Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2018 / Article
Special Issue

From Regulated Cell Death to Adaptive Stress Strategies: Convergence and Divergence in Eukaryotic Cells

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 1052413 | 17 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1052413

Changes of KEAP1/NRF2 and IKB/NF-κB Expression Levels Induced by Cell-Free DNA in Different Cell Types

Academic Editor: Sabrina Büttner
Received19 Sep 2017
Revised31 Dec 2017
Accepted17 Jan 2018
Published20 Mar 2018

Abstract

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a circulating DNA of nuclear and mitochondrial origin mainly derived from dying cells. Recent studies have shown that cfDNA is a stress signaling DAMP (damage-associated molecular pattern) molecule. We report here that the expression profiles of cfDNA-induced factors NRF2 and NF-κB are distinct depending on the target cell’s type and the GC-content and oxidation rate of the cfDNA. Stem cells (MSC) have shown higher expression of NRF2 without inflammation in response to cfDNA. In contrast, inflammatory response launched by NF-κB was dominant in differentiated cells HUVEC, MCF7, and fibroblasts, with a possibility of transition to massive apoptosis. In each cell type examined, the response for oxidized cfDNA was more acute with higher peak intensity and faster resolution than that for nonoxidized cfDNA. GC-rich nonoxidized cfDNA evoked a weaker and prolonged response with proinflammatory component (NF-κB) as predominant. The exploration of apoptosis rates after adding cfDNA showed that cfDNA with moderately increased GC-content and lightly oxidized DNA promoted cell survival in a hormetic manner. Novel potential therapeutic approaches are proposed, which depend on the current cfDNA content: either preconditioning with low doses of cfDNA before a planned adverse impact or eliminating (binding, etc.) cfDNA when its content has already become high.

1. Introduction

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is circulating DNA of both nuclear and mitochondrial origins. Dying cells are the major source of cfDNA [14]. For a long time, cfDNA has been studied as a passive marker of cell death after various influences, such as irradiation, and pathologies, especially oncologic [5, 6], or an object for noninvasive diagnostics (liquid biopsy), including prenatal [79]. Recently, a novel approach emerged to consider cfDNA as a signaling molecule, which is biologically active regardless of its nucleotide code sequence [1, 10, 11]. The signaling properties of cfDNA depend on two factors. First, it was shown that the GC-content of cfDNA differs from that of the source genomic DNA and depends on the pattern of cell death. In case of a chronic process, circulating cfDNA is enriched with CG-pairs due to the fact that GC-rich regions are more resistant to the endonuclease action [12, 13]. Second, cfDNA is prone to oxidation, mostly through the formation of 8-oxodG, and the oxidized cfDNA exerts a stronger signaling action in an oxidation degree-dependent manner [10, 14, 15].

The cfDNA is a DAMP (damage-associated molecular pattern) signaling molecule [16]. The DAMP signaling molecules are hypothesized to serve as messengers of infection or strongly hostile conditions/trauma provoking oxidative stress and cell death. The best-studied receptors for cfDNA are cytosolic AIM2, RIG-1, and DAI and some other DNA sensors [1726], as well as TLR9 [27, 28]. It is commonly supposed that intrinsic DNA does not activate TLR9; however, our earlier studies have shown that TLR9 reacts for GC-rich endogenous cfDNA [29]. The activation of TLR9 evokes an inflammatory response that implicates the translocation of the transcription factor NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells) from the cytoplasm to the nucleus with the subsequent launch of transcription of the NF-κB-driven genes [3033]. This is a tissue-level reaction.

At cellular level, an expression of 100+ genes providing for the cell protection in stress conditions is triggered by another transcription factor, NRF2 (nuclear factor- (erythroid-derived 2-) like factor 2) [3436]. NRF2 is a master regulator of the antioxidative and anti-inflammatory cell responses [3739] via the inducible expression of ARE- (antioxidant response element-) driven genes [40]. Thus, NRF2 can provide for the protection against stresses of chemical, infections, and other nature.

The interaction between NF-κB and NRF2 is predominantly antagonistic [4043]. The underpinning mechanisms are thoroughly reviewed in Discussion. At the same time, a number of stimuli such as reactive oxygen species (ROS), bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS), and oxidized low-density lipoproteins induce a simultaneous activation of both NRF2 and NF-κB [44].

In case of protection failure at cellular level, the mechanism of programmed cell death is launched, because the evolutionarily formed strategy prefers to sacrifice the part for the benefit of the whole organism [45]. Both elevated and reduced cell death rates are deleterious and can entail certain pathologic conditions.

The proteins of the BCL2 family play a key role in the regulation of cell death and survival [46, 47]. The BCL-2 protein and four homologous proteins (Bcl-XL, Bcl-W, A1, and Mcl-1) favor cell survival [46].

The inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAP) repress caspases 3, 7, and 9 [48]. Under the stress conditions, when the cell survival-oriented processes are activated, expression of the antiapoptotic genes is induced [49].

The aim of this study was to explore the time dynamics of expression of the NF-κB and NRF2 protective factors in response to the action of various kinds of cfDNA and in different cell types and to investigate the effect of cfDNA on cell survival and death.

2. Materials and Methods

Diverse aspects of the biological action of cfDNA were studied on histologically different cultivated cells with different proliferative capacity: (1)Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) () were derived from various sources and characterized by surface markers (Table 1) [15]: normal adipose tissue of surgical material after partial mastectomy (MSC AT), material of umbilical vein and umbilical blood (MSC V), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (MSC AT). The obtained profile of CD markers (Table 1) was typical for MSC [29].


NumberCellsSourceSurface markers

1MSC AT
()
Breast adipose tissueCD34−, CD45−, HLA-ABC+, HLA-DR−, CD44+, CD29+, CD49b low, CD54 low, CD90+, CD106−, CD105+, CD117−
2MSC V
()
Umbilical blood and veinCD34–, CD45–, HLA-ABC+, HLA-DR−, CD44+, CD29+, CD90+, CD105+, CD117−
3MSC AD
(hMADs)
()
Adipose tissueCD34−, CD15−, HLA-ABC low, HLA-DR−, CD44+, CD13+, CD49b+, CD133−, CD90+, CD105+, CD117−

The expression of surface proteins by the cells was studied with the help of flow cytofluorometry using the corresponding antibodies at CyFlow (PARTEC, Germany) [15]. (2)Cultures of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) () were derived from 9 different specimens of umbilical vein (normal course of pregnancy, successful birth, and healthy newborns) [50]. The HUVEC were characterized by the CD31+ marker.(3)Human breast adenocarcinoma cells (MCF7) were derived from the cell culture bank of Federal State Budgetary Institution “Research Centre for Medical Genetics” (RCMG), Moscow, Russia. The distinctive molecules of estrogen receptors (ER+) were located on the MCF7 surface [51].

2.1. Model cfDNA Fragment Samples

Based on the conclusions made from the results of our studies of cfDNA properties, we determined the most significant cfDNA parameters, which can evoke biological responses in different cell types: (1)Elevated GC-rich DNA content of the cfDNA, in particular, elevated ribosomal DNA (rDNA) content [14, 52].(2)Increased content of oxidized DNA fragments [15, 53].

In order to study the response to the presence of cfDNA in different cell types, model cfDNA fragments were used.

2.1.1. Oxidized Forms of DNA

In case of pathologies and impacts deleterious for the genome, cfDNA contains an increased quantity of oxidized bases. Therefore, to investigate the action of oxidized DNA upon the cells of different types, we prepared in vitro samples of model oxidized forms of DNA (Table 2) [15]. We chose gDNA, which had been oxidized by Н2O2 in vitro, as a model molecule in order to exclude the action of other possible factors, such as a changed methylation rate or shifted contents of various motifs that could exert influence on cfDNA properties.


