Research Article
A Fast and Efficient Numerical Algorithm for the Nonlocal Conservative Swift–Hohenberg Equation
Table 1
Convergence rate with
and different
M for Problem 1 at
.
| | | 10 | 20 | 40 | 80 | 160 |
| ϵ = 0.05 η = 0.05 | | 8.14e − 5 | 1.78e − 5 | 4.18e − 6 | 1.01e − 6 | 2.49e − 7 | | — | 2.19 | 2.09 | 2.05 | 2.02 | | 1.30e − 3 | 2.95e − 4 | 7.04e − 5 | 1.72e − 5 | 4.25e − 6 | | — | 2.14 | 2.07 | 2.03 | 2.02 | ϵ = 0.25 η = 2 | | 4.61e − 3 | 1.10e − 3 | 2.66e − 4 | 6.52e − 5 | 1.62e − 5 | | — | 2.07 | 2.05 | 2.03 | 2.01 | | 3.69e − 2 | 9.16e − 3 | 2.27e − 3 | 5.63e − 4 | 1.40e − 4 | | — | 2.01 | 2.01 | 2.01 | 2.01 | ϵ = 0.5 η = 0.5 | | 1.25e − 4 | 3.30e − 5 | 8.43e − 6 | 2.13e − 6 | 5.34e − 7 | | — | 1.92 | 1.97 | 1.99 | 1.99 | | 1.78e − 3 | 4.23e − 4 | 1.03e − 4 | 2.54e − 5 | 6.32e − 6 | | — | 2.08 | 2.04 | 2.02 | 2.01 |
|
|