Parkinson’s Disease

Parkinson’s Disease / 2015 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 571475 | 9 pages |

Potential of Neural Stem Cell-Based Therapy for Parkinson’s Disease

Academic Editor: Peter Hagell
Received25 Jun 2015
Accepted03 Nov 2015
Published17 Nov 2015


Neural stem cell (NSC) transplantation is an emerging strategy for restoring neuronal function in neurological disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease (PD), which is characterized by a profound and selective loss of nigrostriatal dopaminergic (DA) neurons. Adult neurogenesis generates newborn neurons that can be observed at specialized niches where endothelial cells (ECs) play a significant role in regulating the behavior of NSCs, including self-renewal and differentiating into all neural lineage cells. In this minireview, we highlight the importance of establishing an appropriate microenvironment at the target site of NSC transplantation, where grafted cells integrate into the surroundings in order to enhance DA neurotransmission. Using a novel model of NSC-EC coculture, it is possible to combine ECs with NSCs, to generate such a neurovascular microenvironment. With appropriate NSCs selected, the composition of the transplant can be investigated through paracrine and juxtacrine signaling within the neurovascular unit (NVU). With target site cellular and acellular compartments of the microenvironment recognized, guided DA differentiation of NSCs can be achieved. As differentiated DA neurons integrate into the existing nigrostriatal DA pathway, the symptoms of PD can potentially be alleviated by reversing characteristic neurodegeneration.

1. Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) has traditionally been regarded as the most common neurodegenerative movement disorder, first reported by British physician James Parkinson in his 1817 essay as six cases of paralysis agitans [1]. Understanding of the disease was extended from clinical characteristics to a pathological diagnosis, when Frederic Lewy described microscopic particles in affected brains as early as 1912, later named “Lewy bodies” [1]. In the era of molecular biology, a diagnosis of PD is possible through the detection of mutations in specific genes that code for, for example, alpha-synuclein (SNCA) and parkin (PRKN), responsible for familial PD. Only about 10% of diagnosed patients carry identifiable pathological mutations though, and the majority of PD cases are sporadic [2]. Current pharmacologic treatments, including L-Dopa and monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors, as well as advanced surgical interventions such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), play no role in reversing the characteristic degeneration. As the prevalence of PD reaches 0.3% of the entire population in industrialized countries and 4% in those aged over 80 [2], a cure is urgently required to prevent suffering from nonmotor symptoms, including dementia, sleep disturbance, and autonomic dysfunction, as well as typical motor symptoms, such as asymmetrical bradykinesia, rigidity, postural instability, and resting tremors.

Replacement of lost dopaminergic (DA) neurons and accompanied tissues is a logical treatment for PD. Generally more than 50% of DA neurons have been lost before typical symptoms of PD develop [3]. Neural stem cell (NSC) transplantation is an attractive treatment option, as the cells have the capacity to self-renew and differentiate into all neural lineage cells, which may replace lost DA neurons and reverse the degenerative process of PD [4]. NSCs derived from iPSCs, or immortalized NSC lines, minimize the ethical conflicts using fetal ventral mesencephalic (VM) tissue for transplantation. Once standardized procedures for cell preparation and surgical techniques are established, a thorough evaluation of preclinical and clinical approaches will provide the evidence necessary for promoting cell-based therapies in PD. In this minireview, we highlight the significance of neurovascular unit (NVU) disruption in the progression of PD and introduce the advantages of NSC-based therapy.

2. NSCs and Neurogenesis in Adult Brains

Endogenous neurogenesis in the adult mammalian brain can be regarded as repair or replacement for neuronal loss [5]. Neuronal differentiation is largely restricted to two neurogenic niches where NSCs reside, the subependymal zone (SEZ) of the lateral ventricles and the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the dentate gyrus in the hippocampal formation [6, 7]. Only specific types of neurons, such as interneurons at the olfactory bulb (OB) and dentate granule cells in the hippocampus, are generated for replacing older neurons [8]. Several groups have shown that newly differentiated neurons can migrate to acutely injured areas, such as infarcts in ischemic stroke [9, 10]; however solid evidence is lacking for regenerated neurons replacing lost DA cells in PD.

The SEZ contains NSCs, astrocytes, immature precursors, neuroblasts, and ependymal and endothelial cells (ECs). The resident stem cell lineage in the SEZ consists of NSCs and the relatively quiescent neural progenitor cells (type B cells), which can give rise to rapidly dividing transit-amplifying cells (type C cells). Type C cells ultimately lead to migratory neuroblasts (type A cells), which enter the rostral migratory stream (RMS) [5]. A layer of ependymal cells lines the ventricle borders and is penetrated by the apical process of neural progenitor cells (NPCs), with a short single cilium at sites of adult neurogenesis. Beneath this layer, the bodies of type B cells are organized into chains of tunnels through which type A cells migrate. Proliferative clusters of type C cells reside along chains of type A cells, and within this layer runs an extensive network of blood vessels [12].

Neurogenesis is associated with the vasculature in neurogenic niches. NSCs are in close proximity to blood vessels, and so small molecules in the blood can regulate NSC regeneration [13, 14]. In the mouse brain the basal processes of NSCs frequently contact this vasculature, leading to a modified blood-brain barrier (BBB) at these sites of contact which lacks astrocytic end-feet and pericytic coverage [13]. NSCs lie closer to the SEZ vasculature, both in proximity and in frequency of direct contact. The close anatomical relationships of NSCs with ependymal cells and blood vessels and the direct contact with the CSF implicate signaling from each of these sources as potential regulators of stem cell behavior.

