Association between Circulating Antioxidants and Longevity: Insight from Mendelian Randomization Study

Yu, Zhimin; Zhang, Fangfang; Xu, Chengkai; Wang, Yanggan

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4012603

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 4012603 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4012603

Association between Circulating Antioxidants and Longevity: Insight from Mendelian Randomization Study

Zhimin Yu,^1,2Fangfang Zhang,³Chengkai Xu,¹and Yanggan Wang^4,5

Academic Editor: Tariq Ismail

Received18 Sept 2021

Accepted05 Jan 2022

Published29 Jan 2022

Abstract

Background. Antioxidants attracted long-standing attention as promising preventive agents worldwide. Previous observational studies have reported that circulating antioxidants are associated with reduced mortality; however, randomized clinical trials indicate neutral or harmful impacts. The association of long-term circulating antioxidant exposure with longevity is still unclear. Objectives. We aim to determine whether long-term circulating antioxidant exposure is causally associated with longevity in the general population using the two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) design. Methods. Genetic instruments for circulating antioxidants (ascorbate, lycopene, selenium, beta-carotene, and retinol) and antioxidant metabolites (ascorbate, alpha-tocopherol, gamma-tocopherol, and retinol) were identified from the largest up-to-date genome-wide association studies (GWASs). Summary statistics of these instruments with individual survival to the 90^th vs. 60^th percentile age (11,262 cases and 25,483 controls) and parental lifespan ( individuals) were extracted. The causal effect was estimated using the inverse-variance weighted method in the main analysis and complemented by multiple sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of results. Results. We found that genetically determined higher concentration of circulating retinol (vitamin A) metabolite was casually associated with a higher odds of longevity (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02–1.13; ) and increased parental lifespan (lifespan years per 10-fold increase: 0.17; 95% CI, 0.07–0.27; ). Present evidence did not support a causal impact of circulating ascorbate (vitamin C), tocopherol (vitamin E), lycopene, selenium or beta-carotene on life expectancy. No evidence was identified to show the pleiotropic effects had biased the results. Conclusions. Long-term higher exposure to retinol metabolite is causally associated with longevity in the general population. Future MR analyses could assess the current findings further by utilizing additional genetic variants and greater samples from large-scale GWASs.

1. Introduction

Human longevity is a consequence of the complex interplay between inherited genetic factors and environmental influences [1]. Despite the past two centuries having witnessed the significant increase of life expectancy in the western countries, our knowledge concerning factors that influence longevity is still scarce [2]. It is acknowledged that the heritability of lifespan was consistently low in a variety of populations (12%-25%) [3]. In other words, environmental factors play key roles in ageing process and longevity. Seeking potential environmental determinants of longevity will assist in informing public health strategies and promoting overall health in populations.

Oxidative stress denotes the imbalance between formation of pro-oxidative factors, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and antioxidants, resulting in disturbance of redox signaling and molecular damage [4]. Oxidative modification and damage to cellular DNA, proteins, or lipids due to overproduction of free radicals have been associated with the ageing process [5]. Antioxidants can mitigate oxidative stress and maintain the stable biological redox status through scavenging free radicals. From this prospective, supplementing antioxidant appears to be a promising strategy for slowing down aging and to prolong lifespan [6]. In line with this hypothesis, a large number of observational cohort studies provided evidence that higher dietary or circulating antioxidants (vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin E, lycopene, selenium, and beta-carotene) were associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality [7–14]. However, making causal inferences from these observational studies is impossible, since observational studies are susceptible to residual confounding and reverse causation bias.

In contrast to the findings from these observational studies, many interventional studies suggest neutral [15–18] or detrimental effects [19, 20] on cardiovascular disease and mortality for antioxidant supplements. For example, a pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) failed to show that adequate vitamin E intake alone can lower the risk of all-cause mortality [18]. Some meta-analyses of RCTs even indicated that individuals supplemented with antioxidants such as beta-carotene, vitamin A, and vitamin E had increased risk of mortality [19, 20]. Conclusions from RCTs can be limited by duration, dosage, and timing of antioxidant supplements [21]. The null findings from RCTs might be a consequence of inadequate therapy duration, since it is unrealistic to reverse the influence of several decades of oxidative stress via only a few years of antioxidant therapy [21]. Whether long-term antioxidant exposure can improve life expectancy in the general population still remains largely unclear.

By using genetic variants as instrumental variables, Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis can infer the causal effects of exposures (circulating antioxidants) on a clinical outcome (longevity) [22]. This method largely avoids residual confounding and reverse causation bias inherent in observational studies, since genetic variants are randomly allocated during meiosis and remain stable throughout the whole life. Meanwhile, MR design is of great value in assessing the lifelong effect of exposure on clinical outcomes. We therefore conducted a two-sample MR analysis to determine whether long-term exposure to circulating antioxidants or its metabolites are causally associated with longevity outcome. We also evaluated its impact on established risk factors of longevity (e.g., type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and smoking initiation) as they may provide mechanistic insights.

2. Methods

2.1. Two-Sample MR Design

MR relies on three principle assumptions to provide unbiased estimates [23]: (1) genetic instrument should be strongly related to exposure, (2) genetic instrument should be independent of any possible known confounders, and (3) genetic instrument exerts impact on outcomes entirely through the exposure of interest (Supplemental Figure S1). Summary-level statistics from publicly available genome-wide association study (GWAS) were used in this MR study.

