcription of PG synthesis genes showed significant changes in OMP deletion mutants but not after ampicillin stimulation. These findings implied that OMP deletion caused internal resistance to ampicillin instead of inducing a stress response with stimulation of ampicillin.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

Figure 6

Comparison of transcription of 20 genes in the 7 V. parahaemolyticus OMP deletion mutants under stimulation of ampicillin (AMP), using wild-type ATCC33846 as a control. Five kinds of genes are divided by dotted line: OMP genes, β-lactamase genes, PG synthesis-related genes, stress-regulation-related genes, and lipid A synthesis genes. The transcription change fold is calculated by 2^−ΔΔCt. Each bar represents the mean value of three biological replicates, and the error bars represent standard deviations calculated from three biological replicates.

4. Discussion

The MIC change folds showed two major increases in resistance to aminoglycosides and ampicillin (Figure 4), and the MIC value is shown in Table S1. The MIC values of 3 kinds of aminoglycosides (streptomycin, kanamycin, and gentamicin) increased in all 7 OMP mutant strains, indicating that the mechanism of aminoglycoside resistance could be related to OM. Aminoglycosides act on bacterial ribosomes and inhibit translation [28]. Moreover, aminoglycosides are polycationic at physiological pH and can replace divalent cations on lipopolysaccharide, thereby increasing membrane permeability [29]. However, the results of the MIC fold change of polymyxin B, which could also damage OM by replacing divalent cations on lipopolysaccharides, showed that not all the OM of mutants was more resistant to cationic antibiotics. In addition, after the deletion of OMP genes, the fold change of tobramycin’s MIC was lower than that of other aminoglycosides, and ΔVP_RS03765 was sensitive to tobramycin. Therefore, the aminoglycoside resistance mechanism remains unclear in OMP deletion mutants.

A significant increase in ampicillin resistance was observed, with ATCC33846 showing a small MIC value (fluctuating 3.90625–15.625 μg·mL⁻¹). However, 10.6% of V. parahaemolyticus isolates from the coast of Korea were sensitive to ampicillin, while 87.2% were resistant [30]. It is speculated that the low ampicillin MIC of ATCC33846 was caused by repeated subculturing through different generations without antibiotics in the laboratory and an ATCC33846 sample at the early exponential phase. In addition, different CARB β-lactamases in various V. parahaemolyticus strains exhibit different ampicillin hydrolysis rates [31].

Ampicillin resistance in different OMP mutants may result from reduced PG synthesis activity and expression of β-lactamase. PG synthesis can be affected by reduced transcription of PBPs, increased transcription of Ldts, downregulated D,D-carboxypeptidase, and alanine deficiency.

Reduced transcription of PBPs was inferred to be one cause of ampicillin resistance. In ΔVP_RS22195, ΔVP_RS03765,and ΔVP_RS11205, PG synthesis-related genes were downregulated (Figures 5(a), 5(f), and 5(g)). VP_RS22195 is located adjacent to VP_RS22200 in the genome and has 40.45% protein similarity to the murein lipoprotein Lpp in E. coli (Table 3). Furthermore, the N-terminus of lipoprotein LpoB is required for the activation of PBP1B in E. coli [32]. Lipoprotein NlpI is a part of PG biosynthetic multienzyme complexes and acts as an adaptor [33]. In addition, transcription of uhpA in ΔVP_RS22195 was downregulated over 15-fold (Figure 5(a)). The lack of lipoprotein increases the periplasmic distance, and OM stress signals cannot be transmitted by the Rcs system [34]. PG synthesis was affected after the deletion of VP_RS22195, resulting in a slower division rate in the exponential phase than ATCC33846 (Figure 2(a)). Another cause might be the upregulated Ldts in ΔVP_RS23020. In a β-lactam-resistant mutant of Enterococcus faecium, Ldt_fm was found to account for β-lactam resistance by using a different substrate from D,D-transpeptidase [6].