In addition to cellular components as a support for establishing and maintaining the microenvironment for NSCs to continue symmetrical divisions for self-renewal and asymmetric divisions for generating daughter cells, the composition and organization of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in the neurogenic niches are distinct from other regions of the adult brain [15]. The expression of receptors other than variations in the ECM is likely responsible for any contribution made by ECM signaling to NSC behaviors. It has been observed that fingerlike processes of basal lamina called fractones extend from blood vessels to contact each stem cell in the niche [16]. These structures contain laminin b1 and c1 chains, collagen IV, nidogen, and perlecan, with the laminin a1 chain present on blood vessels but not fractones [17]. Each stem cell receives different sources of laminin signals, and laminins composed of different laminin trimers may have different functions, which are essential for regulating the NSC behavior.

3. NVU Disruption in PD

The characteristic pathophysiology of PD includes death of DA neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc), degeneration of DA neurotransmission, and the presence of α-synuclein and protein inclusions in neuronal cells that are known as Lewy bodies [18]. In addition to gene mutations of specific proteins in familial or sporadic cases of PD, vascular insults to the brain as well as various environmental factors can induce PD-like symptoms, such as exposure to heavy metals, rotenone, or paraquat [1921]. BBB disruption has been observed in each of these situations, based on clinical and in vitro evidence [22]. Importantly, α-synuclein deposition increases permeability of the BBB, suggesting the significance of α-synuclein in BBB disruption and PD development [23]. The implications of astrocytic modulation of the BBB have also been proposed in the development of PD [24]. In order to promote cell-based therapy in PD with the aim of regenerating DA neurons, it is essential to have a thorough understanding of the NVU, within which neurons exert their function of transmitting information through electrical and chemical signals.

The concept of the NVU has been extended over time to include a greater number of cell types, as the significance of interactions between these cells is revealed [25]. Initially, a triad of neurons, astrocytes, and vasculature was proposed as the NVU in 1996 [26]. The first recognized definition of the NVU was jointly proposed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) in 2002 and comprised neurons, astrocytes, and ECs. According to this definition, both neural and endovascular elements are critical, especially for investigating cerebrovascular diseases, such as stroke.

Neurons are the signaling unit of neurotransmission; however their functional performance and maintenance rely upon complex interactions within a network of multiple cell types in the NVU. In addition to a physical association in the common microenvironment, these cells interact with each other through positive and negative feedback mechanisms, maintaining homeostasis. Astrocyte foot processes occupy 99% of the abluminal surface of brain capillaries, whereas neuronal endings may directly innervate either the capillary endothelium or the astrocyte foot processes investing the capillary endothelium [27]. Hemodynamic neurovascular coupling is essential for neuronal firing in the brain, as constant blood flow is required due to a lack of local energy reserve [28]. The ECs of the BBB can be distinguished from those in the periphery by an increased mitochondrial content, a lack of membrane fenestration, reduced pinocytic transport or transcellular flux, and extensive tight junctions which limit the influx of molecules between ECs known as paracellular flux [2932]. Pericytes belong to a class of mural cells with contractile proteins and help maintain the structural integrity and function of blood vessels, being attached at irregular intervals to the abluminal membrane of the cerebral microvascular endothelium [33].

In contrast to the cellular compartments of the NVU, the acellular ECM is secreted by neighboring cells. These tissue-specific acellular matrices are primarily composed of proteins, polysaccharides, and enzymes and are the main component of the basement membrane (BM), which is an essential component of the BBB contributing to tissue and cell organization, stability, and differentiation. The neural ECM has a unique molecular composition, containing very small amounts of collagens, laminin-1, and fibronectin [34]. The matrix is mainly composed of a hyaluronic acid (HA) scaffold, which behaves as a large molecular sieving mesh that influences cell division and motility. Associated glycoproteins and proteoglycans regulate its molecular properties and spatial localization and are crucial in determining the major structural features of the neural ECM [35].

The BM of the BBB surrounds ECs and pericytes and presents a duplicature that separates the pericyte from the EC and the astrocyte end-feet. The formation and maintenance of the BM are ensured by ECs, pericytes, and astrocytes. The BM of the NVU is formed by tightly interwoven protein sheets of 20–200 nm thickness, created by the structural proteins collagen and elastin, as well as specialized proteins fibronectin and laminin, in addition to proteoglycans, organized in three layers: the lamina lucida, lamina densa, and lamina fibroreticularis [36]. The attachment of the BM to cells is primarily through laminins to sulfated glycolipids on the cell surface and transmembrane receptors [37]. The identification of dynamic regulation of tight junction proteins in human NSCs means that the cell-matrix interactions in the neurogenic niche, or potential target sites of NSC transplantation, will influence the therapeutic effects of NSCs in PD [38].

