Research Article
Modelling and Validation of CANDU Shim Operation Using Coupled TRACE/PARCS with Regulating System Response
Table 2
Comparison of station data and simulations on zone level figures of merit. Uncertainties are stated as one standard deviation.
| Case | Average zone level (4 + 11 only) (%) 5 minutes before end of station data | Average zone level (%) 105 minutes after 59% FP |
| Station | 65.6 | n/a | 0 EFPH | 19.0 | 41.4 | 154008 EFPH | 42.3 | 24.7 | 182500 EFPH (ref.) | 47.0 | 21.9 | 195000 EFPH | 49.2 | 20.6 | 90% LZC weight | 52.1 | 21.4 | 12 plane nodalisation | 42.1 | 28.8 | 26 plane nodalisation | 44.9 | 24.6 | Nuclear data unc | 47.0 ± 15.2 | 22.3 ± 2.6 | No refuel reference | 46.9 | 21.7 | Burnup distribution unc | n/a | 21.4 ± 1.0 | Burnup + data unc | n/a | 21.8 ± 3.4 |
|
|
The bolded rows denote the real world results as well as corresponding best-estimate simulations; the nonbolded rows are sensitivity cases.
|