Research Article
An Improved Cockroach Swarm Optimization
Table 9
Comparison of exec1ution time of RIO, HRIO, CSO, MCSO, and ICSO.
| SN | Function | RIO | HRIO | CSO | MCSO | ICSO |
| 1 | Bohachevsky1 | 1.137525 | 0.886356 | 23.913237 | 0.075212 | 0.097187 | 2 | Bohachevsky2 | 0.998178 | 0.946887 | 26.492095 | 0.072021 | 0.074106 | 3 | Bohachevsky3 | 1.089920 | 0.885252 | 25.028054 | 0.080908 | 0.068189 | 4 | 3 hump camel back | 4.231533 | 0.794983 | 18.281683 | 0.104132 | 0.078845 | 5 | 6 hump camel back | 0.406355 | 0.330198 | 5.723039 | 0.0945856 | 0.086637 | 6 | Easom | 0.124022 | 0.107303 | 0.106738 | 0.077179 | 0.092393 | 7 | Matyax | 0.973322 | 0.711734 | 13.559576 | 0.88536 | 0.076693 | 8 | Schaffer1 | 0.109048 | 0.086433 | 0.119076 | 0.072400 | 0.081599 | 9 | Schaffer2 | 62.567654 | 31.415836 | 29.194283 | 0.084127 | 0.082320 | 10 | Sphere | 0.617544 | 0.557871 | 25.378161 | 0.82512 | 0.199373 | 11 | Rastrigin | 0.956329 | 0.826770 | 71.811170 | 0.175563 | 0.369987 | 12 | Rosenbrock | 126.618734 | 127.469638 | 81.361663 | 76.084929 | 78.572185 | 13 | Ackley | 122.216187 | 117.635854 | 82.227210 | 0.235012 | 0.192339 | 14 | Quadric | 0.718785 | 0.512242 | 31.075809 | 0.247456 | 0.227244 | 15 | Schwefel2.22 | 128.445013 | 127.084387 | 79.924516 | 0.217104 | 0.219296 | 16 | Griewangk | 126.872461 | 126.210153 | 70.852376 | 0.211351 | 0.210934 | 17 | Sumsquare | 122.748646 | 125.154349 | 78.809270 | 0.273780 | 0.236129 | 18 | Sinusoidal | 0.204559 | 0.240200 | 0.234205 | 0.200361 | 0.217635 | 19 | Zakharov | 115.192226 | 114.691827 | 79.926232 | 0.205280 | 0.259202 | 20 | Step | 0.686403 | 0.633264 | 39.136696 | 0.239525 | 0.225102 | 21 | Powell | 122.796991 | 92.876086 | 74.794730 | 1.527170 | 0.853751 | 22 | ST9 | 0.435911 | 0.426320 | 0.437944 | 0.431122 | 0.436741 | 23 | ST17 | 1.066161 | 1.052169 | 1.159830 | 1.089657 | 1.147114 |
| Number of minimum execution times | | — | 2 | — | 9 | 12 |
|
|
ST9 denotes Storn's Tchebychev 9. ST17 denotes Storn's Tchebychev 17.
|