Research Article
Effect of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS) on Alveolar Bone during Maxillary Expansion Using Clear Aligners
Table 4
Comparing BH, BT-3, and BT-6 between clear aligner (control) and LIPUS with clear aligner groups.
| | Mean | Std. deviation | | df | Sig. (2-tailed) |
| Rt second molar | -0.333 | 0.707 | -1.414 | 8 | 0.195 | Rt first molar | 0.333 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 8 | 0.347 | Rt second premolar | 0.222 | 0.833 | 0.800 | 8 | 0.447 | Rt first premolar | 0.556 | 1.878 | 0.887 | 8 | 0.401 | Rt canine | 0.333 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 8 | 0.347 | Lt second molar | -0.333 | 0.707 | -1.414 | 8 | 0.195 | Lt first molar | 0.222 | 1.302 | 0.512 | 8 | 0.622 | Lt second premolar | .444 | 1.424 | 0.936 | 8 | 0.377 | Lt first premolar | 1.000 | 3.041 | 0.986 | 8 | 0.353 | Lt canine | 0.524 | 1.325 | 1.118 | 7 | 0.301 | Rt second molar | 0.333 | 0.500 | 2.000 | 8 | 0.081 | Rt first molar | 0.222 | 0.667 | 1.000 | 8 | 0.347 | Rt second premolar | 0.556 | 0.882 | 1.890 | 8 | 0.095 | Rt first premolar | 0.556 | 0.726 | 2.294 | 8 | 0.051 | Rt canine | 0.111 | 0.333 | 1.000 | 8 | 0.347 | Lt second molar | 0.444 | 0.726 | 1.835 | 8 | 0.104 | Lt first molar | 0.889 | 1.054 | 2.530 | 8 | 0.035 | Lt second premolar | 0.333 | 0.500 | 2.000 | 8 | 0.081 | Lt first premolar | 0.556 | 1.014 | 1.644 | 8 | 0.139 | Lt canine | 0.250 | 0.463 | 1.528 | 7 | 0.170 | Rt second molar | 0.222 | 0.441 | 1.512 | 8 | 0.169 | Rt first molar | 0.222 | .833 | 0.800 | 8 | 0.447 | Rt second premolar | 0.444 | 1.130 | 1.180 | 8 | 0.272 | Rt first premolar | 0.333 | 0.707 | 1.414 | 8 | 0.195 | Rt canine | 0.111 | 0.333 | 1.000 | 8 | 0.347 | Lt second molar | 0.222 | 0.441 | 1.512 | 8 | 0.169 | Lt first molar | 0.556 | 0.882 | 1.890 | 8 | 0.095 | Lt second premolar | 0.222 | 0.441 | 1.512 | 8 | 0.169 | Lt first premolar | 0.222 | 0.667 | 1.000 | 8 | 0.347 | Lt canine | 0.125 | 0.354 | 1.000 | 7 | 0.351 |
|
|