Factors Associated with Poor Treatment Outcome among Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in South Central, Ethiopia

Kaso, Abdene Weya; Hareru, Habtamu Endashaw; Kaso, Taha; Agero, Gebi

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4551132

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Background Materials Discussion Conclusion Abbreviations Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 4551132 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4551132

Factors Associated with Poor Treatment Outcome among Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in South Central, Ethiopia

Abdene Weya Kaso,¹Habtamu Endashaw Hareru,¹Taha Kaso,²and Gebi Agero³

Academic Editor: Mohd Saeed

Received10 Nov 2021

Revised20 Jan 2022

Accepted02 Feb 2022

Published23 Feb 2022

Abstract

Background. Deaths due to COVID-19 are common among the elderly, especially among individuals with underlying illnesses. The pandemic of the COVID-19 impaired the mental, psychological, and physical well-being of people admitted to hospitals. Furthermore, in underdeveloped countries, scarcity of medical equipment was a challenge to manage cases in public health facilities. Thus, understanding the epidemiology and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients who are receiving treatment is critical for developing effective treatments and assessing service quality. Therefore, this study is aimed at assessing the treatment outcomes and associated factors among patients affected by the COVID-19 virus. Method. We used an institutional-based retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 398 patients discharged in South Central, Ethiopia, between June 1, 2020, and July 5, 2021. Data were extracted using the data abstraction format. Data were entered, coded, and analyzed using the STATA 16 software. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the factors associated with poor treatment outcomes. A 95% confidence interval with adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and value less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Result. In our study, the proportion of poor treatment outcomes was 61 (15.3%). Chronic pulmonary disease (; 95% CI: 2.49–12.70), asthma (; 95% CI: 1.17–6.67), chronic kidney disease (; 95% CI: 1.27–18.22),diabetic mellitus (; 95% CI: 1.02–5.09), HIV positive (; 95% CI: 3.0–36.35), worsening conditions (, 95% CI: 1.17–11.95), and age 55 and above years (, 95% CI: 1.30–14.60) were statistically associated with poor treatment outcomes.Conclusion. We found a significant number of patients had favourable treatment. Moreover, aging, having complicated situations at admission, and chronic illnesses such as COPD, CKD, asthma, diabetic mellitus, and HIV/AIDS participants were significantly associated with poor treatment outcomes. Therefore, critical follow–up and management of patients with underlying diseases and worsening health conditions during admission is required.

1. Background

Coronaviruses (CoVs) are RNA viruses that are single-stranded, encapsulated, and belong to the Coronaviridae family [1, 2]. They are classified as beta coronaviruses, gamma coronaviruses, and delta coronaviruses based on differences in protein sequences. The human coronaviruses (HCoV) HCoV-OC43, HCoV-229E, HCoV-NL63, and HCoVHKU1 are among the less pathogenic HCoV that cause a mild common cold or diarrhea [3]. Currently, three coronavirus infections have been identified, all of which are highly pathogenic and cause mild to severe respiratory tract disorders [4]. Among these, the recently discovered severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), which was connected to a pneumonia outbreak in 2003 and had an 11 percent fatality rate, was linked to a pneumonia outbreak. The most prevalent clinical signs and symptoms of SARS-CoV were viral pneumonia, fever, chills, myalgia, and a nonproductive cough, with sore throats being less common. The virus has a two-to-seven-day incubation period [5]. The Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) was first found in Saudi Arabia in 2012 and has a fatality rate of 35%. The virus has a two to fourteen-day incubation period, and symptoms include fever, shortness of breath, diarrhea, vomiting, cough, sore throat, and stomach discomfort, with a substantial number of critically ill patients requiring ICU treatment [3, 5].

