Research Article

Public Perception of Genetically Modified Organisms and the Implementation of Biosafety Measures in Kenya

Table 2

Correlation between awareness of Cartagena Protocol on biosafety and views on the adequacy of legal and regulatory frameworks in Kenya.

GM food is a solutionGM food is safeGM health concernsGM data is adequateGM food is regulatedGM legal regulation adequateCartagena awarenessGM policies are strongPublic has a voiceGM is profitableGM ban was justified

GM food is a solution1
GM food is safe0.66751
GM health concerns−0.2567−0.45911
GM data is adequate0.15770.2702−0.261
GM food is regulated0.2370.3096−0.08820.21741
GM legal regulation adequate0.28080.3426−0.18750.32930.39011
Cartagena awareness0.17090.2391−0.03870.16020.32250.44271
GM policies are strong0.2580.3189−0.12740.35240.41050.58560.34341
Public has a voice0.2320.3019−0.09760.28140.39010.42930.28870.43771
GM is profitable−0.5748−0.53320.2932−0.2204−0.1819−0.2352−0.1947−0.2889−0.31021
GM ban was justified−0.4257−0.41760.3308−0.16730.0353−0.1628−0.0487−0.1772−0.10230.29691

Parameters testedLegal and regulatory framework is adequateAwareness of Cartagena Protocol

Legal and regulatory framework is adequate1.0000
Awareness of Cartagena Protocol0.44271.0000

Interpretation: 0.1<|<.3 = minimal correlation, 0.3<|<.5 = moderate correlation, |r|>.5 = strong correlation (Cohen, 1988).