Research Article
Optimisation of Longitudinal Seismic Energy Dissipation System for Straddle-type Monorail-Cum-Road Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridge
Table 6
Longitudinal structural response of the four schemes viscous damper setting positions.
| Viscous damper setting position | Scheme 1 | Scheme 2 | Scheme 3 | Scheme 4 |
| Displacement of the top section of the main tower (m) | 0.617 | 0.531 | 0.513 | 0.460 | Displacement of the end section of the main girder (m) | 0.473 | 0.399 | 0.403 | 0.355 | Relative displacement of the main girder between the main bridge and the approach bridge (m) | 0.153 | 0.053 | 0.077 | 0.052 | Bending moment at the bottom section of the main tower (MN·m) | 4379.1 | 4254.7 | 4222.9 | 4165.1 | Bending moment at the bottom section of the auxiliary pier (MN·m) | 664.9 | 511.0 | 668.9 | 514.8 | Bending moment at the bottom section of the transitional pier (MN·m) | 586.2 | 589.3 | 677.3 | 679.2 | Damping force of the damper at the main tower (kN) | 3433.4 | 3385.7 | 3391.5 | 3375.6 | Damping force of the damper at the auxiliary pier (kN) | — | 3329.0 | — | 3304.8 | Damping force of the damper at the transitional pier (kN) | — | — | 3116.9 | 3000.8 |
|
|