A Chaotic Multi-Objective Runge–Kutta Optimization Algorithm for Optimized Circuit Design

<div>Slopes used to determine <svg height="9.36162pt" id="M30" style="vertical-align:-3.40071pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -5.96091 22.5326 9.36162" width="22.5326pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M536 404C536 423 520 448 491 448C445 448 398 404 308 283L286 338C255 416 242 448 217 448C182 448 138 402 92 341L111 321C149 368 169 378 178 378C188 378 198 363 214 320L254 212C185 117 138 65 107 65C98 65 85 69 82 75C79 82 73 86 65 86C44 86 23 60 23 39C23 7 44 -12 71 -12C119 -12 168 33 265 177L306 61C321 17 347 -12 373 -12C413 -12 465 33 507 96L491 119C459 84 432 60 413 60C395 60 378 92 358 148L321 250C341 279 369 310 389 332C417 363 439 382 456 382C466 382 475 376 481 368C486 361 492 358 496 358C513 358 536 381 536 404Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,7.202,3.132)"><path d="M504 89L488 119C453 85 428 69 416 69C408 69 405 75 412 102L462 304C492 438 460 451 436 451S388 441 356 423C311 397 229 336 170 256H168L189 340C208 418 200 451 177 451C144 451 82 413 24 352L40 322C65 345 98 369 108 369C114 369 119 363 112 335L28 -3L36 -12C54 -3 83 4 112 10C125 73 138 122 153 174C205 258 328 382 376 382C395 382 399 369 384 305L330 93C312 25 323 -12 351 -12C378 -12 439 21 504 89Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,11.861,3.132)"><path d="M556 236V289H337V504H275V289H56V236H275V-4H337V236H556Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,17.421,3.132)"><path d="M389 0V32C297 38 291 46 291 118V635C234 613 175 595 109 583V556L161 554C203 552 207 547 207 497V118C207 46 201 38 110 32V0H389Z"></path></g></svg> in the RUN algorithm.</div>

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: A Chaotic Multi-Objective Runge–Kutta Optimization Algorithm for Optimized Circuit Design 