Prediction of Sacral Screw Loosening after Lumbosacral Surgeries Involving Rigid Fixation of Sacral Bone Using Preoperative Computed Tomography Scans

Muheremu, Aikeremujiang; Yakufu, Maihemuti; Jiang, Junyao; Mardan, Muradil; Li, Lei; Zhang, Rui; Aili, Abudunaibi; Luo, Zhaohui

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7123139

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 7123139 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7123139

Prediction of Sacral Screw Loosening after Lumbosacral Surgeries Involving Rigid Fixation of Sacral Bone Using Preoperative Computed Tomography Scans

Aikeremujiang Muheremu,¹Maihemuti Yakufu,²Junyao Jiang,³Muradil Mardan,⁴Lei Li,¹Rui Zhang,⁵Abudunaibi Aili,¹and Zhaohui Luo⁶

Academic Editor: Ajoy Prasad Shetty

Received12 Nov 2021

Revised04 Apr 2022

Accepted30 Apr 2022

Published23 May 2022

Abstract

Objective. To find a preoperative computed tomography-based method to predict the incidence of sacral screw loosening and assist surgical planning. Methods. Surgically treated patients for degenerative lumbosacral disorders with rigid pedicle screw fixation of patients with L5-S1 vertebra in our center from January 2016 to January 2021 were retrospectively included in the current study. CT scan attenuation of the horizontal plane of the sacrum was measured with Hounsfield units (HU). Postoperative X-ray tests were used to diagnose screw loosening. The data was analyzed by independent sample -tests, analysis, Pearson correlation analysis, and ROC curve analysis. Results. A total of 162 (114 male, 48 female, average age years) patients were included in the final analysis. Significant differences were found between the screw loosening group and nonloosening group concerning the HU value of the sacrum at the horizontal plane (). In ROC curve analysis, AUC was 0.674 (95% CI: 0.592-0.756). A cutoff of 200 HU provided 64.8% sensitivity and 62.4% specificity, and a cutoff of 150 HU provided 90.2% sensitivity. Conclusions. Analyzing 162 patients with at least 12 months of follow-up, we propose cutoff CT attenuation values of 200 HU and 150 HU to take moderate and radical measures of screw augmentation to prevent screw loosening in the sacral bone.

1. Introduction

In lumbar spinal stenosis, lumbar spondylolisthesis, and other lumbosacral degenerative diseases, lumbosacral decompression and pedicle screw fixation are often a necessity [1, 2]. However, due to the special anatomical structure and biomechanical properties of the sacrum, lumbosacral fixation is often followed by complications such as the formation of pseudoarticular joints, loosening, and breakage of pedicle screws. Screw loosening is one of the main complications of rigid fixation in spine surgery. It may lead to undesirable outcomes such as pain and decline of motility and life quality. Reported incidence of sacral pedicle screw loosening in the current literature ranges from 15.6% to 46.5%, which is significantly higher than the incidence of lumbar screw loosening [3–5]. Due to poor bone quality in the elderly population, internal fixation-related complications are especially common in patients with lumbosacral degenerative disorders [6].

At present, techniques commonly used to enhance the strength of the sacral pedicle screw fixation include double and tricortical fixation, application of expanding screws, S1-2 combined screw fixation, iliac screw fixation, and the cement-reinforced screw fixation [7–9]. However, sacral double or tricortical fixation and expanding screw fixation techniques still face certain risk of screw loosening, while S1-2 combined screw fixation and iliac screw fixation may lead to extensive soft tissue damage. Bone cement augmentation technique is easy to carry out and has better fixation strength, but there are concerns that it could cause complications such as fatal pulmonary embolism [10, 11]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a preoperative measure with high sensitivity to predict screw loosening so as to help the surgeon decide whether or not to apply screw augmentation techniques in a specific patient. Considering that preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans are regularly carried out before spine surgeries, here, we report a computed tomography scan-based method to predict screw loosening in the sacral spine after rigid lumbosacral fixation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Inclusion and Exclusion

All procedures were approved by the ethical committee of our hospital, and written consent was achieved from patients before treatment. All the procedures were carried out according to the Helsinki declaration. Surgically treated patients for degenerative lumbosacral disorders with bicortical pedicle screw fixation and interbody fusion of the sacral vertebra in our center from January 2016 to January 2021 were retrospectively included in the current study. Other inclusion criteria include the age of 50 years or older, computed tomography scans carried out before and after surgery, followed up for more than 12 months, no previous surgical intervention in the sacral region, and no previous congenital malformations such as congenital scoliosis. Patients with malignant tumor of the spine, previous surgeries at the lumbosacral region, and active inflammation before and after surgery were excluded.