ΔVP_RS16465 and ΔVP_RS20840 might exhibit ampicillin resistance due to the downregulated transcription of VP_RS22785 (Figures 5(d) and 5(e)), which encodes a D,D-carboxypeptidase cleaving pentapeptides into tetrapeptides [23]. The V. choleraeD,D-endopeptidase ShyA could recognize but not cleave dimers containing pentapeptides [35]. Therefore, PG was protected from being cleaved by D,D-endopeptidases, and existed PG was maintained, reducing the activity of PG synthesis to resist ampicillin. In addition, with lower tetrapeptides, the transcription of VP_RS09310 was downregulated, which is homologous to L,D-transpeptidase LdtD cleaving tetrapeptide to form mDAP³–mDAP³cross-links (Table 3). However, the deletion of PBP5 in E. coli increased the sensitivity to β-lactams [36]. It is speculated that 3 homologs of PBP5 in V. parahaemolyticus and one of the downregulated homologs do not exert a significant impact on maintaining the normal cell shape. In addition, the OMP gene VP_RS20840 showed the same trend in transcriptional change as VP_RS22785 in all OMP mutants (Figure 5). This finding implies an unknown relationship between VP_RS22785 and VP_RS20840. In addition, alanine deficiency may be involved in increased ampicillin resistance. Previous research reported lysis in an E. coli strain lacking alanine racemase in the absence of D-ala, which is mainly caused by defects in PG synthesis [37]. OmpA was upregulated after the addition of alanine through analysis of proteomics and RT-qPCR [38]. It is speculated that lower levels of alanine entered the cell following OmpA deletion, which might further affect the transcription of PBP genes. VP_RS16465, VP_RS20840, and VP_RS03765 belong to the OmpA protein family (Table 3), while the different transcription trends of VP_RS22785 inferred different functions of OmpA.

The existence and expression of β-lactamase were one of the causes of ampicillin resistance in V. parahaemolyticus. After ampicillin treatment, VP_RS17515 (β-lactamase) was upregulated in other strains except for ΔVP_RS23020 (Figure 6(c)). The same conclusion was obtained in V. parahaemolyticus V110 [7]. Although the transcription of VP_RS17515 was slightly downregulated in ΔVP_RS23020 under ampicillin stimulation (Figure 6(c)), it was upregulated more than 4-fold in ΔVP_RS23020 (Figure 5(b)). VP_RS23020 encodes maltoporin. In addition, the maltose metabolism pathway was potentially involved in the resistance to antibiotics that target cell wall biosynthesis. In a Lactococcus lactis strain resistant to lactococcin 972, which is a bacteriocin that inhibits cell wall biosynthesis by binding to lipid II, maltose metabolic genes were deleted. However, this strain showed no lactococcin 972 sensitivity in the maltose medium [39].

Lipoprotein potentially affected OM biosynthesis through phospholipids. Transcription of lpxA was downregulated over 3.7-fold in ΔVP_RS22195 (Figure 5(a)), indicating that the lack of VP_RS22195 had an effect on OM synthesis. The maturity of lipoprotein is associated with phosphatidylglycerol [40]. Moreover, crosstalk between phospholipids and lipopolysaccharide synthesis was observed. LpxK catalyzes the synthesis of lipid IV A from lipid A disaccharide, which depends on the concentration of unsaturated fatty acids [41]. Furthermore, transcription of lpxA was downregulated over 2-fold in ΔVP_RS16800, ΔVP_RS20840, ΔVP_RS03765, and ΔVP_RS11205. Nevertheless, the relationship between these OMPs and OM synthesis remains unknown.

5. Conclusions

Deletion of OMP affects growth and OM permeation, and MIC and OMP mutants demonstrated significantly increased ampicillin resistance. Further RT-qPCR analysis showed several possible causes of ampicillin resistance in OMP mutants, including the expression of β-lactamase, the reduction of PG synthesis activity due to reduced transcription of PBPs, increased transcription of Ldts, downregulated D,D-carboxypeptidase, and alanine deficiency. This study provides a new perspective on ampicillin resistance in OMP mutants with respect to PG synthesis. Future work will focus on the role of OMPs in the synthesis of OM and PG.

