Review Article

Modeling of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: An Overview of In Vivo Murine and Human Xenograft Models

Table 1

Overview of in vivo CML models.
(a)

Mouse modelsMethodPhenotype of leukemiaFeaturesReferences

Conventional transgenicSynthetic BCR-v-ABL driven by Eμ or promoter/enhancer of MPSV LTRPre-B and T lymphomas (3/12 with EμVh vector), T lymphomas (1/3 with MPSV LTR vector)BCR-v-ABL possesses oncogenic capability in vivo.
Synthetic BCR-v-ABL was not similar to original hybrid protein. Increased embryonic lethality
[27]

Conventional transgenicp190 BCR-ABL gene driven by delta metallothionein-1 promoterMyeloid leukemia (2/8 mice) and lymphoid leukemia (6/8 mice) between 10 and 58 days of birth Follow-up studies with bigger cohort developed transplantable ALL/lymphoma[28, 29]

Conventional transgenicp210 BCR-ABL gene driven by delta metallothionein-1 promoterT cell leukemia The tumorigenicity of p210 BCR-ABL chimeric gene products is specific for the hematopoietic cells[30]

Conventional transgenicp210 BCR-ABL gene driven by the mouse tec promoterALL (2/5 founder mice developed), MPDs in transgenic progeny with 4–8 months of latency Transgenic progeny of one founder mice exhibited MPD with fundamental features of CML. Secondary mice showed excessive proliferation of myeloid and megakaryocytic cells; however, they succumbed to progressing anemia [31]

Conditional transgenicTet-off system: tTA driven by the MMTV-LTR promoter Lethal B-ALL developed in 100% of mice within 3–11 weeks on withdrawal of tetracycline due to p210 BCR-ABL1 expressionMMTV-LTR promoter directed expression of tTA to B220+ BM cells. Abolition of BCR-ABL1 expression led to apoptosis of leukemic cells and hence reversal of B-ALL phenotype. Reverted mice from one founder did succumb to ALL without BCR-ABL expression, possibly due to the acquisition of additional mutations [32]

Conditional transgenicTet-off system: tTA driven by the SCL promoter Neutrophilia, leukocytosis, and dissemination of myeloid cells into spleen, liver, and lymph nodes within 29–122 days upon tetracycline withdrawal due to p210 BCR-ABL1 expression.
31% of mice progressed to B-ALL
SCLtTA/BCR-ABL expression model recapitulates many features of human CP-CML[33]

Conditional transgenicOverexpression of BMI1 by ubiquitin C promoter in a lentiral EGFP vector in BCR-ABL expressing CP-CML stem cells and progenitor using Scl/p210 BCR-ABL binary mouse modelDevelopment of serially transplantable B-ALL with accumulation of BMI1/BCR-ABL+ B-cells after 16 weeks of transplantation BMI1 synergizes with BCR-ABL to transform chronic-phase SCL/p210 B-lymphoid progenitors but not HSCs or multipotent progenitors (MPPs) and imparts a proliferative advantage to induce serially transplantable B-ALL in vivo[34]

Transgenic by homologous recombinationE14 ES cells to create in-frame fusion of p190 BCR-ABL with exon 1 of murine bcr in the presence or absence of the endogenous nonrearranged bcr allelebcr-ABL/bcr+ chimeric mice and 37/40 bcr-ABL/bcr- developed B-ALLbcr-ABL fusion gene does not require endogenous bcr allele to develop leukemia [35]

Transduction/transplantation Mu BM transduced with retroviral construct of p210 BCR-ABL expressed under control of MPSV myeloid cell-specific promoter13/30 developed 3 distinct malignancies: CML, ALL, and macrophage-like tumorRetrovirus mediated expression of p210 BCR-ABL demonstrates murine model system for CML[5]

Transduction/transplantation Mu BM of 5-fluorouracil
(5-FU) treated mice transduced with v-abl or p210 BCR-ABL retrovirus
>90% mice that received v-abl or BCR-ABL transduced cells died due to myelomonocytic leukemia, granulocytic leukemia, and pre-B-cell lymphomaBoth BCR-ABL and activated v-abl can induce similar malignancies. Integration site analyses allowed evaluation of clonality [36]

