Research Article
A New Framework Based on Supervised Joint Distribution Adaptation for Bearing Fault Diagnosis across Diverse Working Conditions
Table 10
CFD results of DFCD-IDAMN in case 2.
| nf | Accuracies of task 1 (%) | Accuracies of task 2 (%) |
| 40 | 77.67 | 74.17 | 50 | 87.67 | 72.17 | 60 | 87.00 | 91.00 | 70 | 88.67 | 92.50 | 80 | 90.00 | 89.50 | 90 | 89.83 | 93.17 | 100 | 88.83 | 92.33 | 110 | 89.00 | 91.50 | 120 | 91.67 | 87.67 | 130 | 91.50 | 87.83 | 140 | 91.17 | 90.67 | 150 | 90.00 | 90.50 | 160 | 81.50 | 88.00 | 162 | 86.17 | 86.83 | mda | 91.83 nf : 121 | 95.17 nf : 65 |
|
|
The bold values highlight that the experimental results are desirable.
|