The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is a highly transmissible and dangerous virus that first appeared in Wuhan, China, in December [4, 6]. The virus is a beta coronavirus that causes human sickness and is transmitted through coughing and sneezing droplets. At room temperature, it can survive for up to six days on contaminated surfaces and objects. Infected patients experienced fever, dry cough, and shortness of breath as a result of the infection [7, 8]. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the epidemic a global pandemic after it spread to other countries [9]. As of July 5, 2021, there had been 183,198,019 confirmed cases and 3,971,687 deaths worldwide [10]. On March 13, 2020, Ethiopia reported the first confirmed case of COVID-19. Until July 5, 2021, Ethiopia reported 276,323 confirmed cases and 4,327 deaths due to the COVID-19 outbreak [11, 12]. In hospitalized patients, the case fatality rate (CFR) was estimated to be roughly 5%, with an overall mortality rate of 0.25 percent among confirmed cases. COVID-19 infection fatality rates increased with age, and patients with underlying diseases had a higher death rate [13]. Approximately, 20% of patients admitted to the hospital had severe symptoms and were admitted to the ICU [4, 14]. The COVID-19 pandemic impaired people’s emotional, psychological, and physical wellbeing while they were in hospitals [15–19]. The recent finding revealed that individual perceptions regarding a virus had a significant impact on the outcome of treatment. Moreover, medical and supportive care equipment shortages in low and middle-income countries (LMIC) hampered the treatment of illnesses in public health facilities [14]. Understanding the epidemiological and clinical results of COVID-19 patients undergoing therapy, in contrast, is critical for determining the efficacy of therapies and assessing service quality [20]. COVID-19 research has primarily concentrated on prevention measures, epidemiological inquiry, diagnosis, and therapy to date. To our knowledge, no studies have assessed the clinical outcomes and risk factors of COVID-19 patients admitted to hospitals in low-income countries, particularly Ethiopia. As a result, the goal of this study was to determine the treatment outcomes and associated characteristics among COVID-19 patients in Ethiopia’s South Central region.

2. Method and Materials

2.1. Study Design, Population, and Setting

From September 1 to 15, 2021, we conducted an institutional-based retrospective cross-sectional study among hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the Arsi Zone of Ethiopia. There are 28 woredas and two town administrations in the Arsi zone. COVID-19 patients were treated in this zone at the Bokoji hospital treatment center, which is 56 kilometres from the zonal town of Assela. The study covered all COVID-19 patients who were treated between June 1, 2020, and July 5, 2021. Patients with incomplete medical records were excluded from the COVID-19.

2.2. Sample Size and Sampling Technique

We employed a single population proportion with a 95% confidence level, , 5% margin of error, , and the proportion of patients who had poor treatment outcomes (41%) [21]. We employed a correction formula because the number of patients discharged was fewer than 10,000, and the final sample for this study was 398 COVID-19 patient records. The treatment center was chosen using a multistage sampling technique, and the medical records of COVID-19 patients were assessed using a systematic random sample technique.

2.3. Study Variables and Operational Definition

In accordance with WHO and Ethiopian COVID-19 treatment and discharge protocol, we defined the final treatment outcome of patients under treatment as cured, transfer out, discharged with consent, or death [22, 23]. When patients were cured or discharged with a physician order for home-based treatment, the treatment outcome of the COVID-19 patient was considered favourable. Furthermore, if the COVID-19 patients died in the treatment center or were transferred out for further medical treatment to nearby treatment centers, the treatment outcome was rated poor. In this study, cured patients were defined as COVID-19 patients who had two consecutive negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results after 14 days. Moreover, patients who had positive PCR findings after 14 days in the hospital and were discharged for home-based treatment after clinical improvement were considered discharged with consent. Patients who died from any cause in the treatment facility after being hospitalized with COVID-19 were defined as death, whereas patients who were transferred out were defined as patients who were referred to nearby treatment facilities for an additional investigation related to any cause or COVID-19. The sociodemographic factors, comorbidity conditions, clinical characteristics, and status at admission were independent variables.

2.4. Data Collection Procedure and Quality Management

We retrieved data from patients’ medical records using an abstraction format prepared for the study. Thus, data on patients’ sociodemographic, admission status, intranasal oxygen use, place of care, length of stay, comorbidity status, and outcome were collected from COVID-19 medical records. After one day of training, two nurses extracted data, and the collected data were reviewed for consistency and completeness daily. The overall activities of data extraction were supervised by the principal investigator.

2.5. Data Analysis

The extracted data were entered, coded, cleaned, and analyzed using STATA version 16. We calculated the mean and standard deviations (SD) for continuous data and used frequency and percentage to describe categorical variables. Furthermore, to determine the factors associated with the outcome variable, bivariate logistic regression analyses with a 95 percent confidence level and crude odds ratio (COR) were performed, and variables with a value less than 0.25 in the bivariate analysis were considered for multivariate logistic regression analysis. Finally, 95 percent confidence intervals with adjusted odds ratios of less than 0.05 were declared to have a significant association with the outcome variable.

2.6. Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

We obtained ethical approval for this study from Arsi University. Consent to participate was waived since the study was conducted through a review of medical records. Individual patients were not subject to any hurt, and the data was not used for other purposes.

3. Result

3.1. Patient’s Sociodemographic Characteristics

One hundred fifty-one (37.9%) patients were from urban areas, and 237 (59.5%) of participants were males. The majority (25.4%) of patients were above 54 years old, with a mean age of patients 39 (SD: 19.4 years) (Table 1).