Our MR study included six main circulating antioxidants: vitamin C (ascorbate), vitamin E (α- and γ-tocopherol are the predominant forms of vitamin E in humans), lycopene, selenium, β-carotene, and retinol (the major biologically active form of vitamin A). Both absolute antioxidants and antioxidant metabolites in the blood were used to infer causality for longevity. In the analyses of absolute antioxidants on longevity, genetic instruments for absolute circulating levels of ascorbate, lycopene, selenium, β-carotene, and retinol were obtained; for antioxidant metabolites, genetic instruments for relative concentrations of ascorbate, α-tocopherol, γ-tocopherol, and retinol were used. The flow chart of the current study is presented in Figure 1.

2.2. Data Sources for Absolute Circulating Antioxidants

The largest up-to-date GWAS primarily performed on participants of European descent was used to extract instrumental variables. Summary statistics for blood and toenail selenium concentration are all available, and both have been validated as biomarkers of selenium exposure [24, 25]. Toenail selenium can reflect a longer period of exposure than blood selenium. A GWAS of toenail selenium, which included four US cohorts, evaluated the associations of genetic variants with both toenail and blood selenium concentrations; we therefore chose this GWAS as the data source for selenium exposure [25]. Data sources for included instrumental variables are summarized in Table 1.

Briefly, instrumental variables for circulating ascorbic acid concentration were derived from the up-to-date meta-analysis of GWAS, comprising up to 52,018 individuals of European ancestry [26]. 11 leading single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were significantly related to circulating ascorbic acid level at the genome-wide significance level () were identified. One SNP, rs174547, located in the FADS1 gene was excluded due to its pleiotropic effects, leaving 10 SNPs for our analysis [26]. Instrumental variables for circulating lycopene were obtained from a GWAS conducted on 441 old order Amish adults who consumed a controlled diet [27]. A total of five SNPs associated with the circulating lycopene level at the genome-wide () or subgenome-wide () significance level were identified as genetic instruments [27].

Instrumental variables for selenium concentration were derived from a sample size-weighted meta-analysis comprising 4,162 participants of European ancestry [25]. Four SNPs were identified at the genome-wide significance level () and linkage disequilibrium . Instrumental variables for circulating β-carotene were extracted from a GWAS performed on the Nurses’ Health Study including 2,344 women of European ancestry. Three leading SNPs associated with the plasma β-carotene level at the genome-wide significance level () were obtained [28]. Instrumental variables for circulating retinol concentration were derived from a GWAS based on 5006 Caucasian participants drawn from two cohorts of men [29]. Two SNPs associated with the serum retinol level at the genome-wide significance level () were selected [29]. The variance of circulating antioxidant concentrations explained by instrumental variables ranged from 1.87% for ascorbate to 30.1% for lycopene (Table 1).

2.3. Data Sources for Circulating Antioxidant Metabolites

SNPs associated with blood antioxidant metabolites of ascorbate (), α-tocopherol (), and γ-tocopherol () at the suggestive genome-wide significance level () came from a publicly available GWAS based on two European cohort studies [30]. This GWAS reported genome-wide associations of metabolic locus with more than 400 metabolites in human blood from 7,824 individuals of European ancestry. SNPs associated with the blood retinol metabolite level () at the suggestive genome-wide significance level () were derived from a recently published GWAS comprising 1,957 European participants [31]. The variance of circulating antioxidant metabolites explained by genetic instruments varied from 3.3% for α-tocopherol to 18.6% for ascorbate (Table 1).

2.4. Data Sources for Longevity Outcome

Summary statistics for antioxidant-associated SNPs with individual longevity were extracted from a publicly available GWAS, which recruited individuals of European ancestry from ~20 population-based or family-based cohorts [32]. This GWAS discriminated cases from controls based on ages that correspond to different survival percentiles. Therefore, the influence of heterogeneity between cases and controls can be mitigated [32]. Genetic associations of SNPs with odds of individuals surviving to the 90^th percentile age () vs. the 60^th percentile age () according to the country, sex, and birth cohort-specific life table were extracted (the 90th vs. 60th percentile age dataset). The majority of included cohorts have less controls than cases, as many participants enrolled were already relatively old at the beginning of follow-up [32].

Summary statistics for life expectancy were additionally obtained from a meta-GWAS of the UK Biobank and LifeGen consortium [33]. This GWAS investigated the Cox proportional hazard model-quantified parental lifespan from a cohort of 1,012,240 parents of European descent. Parental lifespan can be served as a proxy outcome for individual longevity in genetic association study, as offspring shares 50% of its genome with each parent. The effect estimates extracted from this GWAS may be multiplied by ten to reflect the absolute changes in lifespan years [33].

2.5. Mendelian Randomization Analysis

In the primary analyses, we applied the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) approach under a multiplicative random-effect model to estimate the causal effects [34]. The Wald ratio estimates from each individual SNP were pooled to reflect the overall causal effect of the antioxidant on longevity. This approach can provide the highest precision and unbiased causal estimate when invalid genetic instruments were absent [35].

To test the robustness of causal inference and check for pleiotropy, we conducted sensitivity analyses using the weighted median [36], MR-Egger method [37], and the MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) test [38]. The weighted median method gives reliable estimates if over 50% of the weight in the analysis derives from valid genetic instruments [36]. Potential directional pleiotropy was assessed with the MR-Egger method, where the intercept term constrained to zero suggested the absence of directional pleiotropy [37]. The MR-Egger regression method renders pleiotropy-corrected causal effect estimates, though having a relative lower precision than weighted median method. The MR-PRESSO approach was used to identify outlier instrument variables that were potentially horizontally pleiotropic. Similar to the MR-Egger method, this approach provides corrected causal estimates after removal of outliers [38]. In addition, we evaluated the heterogeneity between instrument variables by using Cochran’s test and value [35]. Finally, “leave-one-out” sensitivity analysis was performed to check if a single SNP had undue effect on the overall estimated effect size.