Regional heterogeneity has to be taken into account when NSCs are delivered into a specific target site for tissue regeneration, typically the putamen in PD brains. The importance of regional heterogeneity has been demonstrated in the central nervous system (CNS), with respect to cytoarchitectural organization in the NVU. Different interfaces exist for packaging neural tissue; for example, the BBB is distinct from the blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier, which is formed by choroid plexus epithelial cells and separates the blood from CSF. Within the neurogenic niche, a specialized NVU, ECs exert their influence over NSCs to regulate fate specification, differentiation, quiescence, and proliferation, through direct contact and paracrine signaling. In the SEZ, for example, a U-shaped gradient distribution of the soluble factor stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), established by ependymal and endothelial cells, helps guide NSCs from the quiescent ependymal niche to the activated endothelial niche [39].

To promote NSC-based therapy in PD, the microenvironment of the target site of transplantation has to be thoroughly studied. Differentiation of delivered NSCs may simulate those in the endogenous neurogenic niches if a homeostasis can be established between the grafted cells and the surroundings. In theory, a series of descendants of NSCs will gradually replace the lost neurons through a sophisticated process of differentiation. The grafted NSCs are characterized by their capability of self-renewal through replication and differentiating into daughter cells by asymmetric division, in response to exogenous stimuli from the environment [40, 41]. As NSCs lose their stemness, the resulting NPCs cannot replicate indefinitely and instead have a tendency to differentiate into all neural lineage cells, such as neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes [42]. As they finally differentiate into migratory neuroblasts, the dividing cells are committed to the neuronal fate [43].

4. NSCs in PD

Adult neurogenesis may be affected in the progression of PD; for example, it has been observed that cell proliferation appears to be decreased in the SGZ and subventricular zone (SVZ) of PD patients. The numbers of proliferating cell nuclear antigen- (PCNA-) positive adult NSCs in the SVZ and nestin-positive precursor cells in the OB are decreased in the PD-affected postmortem brain, and a decrease in NSCs correlates with the progression of PD, while L-Dopa treatment appears to increase NSC numbers [44, 45]. In contrast, other groups have demonstrated no change in NSC proliferation in the PD-affected brain [46], suggesting that neurogenesis might be affected to various extents at different stages of PD. Strong evidence of a link between altered proliferation of NSCs and functional DA neurons remains insufficient.

PD can be regarded as a developmental disorder, in addition to a neurodegenerative disease, as more evidence suggests a relationship between deregulated neurogenesis and the onset and progression of the disease. It has been demonstrated that α-synuclein is necessary for the embryonic development of at least a subpopulation of DA neurons, shown using SNCA knockout mice as well as mice with a spontaneous deletion of the SNCA gene [47]. PD related SNCA mutations may lead to a reduction in the number of DA neurons in the developing brain long before the onset of DA neuronal degeneration. Reduced levels of α-synuclein contribute to an increased PD risk at the embryonic stage, whereas elevated α-synuclein levels are more commonly associated with PD in the degenerative stage. Disruption to the NVU results from increased permeability due to α-synuclein deposition during the development of PD, although altered levels of α-synuclein can be detrimental at different stages. Only an optimal concentration of α-synuclein is beneficial for DA neuron formation and maintenance, and this should be considered when generating DA neurons by NSC transplantation.

Research into embryonic development of the NVU is valuable when considering NSC-based therapy for PD, in order to replace lost DA neurons by neurovascular regeneration in the adult brain. In the developing brain the embryonic NSC microenvironment is influenced by blood vessels that begin to form as early as E9 [48, 49]. There are common signals, including VEGF, Notch, and Shh, which regulate both neurogenesis and angiogenesis [50]. The CNS vasculature develops through angioblastic invasion of the head region in early embryogenesis, and this vasculogenic process establishes the extracerebral vascular plexus that eventually covers the entire surface of the neural tube [51]. Further vascularization of the CNS, such as parenchymal capillaries, is exclusively achieved by angiogenesis from the perineural vascular complex (PNVP) [52]. Driven by metabolic demands of the expanding neuroectoderm, capillary sprouts invade from the extracerebral vascular plexus toward the periventricular zone [53]. The nascent brain vasculature is further stabilized by the formation of the ECM and the recruitment of mural cells, such as pericytes, and fine-tuned by cues from the microenvironment of neighboring cells [54]. BBB formation is not completely intrinsic to ECs in the CNS, and instead neural cells directly induce BBB characteristics in ECs from an early developmental stage [55]. The interactions between NSCs and ECs, through both direct physical contact and contact-independent signaling, begin with the recruitment of angioblasts and the formation of the PNVP in early embryogenesis [56]. Through this maturation process, all the components of the neurovascular network acquire their specific phenotypes and constitute a fully differentiated NVU.

As NVU disruption occurs in the progression of PD, DA neurons, associated astrocytes, and endothelium are all affected. To regenerate or restore the lost neural functions in the brain of PD with NSC-based therapy, the tissue regeneration should include not only DA cells, but also the other compositions of the neurovascular microenvironment. Additionally, an appropriate integration of DA neurons with the existing nigrostriatal DA system has to be established following DA neuronal differentiation of grafted NSCs.