3.2. Patients’ Clinical Characteristics

Among 374 patients with clinical signs and symptoms, 82 (20.6%) were mild, 104 (26.1%) were moderate, and 170 (42.7%) were severe, whereas 18 (4.5%) were critical at admission. A total of 21.9 percent of the 188 patients with worsening symptoms had chronic pulmonary disease (COPD), 19.6 percent had diabetic mellitus, and 17.8 percent had asthma (Figure 1). More than half of the patients (59.3%) had comorbidities, with diabetic mellitus (28%) being the most frequent chronic condition, followed by COPD (17.1%) and hypertension (16.1%). Forty (10%) of the patients were treated in the ICU and 250 (66.8) received intranasal oxygen care. The average length of stay was 13 (SD: 5.7) days (Table 2).

3.3. Patient Treatment Outcome

Among 398 COVID-19 patients, 337 (84.7%) had favourable treatment outcomes, while (2.8%) transferred out and (12.5%) died in the treatment center (Figure 2).

3.4. Factors Associated with Poor Treatment Outcome of COVID-19 Patients

Variables like age, sex, residency, comorbidities, and admission status were statistically associated with poor treatment outcomes in bivariate logistic regression. When compared to their counterparts, the odds of poor treatment outcome among COVID-19 patients were significantly higher among COPD (; 95% CI: 2.49–12.70), asthmatic (; 95% CI: 1.17–6.67), CKD (; 95% CI: 1.27–18.22), diabetic mellitus (; 95% CI: 1.02–5.09), and HIV positive (; 95% CI: 3.0–36.35). Furthermore, people aged 55 and above years old (, 95% CI: 1.30–14.60) were nearly four times more likely to have poor treatment outcomes compared to 0-24 years. On the other hand, patients who were in severe or critical conditions during admission were 3.73 times more likely to have poor treatment outcomes (, 95% CI: 1.17–11.95) (Table 3).

4. Discussion

The COVID-19 pandemic is a worldwide public health issue that has resulted in increased anxiety, death, and deterioration of health in people with comorbidities and the elderly [24, 25]. In this study, we found that 15.3% of COVID-19 patients had poor treatment outcomes, which is similar to the report from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital (11.73%) [26] and higher than Ethiopian findings (1.9%) [27]. On the contrary, this study’s poor treatment outcome was lower than that of Belgium (29.9%) [28] and China (28.27%) [29]. These disparities could be the result of differences in care quality, sample size, age, comorbidities, study time, and settings. We discovered that the likelihood of a poor treatment outcome rises with age. Older patients were more likely than younger patients to have poor treatment results, according to studies from China [13, 29–32], Kurdistan [33], Saudi Arabia [34], and England [35]. This could be related to the body’s immune defense system deteriorating with age, and older persons were more prone to severe disease and poor treatment outcomes from COVID-19 infection because they were more likely to have many chronic conditions that hampered their health [36].

Our study found that diabetic mellitus patients had higher odds of COVID-19 poor treatment compared to those without disease. Previous studies found that the presence of diabetes increased mortality in patients with COVID19, which was consistent with our finding [30, 33, 37–39]. Individuals with COPD, and asthma, had also considerably worse treatment outcomes than those who did not have the disease (). This is consistent with a study from Italy [40], and China [26, 30, 41], Germany [42], and Saudi Arabia [34], which found that patients with heart disease, asthma, and COPD had a poor COVID-19 prognosis. In addition, HIV positive and CKD COVID-19 patients had higher odds of poor treatment outcome compared to their counterpart. These could be due to patients with these comorbidities are more prone to acquire a more severe health condition and disease development, increasing their susceptibility to bad outcomes [43].

In this study, when compared to their counterparts, patients with severe/critical conditions during admission were more likely to have poor treatment outcomes. The study from China [44] and India [45] also reported the same trends among patients with worsening health conditions during admission. This can be explained by the fact that persons who were in those situations may have a chronic illness that worsens their health and leads to poor treatment outcomes. Even though we evaluated patients’ treatment outcomes in a health center that served patients from 28 different districts, our study had significant limitations. First, because the data for the study was gathered from secondary sources, incomplete patient information posed a significant barrier. Second, due to the retrospective nature of the study design, all factors that were not available on registration were not included in the analysis. Moreover, the cross-sectional nature of the study design also does not indicate the cause and effect relationship between the factors.

5. Conclusion

In this study, we found that a significant number of patients had favourable treatment. Moreover, having complicated situations at admission, and chronic illnesses such as COPD, CKD, asthma, diabetic mellitus, and HIV/AIDS, participants were significantly associated with poor treatment outcomes. We found that respondents aged 55 and above years old were also associated with poor treatment outcomes. Therefore, critical follow–up and management of patients with underlying diseases and worsening health conditions during admission is required.

