Research Article

Design and Implementation of a Structural Health Monitoring System for a Large Sea-Crossing Project with Bridges and Tunnel

Table 2

Data analysis methods [5, 26].

MethodsAdvantagesDisadvantages

KFGood signal-noise ratio;
good estimation of change in time
Time consuming;
requires parameter calibration;
limited convergence speed and tracking accuracy
FFTNonlinear model;
model linear and nonlinear system;
ease of implementation;
simplicity
Not applicable for complex system;
requires calibration to find model order;
sensitive to noise;
only frequency-domain representation
MUSICHigh resolution in frequency domain;
closely spaced modes can be estimated
Time consuming
SFFTEase of implementation;
time-frequency-domain representation;
simplicity
Requires large quantity of samples;
limited time-frequency resolution;
not applicable for nonlinear and transient signals
WTGood time-frequency resolution;
good signal-noise ratio;
a mother wavelet can be used for different application
Spectral leakage;
requires several levels of decomposition;
mother wavelet will affect the results;
“end effect” is significant
STGood time-frequency resolution;
high signal-noise ratio;
adaptive method;
ease of implementation
Time consuming;
requires calibration
FSTTime saving;
good time-frequency resolution;
spectrum can be localized in time domain
The application in SHM systems need exploring
HHTGood time-frequency resolution;
high signal-noise ratio;
adaptive method;
ease of implementation
Mode mixing;
requires calibration
BSSGood signal-noise ratio;
closely spaced modes can be estimated;
good accuracy to separate frequency components
Requires calibration;
nonlinear and transient signals cannot be analyzed adequately