Genetic variants may influence longevity outcome through potential confounders or alternative pathways independent of their impacts on circulating antioxidant, namely, horizontal pleiotropy [39]. To examine whether this could bias the MR results, we assessed the effects of included SNPs on established risk factors for longevity. Seven risk factors which had been demonstrated to be causally associated with longevity from a previous MR study were considered: years of education, smoking initiation, type 2 diabetes, body mass index (BMI), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), and hypertension [40]. Details of included GWAS data sets for these risk factors are presented in Supplemental Table S7. The majority of include participants were of European descent, and sample sizes ranged from 188,577 for HDL-c to 1,232,091 for smoking initiation [40]. We assessed the effects of absolute circulating antioxidants and metabolites on these seven risk factors using the IVW approach.

To determine the power of our MR results, post hoc power calculations were conducted for the IVW analyses using an online calculator (https://sb452.shinyapps.io/power/) [41]. statistic reflecting the exposure variance explained by instrumental variable was used to assess the instrument strength [42]. The statistic was either extracted from original exposure GWAS or calculated based on reported values and sample sizes when these were not reported (; represents the variance of exposure explained by instrumental variables, represents the sample size, and represents the number of instrumental variables). statistic above 10 suggests that the possibility of weak instrument bias is small [42].

In the longevity analysis, results are reported as odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), reflecting one unit change in absolute concentrations of antioxidants on natural log-transformed levels (β-carotene, retinol, and selenium), mg/dl (lycopene), mmol/l (ascorbate), or a 10-fold change for metabolite concentrations. In complementary analysis of parental lifespan, results are reported as changes in lifespan years with corresponding 95% CIs. A value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using R (Version 3.6.2) using the “TwoSampleMR” [35] and “MR-PRESSO” [38] packages.

2.6. Ethics

Publicly available summary-level data were utilized in the MR analysis; therefore, no additional ethical approval was required. Ethical approval and informed consent for each included study can be identified in each original publication. All involved studies were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

3. Results

Genetic instruments associated with circulating antioxidants and their metabolites are detailed in Table 1. There was no sample overlap between the GWAS of exposure and the GWAS of longevity. The cohort characteristics and exclusion criteria for individual longevity GWAS and parental lifespan GWAS are presented in Supplemental Tables S2 and S3, respectively. Supplemental Tables S4 and S5 show the effect estimates for the associations of selected SNPs with circulating antioxidants (β_{SNP-antioxidants}) and with longevity outcomes (β_{SNP-longevity}), respectively. statistic for each used SNPs was >10, minimizing the potential weak instrument bias. The bioavailability and mode of action of these antioxidants are summarized in Table 2.

3.1. Absolute Circulating Antioxidants and Longevity

Our principal results obtained from the IVW method showed that there was no significant association of absolute circulating antioxidant concentration with longevity (Figures 2 and 3). The OR for survival to the 90th vs. 60th percentile age per unit increase of antioxidant concentration was 0.96 for ascorbate (per 1 mmol/l increase, 95% CI: 0.74–1.24; ), 1.00 for lycopene (per 1 mg/dl increase, 95% CI: 0.91–1.09; ), 0.92 for selenium (per ln-transformed increase, 95% CI: 0.83–1.03; ), 1.04 for β-carotene (per ln-transformed increase, 95% CI: 0.87–1.26; ), and 0.49 for retinol (per ln-transformed increase, 95% CI: 0.18–1.34; ) (Figure 2). The association of a unit increase in genetically predicted absolute antioxidant concentration with lifespan years was -0.05 for ascorbate (per 1 mmol/l increase, 95% CI: -0.49–0.39; ), 0.07 for lycopene (per 1 mg/dl increase, 95% CI: -0.15–0.29; ), -0.24 for selenium (per ln-transformed increase, 95% CI: -0.51–0.04; ), 0.30 for β-carotene (per ln-transformed increase, 95% CI: -0.06–0.66; ), and 0.003 for retinol (per ln-transformed increase, 95% CI: -1.83–1.84; ) (Figure 3).

Figure 2

Odds ratios for relationships between genetically predicted circulating antioxidants and longevity (). The ORs for absolute antioxidants represent the effect of per unit increase in ln-transformed selenium, β-carotene, and retinol values, 1 mmol/l ascorbate and 1 mg/dl lycopene, on longevity. For antioxidant metabolites, ORs represent the effect of per 10-fold increase in the antioxidant metabolite’s level on longevity. All estimates were calculated based on random-effect IVW method. The P_{heterogeneity} values derived from the Cochran’s statistics were used to reflect heterogeneity between the SNP-specific estimates. Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; IVW: inverse-variance weighted; OR: odds ratio; SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism.

Figure 3

MR estimates for relationships between genetically predicted circulating antioxidants and lifespan years (). The effect estimates for absolute antioxidants represent the change in lifespan years per unit increase in ln-transformed selenium, β-carotene, and retinol values, 1 mmol/l ascorbate and 1 mg/dl lycopene. For antioxidant metabolites, the estimates are expressed as change in lifespan years per 10-fold increase in antioxidant metabolite’s level. All estimates were calculated based on random-effect IVW method. The P_{heterogeneity} values derived from Cochran’s statistics were used to reflect heterogeneity between the SNP-specific estimates. Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; IVW: inverse-variance weighted; MR: Mendelian randomization; SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism.

Sensitivity analyses on all antioxidants except for retinol were performed using the MR-Egger, weighted median, and MR-PRESSO approaches. No significant associations were obtained from either of the MR-Egger or weighted median analysis.