Transduction/transplantation Mu BM transduced with retroviral construct of p210 BCR-ABL under control of MSCV LTR promoter in the presence of SCF All recipients came down with disease and displayed markedly elevated WBC counts with granulocyte predominanceInduction of murine CML in 100% of recipients with 4–6 weeks of latency.
All secondaries succumbed to lymphoid neoplasms.
[37]

Transduction/transplantation 5-FU treated Mu BM cells transduced with retroviral construct of p210 BCR-ABL expressed under control of MSCV promoterElevated WBC counts, majority of which were granulocytes but also included myeloblasts and basophils Induction of transplantable myeloproliferative disease resembling CML.
Leukemic cells expressed excess IL3 and GM-CSF
[38, 39]

Transduction/transplantation 5-FU treated/untreated Mu BM cells transduced with retroviral construct of p210 BCR-ABL, p190 BCR-ABL, and p230 BCR-ABL expressed under control of MSCV promoterCML-like syndrome when 5-FU treated donor cells were used.
Mixture of CML-like disease, B-ALL, and macrophage tumors when non-5-FU treated donor cells were used
All 3 forms of BCR-ABL induce identical CML-like syndrome in mice but p190 BCR-ABL had increased potency for induction of B-ALL[40]

Transduction/transplantation 5-FU treated bone marrow cells with a retrovirus encoding
p210 BCR-ABL together with the XZ-miR-125b overexpressing
miR-125b or the control vector XZ were transplanted into lethally irradiated BALB/c recipient mice
50% of mice died of B-ALL, 42% with MPN, and 8% of mixed (myeloid and lymphoid) leukemia when transplanted with miR-125b plus BCR-ABL-infected cells with median survival of 21 days as compared to 35 days in BCR-ABL transduced control group miR-125b accelerates the oncogenicity of BCR-ABL in transplanted mouse model[41]

Transduction/transplantation B-ALL LDBM cells from specific gene-deleted murine models or WT mice and UCB CD34+ were transduced with bicistronic
vectors expressing EGFP and p190-BCR-ABL (MSCV-p190-BCRABL) or only EGFP (MIEG3) and then cultured with IL-7 and SCF
>90% of recipient mice developed B-ALL in approximately 37 days characterized by B220, CD19+, and CD43 B-cell progenitor population. Infiltration in other organs was also evident Vav3 plays a crucial role in p190-BCR-ABL-mediated leukemogenesis, proliferation, and survival especially for the B-cell progenitor[42]

(b)

Human modelsMethodPhenotype of leukemiaFeaturesReferences

Xenograft
nude mice
Nude mice injected with K562K562 grew as solid vascularized tumors Tumor cells were triphoid and retined human chromosome markers[43]

Xenograft
nude mice
SIA-nu/nu mice were injected with leukemic cell lines and primary patient sampleK562 formed solid tumor at challenged site without metastatic spread with mean latency of 10 days 6/8 leukemic cell lines and 5/18 primary neoplastic tumors induced serially transplantable solid soft mass[44]

Xenograft
SCID mice
BM samples of CP-CML and BC-CML as well as cell lines; K562 and EM-2 were transplanted into CB-17 scid/scid miceAll mice injected with K562 as well as EM-2 or primary CP-CML and BC-CML samples by IV or IP engraft to give myeloblasts in BM, blood, and tumors in peritoneumAfter initial growth in kidney capsule, myeloblasts were detected at varying levels in PB and BM.
Human myeloid and lymphoid leukemia cell lines showed distinct growth patterns.
Differences were also observed in engraftment of CP versus BC-CML primary patient samples
[45]

Xenograft
SCID mice
BM or PB samples obtained from CP-CML and BC-CML patients were injected by IV into sublethally irradiated 400 cGy SCID mice. Exogenous cytokines PIXY321 or c-kit ligand was injected IPCP-CML and BC-CML patient sample showed 1–>10% engraftment with 30–60 days of latency in presence or absence of exogenous human cytokines Multilineage engraftment and CD34+ cells were maintained for more than 60 days after transplantation.
First evidence that both normal and leukemic CP-CML cells can engraft in SCID mice
[46]