5. Tissue and Cell Transplantation Therapy in PD

The symptoms of PD result from dysfunction or loss of DA neurons and associated neighboring tissue in the brain. Tissue regeneration and cell replacement is a potential approach for the neurodegenerative disorder, and since the late 1980s over 300–400 patients with PD worldwide have received transplants of human fetal VM tissue, rich in postmitotic DA neurons [57]. Two double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of VM transplants for PD patients, however, have shown variable efficacy and occurrence of side effects, including “off medication” or “graft induced dyskinesias” (GIDs) [58, 59]. It has also been observed that the PD pathologic process might propagate from host to grafted cells a decade after transplantation [60]. Long-term follow-up of one of these trials however showed consistent efficacy using both clinical and imaging outcome measures [61]. The inconsistent methods between the aforementioned trials, for example, immunosuppression and observation durations, may in part account for the disappointing results. In an attempt to overcome obstacles in the previous studies, new knowledge will be obtained from the TRANSEURO project, a multicenter European initiative on PD transplantation using fetal VM tissue ( Issues still remain though, and heterogeneous compositions of the graft, difficulties in standardization of cell material, and ethical concerns are the fundamental limitations of transplantation therapy using fetal VM tissue.

As concept of the NVU replaces the traditional neurocentric view in neurologic disorders, such as PD and stroke, NSCs which preserve the ability to differentiate into all neural lineage cells and self-renew can be regarded as a potential graft for cellular transplantation. Neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes, which are differentiated from NSCs, together with ECs and pericytes, can constitute the functional NVU for tissue restoration in PD. Since neurons are integrated into the neurovascular network with other cellular and acellular compositions in the NVU, combined transplantation of NSCs with other types of cells or biomaterials may be more efficacious for tissue replacement. Besides the attempt to replace damaged tissues, it has been shown that cell-based therapies also promote endogenous vasculogenesis and neurogenesis in an animal model of ischemic stroke [62].

Technically DA neurons can be derived from embryonic stem cells (ESCs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), umbilical cord blood hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) generated from adult somatic cells, as well as directly from NSCs [63]. In addition to identifying the most appropriate cell type, several factors including the long-term survival and phenotype stability of stem cell-derived neurons or glial cells in the graft following transplantation, the purity of populations of cells derived from NSCs, and safety issues related to the risk of tumorigenesis by grafted stem cells all need to be evaluated in greater depth [64]. Further investigations into the optimal therapeutic window, delivery route, cell dose, and patient selection are also required as a precondition for clinical translation of cell-based therapies [65].

To administer cell transplantation therapies, NSCs can be delivered through the needle into deep targets, such as putamen in the cases of PD. In contrast, the BBB seems to be an effective barrier preventing intravascular transplanted cells from crossing the vessel wall into brain tissue [70]. Typically, NSCs are injected transcranially into the brain parenchyma, close to the diseased tissues. It has been proposed that 100,000 surviving DA neurons per putamen are the minimum required for a successful outcome following intracranial transplantation in PD. Bilateral putamen grafts are favored more than unilateral transplantation, although there seems to be no consensus on the decision [71]. Transcranial transplantation of NSCs has been applied to experimental models of neurodegenerative diseases, such as PD [72], Huntington’s disease [73], amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [74, 75], and Alzheimer’s disease [76], in addition to vascular events, including ischemic stroke [77] and intracerebral hemorrhage [78].

Local factors within the microenvironment of transplanted NSCs affect the fate of the cells, as measured by survival, proliferation, differentiation, and neurogenesis [79]. Several groups have studied the modulation of grafted stem cells or DA cells with combined cellular transplantation in PD, although more extensive research is required into the topic (Table 1). To optimize survival and guide appropriate differentiation of grafted NSCs, ECs have been combined with NSCs for transplantation into stroke brains in animal models. Combined transplantation of ECs and neural stem and progenitor cells (NSPCs) increased survival and proliferation of ischemia-induced NSPCs and also accelerated neuronal differentiation [9]. A recent study demonstrates that cotransplantation of fetal DA neurons with mouse NSCs, genetically modified to overexpress human glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), mitigates motor symptoms in a rat model of PD [66]. It is reasonable to optimize the microenvironment surrounding the transplanted NSCs or DA neurons in order to support differentiation into DA cells and their survival in vivo.

Type of transplanted cellsAnimal modelSignificanceReference

Mouse fetal DA neuronsMouse mesencephalic NSCs overexpressing human glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF-mNSCs)6-OHDA rat Apomorphine-induced rotation was reduced by cotransplantation of fetal DA neurons with mNSCs genetically modified to overexpress GDNF, which supports differentiation into DA cells and their survival[66]

Human embryonic NSCMacaque autologous Schwann cells (SCs)6-OHDA macaque Gomez-Mancilla dyskinesia score in the group of cotransplantation with SCs and NSCs was significantly lower than the control group. SCs harvested from the autologous peripheral nerves can avoid rejection[67]

Human umbilical cord-derived MSCsHuman dermal fibroblastsMPTP rat Fibroblasts may be common cell contaminants affecting purity of MSC preparations and clinical outcome in stem cell therapy protocols[68]

Rat embryonic DA neuronsRat Schwann cells (SCs) overexpressing basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2)6-OHDA rat Cotransplantation of DA neurons and FGF-2 overexpressing SCs differentially affects survival and reinnervation. Behavioral recovery underlines the necessity of direct contact between FGF-2 and DA neurons[69]

6. Transplantation of Ensured Neurovascular Microenvironment Using NSCs

Several “clinical-grade” stem cell lines have been produced under Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) conditions and according to established guidelines and safety regulations [80]. Recently a GMP clinical-grade NSC line manufactured by the technique of c-mycE transduction has been applied to the PISCES study (Pilot Investigation of Stem Cells in Stroke) [81]. This human NSC (hNSC) line was derived from the cerebral cortex of postmortem human fetuses at 10–12-week gestation [82]. It is genetically normal and stable over 50 population doublings. Genetic stability has been shown through G-banding karyotype analysis, Southern blot, and inverse PCR, in addition to phenotypic analyses by immunocytochemistry. These cells have been delivered intracranially in the treatment of patients with stable ischemic stroke ( Identifier: NCT01151124) [83]. Patients with PD will have the opportunity to receive cell-based therapy using these cells lines once DA neuronal differentiation can be guided appropriately.