No significant heterogeneity between individual SNPs was observed with Cochran’s test (all values for , Table 3, Supplemental Table S6). Furthermore, MR-Egger regression did not support the presence of potential pleiotropy as the intercepts constrained to zero (). MR-PRESSO analysis did not identify any potential outlier SNPs (Table 3, Supplemental Table S6). In addition, similar null associations were obtained after omitting each SNP in turn in the leave-one-out analysis, demonstrating that no single SNP was having undue effect on the overall estimated effect size (Supplemental Figures S2-5).

3.2. Circulating Antioxidant Metabolites and Longevity

Similar with the findings from analyses of absolute antioxidants, there was no significant difference in longevity or lifespan years according to antioxidant metabolite concentrations of α-tocopherol, γ-tocopherol, and ascorbate. However, significant association between retinol metabolite concentration and longevity was observed (Figures 2 and 3). Specifically, a 10-fold increase in retinol metabolite was causally associated with 7% higher odds of longevity (OR 1.07; 95% CI: 1.02–1.13; , Figure 2). Similarly, significantly higher lifespan years were also observed for genetically predicted higher retinol metabolite level (lifespan years per 10-fold increase: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.07–0.27; , Figure 3).

In sensitivity analyses of the associations of antioxidant metabolites with longevity, no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy was indicated (P_Intercept in MR-Egger regression was >0.05; Table 3, Supplemental Table S6). In addition, no significant heterogeneity between SNPs was suggested, except for ascorbate where moderate heterogeneity was presented in the analysis of the 90th vs. 60th percentile age dataset (). However, this heterogeneity was unlikely to influence the MR estimate, as weighted median approach provided comparable result to the IVW method (Table 3). Although MR-PRESSO detected 1 outlier SNP for ascorbate in the analysis of individual longevity, the conclusion did not alter after removing the outlier. Furthermore, the leave-one-out analysis performed in this dataset found no undue influence of potentially pleiotropic SNPs on the overall causal inference (Supplemental Figures S6-9).

3.3. Antioxidant Associations with Longevity Risk Factors

The effects of absolute antioxidant on established longevity risk factors with IVW approach are depicted in Figure 4. In general, there is no clear pattern of correlation between circulating absolute antioxidant exposure and longevity risk factors. The only exception was an inverse association of selenium with LDL-c level (beta: -0.07; 95% CI: -0.12 to -0.01; ). Nevertheless, this association did not alter the null findings between selenium and longevity outcome. Genetically predicted antioxidant metabolites were not associated with any of these longevity risk factors (all , Figure 5).

4. Discussion

4.1. Principal findings

For the first time, the effect of long-term circulating antioxidant exposure on longevity outcome was assessed using the MR approach. Based on large-scale longevity consortia, our study provided evidence for a causal relationship of higher circulating retinol metabolite with higher odds of being long-lived. However, our study did not support the association of circulating tocopherol, lycopene, selenium, β-carotene, or ascorbate with life expectancy. The null associations were consistent across the 90th vs. 60th percentile age dataset and parental lifespan dataset, implying that these circulating antioxidants are unlikely to be causal factors for life expectancy. Furthermore, our study indicated an inverse association of circulating selenium with plasma LDL-c level, although its effect on longevity was close to null.

During the past several decades, people consume antioxidants to prevent diseases and promote health worldwide [53]. Controversy still remains across observational studies and RCTs, and no general agreement on single antioxidants should be used as supplements for mortality prevention. It is of great public health significance, since up to 52% of the population take these supplements in 2012 according to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data (1999 to 2012) [54]. Using a genetic approach, this study provides evidence that circulating retinol, but not other antioxidants, is causally related to longevity. The magnitude of the impact of included genetic variants on the antioxidant level was summarized in Supplemental Table S8. Overall, the impacts of these genetic variants are comparable to or within the range of the effects of supplementation in RCTs. However, outcomes obtained from these two methods can be different. It is presumed that the impact of these genetic variants was lifelong, whereas the impact of antioxidant supplementation may merely last for the duration of the trial. A slightly minor exposure throughout the whole life course would exert greater potential biological influence than the temporarily larger impact of supplements, considering aging is a consequence of long-term accumulation of molecular damage. It is noteworthy that our findings did not rule out the favorable roles of fruit and vegetables, which contain numerous micronutrients and fibers besides the abovementioned antioxidants.

4.2. Comparisons with other studies

Our study suggested that circulating retinol metabolite was positively related to increased lifespan years, a finding that was similar to those of interventional trials conducted in children, which showed that vitamin A supplementation was associated with 12% reduction in mortality [55, 56]. Previous studies have suggested that vitamin A deficiency increases the risk of a range of diseases, including respiratory disease, diarrhoea, measles, and vision problem [57]. All these aforementioned diseases have been considered the leading cause of mortality among children [58]. On the other hand, RCTs performed in children aged six months to five years support the beneficial effect of vitamin A supplementation on morbidity and mortality [56]. Based on these evidences, vitamin A supplementation has been continually recommended by the World Health Organization for children aged 6 to 59 months. However, current evidence does not support the beneficial effect of vitamin A supplementation among neonates and adults in reducing mortality, albeit the certainty of evidence was low [59, 60]. Furthermore, prior MR studies found no effect of higher blood vitamin A concentration on risk of coronary heart disease [61], ovarian cancer [62], and Alzheimer disease [63]. The longevity outcome may be considered in relation to all these effects over the life course. The beneficial effect of circulating retinol on longevity observed in our study might be explained, at least in part, by the significant reduction in all-cause mortality during children’s period, considering that the assessed effect of retinol was lifelong in the MR study. In addition, the null finding for absolute retinol concentration on longevity might be a consequence of insufficient power, given the small variance of absolute retinol concentration explained by only two SNPs (2.3%). This is further supported by the wide confidence intervals for the effect estimates. On the other hand, genetic instruments for retinol metabolite explained greater proportion of phenotypic variance (4.8%) showed a significant association with longevity.