NumberDenominationContent of 8-oxodG per 106 DNA nucleosides

1gDNA (control)Less than 0.01
2DNAoxy1400
3DNAoxy2 (or DNAoxy)1400
4DNA8-oxodG700
5p(rDNA)oxy50,000

The conditions of gDNA oxidation were chosen in such a way that the final content of the oxidation marker 8-oxo-deoxyguanosine in the oxidized gDNAoxy approximately corresponded to the real 8-oxo-deoxyguanosine content detected in the cfDNA in case of disorders accompanied by oxidative stress. Using mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS), we analyzed the 8-oxo-deoxyguanosine content in plasma cfDNA derived from patients with breast cancer and acute myocardial infarction and detected 800 and 2100 8-oxodG, respectively, per 106 cfDNA nucleosides [15].

The specimens of oxidized DNA for the experiment were prepared using two methods: either treatment of a genomic DNA (gDNA) sample with 300 mM Н2O2/Fe2+/EDTA (gDNAoxy 1) or combined treatment of a gDNA sample with 300 mM Н2O2 and ultraviolet radiation at a wavelength of nanometers, which induced intense H2O2 decomposition and ROS production (gDNAoxy 2) [14]. The content of the oxidation marker 8-oxodG in the obtained DNA specimens was measured using mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) (quantification of 8-oxodG was conducted by Galina V. Baidakova, a senior researcher of Federal State Budgetary Institution “Research Centre for Medical Genetics”) [15].

The 8-oxo-deoxyguanosine content in an intact gDNA was below the threshold sensitivity of the method, which was equal to 0.1 (8-oxodG)/106 nucleosides, while the first gDNAoxy1 specimen contained ~400 (8-oxodG) per 106 nucleosides (lightly oxidized DNA) and the second gDNAoxy2 specimen contained ~2900 (8-oxodG)/106 nucleosides (highly oxidized DNA) [15].

When H2O2 is applied as an oxidizing agent, not only 8-oxodG but also some other oxidative modifications can be found in the DNA molecule after treatment, because H2O2 is a nonspecific oxidant. DNA can be oxidized with the formation of 8-oxodG only, if an oxidation technique based on methylene blue is used [54]. DNA oxidized in this way (DNA8-oxodG) contains solely 8-oxodG in a quantity of ~700 (8-oxodG)/106 nucleosides, and we considered this a better model to explore the contribution of the 8-oxodG oxidative modification to the effects evoked by oxidized cfDNA in vivo. In addition, we oxidized the sequence of p(rDNA) in order to obtain GC-rich oxidized DNA with a very high oxidation rate of 50,000 per 106 nucleosides [15].

2.1.2. GC-Rich Model Fragments, Ligands for TLR9 and TLR9 Blockers

Earlier, we determined that in case of pathology, pregnancy, or damaging exposure, GC-rich rDNA fragments accumulate in the total pool of cfDNA, while the fraction of AT-rich satellite III (SatIII) fragments decreases. The corresponding model fragments were designed as plasmids containing rDNA or SatIII inserts.

A CpG-rich fragment of the transcribed region of the rDNA (from base pair 515 to 5321 in accordance with HSU13369, GeneBank) embedded in pBR322 vector (p(rDNA)) was used as the model GC-DNA. The GC-motif was 9504 bp long [55].

The model DNA samples underwent the same procedure of additional cleaning from lipopolysaccharides via a treatment with Triton Х-114 [52] with a subsequent gel filtration on the HW-85 carrier [55].

A computer-aided analysis of the nucleotide composition of p(rDNA) revealed unmethylated CpG motifs within rDNA, which are binding sites for TLR9, a TLR family receptor [55]. We conducted a thorough computer-aided analysis of the model plasmid samples used in the experiments for the existence of TLR9 binding sites and TLR9 blocking sequences.

The ligand for human TLR9 is the sequence GTCGTT and/or TCGTA [5658]. Generally, R1R2CGY1Y2 is deemed to be an immunostimulating CрG-motif, where R1 stands for a purine (preferably G), R2 is a symbol for a purine or Т, and Y1 and Y2 are pyrimidines, which form a complex with human TLR9 having an association constant less than GTCGTT motif [57, 59]. TLR9 blockers can be the motifs Gn (n > 5), CCN(A/G/T)(A/G/T)NNGGGN, and CC(A/G/T)(A/G/T)NGGGNN [58, 60, 61].

The plasmid DNA we have chosen carries the pBR322 vector that harbors seven sites being the ligands for human TLR9. The plasmid p(rDNA) carries a CpG-rich fragment of the ribosomal repeat (which contains both binding sites and blocking sequences) [55].

2.2. Cultivation of MSC (Mesenchymal Stem Cells)

The technical problem of MSC cultivation is a requirement of the elimination of cells belonging to other tissues, which contaminate the MSC. If the selected cultivation conditions are optimum, the contaminant cells derived from other tissues are eliminated during subsequent passages [29]. The MSC were derived from the adipose tissue of the surgical material of patients with breast adenocarcinoma delivered from Federal State Budgetary Institution N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center (Moscow) in one hour after partial mastectomy [29]. An informed consent for the use of the surgical material was obtained from each patient. The specimen was mechanically disintegrated in DMEM medium (PanEco, Moscow) containing gentamicin at 250 μg/ml, penicillin at 60 units/ml, and streptomycin at 60 units/ml (PanEco); enzymatic dissociation was conducted in DMEM medium by incubating the preparation in the presence of 10% fetal bovine serum (PAA, Austria), 0.04% collagenase (Sigma), and the above-mentioned antibiotics for 16 h at 37°C [29]. The cells were centrifugated at 200 for 10 min, transferred into vials, and cultivated at 37°C in AmnioMax С-100 Basal Medium (Gibco) that contained AmnioMax Supplement C-100, 20 μmol/l HEPES (PanEco) and the antibiotics [29].

2.3. Cultivation of HUVEC (Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells)

Endothelial cells were isolated from the umbilical cord (healthy women, normal course of the pregnancy, birth in time and without complications, and healthy newborns). Material sampling and cell isolation were performed in sterile conditions pursuant to an adapted technique [62]. Cultivation was conducted in 199 medium (PanEco, Russia) with penicillin (50 units/ml), streptomycin (50 μg/ml), gentamicin (10 μg/ml), HEPES (20 μl, PanEco, Russia), and growth factors at +37°C (starting density was 500,000 cells per 25 cm2).

2.4. Cultivation of MCF7 (Human Breast Adenocarcinoma Cells)

MCF7 were cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 units/ml of penicillin, and 100 μg/ml of streptomycin. Cells were grown in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 in air at 37°C. Before treatment with DNA probes, cells were grown for 24 h or 72 h in slide flasks.

2.5. Measuring Gene Expression Levels Using Real-Time PCR

Expression levels of the genes NFKB1, NRF2, BAX, BCL2, BCL2A1, BCL2L1 (BCL-X), BIRC2 (c-IAP1), BIRC3 (c-IAP2), ТВР, and GAPDH were measured using real-time PCR.

After the exposure of the cells to extracellular DNA fragments, RNA was extracted from the cells using YellowSolve kits (Clonogen, Russia) or Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) pursuant to the technique attached (http://tools.lifetechnologies.com/content/sfs/manuals/trizol_reagent.pdf) with the subsequent phenol-chloroform extraction and precipitation with chloroform and isoamyl alcohol (49 : 1). RNA concentrations were determined with the help of the dye Quant-iT RiboGreen RNA reagent (MoBiTec, Germany) at a plate reader (EnSpire equipment, Finland) (λexcit = 487 nm, λflu = 524 nm). The reverse transcription reaction was carried out using chemical reagents supplied by Sileks company (Russia) according to the standard procedure.