The preclinical studies of NSC-based therapies, essential for improving neurobehavioral outcomes, should include investigations into a variety of factors, such as cell dose, timing of transplantation, and implantation sites [84]. Optimal experimental design for modeling the NVU should mimic as closely as possible the in vivo human brain where the grafted NSCs are to be delivered. With the technique of c-mycE transduction for NSCs derived from the whole ganglionic eminence and the ventral mesencephalon region of human fetuses, NSC lines have been induced and differentiated to neurons producing tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), a critical enzyme involved in dopamine synthesis [73, 85].

Our novel model of coculturing hNSCs with human cerebral microvascular ECs (hCMECs) demonstrates a neurovascular environment, within which neuronal differentiation can be enhanced by neighboring ECs (Figure 1) [11]. The hNSC line has been shown to differentiate into cells positive for TH, and so these neurons could be guided to become DA neurons, replacing those lost in vivo. Using a novel method of modeling the NVU, unlike the Boyden chamber studies, we have shown the successful direct coculture of NSCs and hCMECs, demonstrating that direct interaction between the two cell types is possible [11, 38]. Intercellular communication is therefore possible through direct interaction of brain ECs with NSCs in vascular niches and may be essential for NSC self-renewal, proliferation, and differentiation. By understanding the interactions between NSCs and the surrounding compositions of the NVU, we can select NSCs with appropriate origins for the optimal transplant, ensuring the formation of the functional NVU and DA neuronal differentiation of NSCs. Once DA neurons are derived from transplanted NSCs and perform neurotransmission with integration into the existing nigrostriatal DA system, improvements in PD symptoms will be expected.

7. Perspectives on the NSC-Based Therapy for PD

NSCs are unique in that they can self-renew and differentiate into all neural lineage cells. They may therefore have the potential to replace lost neural tissue, such as DA neurons in PD. As NSCs are regulated by a specialized vasculature during adult neurogenesis, transplanted NSCs may be significantly affected by the neighboring vasculature and ECs, while they differentiate and integrate into the functional NVU. Elucidating interactions between NSCs and ECs should be an essential element of research and treatment plans for PD patients receiving transplants of NSCs.

Beyond cellular interactions, a number of technical parameters are likely to have an important role in cell-based therapy in PD, specifically issues of tissue procurement and preparation, such as the age and number of donor fetuses, graft dissection procedures, storage length and conditions, tissue dissociation before transplantation, or the use of ancillary neuroprotective strategies to increase graft survival (i.e., GDNF, lazaroids) [86, 87]. The fundamental concerns of cell-based therapies reside in the cells themselves, and major hurdles include devising methods for sustained clinical-grade production of immune-tolerable and genetically stable cells, prevention of tumorigenesis, improving graft survival accompanied by appropriate differentiation and integration of grafted or differentiated DA neurons into host circuits, and strategies to avoid untoward side effects like GID [88].

In this minireview we highlight the importance of establishing an appropriate neurovascular microenvironment into which NSCs, or any implants, are delivered in order to replace lost DA neurons. Using our novel model of NSC-EC coculture, it is possible to select appropriate NSCs and determine compositions of the transplant through complete investigation of the paracrine and juxtacrine signaling between elements of the NVU [11]. Once the cellular and acellular compartments of the graft and the microenvironment at the target sites are recognized, a guided differentiation of NSCs into DA neurons can be achieved. As these implanted or regenerated DA neurons are integrated into the existing nigrostriatal DA pathway, the symptoms of PD can potentially be alleviated by reversing characteristic neurodegeneration.


The funders had no role in decision to publish or preparation of the paper.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


Preparation of this paper was supported by the Program for Clinical Research of Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH-C104-083 and TSGH-C104-086) and the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (104-2314-B-016-017-MY3).


