A Multicenter Study Evaluating the Stages of Change in Food Consumption with Warning Labels among Chilean University Students

Table 4

Comparisons of the importance and confidence to change consumption of particular foods by nutritional status among women.

	Under weight	Normal weight	Overweight	Obese
	(n=135)	(n=2225)	(n=781)	(n=234)
Soft drinks
Importance	6.5 ± 3.3	6.9 ± 3.3	6.9 ± 3.5	6.9 ± 3.2
Confidence	7.2 ± 2.8	7.7 ± 2.6	7.4 ± 2.7	7.1 ± 2.7
Juices
Importance	6.1 ± 3.2	6.6 ± 3.2	6.7 ± 3.1	6.5 ± 3.2
Confidence	7.0 ± 2.8	7.3 ± 2.7	7.4 ± 2.7	6.9 ± 2.8
Cookies
Importance	5.6 ± 3.2	6.6 ± 3.0	6.8 ± 2.9	7.1 ± 2.7
Confidence	5.7 ± 3.2	6.2 ± 2.9	6.2 ± 2.8	6.0 ± 2.8
Sweet snacks
Importance	6.1 ± 3.3	6.9 ± 3.1	7.3 ± 2.9	7.4 ± 2.7
Confidence	6.0 ± 3.1	6.5 ± 3.0	6.5 ± 2.8	6.2 ± 2.9
Potato chips
Importance	6.3 ± 3.4	7.0 ± 3.2	7.1 ± 3.1	7.4 ± 2.9
Confidence	5.9 ± 3.3	6.8 ± 3.0	6.7± 2.9	6.8 ± 2.9
Cold cuts
Importance	6.2 ± 3.4	6.9 ± 3.2	6.8 ± 3.2	6.9 ± 3.0
Confidence	6.8 ± 3.1	7.2 ± 2.9	7.0 ± 2.9	6.5 ± 3.0
Soups
Importance	6.5 ± 3.5	6.9 ± 3.6	6.8 ± 3.6	6.5 ± 3.6
Confidence	7.6 ± 3.1	8.0 ± 2.8	7.8 ± 2.9	7.8 ± 3.0
Chocolate
Importance	5.6 ± 3.5	6.4 ± 3.3	6.9 ± 3.1	7.0 ± 3.1
Confidence	5.3 ± 3.4	5.5 ± 3.3	5.7 ± 3.2	5.2 ± 3.2
Ice-cream
Importance	5.7 ± 3.4	6.3 ± 3.1	6.7 ± 3.2	6.8 ± 3.1
Confidence	5.4 ± 3.3	6.3 ± 3.1	6.4 ± 3.0	6.4 ± 3.0
Breakfast cereals
Importance	6.1 ± 3.4	6.6 ± 3.4	6.7 ± 3.4	6.5 ± 3.4
Confidence	5.9 ± 3.3	6.8 ± 3.2	7.3 ± 3.0	6.8 ± 3.1

Values expressed as mean ± SD. Anova test post hoc Bonferroni. Equal letters indicate significant differences.