PCR was carried out using the corresponding primers (Syntol) and the intercalating dye SybrGreen at StepOnePlus instrument (Applied Byosystems, USA). The used primers were as follows (written in the same order (F; R)): NFKB1 (CAGATGGCCCATACCTTCAAAT; CGGAAACGAAATCCTCTCTGTT); NRF2 (TCCAGTCAGAAACCAGTGGAT; GAATGTCTGCGCCAAAAGCTG); ТВР (5-GCCCGAAACGCCGAATAT-3; 5-CCGTGGTTCGTGGCTCTCT-3); GAPDH (GAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTC; GAAGATGGTGATGGGATTTC); BAX (CCCGAGAGGTCTTTTTCCGAG; CCAGCCCATGATGGTTCTGAT); BCL2 (TTTGGAAATCCGACCACTAA; AAAGAAATGCAAGTGAATGA); BCL2A1 (TACAGGCTGGCTCAGGACTAT; CGCAACATTTTGTAGCACTCTG); BCL2L1 (CGACGAGTTTGAACTGCGGTA; GGGATGTCAGGTCACTGAATG); BIRC2 (GAATCTGGTTTCAGCTAGTCTGG; GGTGGGAGATAATGAATGTGCAA); and BIRC3 (AAGCTACCTCTCAGCCTACTTT; CCACTGTTTTCTGTACCCGGA).

The composition of the PCR reaction mix in a volume of 25 μl was the following: 2.5 μl of PCR buffer (700 mM/l Tris-HCl, pH 8.6; 166 mM/l ammonia sulphate, 35 mM/l MgCl2), 2 μl of 1.5 mM/l dNTP solution, and 1 μl of 30 picomol/l solution of each primer and cDNA. The conditions of PCR were chosen individually for each primer pair. The standard conditions for most primers were the following: after denaturation (95°C, 4 min), 40 amplification cycles were conducted in the following mode: 94°C for 20 sec, 56 to 62°С for 30 sec, 72°С for 30 sec, and then, 72°С for 5 min. The PCR procedures were performed at StepOnePlus (Applied Biosystems, USA).

Gene expression levels were analyzed in a series of independent experiments on cells from different donors. Statistical processing of the results was performed using a calibrating curve taking into account the PCR efficiency; the standard error was 2%.

The expression levels of pro- and antiapoptotic genes of interest were normalized to the expression levels of the respective standard gene (TBP) in each cell line analyzed.

Flow cytometry was applied to measure the content of 8-oxo-deoxyguanosine in nuclear DNA using primary (Sc-66036, Santa Cruz, USA) and secondary (anti-mouse-FITC, SC-2010, Santa Cruz, USA) monoclonal antibodies, double-strand DNA break rate via the analysis of gamma focuses of the phosphorylated form of H2AХ histone using antibodies to H2AX histones (NB100-78356G, NovusBio, USA), and protein expression level using the corresponding monoclonal antibodies BCL2 (Sc-783), BRCA2 (NBP1-88361), NOX4 (SC-30141), NRF2 (ab194984), p53 (sc-126-f), and PCNA (ab2426) according to the common protocol: the exposed cells and control cells were collected from the underlayer, washed with 1% albumin solution in PBS, fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde for 10 min at 37°C, washed off, and permeabilized in 90% methanol at −20°C. Then the cell suspension was incubated with primary antibodies (1 μg/ml) overnight at +4°C (1 μg/ml in PBS in the presence of 1% albumin) and, if necessary, with secondary antibodies (anti-rabbit-FITC Sc-2012, Santa Cruz, USA) for 1 h at room temperature in the dark and assayed with a flow cytofluorometer (СyFlow, Partek, Germany).

2.6. Fluorescence Microscopy

Fluorescence microscopy was conducted using fluorescence microscope AxioImagerA2 (Carl Zeiss). The cultured cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde for 20 min at +4°C and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS (phosphate-buffered saline) with subsequent washing and blocking with 1% albumin solution in PBS and incubated overnight with primary antibodies to NRF2 and р65 subunit of NF-κB at +4°C (1 μg/ml in PBS in the presence of 1% albumin) and then, after washing with PBS, incubated for 1 h with secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz, USA) at room temperature, washed off with PBS and, if required, stained with DAPI.

2.7. Image Analysis

Image processing software “Image 6” was developed in our laboratory and applied in order to measure the fluorescence intensity in and around the nuclei and to calculate the content as compared to controls (in arbitrary units (arb.un.)).

The data were verified with the use of the multifunction system for cell imaging and subsequent automatic processing of the obtained data CyTell (GE Healthcare).

2.8. Annexin V Binding Assays

Cells were detached and washed with PBS. 10,000–50,000 cells were collected by centrifugation, washed in binding buffer (BB) (140 mM NaCl, 4 mM KCl, 0.75 mM MgCl2, 10 mM CaCl2, and 10 mM HEPES), and resuspended in 100 μl of BB.

Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide staining solution (to 10 samples: 4 μl Annexin V-FITC (ab14082), 10 μl of PI (50 μg/ml), and 90 μl BB, mixed well) was prepared and immediately added to the samples, then incubated at room temperature for 15 min in the dark. After staining, cells were immediately analyzed by flow cytometry using CyFlow Space (Partec, Germany). Annexin V-FITC binding (Ex = 488 nm; Em = 530 nm) was analyzed using the FITC signal detector (FL1) and PI staining by the phycoerythrin emission signal detector (FL2).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The statistical data analysis was conducted using MS Excel, Statistica 6.0, StatGraph software. The null hypotheses of the absence of the difference between the compared samples were tested with the Mann–Whitney U test. Samples were deemed to be distinct at .

2.10. Ethics

The study design was reviewed and approved by the Local Ethics Committee of RSMG (Research Centre for Medical Genetics) to meet the requirements of the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 as revised in 2013. An informed consent for the use of the surgical material had been obtained from each patient, from whom an anonymous cell culture was derived.

3. Results

3.1. Nuclear Translocation of NF-κB and NRF2 after Exposure to cfDNA

The induction of the NF-κB transcription factor by cfDNA fragments is followed by its nuclear translocation with the subsequent activation of target gene expression. The data for NF-κB induction in MSC are shown in Figures 1(a) and 1(b). The translocation of the NRF2 factor under the action of oxidized cfDNA has a similar pattern (Figure 1(c)).

3.2. Profiles of NF-κB and NRF2 Expression in Cells Exposed to cfDNA

Analysis of the dynamics of the expression of NRF2 and NF-κB transcription factors (Figures 2, 3, and 4) corroborates the regularity of mutual inhibition of NF-κB and NRF2 [4043]. The expression of both factors starts almost simultaneously; however, the expression of NRF2 demonstrated a faster growth followed by NF-κB suppression. Later, NF-κB expression begins to increase, while NRF2 expression decreases. The expression profiles of the two factors overlap to a greater or lesser degree. The dynamics of these processes depends on the types of cells examined and cfDNA used for the induction of expression.

Interestingly, MSC demonstrated the early activation of transcription of NFKB1 and NRF2 genes in the presence of oxidized DNA fragments. However, the expression level of the NFKB1 gene transcription factor only slightly increased in 30 minutes after the start of exposure and then the growth finished soon (in 1 hour), whereas the level of NRF2 transcription increased (Figure 2(b)).

After the exposure of MSC to GC-rich fragments, the activation of NFKB1 and NRF2 gene transcription occurs later. The expression of NFKB1 gene elevates in 3–24 hours. In contrast, transcription of NRF2 begins to grow after 10 hours. In this case, we also observed a partial overlapping of the expression profiles of NFKB1 and NRF2 genes (Figure 2(a)).

After the exposure of human umbilical vascular endothelial cells (HUVEC) to GC-rich and oxidized fragments, the level of NRF2 gene increased rapidly in 2-3 hours (Figure 3).