2.2. Outcome Assessment

Computed tomography scans were carried out in the department of radiology of our hospital. Patients underwent CT scans (GE 32 row spiral CT, US) before the surgery. Two independent examiners used PACS (GE electrics, US) to measure the HU value. The region of interest (ROI) with a maximum diameter within the cortex of the sacrum was determined on the horizontal plane, and the radiologic attenuation was recorded in HU automatically (Figure 1). CT scan attenuation of the horizontal plane of the sacrum was measured with Hounsfield units (HU). Postoperative anteroposterior X-ray tests were used to diagnose screw loosening. Patient demographic data including patient age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) were recorded in addition to radiological parameters.

Two senior spine surgeons independently evaluated screw loosening and bone fusion by the follow-up X-ray and CT scans. More than 1 mm of clear zone around the screw was used as a reference to diagnose screw loosening [12]. Nonfusion was determined if there was no continued trabecular bone in flexion-extension X-ray film and in cases with more than 3 mm anterior translation and more than 5° rotation.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Demographic characteristics between the two groups were compared with independent sample -tests (measurement data) and Fisher’s exact test analysis (count data). Pearson correlation analysis and ROC curve analysis were used to further evaluate applicability of HU on the prediction of screw loosening. IBMSPSS 24.00 software was used for all statistical analysis. Continuous variables were recorded as . The difference was considered significant when .

3. Results

A total of 162 (114 male, 48 female, average age years) patients underwent sacral screw fixation in the treatment of lumbosacral spinal disorders during the study period. They were treated for diseases including spondylolisthesis, lumbar spinal stenosis, degenerative scoliosis, and spondylodiscitis. The average time of follow-up was months (range 12-53 months). The average HU value of the sacrum was . There were no significant differences between the screw loosening group and non-screw loosening group concerning patient gender, BMI, habit of smoking, and whether or not the patient had diabetes or suffered from spondylolisthesis (). The difference was significant between the groups concerning patient age, formation of pseudoarthrosis during follow-up, and HU value of the sacrum at the horizontal plane (). The average HU value of sacrum was and in the non-screw loosening group while it was and in the screw loosening group (Table 1).

Pearson correlation analysis on the indicators showed significant correlation between the incidence of screw loosening and the formation of pseudoarthrosis () and HU values measured on the horizontal plane (). Although pseudoarthrosis is significantly correlated to the incidence of screw loosening, considering the objective of the current study which was to find a prediction measure for sacral screw loosening, here, we only carried out further analysis on the sacral HU value on different planes. ROC curve analysis was carried out to find the predictive value of computed tomography on screw loosening after sacral screw implantation, and the results revealed that area under the curve (AUC) was 0.674 (95% CI: 0.592-0.756), indicating a higher predictive value of CT attenuation measured on the horizontal plane (Figure 2).

Although ROC curve analysis failed to provide an ideal cutoff HU value with high sensitivity and specificity to predict the incidence of screw loosening, a further look into the statistical data showed that on the horizontal plane, a cutoff of 200 HU provided 64.8% sensitivity and 62.4% specificity, and a cutoff of 150 HU provided 90.2% sensitivity and 20.0% specificity.

4. Discussion

Due to the relatively porous structure and large stress load on the sacrum, pedicle screws in the sacral bone are liable to loosening after lumbosacral surgery, especially in elder patients with low bone mineral density [13].

