A New Framework Based on Supervised Joint Distribution Adaptation for Bearing Fault Diagnosis across Diverse Working Conditions

Table 6

CFD results of M1–M18 comparative models in case 1.

Models	Accuracies (%)
	Task 1	Task 2	Task 3	Task 4	Task 5	Task 6	Task 7	Task 8	Task 9	Task 10	Task 11	Task 12
M1	96.46	93.13	81.25	98.33	99.79	88.75	91.46	94.17	96.88	83.75	83.33	94.79
M2	91.25	89.79	81.04	95.63	99.79	87.50	93.54	92.71	99.17	84.38	83.13	92.92
M3	98.75	94.38	82.71	97.08	99.58	96.88	91.25	92.08	99.38	83.75	84.38	92.29
M4	89.38	87.29	78.33	86.25	93.96	91.67	88.54	90.00	92.50	79.79	80.83	90.42
M5	87.29	84.58	80.00	88.54	91.04	89.17	88.33	90.63	88.75	76.25	79.79	91.04
M6	78.96	74.79	71.46	79.17	82.50	80.42	87.08	91.25	89.38	78.13	78.96	84.17
M7	96.04	94.58	82.50	97.08	98.96	87.29	96.88	94.58	94.79	84.79	83.33	91.04
M8	98.13	98.33	89.17	95.42	99.79	98.96	96.67	95.83	99.17	90.83	83.33	98.54
M9	89.17	98.75	87.08	94.58	99.79	98.75	97.08	91.67	98.75	88.75	92.29	92.50
M10	97.71	97.92	90.42	95.83	99.79	98.33	96.25	94.58	98.96	91.88	94.38	98.75
M11	93.54	91.25	80.21	96.67	99.38	84.17	94.38	93.13	98.33	88.75	82.92	95.42
M12	96.46	99.58	98.54	99.17	100.00	99.38	98.54	97.29	99.38	95.83	98.75	99.58
M13	98.75; nf : 40	99.79; nf : 40	90.63; nf : 40	97.92; nf : 127	100.00; nf : 122	97.92; nf : 56	97.50; nf : 130	96.67; nf : 61	99.38; nf : 80	89.79; nf : 72	97.92; nf : 71	100.00; nf : 71
M14	99.38; nf : 122	100.00; nf : 40	97.92; nf : 80	99.58; nf : 55	100.00; nf : 40	99.17; nf : 67	98.96; nf : 56	97.92; nf : 45	99.79; nf : 98	95.21; nf : 134	98.96; nf : 134	100.00; nf : 41
M15	100.00; nf : 73	100.00; nf : 45	91.46; nf : 82	98.96; nf : 99	100.00; nf : 40	99.38; nf : 99	98.96; nf : 140	96.88; nf : 43	99.58; nf : 95	93.75; nf : 140	98.33; nf : 95	100.00; nf : 57
M16	99.58; nf : 62	100.00; nf : 40	99.79; nf : 70	98.33; nf : 73	100.00; nf : 40	99.38; nf : 100	99.17; nf : 74	98.33; nf : 58	99.79; nf : 95	91.17; nf : 74	99.17; nf : 95	100.00; nf : 45
M17	99.38; nf : 86	99.79; nf : 62	89.79; nf : 47	100.00; nf : 56	100.00; nf : 45	98.75; nf : 44	96.04; nf : 115	97.29; nf : 46	99.58; nf : 101	90.63; nf : 40	91.25; nf : 44	99.58; nf : 46
M18	99.79; nf : 67	100.00; nf : 80	99.58; nf : 92	100.00; nf : 80	100.00; nf : 60	100.00; nf : 90	99.58; nf : 81	99.79; nf : 46	100.00; nf : 60	96.88; nf : 131	99.38; nf : 50	100.00; nf : 60

The bold values highlight that the experimental results are desirable.