The Sensible Heat Flux in the Course of the Year at Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard: Characteristics of Eddy Covariance Data and Corresponding Model Results

Figure 3

30 min averages of the kinematic sensible heat flux (K m s⁻¹), eddy covariance versus HMA. Additionally shown is the correlation coefficient between the two data series and the linear regression (line and equation) for data from the convective period: (a) for the time window 16.6. to 31.8. and friction velocities ≤0.23 m s⁻¹, (b) for the time window 16.6. to 31.8. and friction velocities >0.23 m s⁻¹, (c) Figure 3(a) for quality flags 1–3, (d) Figure 3(b) for quality flags 1–3, (e) for the time window 1.9. to 15.6. and friction velocities ≤0.23 m s⁻¹, (f) for the time window 1.9. to 15.6. and friction velocities >0.23 m s⁻¹, (g) Figure 3(e) for quality flags 1–3, and (h) Figure 3(f) for quality flags 1–3.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)