In patients with high probability of screw loosening, it is plausible to use preventive pedicle screw augmentation. Among the various methods of screw augmentation, bone cements and expandable screws are the most tested [14–16]. In the study of Mueller et al. [17], 237 vertebrae in 98 patients were fixed by 474 cement-augmented pedicle screws. Although no symptomatic cement leakage was observed, asymptomatic paravertebral cement leakage was seen in 88 patients and pulmonary cement embolism was found in 4 patients. In the study of Gazzeri et al. [18], 174 expandable screws were used to treat 33 patients with traumatic and degenerative spinal diseases, while 50 patients with similar conditions were treated with conventional screws. The mean ODI score improved from 83.78% to 29.7% after surgery, and no screw loosening was found during a 2-year follow-up in patients treated with expandable screws. When reviewing the current literature, we found that most studies show a significant decrease in the incidence of screw loosening by various techniques such as bicortical fixation, expandable screws, or bone cement augmentation [19–25].

However, screw augmentation techniques are not without their drawbacks. Screw augmentation increases the risk of cement leakage and the incidence of deep tissue infection, operative time, and cost of treatment. In the prospective study of Mueller et al. [17], 237 vertebrae in 98 patients were placed by 474 cement-augmented pedicle screws. Although no symptomatic cement leakage was observed, asymptomatic paravertebral cement leakage was seen in 88 patients and pulmonary cement embolism was found in 4 patients. Martín-Fernández et al. [26] reported 62.3% (650/1043 screws) ratio of cement leakage in 313 patients. Two of those patients had radicular pain, and 13 patients developed deep infections that had to be treated with revision surgeries. A total of 180 screws had to be removed in 56 patients. Those studies suggest that screw augmentation should only be performed when there is high probability of screw loosening. This makes it important to find a preoperative tool with high accuracy to predict the incidence of screw loosening.

In our clinical practice, we found that when the sacral bone is involved in rigid fixation, the probability of screw loosening can be significantly higher than cases with pedicle screw fixation of lumbar vertebra only. Therefore, it is especially important to find a predictive index for the screw loosening after the rigid fixation of the sacral bone. Quality of bone is the main contributor for the stability of pedicle screws because it decides the strength of screw bone interface. Due to decreased osseointegration at screw bone interface in patients with osteoporosis, they face higher risk of screw loosening after spinal surgeries. Therefore, it is plausible to use preoperative bone mineral density of the lumbar spine to predict the risk of screw loosening after spinal surgeries. It has been previously reported that CT-based Hounsfield units can be used to assess the quality of bone, which was also proven by many other authors [27–29].

By assessing the lumbar bone mineral density in routine using multidetector row CT, Schwaiger et al. found that in patients with lower Hounsfield units were more likely to experience screw loosening [30]. In the study of Bredow et al. [31], preoperative CT scans were used to assess the risk of pedicle screw loosening in 365 patients who received lumbar and thoracic spinal fusion surgeries. During a follow-up of 50.8 months, there were a total of 45 patients with screw loosening, whose CT-based overall vertebral mean bone density was HU, which was HU in patients with no screw loosening, indicating the predictive value of preoperative CT scan attenuation on postoperative screw loosening. Sakai et al. used the HU of screw trajectory to predict screw loosening after single-level spinal fusion surgeries in 52 patients with 206 screws, and HU of screw trajectory is an independent risk factor for screw loosening [32].

Although there were some reports on the correlation of HU value and the incidence of screw loosening in the lumbar spine, few studies were carried out to find HU-based criteria to predict sacral screw loosening. In the current study, we retrospectively analyzed the relations between Hounsfield units and the incidence of screw loosening after pedicle screw fixation in the sacral bone. In the current study, we measured the HU value of the sacral bone. Results of our study showed significant difference () between the screw loosening group and control groups, indicating the correlation between low HU value of the sacral bone and the high incidence of screw loosening of the sacral bone, which was further proven by the Pearson correlation tests (). Area under the curve in ROC curve analysis was 0.674 (95% CI: 0.592-0.756), indicating relatively high diagnostic value of CT attenuation. Further analysis on the statistical data showed a potential cutoff value of 200 with the sensitivity of 64.8% and the specificity of 62.4%. Although a HU value of 200 suggests more than 60% chance of screw loosening, considering the potential fatal complications of cement augmentation and complexity of revision surgery in cases of screw loosening after cement augmentation, we propose a relatively mild approach such as expandable screws to increase the stability of screws when the CT attenuation value of the sacrum on the horizontal plane is lower than 200 HU. In the meanwhile, there was 90% sensitivity when the HU value is lower than 150; it may be plausible to use more radical methods such as bone cement augmentation to increase pullout strength and avoid screw loosening in those cases.