The mechanisms underlying the beneficial effect of retinol on longevity are complicated, and several explanations exist. It is presumed that oxidative stress plays import roles in aging process and various age-related disorders [6]. Meanwhile, a decrease in lipophilic antioxidants was observed in clinical and animal studies during aging [64]. The lipophilicity of dietary antioxidants may play a critical role in the aging process, since it enables the compound to accumulate within the organism for extended effects. As a lipophilic antioxidant, plasma retinol has been considered as an important micronutrient in guaranteeing extreme longevity [65]. This could be partially attributed to its antioxidant property (Table 2). However, many other properties of this antioxidant that were observed in the biological systems may also justify its beneficial effects during life. For example, retinol has an essential role in maintaining normal functions of neutrophils, macrophages, and natural killer cells during infection [66]. Retinol is also needed for adaptive immunity, and its deficiency diminished antibody-mediated responses [66]. Moreover, retinol and vitamin A derivatives can affect cell differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis and are inversely associated with several types of cancers [67]. Further investigations are still required to determine to what extent these actions are affected by the antioxidant activity of retinol or by other potential mechanisms.

Previous studies reported inconsistent associations between circulating vitamin E and risk of all-cause mortality. For instance, in a meta-analysis which included 37,199 participants from six prospective cohorts, a higher circulating α-tocopherol level was significantly associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality [68]. However, other meta-analyses based on RCTs indicated reverse conclusions, especially for the highest supplement dosage (≥400 IU/d) [20, 69–71]. Significant heterogeneity between observational studies was observed for the effect estimates in the meta-analysis. This implies that results from these observational studies can be biased by potential confounders, such as physical activity, BMI, educational status, lipid profiles, and alcohol consumption. Despite the relatively consistent evidence of observational studies, it is still challenging to clarify whether circulating α-tocopherol causally affects life expectancy. This can be attributed to the biases such as residual confounding that undermine the validity in observational studies, even when the confounding factors had been adjusted. Meanwhile, a single detection of the serum α-tocopherol level at baseline might not reflect the long-term status of vitamin E, since vitamin E and its metabolite levels could have altered over time [14]. On the other hand, many RCTs were conducted with very short follow-up period (i.e., <2 years) [60], which would significantly hinder the evaluation of long-term effect of vitamin E exposure on longevity outcome. In this setting, the MR study using genetic instruments as proxies can reflect lifelong exposure to a certain extent with a higher tocopherol concentration and can largely avoid biases in observational studies. However, our findings did not support the beneficial or detrimental effects of higher serum tocopherol on longevity. These results were robust in a wide variety of sensitivity analyses with no indication of violation of the MR assumptions.

Our study also does not support the association of circulating lycopene with longevity with no evidence of violation of the MR principals (Table 3). Moreover, the association was consistent with several observational studies on circulating lycopene and all-cause mortality [72, 73], despite the fact that these observational studies had relatively small sample size, and circulating lycopene concentration was measured at a single time-point only.

Previous observational studies concerning selenium, vitamin C, and β-carotene on risk of all-cause mortality also yielded controversial results. One recent meta-analysis which included 41 prospective observational studies based on the general population () indicated inverse associations of circulating selenium, vitamin C, and β-carotene concentrations with all-cause mortality [68]. However, significant between-study heterogeneity was noted in the analyses for selenium (, for heterogeneity < 0.01) and vitamin C (, for heterogeneity <0.05), and publication bias was also suggested [68]. Another pooled analysis of 53 RCTs showed a significantly increased risk of mortality for β-carotene supplement, whereas no effect was indicated for selenium or vitamin C supplement [69]. In these interventional trails, antioxidant supplement may not be linearly associated with the circulating concentration of antioxidant, since it can be influenced by various factors such as absorption effectiveness, age, smoking, comorbidities, and physical activity. Considering the null associations of circulating selenium, vitamin C, and β-carotene with longevity detected by our MR analyses, and no evidence of violating the MR assumptions, the inconsistent results from previous observational trials raised concern about confounding. Fruit and vegetables are the primary sources of these dietary antioxidants; meanwhile, they are both abundant in fibers and polyphenols, and both have been linked with better health status [74]. Therefore, higher circulating concentrations of these antioxidants might imply higher intake of fruit and vegetables [74], which would represent the total dietary patterns instead of a single micronutrient measure.

4.3. Strengths and Limitations

A major strength of the present study was the use of two-sample MR design, which overcomes the short duration of antioxidant exposure in RCTs and minimizes potential confounding bias in observational investigations and adds to the body of knowledge on dietary antioxidants and longevity. Another strength was that we used two European datasets with large sample size (>1 million) for SNP-longevity associations in this MR analysis. Thus, we had adequate statistical power to identify even modest causal associations for most analyses (Supplemental Table S1). The results obtained from two longevity datasets were largely consistent with no indication of heterogeneity generally, and model violations (mainly from pleiotropy) were explored by various methodologies also increased the robustness of our findings, despite the limited number of strong instrument variables used in partial analysis. Furthermore, no sample overlap in the exposure GWASs and longevity GWASs has lowered the type 1 error rate (Table1).