Data Availability

All the data generated or analysed during this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Xiangyu Meng conceptualized the study, performed investigation, and wrote the original draft. Danyang Huang, Qing Zhou, Fan Ji, and Xin Tan performed investigation. Jianli Wang optimized methodology. Xiaoyuan Wang conceptualized the study, reviewed and edited it, and performed supervision. Xiangyu Meng and Xiaoyuan Wang contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC1600102).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table S1 shows the detailed data about MIC in Figure 4 and the MIC of amoxicillin. (Supplementary Materials)

References

C. W. Tan, Y. Rukayadi, H. Hasan et al., “Prevalence and antibiotic resistance patterns of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from different types of seafood in Selangor, Malaysia,” Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1602–1608, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Kumar, K. Baruah, D. V. Nguyen, G. Smagghe, E. Vossen, and P. Bossier, “Phloroglucinol-mediated Hsp70 production in crustaceans: protection against Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Artemia franciscana and Macrobrachium rosenbergii,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 9, p. 1091, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Elmahdi, L. V. DaSilva, and S. Parveen, “Antibiotic resistance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus in various countries: a review,” Food Microbiology, vol. 57, pp. 128–134, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Bartsch, C. M. Ives, C. Kattner et al., “An antibiotic-resistance conferring mutation in a neisserial porin: structure, ion flux, and ampicillin binding,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, Biomembranes, vol. 1863, no. 6, Article ID 183601, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. Mendelman, D. O. Chaffin, T. L. Stull, C. E. Rubens, K. D. Mack, and A. L. Smith, “Characterization of non-beta-lactamase-mediated ampicillin resistance in Haemophilus influenzae,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 235–244, 1984.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Mainardi, M. Fourgeaud, J. E. Hugonnet et al., “A novel peptidoglycan cross-linking enzyme for a beta-lactam-resistant transpeptidation pathway,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 46, pp. 38146–38152, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Chiou, R. Li, and S. Chen, “CARB-17 family of beta-lactamases mediates intrinsic resistance to penicillins in Vibrio parahaemolyticus,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 3593–3595, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Ghai and S. Ghai, “Understanding antibiotic resistance via outer membrane permeability,” Infection and Drug Resistance, vol. 11, pp. 523–530, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Ghai and S. Ghai, “Exploring bacterial outer membrane barrier to combat bad bugs,” Infection and Drug Resistance, vol. 10, pp. 261–273, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Ghai, H. Bajaj, J. Arun Bafna, H. A. El Damrany Hussein, M. Winterhalter, and R. Wagner, “Ampicillin permeation across OmpF, the major outer-membrane channel in Escherichia coli,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 293, no. 18, pp. 7030–7037, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hao, M. Ye, Z. Shen et al., “Porin deficiency in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter aerogenes strains,” Microbial Drug Resistance, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1277–1283, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. T. Horng, K. C. Chang, Y. N. Liu, H. C. Lai, and P. C. Soo, “The RssB/RssA two-component system regulates biosynthesis of the tripyrrole antibiotic, prodigiosin, in Serratia marcescens,” International Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 300, no. 5, pp. 304–312, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. L. Milton, A. Norqvist, and H. Wolf-Watz, “Cloning of a metalloprotease gene involved in the virulence mechanism of Vibrio anguillarum,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 174, no. 22, pp. 7235–7244, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Philippe, J. P. Alcaraz, E. Coursange, J. Geiselmann, and D. Schneider, “Improvement of pCVD442, a suicide plasmid for gene allele exchange in bacteria,” Plasmid, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 246–255, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wang, W. Ma, Y. Wang et al., “Deletion of 76 genes relevant to flagella and pili formation to facilitate polyhydroxyalkanoate production in Pseudomonas putida,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 102, no. 24, pp. 10523–10539, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Hu, Y. Tan, Y. Li, X. Hu, D. Xu, and X. Wang, “Construction and application of an efficient multiple-gene-deletion system in Corynebacterium glutamicum,” Plasmid, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 303–313, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Tan, J. Qiao, Q. Zhou et al., “Identification of a phosphoethanolamine transferase for lipid A modification in Vibrio parahaemolyticus,” Food Control, vol. 125, Article ID 108033, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. L. Bertrand, “Lag phase is a dynamic, organized, adaptive, and evolvable period that prepares bacteria for cell division,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 201, no. 7, pp. 00697–e718, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. M. Helander and T. Mattila-Sandholm, “Fluorometric assessment of gram-negative bacterial permeabilization,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 213–219, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Munoz-Davila, “Role of old antibiotics in the era of antibiotic resistance. Highlighted nitrofurantoin for the treatment of lower