Review Article

The Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Posterior Approach Spinal Fusion in Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: The Current Evidence from Prospective Comparative Studies

Table 2

Quality assessment of five included studies.

Methodological item for nonrandomised studiesGhahreman et al.Wang et al.Archavlis and Carvi y NievasKotani et al.Parker et al.

() A clearly stated aim22222
() Inclusion of consecutive patients12211
() Prospective collection of data22222
() Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the study22222
() Unbiased assessment of the study end point00000
() Follow-up period appropriate to the aim of the study11222
() Loss to follow-up less than 5%22222
() Prospective calculation of the study size00000
() An adequate control group22222
() Contemporary groups22222
() Baseline equivalence of groups22222
() Adequate statistical analyses22222
Total scores1819201919