NFKB1 gene transcription during exposure to GC-rich fragments was activated by 3 hours, with the expression level of this gene being approximately twofold higher than the level of transcription of NRF2 gene—in this case, expression profiles of the two transcription factors under examination markedly overlapped (Figure 3(a)). Under the action of oxidized fragments, the level of NFKB1 gene transcription peaked much later after 24 hours at the stage of the decreased transcriptional activity of NRF2 gene (Figure 3(b)).

The human breast adenocarcinoma cells (MCF7) exposed to fragments of oxidized cfDNA and nonoxidized DNA showed a short-time increase in NRF2 gene expression with the maximum level by 2 hours; then the content of RNANRF2 decreased (Figure 4).

Under the action of GC-rich fragments, a late elevation of NFKB1 gene expression level occurred to have reached the maximum by 24 hours and persisted for a long time (Figure 4(a)). After the exposure to oxidized fragments, the maximum expression was registered in 3 hours, and partial overlapping of the NFKB1 and NRF2 gene expression profiles was observed (Figure 4(b)).

3.3. Apoptosis and Expression of Antiapoptotic Proteins under the Action of cfDNA

We observed no signs of massive cell death via necrosis in the cell culture exposed to cfDNA. Therefore, we studied the process of programmed cell death via apoptosis, a long-duration process estimated by specific markers. One of the most frequently used markers of apoptosis intensity is annexin V [63].

In 30 minutes after adding DNA fragments in the HUVEC culture medium, the fraction of cells with the signs of apoptosis (fraction R framed in Figure 5(a)) diminishes, and this effect is especially prominent in case of exposure to GC-rich DNA (Figure 5(b)). Nonetheless, 3 hours later, the fraction of apoptotic cells increases after the exposure to any type of DNA.

The fraction of MSC with the signs of apoptosis after the exposure to nonoxidized, GC-rich, and oxidized cfDNA fragments was also estimated by the detection of annexin V protein on the cell surface (Figure 6).

A combination of oxidized and nonoxidized cfDNA fragments reduced the level of apoptosis in MSC registered in 3 hours by 40–50%. After a three-hour-long exposure, GC-rich oxidized and nonoxidized fragments (p(rDNA) and p(rDNA)oxy) caused a decrease in the frequency of cells with the signs of apoptosis in a greater degree by 70–80%.

A decrease in the fraction of dying cells in the cultures exposed to GC-rich and oxidized DNA is proved by a decrease several times in the content of endogenous extracellular DNA in the cell culture medium. During cultivation, endogenous DNA can be normally found in the medium. The contents are 23 ± 6 ng/ml in HUVEC cultures (a mean for three different cultures), 6 ± 5 ng/ml in MSC lines (a mean for six different cultures), and 140 ± 20 ng/ml in MCF7 cultures. This kind of cfDNA is derived from naturally dying cells during cultivation [16, 52].

Cells from a culture or from a body bind the endogenous extracellular/circulating DNA [64]. Cells seem to adapt to extracellular DNA in the medium and to be in an inactive state. We suppose that potential DNA binding sites, which are not blocked by endogenous DNA, remain on the cell surface in an inactive state. When the cfDNA content increases several times (it occurs in vitro after adding exogenous DNA to the culture medium or in vivo in case of massive cell death during acute pathologic processes), more DNA will bind to the cell surface. The process of cfDNA binding to the cell surface is rapid. Within the first 30 minutes after emerging the exogenous DNA in the medium, almost the entire amount of cfDNA is located on/in the cells, while the cfDNA content in the culture medium decreases below the control values. In the presence of oxidized (gDNAoxy, p(rDNA)oxy) and unoxidized GC-rich DNA (in a concentration of 50 to 100 ng/ml), the cfDNA content in the culture medium will decrease in 30 minutes by a factor of 2 and 1.5 (HUVEC, ), 3.5 and 2 (MSC, ), and 3 and 1.8 in the culture (MCF7) in relation to the baseline values measured before the cell exposure to the cfDNA fragments. We are of opinion that unoxidized cfDNA interacts with the cell surface during this process, while oxidized cfDNA is transported to the cytoplasm.

Fragments of GC-rich and oxidized cfDNA also reduced the strength of the apoptotic enzyme caspase 3 in HUVEC, MSC, and lymphocytes (). The influence of cfDNA on the strength of caspase 3 depends on the concentration and oxidation degree of the cfDNA fragments: low concentrations of oxidized cfDNA inhibited apoptosis in a greater degree than highly oxidized cfDNA. Fragments of GC-rich cfDNA inhibited apoptosis within a concentration interval of 5 to 100 ng/ml.

We studied the activation of the expression of genes for antiapoptotic proteins of the BCL-2 family (BCL2, BCL2A1, and BCL2L1), BIRC2 (c-IAP1), and BIRC3 (c-IAP2) after the exposure of different cell types to cfDNA.

The analysis of the amount of mRNA for BCL2, BCL2A1 (Bfl-1/A1), BCL2L1 (BCL-X), BIRC2 (c-IAP1), and BIRC3 (c-IAP2) in HUVEC showed that in response to an elevated cfDNA content, processes aimed to apoptosis prevention are considerably activated in the cells. This fact agrees with the data on the absence of significant changes of the total cell count, despite the proliferation arrest. The expression of BCL2 and BIRC family genes increases in 3 hours and remains elevated by a factor of 1.5 to 3 within 72 hours (Figure 7(a)). The activation of the antiapoptotic gene expression was also observed after the exposure of MCF7 culture to cfDNA.

In the presence of oxidized fragments (gDNAoxy and p(rDNA)oxy) and GC-rich fragments of p(rDNA) upon MCF7, the level of mRNA for BCL2, BCL2A1, and BCL2L1 increases by a factor of 1.5 to 2 as early as in 0.5 hours, with a 2-fold to 4-fold increase by 48 hours (Figure 7(b)). Nonoxidized gDNA significantly (by a factor of 1.9 to 3.5) induced an increase in the expression of BCL2 family genes in MCF7 as late as 48 hours (Figure 7(b)). GC-rich and oxidized cfDNA fragments heightened BIRC2 (c-IAP1) and BIRC3 (c-IAP2) gene expression by a factor of 2 to 3 (Figure 8(b)). Under the action of cfDNA upon MCF7, the level of expression of the proapoptotic gene BAX does not increase or slightly decreases. The facts of the activation of the antiapoptotic genes and suppression of the proapoptotic gene BAX agree with the findings suggesting an augmentation of the fraction of the MCF7 pool under the exposure to cfDNA fragments. In MCF7, as well as in HUVEC, cfDNA blocks the process of apoptosis.

The expression of antiapoptotic genes also increases after an exposure of MSC to cfDNA. The expression of ВCL2 gene increased in 1 hour by a factor of 1.5 to 2 on the average after adding oxidized and GC-rich cfDNA fragments; by 3 hours, the expression of ВCL2 gene increased by a factor of 3.5 to 5 and remained on the same level in 24 hours (Figure 8(a)). The level of BCL2, BCL2A1, BCL2L1, BIRC2 (c-IAP1), and BIRC3 (c-IAP2) gene expression in MSC was heightened by a factor of 3 to 6 in 3 hours after the beginning of exposure of MSC to gDNAoxy and GC-rich p(rDNA); an exposure to gDNA increased the expression of the above-mentioned genes, on the average, two times only. Notably, MSC cultures that harbor mutations in BRCA1 (5382insC) and TP53 (missense mutation L145p in the fifth exon) genes showed more active expression of the antiapoptotic genes BCL2, BCL2A1, and BCL2L1: the level of expression of these genes raised approximately two times higher than in the MSC cultures carrying no mutation in BRCA1 and TP53 genes (data not shown). Apparently, such a strong antiapoptotic response in MSC cultures with mutations in BRCA1 and TP53 genes and the activation of the DNA repair gene BRCA1 are aimed at the survival of cells with the defects in the genes of DNA repair and apoptosis regulation.