  1. A. J. Lees, “Unresolved issues relating to the shaking palsy on the celebration of James Parkinson’s 250th birthday,” Movement Disorders, vol. 22, supplement 17, pp. S327–S334, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. L. M. de Lau and M. M. Breteler, “Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 525–535, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. R. Savica, W. A. Rocca, and J. E. Ahlskog, “When does Parkinson disease start?” Archives of Neurology, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 798–801, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. Suksuphew and P. Noisa, “Neural stem cells could serve as a therapeutic material for age-related neurodegenerative diseases,” World Journal of Stem Cells, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 502–511, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. G.-L. Ming and H. Song, “Adult neurogenesis in the mammalian brain: significant answers and significant questions,” Neuron, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 687–702, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. G. Kempermann, H. G. Kuhn, and F. H. Gage, “Genetic influence on neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of adult mice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 19, pp. 10409–10414, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. Luo, S. B. Daniels, J. B. Lennington, R. Q. Notti, and J. C. Conover, “The aging neurogenic subventricular zone,” Aging Cell, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 139–152, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. O. Suhonen, D. A. Peterson, J. Ray, and F. H. Gage, “Differentiation of adult hippocampus-derived progenitors into olfactory neurons in vivo,” Nature, vol. 383, no. 6601, pp. 624–627, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. N. Nakagomi, T. Nakagomi, S. Kubo et al., “Endothelial cells support survival, proliferation, and neuronal differentiation of transplanted adult ischemia-induced neural stem/progenitor cells after cerebral infarction,” Stem Cells, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 2185–2195, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. T. Kojima, Y. Hirota, M. Ema et al., “Subventricular zone-derived neural progenitor cells migrate along a blood vessel scaffold toward the post-stroke striatum,” Stem Cells, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 545–554, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C.-H. Chou, J. D. Sinden, P.-O. Couraud, and M. Modo, “In vitro modeling of the neurovascular environment by coculturing adult human brain endothelial cells with human neural stem cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 9, Article ID e106346, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. H. Suh, W. Deng, and F. H. Gage, “Signaling in adult neurogenesis,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 25, pp. 253–275, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Tavazoie, L. Van der Veken, V. Silva-Vargas et al., “A specialized vascular niche for adult neural stem cells,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 279–288, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. V. Gómez-Gaviro, R. Lovell-Badge, F. Fernández-Avilés, and E. Lara-Pezzi, “The vascular stem cell niche,” Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 618–630, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. I. Kazanis and C. Ffrench-Constant, “Extracellular matrix and the neural stem cell niche,” Developmental Neurobiology, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 1006–1017, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. F. Mercier, J. T. Kitasako, and G. I. Hatton, “Anatomy of the brain neurogenic zones revisited: fractones and the fibroblast/macrophage network,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 451, no. 2, pp. 170–188, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Kerever, J. Schnack, D. Vellinga et al., “Novel extracellular matrix structures in the neural stem cell niche capture the neurogenic factor fibroblast growth factor 2 from the extracellular milieu,” Stem Cells, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 2146–2157, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. G. Nutt and G. F. Wooten, “Clinical practice. Diagnosis and initial management of Parkinson’s disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 353, no. 10, pp. 1021–1027, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. R. Betarbet, T. B. Sherer, G. MacKenzie, M. Garcia-Osuna, A. V. Panov, and J. T. Greenamyre, “Chronic systemic pesticide exposure reproduces features of Parkinson’s disease,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 1301–1306, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. P. M. Rappold and K. Tieu, “Astrocytes and therapeutics for Parkinson’s disease,” Neurotherapeutics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 413–423, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. C. M. Tanner, F. Kame, G. W. Ross et al., “Rotenone, paraquat, and Parkinson’s disease,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 866–872, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. H. Lee and I. S. Pienaar, “Disruption of the blood-brain barrier in Parkinson’s disease: curse or route to a cure?” Frontiers in Bioscience (Landmark Edition), vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 272–280, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. Jangula and E. J. Murphy, “Lipopolysaccharide-induced blood brain barrier permeability is enhanced by alpha-synuclein expression,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 551, pp. 23–27, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. R. Cabezas, M. Avila, J. Gonzalez, R. S. El-Bacha, E. Baez, L. M. Garcia-Segura et al., “Astrocytic modulation of blood brain barrier: perspectives on Parkinson’s disease,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 8, article 211, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. H. Zhang, J. Badaut, J. Tang, A. Obenaus, R. Hartman, and W. J. Pearce, “The vascular neural network—a new paradigm in stroke pathophysiology,” Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 711–716, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. Z. V. I. Cohen, G. Bonvento, P. Lacombe, and E. Hamel, “Serotonin in the regulation of brain microcirculation,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 335–362, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. Lok, P. Gupta, S. Guo et al., “Cell-cell signaling in the neurovascular unit,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 2032–2045, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C. T. Drake and C. Iadecola, “The role of neuronal signaling in controlling cerebral blood flow,” Brain and Language, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 141–152, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. Fenstermacher, P. Gross, N. Sposito, V. Acuff, S. Pettersen, and K. Gruber, “Structural and functional variations in capillary systems within the brain,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 529, pp. 21–30, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. W. H. Oldendorf, M. E. Cornford, and W. J. Brown, “The large apparent work capability of the blood-brain barrier: a study of the mitochondrial content of capillary endothelial cells in brain and other tissues of the rat,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 409–417, 1977. