Research Article

Effect of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS) on Alveolar Bone during Maxillary Expansion Using Clear Aligners

Table 3

Difference in bone thickness at 3 mm and 6 mm for clear aligner (control) and LIPUS with clear aligner.
(a)

Tooth numberClear aligner (control)LIPUS with clear aligner
BT-3 mm beforeBT-3 mm afterMean difference (SD)p valueBT-3 mm beforeBT-3 mm afterMean difference (SD) value

Rt second molar2.622.300.32 (0.39)0.0402.332.07-0.25 (0.30)≤0.001
Rt first molar0.690.600.09 (0.14)0.0780.900.55-0.33 (0.55)0.02
Rt second premolar1.621.470.14 (0.41)0.3211.400.88-0.49 (0.46)≤0.001
Rt first premolar1.000.820.18 (0.32)0.1241.100.55-0.56 (0.58)≤0.001
Rt canine0.560.520.04 (0.11)0.3470.670.38-0.29 (0.47)0.02
Lt second molar2.191.960.23 (0.27)0.0332.101.90-0.20 (0.27)≤0.001
Lt first molar1.030.690.34 (0.61)0.1320.920.53-0.36 (0.50)0.01
Lt second premolar1.371.260.11 (0.13)0.0351.320.99-0.33 (0.42)≤0.001
Lt first premolar0.390.270.11 (0.19)0.1110.980.61-0.37 (0.67)0.03
Lt canine0.370.340.03 (0.10)0.4840.770.45-0.32 (0.52)0.03

(b)

Tooth numberClear aligner (control)LIPUS with clear aligner
BT-6 mm beforeBT-6 mm afterMean difference (SD) valueBT-6 mm beforeBT-6 mm afterMean difference (SD) value

Rt second molar1.741.570.16 (0.25)0.0902.732.51-0.21 (0.29)≤0.001
Rt first molar0.630.470.17 (0.36)0.2030.840.63-0.20 (0.49)0.10
Rt second premolar1.511.60-0.1 (0.39)0.4791.090.64-0.42 (0.75)0.03
Rt first premolar0.250.190.06 (0.12)0.1560.720.33-0.39 (0.63)0.02
Rt canine0.190.150.03 (0.08)0.2220.410.21-0.19 (0.39)0.05
Lt second molar2.192.000.19 (0.44)0.2462.532.33-0.21 (0.27)≤0.001
Lt first molar0.860.660.20 (0.45)0.2150.800.54-0.25 (0.51)0.06
Lt second premolar1.241.26-0.03 (0.15)0.6070.930.77-0.15 (0.26)0.02
Lt first premolar0.110.080.03 (0.09)0.3470.710.43-0.28 (0.52)0.03
Lt canine0.240.210.03 (0.07)0.1730.440.33-0.11 (0.31)0.168