Highly oxidized DNA at a high concentration (300 ng/ml and higher) and high contents of p(rDNA) (>350 ng/ml) in the composition of cfDNA-induced cell death processes. So using Countess II FL Automated Cell Counter (TermoFisher) and cell staining with propidium iodide and annexin V-FITC, it was shown that the fraction of apoptotic cells in the MSC pool increased by 40% in 24 hours after the beginning of exposure to highly oxidized DNA in a high concentration (350 ng/ml and higher).

4. Discussion

Every complex metazoan organism maintains its homeostasis at several hierarchic levels: molecular, cellular, and tissue/organ. When the protection at a certain level is insufficient, the protection is activated at the higher level, while the lower level defense mechanisms are switched off in order to avoid excessive resource expenditures, and “broken” elements of the lower level are sacrificed in order to save the whole system. Similarly, the transition to the lower level of protection inactivates the higher level defense mechanisms and entails saving the lower level elements of the system. A good example of this “save-or-kill” strategy can be the well-investigated crosstalk between NRF2 (cellular level) and NF-κB (tissue/organ level) defense pathways.

Most authors report the operation of the NF-κB and NRF2 signaling pathways in opposition [41, 44, 65, 66]. The published articles propose a variety of mechanisms underpinning the mutual suppression of NRF2 and NF-κB. Some of them are reviewed below.

Binding sites for NF-κB were discovered in a rat Nrf2 gene promoter [67]. NF-κB binding to the Nrf2 gene promoter is characterized by a feedback loop: after a long enough period of NF-κB activity, the transcriptional activity of Nrf2 increases thus suppressing NF-κB [67].

KEAP1 was shown to have some homology to IKB. IKKβ contains an ETGE motif [68]; therefore, it can bind KEAP1 and be targeted for ubiquitination [69]. Sequestration of the IKKβ pool via KEAP1 binding reduces IKBα degradation and may be the elusive mechanism by which NRF2 activation is known to inhibit NF-κB activation. When NRF2 is released due to oxidative signals, it results in an augmentation of the intracellular pool of unbound KEAP1, which can recruit more molecules of intracellular IKKβ thus inhibiting the NF-κB-driven gene expression. A mild oxidative stress entails a reversible KEAP1 alkylation; however, this reaction becomes irreversible under more oxidative conditions thus prohibiting most KEAP1 molecules from returning to the protein-binding conformation [70, 71]. In consequence of that, an abolishment of IKKβ inhibition by KEAP1 is logically expected, which results in growing NF-κB activation as more KEAP1 molecules lose their inhibitory properties. An additional argument in favor of this scheme is an experimentally established fact that the genetically determined decomposition of a KEAP1/CUL3/RBX1 complex with an E3-ubiquitin ligase that regulates both NRF2 and NF-κB signaling pathways appeared to be the key mechanism triggering NF-κB activation in human lung cancer cells [72]. KEAP1 has been shown to physically associate with NFKB-p65 in vitro and in vivo, and the signal from NF-κB inhibits the NRF2 signaling pathway through the interaction between p65 and KEAP1 [73].

There is evidence for NRF2 modulating the NF-κB signaling pathway at posttranslational level. This response involves IKB kinase and is mediated by the RAC1 signaling protein activated by the TLR4 receptor. This is a small GTPase of the RHO family, which is involved in innate immunity and triggers the NF-κB signaling pathway, as well as activating the NRF2/ARE pathway, which in turn blocks the RAC1-dependent NF-κB activation thus forming a negative feedback loop [74].

Seemingly, NF-κB can repress the NRF2 gene transcription by a mechanism connected with CREB: NF-κB competes with NRF2 for a transcription coactivator CREB-binding protein (a protein that binds to CREB) [66].

Another scheme accounts for the antagonism because of an interaction of NF-κB with histone deacetylase SIRT1 (Figure 9) [42]. In turn, SIRT1 is an upstream inductor of NRF2 [7580].

Finally, direct sequestration of free radicals by the NRF2-driven enzymes weakens the action of NF-κB [81].

Major NRF2 functions are xenobiotic detoxification and protection against oxidative stress. The oxidative stress is involved in the pathogenesis and progress of various diseases. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) alter the reductive-oxidative balance in the cells and apply oxidation-sensitive mechanisms in order to regulate the expression and activity of the transcription factors and genes regulated by the latter [82]. ROS trigger the NF-κB signaling pathway resulting in elevated expression of a large quantity of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNFα, IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-12, and adhesion molecules. The cytokines can induce ROS synthesis to form a vicious circle between oxidative stress and production of the proinflammatory cytokines [67]. This vicious circle can be broken by NRF2 released from the complex with its inactivator KEAP1 [65]. The activated free NRF2 translocates to the nucleus and launches the expression of genes for phase II detoxification enzymes and antioxidative enzymes, including NADP-H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), glutathione S-transferase (GST), heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), glutamate cysteine ligase (GCL), and peroxiredoxin 1 (PRX 1), which play an important role in cell protection by ROS quenching [67, 83]. The NRF2-KEAP1 system is acknowledged as the key mechanism of protection of the cell against oxidative stress. Besides, NRF2 inhibits the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-9), cyclooxygenase-2, and iNOS [67]. NRF2 modulates a cascade of anti-inflammatory cytokines via NF-κB inhibition and regulates the antioxidant cellular responses [65]. Inducing NRF2 or inhibiting NOX4 as a source of ROS demonstrated therapeutic effectiveness in vivo in the therapy of diseases caused by cell senescence [84] or malignant transformation [85], via inhibiting NF-κB.

When the NF-κB-mediated attempt to restore homeostasis fails and oxidative stress rises to extreme levels, AP-1-mediated apoptosis is triggered (Figure 10) [86, 87]. Thus, the organism successively implements the “save-or-kill” strategy firstly at the cellular level and, if it failed, then at the tissue level.

We studied the time profiles of activity of the transcription factors NF-κB and NRF2 at the level of expression of their genes. Incubation with cfDNA was accompanied by an apparent increase in NRF2 expression in MSC and HUVEC at the levels of transcription and translation. The maximum effect was observed in case of action of oxidized DNA upon MSC, when the level of RNANRF2 showed a 12-fold increase and the protein level showed a 2-fold augmentation. In cancer cells, NRF2 plays an insignificant role in the response for a change of the parameters of cfDNA. The increased expression of NRF2 in MSC and HUVEC is followed by its nuclear translocation suggesting its activation as a transcription factor.

Our findings demonstrate a different intensity of the NRF2-based response in the cells of different types. We hypothesized that the organism’s evolutionarily established readiness to sacrifice affected or damaged cells in order to save the tissue integrity depends on the degree of differentiation of the cells. Stem cells are more valuable as a cell depot; therefore, they showed the highest expression of NRF2 in response to model cfDNA exposure. Perhaps, these peculiarities of MSC determine the anti-inflammatory effect in the MSC-based therapy of autoimmune diseases [88]. Unlike MSC, HUVEC are already differentiated cells; therefore, they easily develop an NF-κB-mediated inflammatory response with the possible transition to massive apoptosis. The same picture was observed in other experiments on fibroblasts (data not shown). In the fibroblasts after serum withdrawal or an exposure to oxidized DNA, the levels of RNANRF2 and NRF2 protein increased fivefold.

As far as cancer cells are concerned, they are characterized by a secondary loss of specialization. The cancer cells are known to have constitutive activation of NRF2 expression [8993]; therefore MCF7 demonstrated the minimum response of NRF2 expression to cfDNA, while the NF-κB-mediated proinflammatory response prevailed.

