Radiology Research and Practice / 2015 / Article / Tab 2 / Clinical Study
Mechanical Recanalization following i.v. Thrombolysis: A Retrospective Analysis regarding Secondary Hemorrhagic Infarctions and Parenchymal Hematomas Table 2 Comparison to other studies.
ā Present study
Hacke et al. [13 ] Smith et al. [15 ] Smith et al. [7 ] Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial [6 ] Nelles et al. [23 ] MR CLEAN [20 ] (100%)31 406 141 164 125 65 500 Target vessel ICA, MCA ICA, MCA ICA, MCA, VA, BA ICA, MCA, VA, BA ICA, MCA, VA, BA ICA, MCA ICA, MCA, ACA i.v. thrombolysis with rtPA 31 (100%) 406 (100%) No 48 (29%) n/a# n/a 445 (89%) Mechanical recanalization 31 (100%) no 141 (100%) 164 (100%) 125 (100%) 65 (100%)## 195 (39%) Hematoma 6 (19.4%) 120 (29.5%) 50 (35.5%) 16 (9.8%) 35 (28%) 3 (5%)## 35 (7%)
i.v. and also i.a. thrombolysis.# Only the percentage of i.v. rtPA in case of bleeding, not the overall i.v. rtPA rate.## Only TICI 2b and TICI 3, where they administered only 50% of the usual dose.