Clinical Study

Modified Suction-Assisted Cartilage Shaver for Axillary Osmidrosis

Table 3

Comparison of cartilage shaver and microwave device for AO.

AuthorMethods for AOPatients numbersEfficacy Complications (%)Wound healingFollow-up duration

Tung [9], 20011 cm incision, cartilage shaver6491.43.9 (wound edge necrosis)5 days6-13 months, mean 9.3 months
Lee et al [10], 2005Two 1 cm incisions, cartilage shaver8991.21.1 (hematoma and skin perforation)  
0.6 (of wounds)
21 days14-28 months, mean 20 months
Wu [11], 20070.5–1.0 cm incision, cartilage shaver15692.37.7 (wound edge necrosis)21 days6-59 months, mean 16 months
Chern et al [12], 20110.8 cm incision, cartilage shaver30941.7 (wound local infection)7 days3-13 months, mean 10 months
Hsu et al [13], 20181 cm incision, cartilage shaver19943.8% (ecchymosis)Not mentioned3 months
Current study, 20180.5 cm incision, cartilage shaver3992.31.3% (scar formation)7 days12-69 months, mean 31 months

Glaser et al [3], 2012Microwave12089%28%12 months
Hong et al [4], 2012Microwave3190.3%26% - 71% temporary adverse effects12 months
Scuderi et al [5], 2016Microwave2072.5%25% nodular formationMean 5 months
Chang et al [8], 2017Microwave1-Median nerve neuropathy affected both sensory and motor function6 months (partially recovered sensory and motor function

Elimination of malodor, rated as excellent to good.