Research Article

Selected Spatiotemporal and Joint Angle Parameters in Normal Gait and Nordic Walking with Classical and Mechatronic Poles in Aspects of Sex Differences

Table 3

ROM differences between measurements: “no-pole”(1) vs. “classical pole”(2) vs. “mechatronic pole”(3).

ROM
(degree)
Sex(1)
(2)
(3)
value,
ANOVA, or Friedman test
Significant differences
(1)-(2)-(3)
(according to post hoc test)

Elbow flexion-extension LTMales0.723
Females

Elbow flexion-extension RTMales0.630
Females

Shoulder flexion-extension LTMales0.010
(1)-(2)
(1)-(3)
Females

Shoulder flexion-extension RTMales0.167
Females

Shoulder ab-adduction LTMales0.031Females: (1)-(2) females: (1)-(3)
Females

Shoulder ab-adduction RTMales0.564
Females

Shoulder rotation LTMales<0.001(1)-(2)
(1)-(3)
Females

Shoulder rotation RTMales<0.001Females: (1)-(2) females: (1)-(3)
Females

Wrist radial-ulnar LTMales0.032Males: (1)-(3)
Females

Wrist radial-ulnar RTMales0.090
Females

Wrist supination-pronation LTMales<0.001
(1)-(2)
(1)-(3)
Females

Wrist supination-pronation RTMales0.054
Females

Hip flexion-extension LTMales0.001(1)-(2)
(1)-(3)
Females

Hip flexion-extension RTMales<0.001(1)-(2)
(1)-(3)
Females

Hip ab-adduction LTMales0.717
Females

Hip ab-adduction RTMales0.297
Females

Hip rotation LTMales0.047
(1)-(3)
Females

Hip rotation RTMales0.005
(1)-(3)
(2)-(3)
Females

Knee flexion-extension LTMales0.105
Females

Knee flexion-extension RTMales0.184
Females

Ankle dorsi-plantarflexion LTMales0.520
Females

Ankle dorsi-plantarflexion RTMales0.179
Females

Ankle inversion-eversion LTMales0.141
Females

Ankle inversion-eversion RTMales0.841
Females

Ankle ab-adduction LTMales0.520
Females

Ankle ab-adduction RTMales0.151
Females

Where: italics indicate Friedman test results; bold indicates significant differences between males and females; M: mean; SD: standard deviation; ROM: range of motion; RT: right; LT: left limb; : partial eta squared.