Abbreviations

AIDS:	Acquired immune deficiency syndrome
AOR:	Adjusted odds ratio
CI:	Confidence interval
CKD:	Chronic kidney disease
COPD:	Chronic pulmonary disease
CoVs:	Coronaviruses
COR:	Crude odds ratio
HIV:	Human immune virus
HCoV:	Human coronavirus
LMIC:	Low and medium-income countries
ICU:	Intensive care unit
MERS:	Middle East respiratory syndrome
PCR:	Polymerase chain reaction
OR:	Odds ratio
SARS:	Severe acute respiratory syndrome
SD:	Standard deviation
WHO:	World Health Organization.

Data Availability

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included in the supporting information.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

Our deepest gratitude goes to Bokoji hospital staff for their continuous support during data collection. Our appreciation also goes to Mr. Mengesha Moges and Mr. Angasa Demissie for their unreserved inputs during data collection.

References

I. Salahshoori, N. Mobaraki-Asl, A. Seyfaee et al., “Overview of COVID-19 disease: virology, epidemiology, prevention diagnosis, treatment, and vaccines,” Biologics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2–40, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Li, “Structure, function, and evolution of coronavirus spike proteins,” Annual Review of Virology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 237–261, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z.-W. Ye, S. Yuan, K.-S. Yuen, S.-Y. Fung, C.-P. Chan, and D.-Y. Jin, “Zoonotic origins of human coronaviruses,” International Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1686–1697, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. J. Wiersinga, A. Rhodes, A. C. Cheng, S. J. Peacock, and H. C. Prescott, “Pathophysiology, transmission, diagnosis, and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19),” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 324, no. 8, pp. 782–793, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. N. C. House and S. Palissery, “Corona viruses: a review on SARS, MERS and COVID-19,” Microbiology Insights, vol. 14, p. 8, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Shereen, S. Khan, A. Kazmi, N. Bashir, and R. Siddique, “COVID-19 infection: emergence, transmission, and characteristics of human coronaviruses,” Journal of Advanced Research, vol. 24, pp. 91–98, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Hafeez, S. Ahmad, S. A. Siddqui, M. Ahmad, and S. Mishra, “A review of COVID-19 (coronavirus Disease-2019) diagnosis, Treatments and Prevention,” Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 116–125, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
Solution, Clarivate Analytics, Disease Briefing: Coronaviruses, Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA, 2020.
S. S. Unhale, Q. B. Ansar, S. Sanap et al., “A review on corona virus (covid-19),” World Journal of Pharmaceutical and Life Sciences, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 109–115, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
“Weekly Operational Update on COVID-19,” 2021, https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-operational-update-on-covid-19.
View at: Google Scholar
FMOH, Covid-19 daily situational analysis, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2021.
“Covid-19 daily situational analysis update,” 2020, May 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
Q. Shi, X. Zhang, F. Jiang et al., “Clinical characteristics and risk factors for mortality of COVID-19 patients with diabetes in Wuhan, China: a two-center, retrospective study,” Diabetes Care, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 1382–1391, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. J. Emanuel, G. Persad, R. Upshur et al., “Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 382, no. 21, pp. 2049–2055, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Zhang, K. Wang, L. Yin et al., “Mental health and psychosocial problems of medical health workers during the COVID-19 epidemic in China,” Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, vol. 89, pp. 242–250, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Chou, T. Dana, D. I. Buckley, S. Selph, R. Fu, and A. M. Totten, “Update alert: epidemiology of and risk factors for coronavirus infection in health care workers,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 173, no. 2, pp. W46–W47, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Suryavanshi, A. Kadam, G. Dhumal et al., “Mental health and quality of life among healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic in India,” Brain and Behavior, vol. 10, no. 11, article e01837, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kurnik-Łucka, P. Pasieka, A. Górecka-Mazur, E. Rząsa-Duran, J. Pękala, and K. Gil, Health-related quality of life of pharmacists in the pre-COVID-19 era, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site
J. Stojanov, M. Malobabic, G. Stanojevic, M. Stevic, V. Milosevic, and A. Stojanov, “Quality of sleep and health-related quality of life among health care professionals treating patients with coronavirus disease-19,” International Journal of Social Psychiatry, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 175–181, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. E. Alzoubi, R. Hariri, and N. J. Attard, “Oral health related quality of life impact in dentistry,” Journal of Dental Health Oral Disorders & Therapy, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 35–42, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Arab-Zozani, F. Hashemi, H. Safari, M. Yousefi, and H. Ameri, “H A. Health-related quality of life and its associated factors in COVID-19 patients,” Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 296–302, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
WHO, Clinical management of COVID-19: interim guidance, 27 May 2020, World Health Organization, 2020.