Our study also has several limitations which merit further consideration. First, individuals had to survive to a certain age to be recruited in the longevity GWASs. As a consequence, individuals with early death were missing from the control group, and the true effect might be underestimated if those individuals have more unfavorable risk factors. Second, we are unable to evaluate nonlinearity in the associations of circulating antioxidants with life expectancy that have previously been suggested, in particular for circulating lycopene [68]. Future investigations utilizing individual-level data to fully clarify the potential dose-response associations are still needed. Third, higher circulating lycopene, selenium, β-carotene, and vitamin C concentrations might still be beneficial in discriminatingly selected populations who have risk factors at baseline or under increased oxidative stress status. For instance, protective effects of circulating β-carotene and selenium on mortality have been demonstrated to be more obvious in individuals aged above 60 years when compared with younger individuals [68]. However, our study could not evaluate the effect of these antioxidants on longevity in subgroups with different risk factors or lacking certain kind of nutrients where antioxidant supplement appears to be more beneficial. Finally, our findings are only generalizable to individuals of European descent.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study supports the hypothesis that higher circulating retinol concentration is causally associated with increased life expectancy. Current evidence casts doubt over the beneficial or detrimental effect of higher circulating lycopene, selenium, β-carotene, or vitamin C concentrations in longevity. Supplementing these antioxidants in the general population without a definite deficiency will have little benefit for life expectancy. Future MR analyses designed to expand on the current findings by exploiting larger number of SNPs to proxy circulating antioxidants based on large-scale GWASs are still warranted.

Data Availability

All data described in the article are provided within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Authors’ Contributions

ZY and YW designed the research; FZ and CX conducted the research; ZY analyzed the data; and ZY, FZ, and CX wrote the paper. YW had primary responsibility for the final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully thank the investigators and individuals of all GWASs from which we used summary statistics data. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 81873507 and 82070348).

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Table S1: post hoc power calculation for the main IVW analyses on circulating antioxidants and longevity. Supplemental Table S2: cohort characteristics and exclusion criteria for the individual longevity GWAS. Supplemental Table S3: cohort characteristics and exclusion criteria for the parental lifespan GWAS. Supplemental Table S4: effect estimates for the associations of the included instrumental variants with absolute circulating antioxidants and longevity outcome. Supplemental Table S5: effect estimates for the associations of the selected instrumental variants with circulating antioxidant metabolites and longevity outcome. Supplemental Table S6: IVW findings and sensitivity analyses for genetically predicted per unit increase in circulating antioxidants and parental lifespan outcome. Supplemental Table S7: details of GWAS datasets used to test associations of antioxidant-instrumenting SNPs with potential confounders and other determinants of longevity. Supplemental Table S8: comparison of the impacts on circulating antioxidant levels between genetic instruments and antioxidant supplementation. Supplemental Figure S1: three principal assumptions in MR study. Supplemental Figure S2: leave-one-out permutations for the association of absolute circulating ascorbate with longevity. Supplemental Figure S3: leave-one-out permutations for the association of absolute circulating lycopene with longevity. Supplemental Figure S4: leave-one-out permutations for the association of absolute circulating selenium with longevity. Supplemental Figure S5: leave-one-out permutations for the association of absolute circulating beta-carotene with longevity. Supplemental Figure S6: leave-one-out permutations for the association of alpha-tocopherol metabolite with longevity. Supplemental Figure S7: leave-one-out permutations for the association of gamma-tocopherol metabolite with longevity. Supplemental Figure S8: leave-one-out permutations for the association of circulating retinol metabolite with longevity. Supplemental Figure S9: leave-one-out permutations for the association of circulating ascorbate metabolite with longevity. (Supplementary Materials)

