Clinical Study
A Comparison between Primary and Secondary Flap Coverage in Ridge Preservation Procedures: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Table 3
Stent measurement at baseline and 6 months following extraction and ridge preservation.
| | Variables | CFT | OFT | p value | Mean±SD | Median (IQR) | Mean±SD | Median (IQR) | |
| bone height at center | Baseline | 13.8±2.8 | 15(5) | 14.2±3.1 | 15(5) | 0.551 | 6 months following Sx | 5.7±2 | 5.5(3) | 6.7±2.9 | 6(4) | 0.034 | Difference | 8.1±1.9 | 8(3) | 7.5±1.8 | 7(3) | 0.389 | p Value | | 0.005 | | 0.005 | |
| bone height at mid-buccal (BH) | Baseline | 6.2±2.3 | 6(3) | 6.1±1.7 | 6(2) | 0.763 | 6 months following Sx | 5.4±2.3 | 5.5(3) | 5.8±1.7 | 6(2) | 0.157 | Difference | 0.8±1 | 1(2) | 0.3±1.1 | 0.5(1) | 0.096 | p Value | | 0.046 | | 0.429 | |
| bone width at 3 mm sub-crestal | Baseline | 3.4±1.4 | 3(1) | 4.2±2 | 4(4) | 0.071 | 6 months following Sx | 3.5±1.1 | 3(1) | 4.6±1.5 | 4.5(2) | 0.031 | Difference | -0.1±1.1 | 0(1) | -0.4±1.6 | -0.5(2) | 0.257 | p Value | | 0.783 | | 0.389 | |
| bone width at 5 mm sub-crestal | Baseline | 3.3±1.3 | 3(2) | 3.6±1.2 | 4(3) | 0.366 | 6 months following Sx | 3.2±1.1 | 3(2) | 3.7±1 | 3.5(2) | 0.132 | Difference | 0.1±0.3 | 0(0) | -0.1±0.5 | 0(0) | 0.317 | p Value | | 0.317 | | 0.564 | |
| Keratinized tissue width (KTW) | Baseline | 3.7±1.2 | 4(2) | 3.4±1.2 | 3.5(2) | 0.18 | 6 months following Sx | 2±0.9 | 2(1) | 3.4±1.2 | 3.5(2) | 0.011 | Difference | 1.7±0.6 | 2(1) | 0±0 | 0(0) | 0.004 | p Value | | 0.004 | | 0.946 | |
| Pain (VAS scale 0-10) | 24 hours following Sx | 3±0.8 | 3(2) | 1.1±0.5 | 1(0) | 0.006 | 2 weeks following Sx | 0.8±0.9 | 1(1) | 0.4±0.5 | 0(1) | 0.132 | Difference | 2.2±1.2 | 1(1) | 0.7±0.4 | 0(1) | 0.023 | p Value | | 0.006 | | 0.008 | |
|
|
p value <0.05 Note. CFT: closed flap technique, OFT: open flap technique, Sx: surgery. |