Review Article

Shedding Light on the Controversy Surrounding the Temporal Decline in Human Sperm Counts: A Systematic Review

Table 2

Summary of studies, published from 1995 up to date, not showing a decline in sperm counts.

Publication dateAuthorLocationStudy periodNumber of participantsSperm count*

1996 Bujan et al. [44]France1977–1992302NC
1996Vierula et al. [45]Finland1967–19945,719NC
1996Paulsen et al. [46]United States1972–1993510NC
1996Fisch et al. [47]United States1970–19941,283
1997Berling and Wölner-Hanssen [48]Sweden1985–1995718
1997Benshushan et al. [49]Israel1980–1995188NC
1997Handelsman [50]Australia1980–1995689NC
1997Rasmussen et al. [51]Denmark1950–19701,055NC
1997Zheng et al. [52]Denmark1968–19928,608NC
1998Emanuel et al. [53]United States1971–1994374NC
1998Younglai et al. [54]Canada1984–199648,968NC
1999Andolz et al. [55]Spain1960–199620,411NC
1999Gyllenborg et al. [56]Denmark1977–19951,927
1999Zorn et al. [57]Norway1975–19941,108NC
1999Acacio et al. [58]Slovenia1983–19962,343NC
2000Itoh et al. [59]United States1951–19971,347NC
2001Costello et al. [60]Japan1975–1998711NC
2002Marimuthu et al. [61]Australia1983–2001448NC
2003Chen et al. [62]India1990–20001,176NC
2003Carlsen et al. [63]United States1989–2000551
2005Mukhopadhyay et al. [64]Denmark1996–2001158NC
2010Esteves et al. [65]India1980–20003,729NC
2011Axelsson et al. [43]Sweden2000–2010511NC
2012Jensen et al. [42]Denmark1996–20104,867

↑: significant increase; NC: no significant change.