An fMRI Study of the Effects of Vibroacoustic Stimulation on Functional Connectivity in Patients with Insomnia
Table 2
Results show functional connectivity differences between the two groups for the regions that survived post hoc correction for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate method (FDR-corrected values provided). ,, and coordinates of each target ROI are also shown, representing the centroid of the ROI. A two-sample -test is calculated for resting state functional connectivity between the groups for the following ROIs.
Insomnia group (vibroacoustic stimulation vs. control group/pre vs. post)
Brain structures
FDR-corrected
-test
,, coordinates
Vermis-sensorimotor
0.009
-4.16
Sensorimotor superior network: (-0.073, -30.535, and 67.405)
Vermis-R auditory cortex
0.0435
-3.30
Auditory cortex (R): (46.110, -17.401, and 6.961)
R thalamus-R caudate
0.032
+3.26
R caudate: (13.301, 10.010, and 10.49)
R cerebellar hemisphere-R sensorimotor
0.0375
-2.97
Sensorimotor (R) network: (56.386, -9.868, and 28.818)
R nucleus accumbens-R PFC
0.0402
-2.96
Frontoparietal PFC (R) network: (-43.116, 33.186, and 28.244)
L cerebellar hemisphere-L sensorimotor
0.0355
-2.93
Sensorimotor (L) network: (-55.467, -12.364, and 29.489)
