Research Article

Association between Handgrip Strength, Mobility, Leg Strength, Flexibility, and Postural Balance in Older Adults under Long-Term Care Facilities

Table 3

Association between HGS and all outcomes after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI with interaction between sex and HGS.

βStandard error value

TUG
 HGS–0.470.13<0.001
 Age0.280.08<0.001
 Sex (M vs W)–3.123.260.34
 HGS: sex (M vs W)0.20.160.203
 BMI–0.030.120.825
TUG cog
 HGS–0.490.160.002
 Age0.300.090.002
 Sex (M vs W)–1.363.970.732
 HGS: sex (M vs W)0.140.190.451
 BMI–0.150.140.304
Gait speed
 HGS–0.450.140.001
 Age0.290.080.001
 Sex (M vs W)–4.923.470.158
 HGS: sex (M vs W)0.250.170.139
 BMI–0.090.120.482
Chair stand
 HGS–0.350.130.010
 Age0.260.080.002
 Sex (M vs W)–1.683.380.619
 HGS: sex (M vs W)0.150.160.343
 BMI–0.060.120.640
BERG
 HGS0.530.170.002
 Age–0.350.10.001
 Sex (M vs W)–1.544.360.724
 HGS: sex (M vs W)–0.090.210.658
 BMI0.050.160.734
SP-EO
 HGS–7.545.950.207
 Age5.143.570.152
 Sex (M vs W)360.87151.320.018
 HGS: sex (M vs W)–6.637.260.362
 BMI–8.055.430.140
SPML-EO
 HGS–3.662.790.191
 Age1.191.670.476
 Sex (M vs W)168.5370.910.018
 HGS: sex (M vs W)–3.383.40.322
 BMI–7.52.540.004
MaxML-EC
 HGS0.130.170.438
 Age0.110.10.289
 Sex (M vs W)2.884.320.506
 HGS: sex (M vs W)–0.150.210.458
 BMI–0.040.150.813

HGS, hand grip strength; BMI, Body mass index; TUG, Timed Up and Go; TUG cog, Timed Up and Go cognitive; M, men; W, women; SP, total path length; SPML, statokinesiogram path length; MaxML, maximal COP displacement from point 0 in the X direction; EO, eyes open; EC, eyes closed.