An Improved Cockroach Swarm Optimization

Table 9

Comparison of exec1ution time of RIO, HRIO, CSO, MCSO, and ICSO.

SN	Function	RIO	HRIO	CSO	MCSO	ICSO
1	Bohachevsky1	1.137525	0.886356	23.913237	0.075212	0.097187
2	Bohachevsky2	0.998178	0.946887	26.492095	0.072021	0.074106
3	Bohachevsky3	1.089920	0.885252	25.028054	0.080908	0.068189
4	3 hump camel back	4.231533	0.794983	18.281683	0.104132	0.078845
5	6 hump camel back	0.406355	0.330198	5.723039	0.0945856	0.086637
6	Easom	0.124022	0.107303	0.106738	0.077179	0.092393
7	Matyax	0.973322	0.711734	13.559576	0.88536	0.076693
8	Schaffer1	0.109048	0.086433	0.119076	0.072400	0.081599
9	Schaffer2	62.567654	31.415836	29.194283	0.084127	0.082320
10	Sphere	0.617544	0.557871	25.378161	0.82512	0.199373
11	Rastrigin	0.956329	0.826770	71.811170	0.175563	0.369987
12	Rosenbrock	126.618734	127.469638	81.361663	76.084929	78.572185
13	Ackley	122.216187	117.635854	82.227210	0.235012	0.192339
14	Quadric	0.718785	0.512242	31.075809	0.247456	0.227244
15	Schwefel2.22	128.445013	127.084387	79.924516	0.217104	0.219296
16	Griewangk	126.872461	126.210153	70.852376	0.211351	0.210934
17	Sumsquare	122.748646	125.154349	78.809270	0.273780	0.236129
18	Sinusoidal	0.204559	0.240200	0.234205	0.200361	0.217635
19	Zakharov	115.192226	114.691827	79.926232	0.205280	0.259202
20	Step	0.686403	0.633264	39.136696	0.239525	0.225102
21	Powell	122.796991	92.876086	74.794730	1.527170	0.853751
22	ST9	0.435911	0.426320	0.437944	0.431122	0.436741
23	ST17	1.066161	1.052169	1.159830	1.089657	1.147114
Number of minimum execution times		—	2	—	9	12

ST9 denotes Storn's Tchebychev 9. ST17 denotes Storn's Tchebychev 17.