References

A. Santos-Lozano, A. Santamarina, H. Pareja-Galeano et al., “The genetics of exceptional longevity: insights from centenarians,” Maturitas, vol. 90, pp. 49–57, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. van den Berg, M. Beekman, K. R. Smith, A. Janssens, and P. E. Slagboom, “Historical demography and longevity genetics: back to the future,” Ageing Research Reviews, vol. 38, pp. 28–39, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. van den Berg, M. Rodríguez-Girondo, I. K. van Dijk et al., “Longevity defined as top 10% survivors and beyond is transmitted as a quantitative genetic trait,” Nature Communications, vol. 10, p. 35, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Sies, C. Berndt, and D. P. Jones, “Oxidative stress,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 86, pp. 715–748, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Á. Belenguer-Varea, F. J. Tarazona-Santabalbina, J. A. Avellana-Zaragoza, M. Martínez-Reig, C. Mas-Bargues, and M. Inglés, “Oxidative stress and exceptional human longevity: systematic review,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 149, pp. 51–63, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Luo, K. Mills, S. le Cessie, R. Noordam, and D. van Heemst, “Ageing, age-related diseases and oxidative stress: what to do next?” Ageing Research Reviews, vol. 57, article 100982, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Agudo, L. Cabrera, P. Amiano et al., “Fruit and vegetable intakes, dietary antioxidant nutrients, and total mortality in Spanish adults: findings from the Spanish cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Spain),” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 85, pp. 1634–1642, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Bastide, L. Dartois, V. Dyevre et al., “Dietary antioxidant capacity and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the E3N/EPIC cohort study,” European Journal of Nutrition, vol. 56, pp. 1233–1243, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Genkinger, E. A. Platz, S. C. Hoffman, G. W. Comstock, and K. J. Helzlsouer, “Fruit, vegetable, and antioxidant intake and all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular disease mortality in a community-dwelling population in Washington County, Maryland,” Am. J. Epidemiol., vol. 160, no. 12, pp. 1223–1233, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Paganini-Hill, C. H. Kawas, and M. M. Corrada, “Antioxidant vitamin intake and mortality: the Leisure World Cohort Study,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 181, pp. 120–126, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. T. Akbaraly, J. Arnaud, I. Hininger-Favier, V. Gourlet, A.-M. Roussel, and C. Berr, “Selenium and mortality in the elderly: results from the EVA study,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 51, pp. 2117–2123, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Jia, L. S. Aucott, and G. McNeill, “Nutritional status and subsequent all-cause mortality in men and women aged 75 years or over living in the community,” The British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 98, pp. 593–599, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Goyal, M. B. Terry, and A. B. Siegel, “Serum antioxidant nutrients, vitamin A, and mortality in U.S. adults,” Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention: a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, vol. 22, pp. 2202–2211, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Huang, S. J. Weinstein, K. Yu, S. Männistö, and D. Albanes, “Relationship between serum alpha-tocopherol and overall and cause-specific mortality,” Circulation Research, vol. 125, pp. 29–40, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Al-Khudairy, N. Flowers, R. Wheelhouse et al., “Vitamin C supplementation for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease,” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 3, article CD011114, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Rees, L. Hartley, C. Day et al., “Selenium supplementation for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease,” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 1, no. 1, article CD009671, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Bjelakovic, D. Nikolova, and C. Gluud, “Meta-regression analyses, meta-analyses, and trial sequential analyses of the effects of supplementation with beta-carotene, vitamin A, and vitamin E singly or in different combinations on all-cause mortality: do we have evidence for lack of harm?” PLoS One, vol. 8, article e74558, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Jenkins, J. D. Spence, E. L. Giovannucci et al., “Supplemental vitamins and minerals for CVD prevention and treatment,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 71, pp. 2570–2584, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Bjelakovic, D. Nikolova, L. L. Gluud, R. G. Simonetti, and C. Gluud, “Mortality in randomized trials of antioxidant supplements for primary and secondary prevention: systematic review and meta-analysis,” JAMA, vol. 297, pp. 842–857, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Bjelakovic, D. Nikolova, and C. Gluud, “Antioxidant supplements to prevent mortality,” JAMA, vol. 310, pp. 1178-1179, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. Steinhubl, “Why have antioxidants failed in clinical trials?” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 101, pp. 14D–19D, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Lawlor, R. M. Harbord, J. A. C. Sterne, N. Timpson, and G. Davey Smith, “Mendelian randomization: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 27, pp. 1133–1163, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
N. M. Davies, M. V. Holmes, and G. Davey Smith, “Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians,” BMJ (Clinical research ed.), vol. 362, article k601, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Evans, G. Zhu, V. Dy et al., “Genome-wide association study identifies loci affecting blood copper, selenium and zinc,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 22, pp. 3998–4006, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Cornelis, M. Fornage, M. Foy et al., “Genome-wide association study of selenium concentrations,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 24, pp. 1469–1477, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Zheng, J. A. Luan, E. Sofianopoulou et al., “Plasma vitamin C and type 2 diabetes: genome-wide association study and Mendelian randomization analysis in European populations,” Diabetes Care, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 98–106, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. R. D'Adamo, A. D'Urso, K. A. Ryan et al., “A common variant in the SETD7 gene predicts serum lycopene concentrations,” Nutrients, vol. 8, p. 82, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Hendrickson, A. Hazra, C. Chen et al., “β-Carotene 15,15′-monooxygenase 1 single nucleotide polymorphisms in relation to plasma carotenoid and retinol concentrations in women of European descent,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 96, pp. 1379–1389, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Mondul, K. Yu, W. Wheeler et al., “Genome-wide association study of circulating retinol levels,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 20, pp. 4724–4731, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Y. Shin, E. B. Fauman, A. K. Petersen et al., “An atlas of genetic influences on human blood metabolites,” Nature Genetics, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 543–550, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Long, M. Hicks, H.-C. Yu et al., “Whole-genome sequencing identifies common-to-rare variants associated with human blood metabolites,” Nature Genetics, vol. 49, pp. 568–578, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Deelen, D. S. Evans, D. E. Arking et al., “A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies multiple longevity genes,” Nature Communications, vol. 10, p. 3669, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. R. Timmers, N. Mounier, K. Lall et al., “Genomics of 1 million parent lifespans implicates novel pathways and common diseases and distinguishes survival chances,” eLife, vol. 8, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yang, T. Ferreira, A. P. Morris et al., “Conditional and joint multiple-SNP analysis of GWAS summary statistics identifies additional variants influencing complex traits,” Nature Genetics, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 369–375, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Hemani, J. Zheng, B. Elsworth et al., “The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome,” eLife, vol. 7, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Bowden, G. Davey Smith, P. C. Haycock, and S. Burgess, “Consistent estimation in Mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator,” Genetic Epidemiology, vol. 40, pp. 304–314, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Bowden, G. Davey Smith, and S. Burgess, “Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 44, pp. 512–525, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Verbanck, C.-Y. Chen, B. Neale, and R. Do, “Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases,” Nature Genetics, vol. 50, pp. 693–698, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. I. Swerdlow, K. B. Kuchenbaecker, S. Shah et al., “Selecting instruments for Mendelian randomization in the wake of genome-wide association studies,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 45, pp. 1600–1616, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