urinary tract infections,” Antibiotics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 39–48, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. A. Pemberton, R. E. Noor, V. Kumar M V et al., “Mechanism of proton transfer in class A β-lactamase catalysis and inhibition by avibactam,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117, no. 11, pp. 5818–5825, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Markovski, J. L. Bohrhunter, T. J. Lupoli et al., “Cofactor bypass variants reveal a conformational control mechanism governing cell wall polymerase activity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 113, no. 17, pp. 4788–4793, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Garde, P. K. Chodisetti, and M. Reddy, “Peptidoglycan: structure, synthesis, and regulation,” EcoSal Plus, vol. 9, no. 2, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Skoog, F. S. Bruzell, A. Ducroux et al., “Penicillin-binding protein 5 can form a homo-oligomeric complex in the inner membrane of Escherichia coli,” Protein Science, vol. 20, pp. 1520–1529, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Wall, N. Majdalani, and S. Gottesman, “The complex Rcs regulatory cascade,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 111–139, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. L. Guest and T. L. Raivio, “The cpx inner membrane stress response,” in Stress and Environmental Regulation of Gene Expression and Adaptation in Bacteria, F. J. D. Bruijn, Ed., pp. 1015–1024, Wiley Online Library, New York, NY, USA, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
G. De Angelis, P. Del Giacomo, B. Posteraro, M. Sanguinetti, and M. Tumbarello, “Molecular mechanisms, epidemiology, and clinical importance of beta-Lactam resistance in Enterobacteriaceae,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 21, no. 14, p. 5090, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Garneau-Tsodikova and K. J. Labby, “Mechanisms of resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics: overview and perspectives,” Medchemcomm, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 11–27, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. W. Serio, T. Keepers, L. Andrews, and K. M. Krause, “Aminoglycoside revival: review of a historically important class of antimicrobials undergoing rejuvenation,” EcoSal Plus, vol. 8, no. 1, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. Ryu, J. S. Mok, D. E. Lee, J. Y. Kwon, and K. Park, “Occurrence, virulence, and antimicrobial resistance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from bivalve shellfish farms along the southern coast of Korea,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 26, no. 20, pp. 21034–21043, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Choury, G. Aubert, M. F. Szajnert, K. Azibi, M. Delpech, and G. Paul, “Characterization and nucleotide sequence of CARB-6, a new carbenicillin-hydrolyzingbeta-lactamase from Vibrio cholerae,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 297–301, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. F. Egan, N. L. Jean, A. Koumoutsi et al., “Outer-membrane lipoprotein LpoB spans the periplasm to stimulate the peptidoglycan synthase PBP1B,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 22, pp. 8197–8202, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Banzhaf, H. C. Yau, J. Verheul et al., “Outer membrane lipoprotein NlpI scaffolds peptidoglycan hydrolases within multi-enzyme complexes in Escherichia coli,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 39, no. 5, Article ID e102246, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. T. Asmar, J. L. Ferreira, E. J. Cohen et al., “Communication across the bacterial cell envelope depends on the size of the periplasm,” PLoS Biology, vol. 15, no. 12, Article ID e2004303, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Dorr, F. Cava, H. Lam, B. M. Davis, and M. K. Waldor, “Substrate specificity of an elongation-specific peptidoglycan endopeptidase and its implications for cell wall architecture and growth of Vibrio cholerae,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 949–962, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. Sarkar, C. Chowdhury, and A. S. Ghosh, “Deletion of penicillin-binding protein 5 (PBP5) sensitises Escherichia coli cells to beta-lactam agents,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 244–249, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. J. W. Wijsman, “The characterization of an alanine racemase mutant of Escherichia coli,” Genetical Research, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 269–277, 1972.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-Z. Ye, Y.-B. Su, X.-M. Lin et al., “Alanine enhances aminoglycosides-induced ROS production as revealed by proteomic analysis,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 9, p. 29, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Roces, P. Courtin, S. Kulakauskas, A. Rodriguez, M. P. Chapot-Chartier, and B. Martinez, “Isolation of Lactococcus lactis mutants simultaneously resistant to the cell wall-active bacteriocin Lcn972, lysozyme, nisin, and bacteriophage c2,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 78, no. 12, pp. 4157–4163, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Singh, M. Bilal, J. McClory et al., “Mechanism of phosphatidylglycerol activation catalyzed by prolipoprotein diacylglyceryl transferase,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 123, no. 33, pp. 7092–7102, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Emiola, S. S. Andrews, C. Heller, and J. George, “Crosstalk between the lipopolysaccharide and phospholipid pathways during outer membrane biogenesis in Escherichia coli,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 113, no. 11, pp. 3108–3113, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Xiangyu Meng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

472

Downloads

423

Citations