FMOH, National Guideline for Integration of Covid-19 and Essential Healthcare Services, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2021.
F. D. Algahtani, S. U. Hassan, B. Alsaif, and R. Zrieq, “Assessment of the quality of life during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, p. 847, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Greco, V. M. Altieri, F. Esperto, V. Mirone, and R. M. Scarpa, “Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on health-related quality of life in uro-oncologic patients: what should we wait for?” Clinical Genitourinary Cancer, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. e63–e68, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. L. R. Du RH, C. Q. Yang, W. Wang et al., “Predictors of mortality for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia caused by SARSCoV-2: a prospective cohort study,” The European Respiratory Journal, vol. 55, no. 5, p. 2000524, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. M. Gebremariam, K. L. Shienka, B. A. Kebede, and M. G. Abiche, “Epidemiological characteristics and treatment outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Ethiopia,” The Pan African Medical Journal, vol. 37, no. 7, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Meester, D. Bacquer, M. Naesens, B. Meijers, M. M. Couttenye, and A. S. Vriese, “Incidence, characteristics, and outcome of COVID-19 in adults on kidney replacement therapy: a regionwide registry study,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 385–396, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Zhou, T. Yu, R. Du et al., “Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study,” Lancet, vol. 395, no. 10229, pp. 1054–1062, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Yu, Q. Lei, W. Li et al., “Clinical characteristics, associated factors, and predicting COVID-19 mortality risk: a retrospective study in Wuhan, China,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 168–175, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. L. R. Du RH, C. Q. Yang, W. Wang et al., “Predictors of mortality for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2: a prospective cohort study,” The European Respiratory Journal, vol. 55, no. 5, p. 2000524, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Chen, W. Liang, M. Jiang et al., “Risk factors of fatal outcome in hospitalized subjects with coronavirus disease 2019 from a Nationwide analysis in China,” Chest, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 97–105, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Zandkarimi, G. Moradi, and B. Mohsenpour, “The prognostic factors affecting the survival of Kurdistan Province COVID-19 patients: a cross-sectional study from February to May 2020,” International Journal of Health Policy and Management, pp. 1–6, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Khan, S. Althunayyan, Y. Alsofayan et al., “Risk factors associated with worse outcomes in COVID-19: a retrospective study in Saudi Arabia,” Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1371–1380, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Williamson, A. Walker, K. Bhaskaran et al., “Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY,” Nature, vol. 584, no. 7821, pp. 430–436, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. W. Leulseged, D. G. Alemahu, I. S. Hassen et al., “Factors associated with development of symptomatic disease in Ethiopian COVID-19 patients: a case-control study,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. L. Altonen, T. M. Arreglado, O. Leroux, M. Murray-Ramcharan, and R. Engdahl, “Characteristics, comorbidities and survival analysis of young adults hospitalized with COVID-19 in New York City,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 12, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Chang, Y. K. Park, B. O. Kim, and D. Park, “Risk factors for disease progression in COVID-19 patients,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Song, D. W. Park, J. H. Cha et al., “Clinical course and risk factors of fatal adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients in Korea: a nationwide retrospective cohort study,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Boari, G. Chiarini, S. Bonetti et al., “Prognostic factors and predictors of outcome in patients with COVID-19 and related pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study,” Bioscience Reports, vol. 40, no. 12, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wang, W. He, X. Yu et al., “Coronavirus disease 2019 in elderly patients: characteristics and prognostic factors based on 4-week follow-up,” Journal of Infection, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 639–645, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Nachtigall, P. Lenga, K. Jóźwiak et al., “Clinical course and factors associated with outcomes among 1904 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Germany: an observational study,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1663–1669, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. L. Ramatillah, S. H. Gan, S. A. S. Sulaiman et al., “Evaluation of treatment outcome for pneumonia among pre-vaccinated COVID-19 patients with/without comorbidity in a public hospital in Bengkulu, Indonesia,” Vaccine, vol. 9, no. 12, p. 1411, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Hu, S. Chen, Y. Fu et al., “Risk factors associated with clinical outcomes in 323 COVID-19 patients in Wuhan, China,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 71, no. 16, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Mishra, A. D. Burma, S. K. Das, M. B. Parivallal, S. Amudhan, and G. N. Rao, “COVID-19-hospitalized patients in Karnataka: survival and stay characteristics,” Indian Journal of Public Health, vol. 64, Supplement, pp. S221–S224, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Abdene Weya Kaso et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

978

Downloads

927

Citations