Xenograft
NOD/SCID
MNCs from apheresis material from CML patient were IV transplanted into sublethally irradiated 300 cGy NOD/SCID mice. Preselected CD34+ and CD34 cells were also used for BM engrafted studies ≥1–84% multilineage engraftment observed in BM in 76% mice and only 66% of mice showed 16% predominantly T cell splenic engraftment. CML-like disease in BM and spleen. 39%  ±  5% leukemic engraftment in 25 mice having ≥9% BM engraftment was higher as compared to BCR-ABL engraftment in spleen Higher engraftment in NOD/SCID mice using low cell dose compared to SCID mice [47]

Xenograft
NOD/SCID
MNCs or CD34+ enriched cells from BM or PB of 11 CP-CML patient were IV transplanted into sublethally irradiated 400 cGy NOD/SCID mice25% of NOD/SCID recipients had 40–80% human cells, whereas only 3% SCID mice contained similar levels. Further, engrafted human cells had high proportion of leukemic cells along with CD34+ cells NOD/SCID mice allow greater engraftment and amplification of both normal and leukemic cells as compared to SCID mouse model [48]

Xenograft
NOD/SCID
BV173 and PB MN cells from CP, AP, and BC CML patient samples were injectedKinetics and extent of engraftment BP > AP > CP, although according to growth rate BP > AP ≥ CPKinetics of BM repopulation are different for CP, AP, and BC phase of CML[49]

Xenograft
NOD/SCID
9 CP-CML patient samples with predominant LTC-IC were transplanted into sublethally irradiated 350 cGy NOD/SCID and NOD/SCID β2m−/− miceConsistent and durable engraftment was observed with reduced output of B cells and enhanced myelopoiesis with excessive production of erythroid, megakaryocytes, and BCR-ABL CD34+ expressing IL-3 and G-CSF transcriptsNo progressive disease phenotype was observed marking CP-CML phase of the disease [8]

Xenograft
NOD/SCID
CB CD34+ cells were transduced with MSCV based retroviral constructs for BCR-ABL and transplanted 0.2 to 0.3 million cells into each sublethally irradiated 350 cGy NOD/SCID and NOD/SCID β2m−/− mice BCR-ABL transduced cells produced increased ratio of myeloid to B-lymphoid cells with increase in erythroid and megakaryocytic cells. 4/28 mice developed an increased WBC count and/or splenomegaly after 5-6 months of latency First ever model to describe the de novo generation of preleukemic cells by forced expression of BCR-ABL in human CD34+ CB cells. Primary CD34+ CB cells showed rapid and persistent deregulation and erythroid and megakaryocytic biased differentiation in vivo with occasional progression to an early stage of CML[50]

Xenograft
NOD/SCID
CB CD34+ cells were transduced with MSCV based retroviral constructs for BMI1 and BCR-ABL and transplanted only 0.46 to 0.38 million cells into each sublethally irradiated 3 Gy NOD/SCID mice4/8 mice succumbed to [CD34+ CD19+] B-ALL in 16–22 weeks on transplantation of CD34+ cells cotransduced with BMI/BCR-ABL and all secondaries came down with similar phenotypes within 8–12 weeks Coexpression of BMI1 and BCR-ABL in CB CD34+ cells is sufficient to induce transplantable B-ALL in NOD/SCID mice[51]

iPSCKBM7 cells were reprogrammed by retroviral transduction of OCT4, SOX2, c-MYC, and KLF-4Teratoma formation and imatinib resistance were observedThe process of reprogramming KBM7 cell lines readily abolished BCR-ABL dependency which was restored by differentiation into hematopoietic lineage[52]

iPSCMNCs from BM of CP-CML patient sample were cultured with human SCF, IL-3, IL-6, and Flt3L for 2 days and transfected with episomal vectors by nucleofectionCP-CML iPSC lines generated exhibited features of pluripotent stem cells, exhibited complex karyotype, and differentiated into hematopoietic lineagesTransgene free CML iPSC lines can be obtained [53]

iPSCRegeneration of CML iPSCs from CD34+ BM MNCs of CP-CML patient sample by retroviral vectorsDNA methylation pattern and gene expression profile of CML-iPSCs were different from those of original CML sample but were similar to normal iPSCs and human ES cellsRecapitulation of CP CML was shown in terms of that fraction of phenotypically immature cells which showed imatinib resistance although more differentiated cells recovered the sensitivity to imatinib[54]