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. R. Sedlakova, R. R. Shivers, and R. F. Del Maestro, “Ultrastructure of the blood-brain barrier in the rabbit,” Journal of Submicroscopic Cytology and Pathology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 149–161, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  32. U. Kniesel and H. Wolburg, “Tight junctions of the blood-brain barrier,” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 57–76, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Tagami, Y. Nara, A. Kubota, H. Fujino, and Y. Yamori, “Ultrastructural changes in cerebral pericytes and astrocytes of stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats,” Stroke, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1064–1071, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. E. Ruoslahti, “Brain extracellular matrix,” Glycobiology, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 489–492, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. Y. Yamaguchi, “Lecticans: organizers of the brain extracellular matrix,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 276–289, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. R. Timpl, “Structure and biological activity of basement membrane proteins,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 180, no. 3, pp. 487–502, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. P. D. Yurchenco and B. L. Patton, “Developmental and pathogenic mechanisms of basement membrane assembly,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 1277–1294, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. K. Watters, S. Rom, J. D. Hill et al., “Identification and dynamic regulation of tight junction protein expression in human neural stem cells,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1377–1389, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. E. Kokovay, S. Goderie, Y. Wang et al., “Adult svz lineage cells home to and leave the vascular niche via differential responses to SDF1/CXCR4 signaling,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 163–173, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. S. Temple, “Division and differentiation of isolated CNS blast cells in microculture,” Nature, vol. 340, no. 6233, pp. 471–473, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. P. Thored, A. Arvidsson, E. Cacci et al., “Persistent production of neurons from adult brain stem cells during recovery after stroke,” Stem Cells, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 739–747, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. E. Pastrana, L.-C. Cheng, and F. Doetsch, “Simultaneous prospective purification of adult subventricular zone neural stem cells and their progeny,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 15, pp. 6387–6392, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. Snapyan, M. Lemasson, M. S. Brill et al., “Vasculature guides migrating neuronal precursors in the adult mammalian forebrain via brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 13, pp. 4172–4188, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. G. U. Höglinger, P. Rizk, M. P. Muriel et al., “Dopamine depletion impairs precursor cell proliferation in Parkinson disease,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 726–735, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. S. O’Sullivan, M. Johnson, D. R. Williams et al., “The effect of drug treatment on neurogenesis in Parkinson’s disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 45–50, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. A. van den Berge, M. E. van Strien, J. A. Korecka et al., “The proliferative capacity of the subventricular zone is maintained in the Parkinsonian brain,” Brain, vol. 134, no. 11, pp. 3249–3263, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. P. Garcia-Reitboeck, O. Anichtchik, J. W. Dalley et al., “Endogenous alpha-synuclein influences the number of dopaminergic neurons in mouse substantia nigra,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 248, pp. 541–545, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. R. Herken, W. Gotz, and K.-H. Wattjes, “Initial development of capillaries in the neuroepithelium of the mouse,” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 164, pp. 85–92, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  49. A. Vasudevan, J. E. Long, J. E. Crandall, J. L. R. Rubenstein, and P. G. Bhide, “Compartment-specific transcription factors orchestrate angiogenesis gradients in the embryonic brain,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 429–439, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. P. Carmeliet, “Angiogenesis in health and disease,” Nature Medicine, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 653–660, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. W. Risau, “Mechanisms of angiogenesis,” Nature, vol. 386, no. 6626, pp. 671–674, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. J. M. James and Y.-S. Mukouyama, “Neuronal action on the developing blood vessel pattern,” Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1019–1027, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. J. Stone, A. Itin, T. Alon et al., “Development of retinal vasculature is mediated by hypoxia-induced vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression by neuroglia,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 7 I, pp. 4738–4747, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  54. R. K. Jain, “Molecular regulation of vessel maturation,” Nature Medicine, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 685–693, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. P. A. Stewart and M. J. Wiley, “Developing nervous tissue induces formation of blood-brain barrier characteristics in invading endothelial cells: a study using quail-chick transplantation chimeras,” Developmental Biology, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 183–192, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. J. M. James, C. Gewolb, and V. L. Bautch, “Neurovascular development uses VEGF-A signaling to regulate blood vessel ingression into the neural tube,” Development, vol. 136, no. 5, pp. 833–841, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. Z. Kefalopoulou, I. Aviles-Olmos, and T. Foltynie, “Critical aspects of clinical trial design for novel cell and gene therapies,” Parkinson’s Disease, vol. 2011, Article ID 804041, 10 pages, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. C. R. Freed, P. E. Greene, R. E. Breeze et al., “Transplantation of embryonic dopamine neurons for severe Parkinson’s disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 344, no. 10, pp. 710–719, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. C. W. Olanow, C. G. Goetz, J. H. Kordower et al., “A double-blind controlled trial of bilateral fetal nigral transplantation in Parkinson’s disease,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 403–414, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. J.