The second regularity, which can be found in all the three cell type studies, consists in different responses for simple GC-rich cfDNA and for oxidized cfDNA. Probably, the evolutionarily established difference of these response patterns is caused by the fact that GC-rich cfDNA accumulates in the body during chronic cell death on a small scale. We showed earlier that under the above-mentioned circumstances, for example, in case of occupational exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation [13] or in case of a disease accompanied by elevated cell death [94], an activation of cfDNA-cleaving nucleases occurs. As a result, total blood cfDNA paradoxically decreases, while the fraction of GC-rich cfDNA with immunostimulatory properties increases. Oxidized cfDNA is a marker of the strong oxidative stress typical for acute conditions. Thus, GC-rich nonoxidized cfDNA is a signal of chronic mild cell death, while cfDNA with high 8-oxodG content is a hallmark of acute and massive cell death. We believe this difference underpins the observed diversity in the expression patterns. In every cell type studied, the response for oxidized cfDNA was more acute, that is, which started earlier and was more intensive, but returned faster to the baseline. GC-rich nonoxidized cfDNA evoked a weaker and elongated response with a predominance of the inflammatory component (NF-κB). It is indeed quite reasonable that an acute oxidative stress requires a cytoprotective response, which can be provided by NRF2-driven genes, whereas the conditions of a chronic stress will transfer the response to the upper tissue level (inflammation).

The exploration of apoptosis rates after adding cfDNA showed that cfDNA with moderately increased GC-content and lightly oxidized DNA promoted cell survival.

The dose survival curves for various types of cfDNA (e.g., Figure 5(b)) are typical hormetic curves. Hormesis is a dose-response phenomenon characterized by a low-dose stimulation and a high-dose inhibition by the same signal [95]. Hence, the strategies of eventual modulation of the cfDNA effect for future therapeutic purposes should be different depending on the current cfDNA concentration: either preconditioning with low doses before a massive impact or measures intended to elimination (binding, etc.) of cfDNA in cases when the cfDNA concentration has become high.

In particular, the revealed effect of low cfDNA concentrations upon MSC suggests an alternative strategy to increase the viability of MSC used in transplantology and therapy of disorders followed by tissue degeneration, a short-time (3 to 24 hours) pretreatment (preconditioning) of MSC culture with a plasmid p(rDNA) in a low concentration (50 ng/ml). The benefits of the plasmid application are low active concentration and high resistance to nuclease cleavage.

Highly oxidized DNA at a high concentration (250 ng/ml and higher) and high contents of GC-rich DNA fraction in the composition of cfDNA induced apoptosis. We have supposed that the introduction of specific antibodies to cfDNA or blocking the cfDNA signal at the level of receptors will be able to neutralize the negative action of high cfDNA concentrations.

Conflicts of Interest

The funding does not lead to any conflict of interests regarding the publication of this manuscript. There is no other possible conflict of interests in the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The reported study was supported by RFBR (Russian Foundation for Basic Research) within the framework of Research Project no. 16-04-01099A, no. 16-04-00576A, no. 16-04-01541A, and no. 17-04-01587A.

