Research Article
Multiscale Time-Frequency Sparse Transformer Based on Partly Interpretable Method for Bearing Fault Diagnosis
Table 5
The diagnosis results from different methods.
| Working conditions (Nm) | Defect mode | Label | Average accuracy of different methods (%) | CNN | CNN-LSTM | Bi-LSTM | WRN-16-2 | TST | TFT | BAFT | MTFST (proposed) |
| 2 | Single defect | A1 | 86.7 | 88.3 | 89.2 | 90.0 | 87.5 | 89.2 | 90.8 | 92.5 | Single defect + compound defect | A2 | 82.5 | 84.2 | 88.3 | 85.0 | 85.0 | 87.5 | 86.7 | 90.8 |
| 5 | Single defect | B1 | 90.0 | 85.8 | 87.5 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 89.2 | 90.8 | 93.3 | Single defect + compound defect | B2 | 82.5 | 79.2 | 85.0 | 88.3 | 89.2 | 89.2 | 90.8 | 90.0 |
| 10 | Single defect | C1 | 89.7 | 90.5 | 89.6 | 87.7 | 90.1 | 90.5 | 90.4 | 92.5 | Single defect + compound defect | C2 | 83.3 | 87.5 | 84.2 | 87.5 | 85.8 | 88.3 | 89.2 | 90.8 |
|
|
The bold values indicate the optimal diagnosis accuracy.
|