-Y. Li, E. Englund, J. L. Holton et al., “Lewy bodies in grafted neurons in subjects with Parkinson’s disease suggest host-to-graft disease propagation,” Nature Medicine, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 501–503, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. Y. Ma, C. Tang, T. Chaly et al., “Dopamine cell implantation in Parkinson’s disease: long-term clinical and 18F-FDOPA PET outcomes,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 7–15, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. H. Ishikawa, N. Tajiri, K. Shinozuka et al., “Vasculogenesis in experimental stroke after human cerebral endothelial cell transplantation,” Stroke, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 3473–3481, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. G. H. Petit, T. T. Olsson, and P. Brundin, “The future of cell therapies and brain repair: Parkinson’s disease leads the way,” Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 60–70, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. S. U. Kim, H. J. Lee, and Y. B. Kim, “Neural stem cell-based treatment for neurodegenerative diseases,” Neuropathology, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 491–504, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. V. Misra, M. M. Ritchie, L. L. Stone, W. C. Low, and V. Janardhan, “Stem cell therapy in ischemic stroke: role of IV and intra-arterial therapy,” Neurology, vol. 79, no. 13, pp. S207–S212, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. X. Deng, Y. Liang, H. Lu et al., “Co-transplantation of GDNF-overexpressing neural stem cells and fetal dopaminergic neurons mitigates motor symptoms in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 12, Article ID e80880, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. Y. Xia, C. Jiang, Z. Cao, K. Shi, and Y. Wang, “Co-transplantation of macaque autologous Schwann cells and human embryonic nerve stem cells in treatment of macaque Parkinson’s disease,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 7–14, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. M. C. L. Pereira, M. Secco, D. E. Suzuki et al., “Contamination of mesenchymal stem-cells with fibroblasts accelerates neurodegeneration in an experimental model of Parkinson’s diseas,” Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1006–1017, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. M. Timmer, F. Müller-Ostermeyer, V. Kloth, C. Winkler, C. Grothe, and G. Nikkhah, “Enhanced survival, reinnervation, and functional recovery of intrastriatal dopamine grafts co-transplanted with Schwann cells overexpressing high molecular weight FGF-2 isoforms,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 187, no. 1, pp. 118–136, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. A. V. Pendharkar, J. Y. Chua, R. H. Andres et al., “Biodistribution of neural stem cells after intravascular therapy for hypoxic-ischemia,” Stroke, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 2064–2070, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. R. Ambasudhan, N. Dolatabadi, A. Nutter, E. Masliah, S. R. McKercher, and S. A. Lipton, “Potential for cell therapy in Parkinson’s disease using genetically programmed human embryonic stem cell-derived neural progenitor cells,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 522, no. 12, pp. 2845–2856, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. D. E. Redmond Jr., K. B. Bjugstad, Y. D. Teng et al., “Behavioral improvement in a primate Parkinson’s model is associated with multiple homeostatic effects of human neural stem cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 29, pp. 12175–12180, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. G. El-Akabawy, L. M. Medina, A. Jeffries, J. Price, and M. Modo, “Purmorphamine increases DARPP-32 differentiation in human striatal neural stem cells through the Hedgehog pathway,” Stem cells and development, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1873–1887, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. S. M. Klein, S. Behrstock, J. McHugh et al., “GDNF delivery using human neural progenitor cells in a rat model of ALS,” Human Gene Therapy, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 509–521, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. J. D. Glass, N. M. Boulis, K. Johe et al., “Lumbar intraspinal injection of neural stem cells in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: results of a phase I trial in 12 patients,” STEM CELLS, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1144–1151, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. D. Park, S. S. Joo, T. K. Kim et al., “Human neural stem cells overexpressing choline acetyltransferase restore cognitive function of kainic acid-induced learning and memory deficit animals,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 365–371, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. E. J. Smith, R. P. Stroemer, N. Gorenkova et al., “Implantation site and lesion topology determine efficacy of a human neural stem cell line in a rat model of chronic stroke,” Stem Cells, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 785–796, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. H. J. Lee, K. S. Kim, E. J. Kim et al., “Brain transplantation of immortalized human neural stem cells promotes functional recovery in mouse intracerebral hemorrhage stroke model,” STEM CELLS, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1204–1212, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. H.-C. Fan, S.-J. Chen, H.-J. Harn, and S.-Z. Lin, “Parkinson’s disease: from genetics to treatments,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 639–652, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. E. Stephenson, L. Jacquet, C. Miere et al., “Derivation and propagation of human embryonic stem cell lines from frozen embryos in an animal product-free environment,” Nature Protocols, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 1366–1381, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. R. J. Thomas, A. D. Hope, P. Hourd et al., “Automated, serum-free production of CTX0E03: a therapeutic clinical grade human neural stem cell line,” Biotechnology Letters, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1167–1172, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. K. Pollock, P. Stroemer, S. Patel et al., “A conditionally immortal clonal stem cell line from human cortical neuroepithelium for the treatment of ischemic stroke,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 199, no. 1, pp. 143–155, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. G. S. Mack, “ReNeuron and StemCells get green light for neural stem cell trials,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 95–97, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. V. Darsalia, S. J. Allison, C. Cusulin et al., “Cell number and timing of transplantation determine survival of human neural stem cell grafts in stroke-damaged rat brain,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 235–242, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. A. C. Vernon, E. J. Smith, L. Stevanato, and M. Modo, “Selective activation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 7 induces inhibition of cellular proliferation and promotes astrocyte differentiation of ventral mesencephalon human neural stem/progenitor cells,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 421–431, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. P. Brundin, O. Pogarell, P. Hagell et al., “Bilateral caudate and putamen grafts of embryonic mesencephalic tissue treated with lazaroids in Parkinson’s disease,” Brain, vol. 123, part 7, pp. 1380–1390, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. P. Piccini, N. Pavese, P. Hagell et al., “Factors affecting the clinical outcome after neural transplantation in Parkinson’s disease,” Brain, vol. 128, no. 12, pp. 2977–2986, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. M. Sundberg and O. Isacson, “Advances in stem-cell-generated transplantation therapy for Parkinson’s disease,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 437–453, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Chung-Hsing Chou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

2582 Views | 776 Downloads | 15 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
 Sign up for content alertsSign up

You are browsing a BETA version of Click here to switch back to the original design.