Considering the relatively small sample size and retrospective nature of the current study, more prospective studies with larger patient inclusion should be carried out to further test our conclusion. Besides the HU value of the sacral bone, the HU value of the lumbar spine could also provide valuable information on the bone mineral density and the possible of screw loosening after surgery, which should be further analyzed in future studies. Except from the HU value, there are other factors such as patient age, segments of internal fixation, overall health status, and the vigor of the patient. In the meanwhile, most of the patients with pedicle screw loosening did not show any symptoms and require further treatment. All those factors should be taken into consideration when deciding whether or not to apply screw augmentation and to use what type of screw augmentation technique in the patient.

5. Conclusion

Analyzing 200 patients with at least 12 months of follow-up, we propose 200 HU and 150 HU as cutoff points in the horizontal plane to take moderate and radical measures for screw augmentation to prevent screw loosening in the sacral bone.

Data Availability

The data is available from the corresponding author under reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Aikeremujiang Muheremu, Maihemuti Yakufu, and Junyao Jiang have contributed equally to this work.

References

H. Yoshihara and D. Yoneoka, “National trends in the surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease: United States, 2000 to 2009,” The Spine Journal, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 265–271, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. M. O’Lynnger, S. L. Zuckerman, P. J. Morone, M. C. Dewan, R. A. Vasquez-Castellanos, and J. S. Cheng, “Trends for Spine Surgery for the Elderly: Implications for Access to Healthcare in North America,” Neurosurgery, vol. 77, no. 14, pp. S136–S141, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
J. B. Kim, S. W. Park, Y. S. Lee, T. K. Nam, Y. S. Park, and Y. B. Kim, “The effects of spinopelvic parameters and paraspinal muscle degeneration on S1 screw loosening,” Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Association, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 357–362, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Finger, S. Bayerl, J. Onken, M. Czabanka, J. Woitzik, and P. Vajkoczy, “Sacropelvic fixation versus fusion to the sacrum for spondylodesis in multilevel degenerative spine disease,” European Spine Journal, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1013–1020, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Galbusera, D. Volkheimer, S. Reitmaier, N. Berger, A. Kienle, and H. Wilke, “Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication?” European Spine Journal, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1005–1016, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Weiser, G. Huber, K. Sellenschloh et al., “Insufficient stability of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical correlation of bone mineral density and pedicle screw fixation strength,” European Spine Journal, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 2891–2897, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Grevenstein, C. Meyer, K. Wegmann et al., “First results of multicortical screw anchoring compared with conventional bicortical screw placement in the sacrum: a biomechanical investigation of a new screw design,” Clinical biomechanics, vol. 65, pp. 100–104, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hoppe and M. J. B. Keel, “Pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic spine: indications, limitations and technical aspects,” European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 3–8, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Y. Mo, T. P. Zhou, H. Z. Guo et al., “Long-term efficacy and safety of bone cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation for stage III Kümmell disease,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1–9, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
I. Janssen, Y. M. Ryang, J. Gempt et al., “Risk of cement leakage and pulmonary embolism by bone cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation of the thoracolumbar spine,” The Spine Journal, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 837–844, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. F. Ignacio and K. H. D. Ignacio, “Pulmonary embolism from cement augmentation of the vertebral body [J],” Asian Spine Journal, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 380, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Banno, T. Hasegawa, Y. Yamato et al., “Prevalence and risk factors of Iliac screw loosening after adult spinal deformity surgery,” Spine, vol. 42, no. 17, pp. E1024–E1030, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. M. Zhuang, B. S. Yu, Z. M. Zheng, J. F. Zhang, and W. W. Lu, “Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws,” Spine, vol. 35, no. 19, pp. E925–E931, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Colman, J. Pond, K. Bachus, B. D. Lawrence, W. R. Spiker, and D. S. Brodke, “Fenestrated screws augmented with PMMA increase the pullout strength of sacral pedicle screws,” Clinical Spine Surgery, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. E252–E256, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Liu, L. Shi, W. Lei et al., “Biomechanical