A New Framework Based on Supervised Joint Distribution Adaptation for Bearing Fault Diagnosis across Diverse Working Conditions

Table 11

CFD results of M1–M18 models in case 2.

Model	Accuracies of task 1 (%)	Accuracies of task 2 (%)
M1	81.17	77.83
M2	76.33	75.00
M3	75.17	80.83
M4	71.83	73.00
M5	69.33	67.67
M6	66.17	59.33
M7	76.00	69.83
M8	82.50	72.00
M9	66.17	70.83
M10	80.17	74.00
M11	74.50	75.50
M12	86.17	86.83
M13	77.67; nf : 136	79.17; nf : 75
M14	89.00; nf : 116	83.83; nf : 99
M15	74.33; nf : 112	76.83; nf : 88
M16	84.67; nf : 118	86.83; nf : 56
M17	81.67; nf : 95	78.83; nf : 110
M18	91.83; nf : 121	95.17; nf : 65

The bold values highlight that the experimental results are desirable.