S. van Oort, J. W. J. Beulens, A. J. van Ballegooijen, S. Burgess, and S. C. Larsson, “Cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle behaviours in relation to longevity: a Mendelian randomization study,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 289, pp. 232–243, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Burgess, “Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 43, pp. 922–929, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. M. Palmer, D. A. Lawlor, R. M. Harbord et al., “Using multiple genetic variants as instrumental variables for modifiable risk factors,” Statistical Methods in Medical Research, vol. 21, pp. 223–242, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Reboul, “Mechanisms of carotenoid intestinal absorption: where do we stand?” Nutrients, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 838, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Milani, M. Basirnejad, S. Shahbazi, and A. Bolhassani, “Carotenoids: biochemistry, pharmacology and treatment,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 174, pp. 1290–1324, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Fairweather-Tait, R. Collings, and R. Hurst, “Selenium bioavailability: current knowledge and future research requirements,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 91, pp. 1484S–1491S, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. K. Wrobel, R. Power, and M. Toborek, “Biological activity of selenium: revisited,” IUBMB Life, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 97–105, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Reboul, “Absorption of vitamin A and carotenoids by the enterocyte: focus on transport proteins,” Nutrients, vol. 5, pp. 3563–3581, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. I. Dawson, “The importance of vitamin A in nutrition,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 311–325, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Rumsey and M. Levine, “Absorption, transport, and disposition of ascorbic acid in humans,” The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 9, pp. 116–130, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Lykkesfeldt, A. J. Michels, and B. Frei, “Vitamin C,” Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 16–18, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Flory, M. Birringer, and J. Frank, “Bioavailability and metabolism of vitamin E,” in Vitamin E in Human Health, P. Weber, M. Birringer, J. B. Blumberg, M. Eggersdorfer, and J. Frank, Eds., pp. 31–41, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Khadangi and A. Azzi, “Vitamin E-the next 100 years,” IUBMB Life, vol. 71, pp. 411–415, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Nichter and J. J. Thompson, “For my wellness, not just my illness: North Americans' use of dietary supplements,” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, vol. 30, pp. 175–222, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
E. D. Kantor, C. D. Rehm, M. Du, E. White, and E. L. Giovannucci, “Trends in dietary supplement use among US adults from 1999-2012,” JAMA, vol. 316, pp. 1464–1474, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Mayo-Wilson, A. Imdad, K. Herzer, M. Y. Yakoob, and Z. A. Bhutta, “Vitamin A supplements for preventing mortality, illness, and blindness in children aged under 5: systematic review and meta-analysis,” BMJ (Clinical research ed.), vol. 343, article d5094, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Imdad, E. Mayo-Wilson, K. Herzer, and Z. A. Bhutta, “Vitamin A supplementation for preventing morbidity and mortality in children from six months to five years of age,” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 3, article CD008524, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Rice, K. J. West, and R. Black, “Vitamin A deficiency. Global and regional burden of disease attributable to selected major risk factors,” World Health Organization, vol. 1, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
R. E. Black, S. Cousens, H. L. Johnson et al., “Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2008: a systematic analysis,” Lancet (London, England), vol. 375, pp. 1969–1987, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. A. Haider, R. Sharma, and Z. A. Bhutta, “Neonatal vitamin A supplementation for the prevention of mortality and morbidity in term neonates in low and middle income countries,” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2, article CD006980, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. U. Khan, M. U. Khan, H. Riaz et al., “Effects of nutritional supplements and dietary interventions on cardiovascular outcomes: an umbrella review and evidence map,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 171, pp. 190–198, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Luo, S. le Cessie, D. van Heemst, and R. Noordam, “Diet-derived circulating antioxidants and risk of coronary heart disease: a Mendelian randomization study,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 77, pp. 45–54, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Guo, Y. Lu, and H. Jin, “Appraising the role of circulating concentrations of micro-nutrients in epithelial ovarian cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, p. 7356, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Williams, S. Hägg, and N. L. Pedersen, “Circulating antioxidants and Alzheimer disease prevention: a Mendelian randomization study,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 109, pp. 90–98, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. van der Loo, M. Bachschmid, V. Spitzer, L. Brey, V. Ullrich, and T. F. Lüscher, “Decreased plasma and tissue levels of vitamin C in a rat model of aging: implications for antioxidative defense,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 303, pp. 483–487, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Mecocci, M. C. Polidori, L. Troiano et al., “Plasma antioxidants and longevity: a study on healthy centenarians,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 28, pp. 1243–1248, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
C. B. Stephensen, “VITAMINA, INFECTION,ANDIMMUNEFUNCTION,” Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 167–192, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hada, A. M. Mondul, S. J. Weinstein, and D. Albanes, “Serum retinol and risk of overall and site-specific cancer in the ATBC study,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 189, pp. 532–542, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Jayedi, A. Rashidy-Pour, M. Parohan, M. S. Zargar, and S. Shab-Bidar, “Dietary antioxidants, circulating antioxidant concentrations, total antioxidant capacity, and risk of all-cause mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective observational studies,” Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), vol. 9, pp. 701–716, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Bjelakovic, D. Nikolova, L. L. Gluud, R. G. Simonetti, and C. Gluud, “Antioxidant supplements for prevention of mortality in healthy participants and patients with various diseases,” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2012, no. 3, p. CD007176, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. R. Miller, R. Pastor-Barriuso, D. Dalal, R. A. Riemersma, L. J. Appel, and E. Guallar, “Meta-analysis: high-dosage vitamin E supplementation may increase all-cause mortality,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Virtamo, P. R. Taylor, J. Kontto et al., “Effects of α-tocopherol and β-carotene supplementation on cancer incidence and mortality: 18-year postintervention follow-up of the alpha-tocopherol, beta-carotene cancer prevention study,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 135, pp. 178–185, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. J. Bates, M. Hamer, and G. D. Mishra, “Redox-modulatory vitamins and minerals that prospectively predict mortality in older British people: the National Diet and Nutrition Survey of people aged 65 years and over,” The British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 105, pp. 123–132, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Ito, S. Suzuki, K. Yagyu, R. Sasaki, K. Suzuki, and K. Aoki, “Relationship between serum carotenoid levels and cancer death rates in the residents, living in a rural area of Hokkaido, Japan,” J. Epidemiol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Padayatty and M. Levine, “Vitamin C: the known and the unknown and goldilocks,” Oral Diseases, vol. 22, pp. 463–493, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Zhimin Yu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1467

Downloads

1159

Citations