References

  1. S. Gravina, J. M. Sedivy, and J. Vijg, “The dark side of circulating nucleic acids,” Aging Cell, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 398-399, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. van der Vaart and P. J. Pretorius, “Circulating DNA. Its origin and fluctuation,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1137, no. 1, pp. 18–26, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. H. Lu, J. Busch, M. Jung et al., “Diagnostic and prognostic potential of circulating cell-free genomic and mitochondrial DNA fragments in clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 452, pp. 109–119, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. V. Brinkmann, U. Reichard, C. Goosmann et al., “Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria,” Science, vol. 303, no. 5663, pp. 1532–1535, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. E. R. Zaher, M. M. Anwar, H. M. Kohail, S. M. El-Zoghby, and M. S. Abo-El-Eneen, “Cell-free DNA concentration and integrity as a screening tool for cancer,” Indian Journal of Cancer, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 175–183, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Y. I. Elshimali, H. Khaddour, M. Sarkissyan, Y. Wu, and J. V. Vadgama, “The clinical utilization of circulating cell free DNA (ccfDNA) in blood of cancer patients,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 18925–18958, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. V. A. Forte, D. K. Barrak, M. Elhodaky, L. Tung, A. Snow, and J. E. Lang, “The potential for liquid biopsies in the precision medical treatment of breast cancer,” Cancer Biology & Medicine, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 19–40, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. Tamminga, M. van Maarle, L. Henneman, C. B. Oudejans, M. C. Cornel, and E. A. Sistermans, “Chapter three - maternal plasma DNA and RNA sequencing for prenatal testing,” Advances in Clinical Chemistry, vol. 74, pp. 63–102, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. J. Bronkhorst, J. Aucamp, and P. J. Pretorius, “Cell-free DNA: preanalytical variables,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 450, pp. 243–253, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. V. Ermakov, M. S. Konkova, S. V. Kostyuk, V. L. Izevskaya, A. Baranova, and N. N. Veiko, “Oxidized extracellular DNA as a stress signal in human cells,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2013, Article ID 649747, 12 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. K. Glebova, N. Veiko, S. Kostyuk, V. Izhevskaya, and A. Baranova, “Oxidized extracellular DNA as a stress signal that may modify response to anticancer therapy,” Cancer Letters, vol. 356, no. 1, pp. 22–33, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. N. Veiko, N. A. Bulycheva, O. A. Roginko et al., “Ribosomal repeat in cell free DNA as a marker for cell death,” Biochemistry (Moscow) Supplement Series B: Biomedical Chemistry, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 198–207, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. I. B. Korzeneva, S. V. Kostuyk, L. S. Ershova et al., “Human circulating plasma DNA significantly decreases while lymphocyte DNA damage increases under chronic occupational exposure to low-dose gamma-neutron and tritium β-radiation,” Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, vol. 779, pp. 1–15, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. V. Kostyuk, V. J. Tabakov, V. V. Chestkov et al., “Oxidized DNA induces an adaptive response in human fibroblasts,” Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, vol. 747-748, pp. 6–18, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. P. Loseva, S. Kostyuk, E. Malinovskaya et al., “Extracellular DNA oxidation stimulates activation of NRF2 and reduces the production of ROS in human mesenchymal stem cells,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 12, Supplement 1, pp. S85–S97, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. D. S. Pisetsky, “The origin and properties of extracellular DNA: from PAMP to DAMP,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 32–40, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. Y. H. Chiu, J. B. Macmillan, and Z. J. Chen, “RNA polymerase III detects cytosolic DNA and induces type I interferons through the RIG-I pathway,” Cell, vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 576–591, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. H. Li, J. Wang, J. Wang, L. S. Cao, Z. X. Wang, and J. W. Wu, “Structural mechanism of DNA recognition by the p202 HINa domain: insights into the inhibition of Aim2-mediated inflammatory signaling,” Acta Crystallographica Section F Structural Biology Communications, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 21–29, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. L. Unterholzner, “The interferon response to intracellular DNA: why so many receptors?” Immunobiology, vol. 218, no. 11, pp. 1312–1321, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. T. Kawai and S. Akira, “Toll-like receptors and their crosstalk with other innate receptors in infection and immunity,” Immunity, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 637–650, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. Triantafilou, D. Eryilmazlar, and M. Triantafilou, “Herpes simplex virus 2-induced activation in vaginal cells involves Toll-like receptors 2 and 9 and DNA sensors DAI and IFI16,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 210, no. 2, pp. 122.e1–122.e10, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. E. Harberts and A. A. Gaspari, “TLR signaling and DNA repair: are they associated?” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 296–302, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. H. Kato, K. Takahasi, and T. Fujita, “RIG-I-like receptors: cytoplasmic sensors for non-self RNA,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 243, no. 1, pp. 91–98, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. E. Keating, M. Baran, and A. G. Bowie, “Cytosolic DNA sensors regulating type I interferon induction,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 574–581, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. L. Sun, J. Wu, F. Du, X. Chen, and Z. J. Chen, “Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is a cytosolic DNA sensor that activates the type I interferon pathway,” Science, vol. 339, no. 6121, pp. 786–791, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. J. Wu, L. Sun, X. Chen et al., “Cyclic GMP-AMP is an endogenous second messenger in innate immune signaling by cytosolic DNA,” Science, vol. 339, no. 6121, pp. 826–830, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. W. A. Rose 2nd, K. Sakamoto, and C. A. Leifer, “TLR9 is important for protection against intestinal damage and for intestinal repair,” Scientific Reports, vol. 2, no. 1, article 574, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. Goulopoulou, T. Matsumoto, G. F. Bomfim, and R. C. Webb, “Toll-like receptor 9 activation: a novel mechanism linking placenta-derived mitochondrial DNA and vascular dysfunction in pre-eclampsia,” Clinical Science, vol. 123, no. 7, pp. 429–435, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Kostjuk, P. Loseva, O. Chvartatskaya et al., “Extracellular GC-rich DNA activates TLR9- and NF-κB-dependent signaling pathways in human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (haMSCs),” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 12, Supplement 1, pp. S99–S111, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. N. Carayol, J. Chen, F. Yang et al., “A dominant function of IKK/NF-κB signaling in global lipopolysaccharide-induced gene expression,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 41, pp. 31142–31151, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Ghosh and J. F. Dass, “Study of pathway cross-talk interactions with NF-κB leading to Its activation via ubiquitination or phosphorylation: a brief review,” Gene, vol. 584, no. 1, pp. 97–109, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. W. Bao, H. Xia, Y. Liang et al., “Toll-like receptor 9 can be activated by endogenous mitochondrial DNA to induce podocyte apoptosis,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 22579, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Bliksøen, L. H. Mariero, M. K. Torp et al., “Extracellular mtDNA activates NF-κB via Toll-like receptor 9 and induces cell death in cardiomyocytes,” Basic Research in Cardiology, vol. 111, no. 4, p. 42, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. G. Joshi and J. A. Johnson, “The Nrf2-ARE pathway: a valuable therapeutic target for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases,” Recent Patents on CNS Drug Discovery, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 218–229, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. H. K. Bryan, A. Olayanju, C. E. Goldring, and B. K. Park, “The Nrf2 cell defence pathway: Keap1-dependent and -independent mechanisms of regulation,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 705–717, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Y. Zhang and Y. Xiang, “Molecular and cellular basis for the unique functioning of Nrf1, an indispensable transcription factor for maintaining cell homoeostasis and organ integrity,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 473, no. 8, pp. 961–1000, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. Lau, N. F. Villeneuve, Z. Sun, P. K. Wong, and D. D. Zhang, “Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 58, no. 5-6, pp. 262–270, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. D. Hayes and A. T. Dinkova-Kostova, “The Nrf2 regulatory network provides an interface between redox and intermediary metabolism,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 199–218, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. A. O'Connell and J. D. Hayes, “The Keap1/Nrf2 pathway in health and disease: from the bench to the clinic,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 687–689, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. L. M. Pedruzzi, M. B. Stockler-Pinto, M. J. Leite, and D. Mafra, “Nrf2–keap1 system versus NF-κB: the good and the evil in chronic kidney disease?” Biochimie, vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 2461–2466, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. H. Chen, Y. Fang, W. Li, R. C. Orlando, N. Shaheen, and X. L. Chen, “NFκB and Nrf2 in esophageal epithelial barrier function,” Tissue Barriers, vol. 1, no. 5, article e27463, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. A. Kauppinen, T. Suuronen, J. Ojala, K. Kaarniranta, and A. Salminen, “Antagonistic crosstalk between NF-κB and SIRT1 in the regulation of inflammation and metabolic disorders,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1939–1948, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. D. Wardyn, A. H. Ponsford, and C. M. Sanderson, “Dissecting molecular cross-talk between Nrf2 and NF-κB response pathways,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 621–626, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. N. Wakabayashi, S. L. Slocum, J. J. Skoko, S. Shin, and T. W. Kensler, “When NRF2 talks, who’s listening?” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1649–1663, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. V. N. Manskikh, “Pathways of cell death and their biological importance,” Tsitologiia, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 909–915, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  46. S. Cory, D. C. Huang, and J. M. Adams, “The Bcl-2 family: roles in cell survival and oncogenesis,” Oncogene, vol. 22, no. 53, pp. 8590–8607, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. W. A. Siddiqui, A. Ahad, and H. Ahsan, “The mystery of BCL2 family: BCL-2 proteins and apoptosis: an update,” Archives of Toxicology, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 289–317, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. J. Silke and P. Meier, “Inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins–modulators of cell death and inflammation,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, vol. 5, no. 2, article a008730, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. C. Muñoz-Pinedo, “Signaling pathways that regulate life and cell death: evolution of apoptosis in the context of self-defense,” in Self and Nonself. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, C. López-Larrea, Ed., vol. 738, pp. 124–143, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. A. V. Ermakov, M. S. Konkova, S. V. Kostyuk et al., “An extracellular DNA mediated bystander effect produced from low dose irradiated endothelial cells,” Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, vol. 712, no. 1-2, pp. 1–10, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. F. Lu, Y. Yu, B. Zhang, D. Liang, Z. M. Li, and W. You, “Inhibitory effects of mild hyperthermia plus docetaxel therapy on ER(+/−) breast cancer cells and action mechanisms,” Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences], vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 870–876, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. N. N. Veiko, E. A. Kalashnikova, S. N. Kokarovtseva et al., “Stimulatory effect of fragments from transcribed region of ribosomal repeat on human peripheral blood lymphocytes,” Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 142, no. 4, pp. 428–432, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. S. V. Kostyuk, M. S. Konkova, E. S. Ershova et al., “An exposure to the oxidized DNA enhances both instability of genome and survival in cancer cells,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 10, article e77469, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. G. W. Buchko, J. R. Wagner, J. Cadet, S. Raoul, and M. Weinfeld, “Methylene blue-mediated photooxidation of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2-deoxyguanosine,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Structure and Expression, vol. 1263, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. S. V. Kostyuk, T. D. Smirnova, L. V. Efremova et al., “Enhanced expression of iNOS in human endothelial cells during long-term culturing with extracellular DNA fragments,” Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 191–195, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. J. Vollmer, “TLR9 in health and disease,” International Reviews of Immunology, vol. 25, no. 3-4, pp. 155–181, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. A. M. Krieg, “CpG still rocks! Update on an accidental drug,” Nucleic Acid Therapeutics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 77–89, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  58. M. Peter, K. Bode, G. B. Lipford, F. Eberle, K. Heeg, and A. H. Dalpke, “Characterization of suppressive oligodeoxynucleotides that inhibit Toll-like receptor-9-mediated activation of innate immunity,” Immunology, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 118–128, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. S. Bauer, “Toll-like receptor 9 processing: the key event in Toll-like receptor 9 activation?” Immunology Letters, vol. 149, no. 1-2, pp. 85–87, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. R. F. Ashman, J. A. Goeken, J. Drahos, and P. Lenert, “Sequence requirements for oligodeoxyribonucleotide inhibitory activity,” International Immunology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 411–420, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. A. Trieu, T. L. Roberts, J. A. Dunn, M. J. Sweet, and K. J. Stacey, “DNA motifs suppressing TLR9 responses,” Critical Reviews in Immunology, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 527–544, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. J. Ma, J. J. van den Beucken, F. Yang et al., “Coculture of osteoblasts and endothelial cells: optimization of culture medium and cell ratio,” Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 349–357, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. D. Wlodkowic, J. Skommer, and Z. Darzynkiewicz, “Cytometry of apoptosis. Historical perspective and new advances,” Experimental Oncology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 255–262, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  64. E. Y. Rykova, E. S. Morozkin, A. A. Ponomaryova et al., “Cell-free and cell-bound circulating nucleic acid complexes: mechanisms of generation, concentration and content,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 12, Supplement 1, pp. S141–S153, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. T. Nguyen, H. C. Huang, and C. B. Pickett, “Transcriptional regulation of the antioxidant response element. Activation by Nrf2 and repression by MafK,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 20, pp. 15466–15473, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. G. H. Liu, J. Qu, and X. Shen, “NF-κB/p65 antagonizes Nrf2-ARE pathway by depriving CBP from Nrf2 and facilitating recruitment of HDAC3 to MafK,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1783, no. 5, pp. 713–727, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. S. Nair, S. T. Doh, J. Y. Chan, A. N. Kong, and L. Cai, “Regulatory potential for concerted modulation of Nrf2- and Nfkb1- mediated gene expression in inflammation and carcinogenesis,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 99, no. 12, pp. 2070–2082, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. Y. R. Kim, J. E. Oh, M. S. Kim et al., “Oncogenic NRF2 mutations in squamous cell carcinomas of oesophagus and skin,” The Journal of Pathology, vol. 220, no. 4, pp. 446–451, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. D. F. Lee, H. P. Kuo, M. Liu et al., “KEAP1 E3 ligase-mediated downregulation of NF-κB signaling by targeting IKKβ,” Molecular Cell, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 131–140, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. H. J. Forman, F. Ursini, and M. Maiorino, “An overview of mechanisms of redox signaling,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 73, pp. 2–9, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. L. B. Poole, P. A. Karplus, and A. Claiborne, “Protein sulfenic acids in redox signaling,” Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 325–347, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. K. L. Thu, L. A. Pikor, R. Chari et al., “Genetic disruption of KEAP1/CUL3 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex components is a key mechanism of NF-kappaB pathway activation in lung cancer,” Journal of Thoracic Oncology, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 1521–1529, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. M. Yu, H. Li, Q. Liu et al., “Nuclear factor p65 interacts with Keap1 to repress the Nrf2-ARE pathway,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 883–892, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. A. Cuadrado, Z. Martín-Moldes, J. Ye, and I. Lastres-Becker, “Transcription factors NRF2 and NF-κB are coordinated effectors of the Rho family, GTP-binding protein RAC1 during inflammation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 289, no. 22, pp. 15244–15258, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. D. S. Yoon, Y. Choi, and J. W. Lee, “Cellular localization of NRF2 determines the self-renewal and osteogenic differentiation potential of human MSCs via the P53-SIRT1 axis,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 7, no. 2, article e2093, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. Y. W. Ding, G. J. Zhao, X. L. Li et al., “SIRT1 exerts protective effects against paraquat-induced injury in mouse type II alveolar epithelial cells by deacetylating NRF2 in vitro,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1049–1058, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. F. Xue, J. W. Huang, P. Y. Ding et al., “Nrf2/antioxidant defense pathway is involved in the neuroprotective effects of Sirt1 against focal cerebral ischemia in rats after hyperbaric oxygen preconditioning,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 309, pp. 1–8, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. Y. Kawai, L. Garduño, M. Theodore, J. Yang, and I. J. Arinze, “Acetylation-deacetylation of the transcription factor Nrf2 (nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2) regulates its transcriptional activity and nucleocytoplasmic localization,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 9, pp. 7629–7640, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. K. Huang, J. Huang, X. Xie et al., “Sirt1 resists advanced glycation end products-induced expressions of fibronectin and TGF-β1 by activating the Nrf2/ARE pathway in glomerular mesangial cells,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 65, pp. 528–540, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. M. T. Do, H. G. Kim, J. H. Choi, and H. G. Jeong, “Metformin induces microRNA-34a to downregulate the Sirt1/Pgc-1α/Nrf2 pathway, leading to increased susceptibility of wild-type p53 cancer cells to oxidative stress and therapeutic agents,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 74, pp. 21–34, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. S. C. Gupta, C. Sundaram, S. Reuter, and B. B. Aggarwal, “Inhibiting NF-κB activation by small molecules as a therapeutic strategy,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms, vol. 1799, no. 10-12, pp. 775–787, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. Z. A. Massy, P. Stenvinkel, and T. B. Drueke, “The role of oxidative stress in chronic kidney disease,” Seminars in Dialysis, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 405–408, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. S. S. Singh, S. Vrishni, B. K. Singh, I. Rahman, and P. Kakkar, “Nrf2-ARE stress response mechanism: a control point in oxidative stress-mediated dysfunctions and chronic inflammatory diseases,” Free Radical Research, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 1267–1288, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. L. Hecker, N. J. Logsdon, and D. Kurundkar, “Reversal of persistent fibrosis in aging by targeting Nox4-Nrf2 redox imbalance,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 6, no. 231, article 231ra47, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. W. Li, T. O. Khor, C. Xu et al., “Activation of Nrf2-antioxidant signaling attenuates NFκB-inflammatory response and elicits apoptosis,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 1485–1489, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. C. G. Woods, J. Fu, P. Xue, and Y. Hou, “Dose-dependent transitions in Nrf2-mediated adaptive response and related stress responses to hypochlorous acid in mouse macrophages,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 238, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. A. L. Stefanson and M. Bakovic, “Dietary regulation of Keap1/Nrf2/ARE pathway: focus on plant-derived compounds and trace minerals,” Nutrients, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 3777–3801, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. V. Pistoia and L. Raffaghello, “Mesenchymal stromal cells and autoimmunity,” International Immunology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 49–58, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. B. Yang, Y. Ma, and Y. Liu, “Elevated expression of Nrf-2 and ABCG2 involved in multi-drug resistance of lung cancer SP cells,” Drug Research, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 526–531, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. Y. O. Son, P. Pratheeshkumar, R. V. Roy et al., “Nrf2/p62 signaling in apoptosis resistance and its role in cadmium-induced carcinogenesis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 289, no. 41, pp. 28660–28675, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. E. Reszka, Z. Jablonowski, and E. Wieczorek, “Polymorphisms of NRF2 and NRF2 target genes in urinary bladder cancer patients,” Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, vol. 140, no. 10, pp. 1723–1731, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. S. A. Rushworth, L. Zaitseva, M. Y. Murray, N. M. Shah, K. M. Bowles, and D. J. MacEwan, “The high Nrf2 expression in human acute myeloid leukemia is driven by NF-κB and underlies its chemo-resistance,” Blood, vol. 120, no. 26, pp. 5188–5198, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. G. M. DeNicola, F. A. Karreth, T. J. Humpton et al., “Oncogene-induced Nrf2 transcription promotes ROS detoxification and tumorigenesis,” Nature, vol. 475, no. 7354, pp. 106–109, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. N. N. Veiko, N. O. Shubaeva, S. M. Ivanova, A. I. Speranskii, N. A. Lyapunova, and D. M. Spitkovskii, “Blood serum DNA in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is considerably enriched with fragments of ribosomal repeats containing immunostimulatory CpG-motifs,” Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 142, no. 3, pp. 313–316, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. V. Calabrese, C. Cornelius, A. T. Dinkova-Kostova, E. J. Calabrese, and M. P. Mattson, “Cellular stress responses, the hormesis paradigm, and vitagenes: novel targets for therapeutic intervention in neurodegenerative disorders,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1763–1811, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Svetlana V. Kostyuk et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1180 Views | 293 Downloads | 3 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
 Sign up for content alertsSign up

You are browsing a BETA version of Hindawi.com. Click here to switch back to the original design.