comparison of expansive pedicle screw and polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw in osteoporotic synthetic bone in primary implantation: an experimental study,” Clinical Spine Surgery, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. E351–E357, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Yi, D. C. Rim, S. W. Park, J. A. Murovic, J. Lim, and J. Park, “Biomechanical comparisons of pull out strengths after pedicle screw augmentation with hydroxyapatite, calcium phosphate, or polymethylmethacrylate in the cadaveric spine,” World Neurosurgery, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 976–981, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. U. Mueller, J. Baldauf, S. Marx, M. Kirsch, H. W. Schroeder, and D. T. Pillich, “Cement leakage in pedicle screw augmentation: a prospective analysis of 98 patients and 474 augmented pedicle screws,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 103–109, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Gazzeri, R. Roperto, and C. Fiore, “Surgical treatment of degenerative and traumatic spinal diseases with expandable screws in patients with osteoporosis: 2-year follow-up clinical study,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 610–619, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
R. A. Lehman Jr., T. R. Kuklo, P. J. Belmont Jr., R. C. Andersen, and D. W. Polly Jr., “Advantage of pedicle screw fixation directed into the apex of the sacral promontory over bicortical fixation: a biomechanical analysis,” Spine, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 806–811, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. D. Luk, L. Chen, and W. W. Lu, “A stronger bicortical sacral pedicle screw fixation through the s1 endplate: an in vitro cyclic loading and pull-out force evaluation,” Spine, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 525–529, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Wu, F. Gong, L. Liu et al., “A comparative study on screw loosening in osteoporotic lumbar spine fusion between expandable and conventional pedicle screws,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 471–476, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. L. Chen, W. C. Chen, C. W. Chou et al., “Biomechanical study of expandable pedicle screw fixation in severe osteoporotic bone comparing with conventional and cement-augmented pedicle screws,” Medical Engineering & Physics, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1416–1420, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Fransen, “Increasing pedicle screw anchoring in the osteoporotic spine by cement injection through the implant. technical note and report of three cases,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 366–369, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Wang, Y. Liu, Z. Rong et al., “Clinical evaluation of a bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw augmented with polymethylmethacrylate: 128 osteoporotic patients with 42 months of follow-up,” Clinics, vol. 74, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Becker, A. Chavanne, R. Spitaler et al., “Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines,” European Spine Journal, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1462–1469, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Martín-Fernández, A. López-Herradón, A. R. Piñera et al., “Potential risks of using cement-augmented screws for spinal fusion in patients with low bone quality,” The Spine Journal, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1192–1199, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. Schreiber, P. A. Anderson, H. G. Rosas, A. L. Buchholz, and A. G. Au, “Hounsfield units for assessing bone mineral density and strength: a tool for osteoporosis management,” JBJS, vol. 93, no. 11, pp. 1057–1063, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Lee, C. K. Chung, S. H. Oh, and S. B. Park, “Correlation between bone mineral density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and Hounsfield units measured by diagnostic CT in lumbar spine,” Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 384–389, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Hoel, C. G. Ledonio, T. Takahashi, and D. W. Polly Jr., “Sacral bone mineral density (BMD) assessment using opportunistic CT scans,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 160–166, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. J. Schwaiger, A. S. Gersing, T. Baum, P. B. Noel, C. Zimmer, and J. S. Bauer, “Bone mineral density values derived from routine lumbar spine multidetector row CT predict osteoporotic vertebral fractures and screw loosening,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1628–1633, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Bredow, C. K. Boese, C. M. L. Werner et al., “Predictive validity of preoperative CT scans and the risk of pedicle screw loosening in spinal surgery,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, vol. 136, no. 8, pp. 1063–1067, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Sakai, S. Takenaka, Y. Matsuo et al., “Hounsfield unit of screw trajectory as a predictor of pedicle screw loosening after single level lumbar interbody fusion,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 734–738, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Aikeremujiang Muheremu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

208

Downloads

573

Citations