Development and Characterisation of a Novel NF-<i>κ</i>B Reporter Cell Line for Investigation of Neuroinflammation

Zeuner, Marie-Theres; Vallance, Thomas; Vaiyapuri, Sakthivel; Cottrell, Graeme S.; Widera, Darius

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6209865

Mediators of Inflammation

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 | Article ID 6209865 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6209865

Development and Characterisation of a Novel NF-κB Reporter Cell Line for Investigation of Neuroinflammation

Marie-Theres Zeuner,¹Thomas Vallance,^1,2Sakthivel Vaiyapuri,²Graeme S. Cottrell,³and Darius Widera¹

Academic Editor: Soh Yamazaki

Received22 Mar 2017

Accepted19 Jun 2017

Published16 Jul 2017

Abstract

Aberrant activation of the transcription factor NF-κB, as well as uncontrolled inflammation, has been linked to autoimmune diseases, development and progression of cancer, and neurological disorders like Alzheimer’s disease. Reporter cell lines are a valuable state-of-the art tool for comparative analysis of in vitro drug screening. However, a reporter cell line for the investigation of NF-κB-driven neuroinflammation has not been available. Thus, we developed a stable neural NF-κB-reporter cell line to assess the potency of proinflammatory molecules and peptides, as well as anti-inflammatory pharmaceuticals. We used lentivirus to transduce the glioma cell line U251-MG with a tandem NF-κB reporter construct containing GFP and firefly luciferase allowing an assessment of NF-κB activity via fluorescence microscopy, flow cytometry, and luminometry. We observed a robust activation of NF-κB after exposure of the reporter cell line to tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and amyloid-β peptide [1-42] as well as to LPS derived from Salmonella minnesota and Escherichia coli. Finally, we demonstrate that the U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc reporter cells can be used for assessing the anti-inflammatory potential of pharmaceutical compounds using Bay11-7082 and IMD0354. In summary, our newly generated cell line is a robust and cost-efficient tool to study pro- and anti-inflammatory potential of drugs and biologics in neural cells.

1. Introduction

The inducible transcription factor nuclear-factor “kappa-light-chain-enhancer” of activated B-cells (NF-κB) is a key regulator of inflammation [1]. The NF-κB protein family consists of the DNA-binding subunits p65 (RelA), RelB, c-Rel, p50, and p52 [2, 3], which bind to consensus elements on DNA (κB-elements/binding sites with the sequence 5′GGGACTTTCC3′). In its inactive form, NF-κB hetero- or homodimers reside in the cytoplasm bound to the inhibitory IκB protein which prevents nuclear translocation of the complex. Upon activation of the signalling cascade, the inhibitor of NF-κB (IκB) kinase (IKK) complex consisting of IKKα, IKKβ, and NF-κB essential modulator (NEMO) is activated. IKK complex in turn phosphorylates inhibitory IκB proteins, for example, IκBα, IκBβ, or IκBε [4–6]. This phosphorylation at serine residues (e.g., serine 32 and 36 for IκBα) promotes polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of IκBs [7]. The liberated NF-κB dimers translocate into the nucleus and bind to their consensus elements and modulate the transcription of target genes [7]. This canonical NF-κB signalling cascade can be activated by pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) (mediated by Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)), proinflammatory cytokines, and other external stimuli including UV-irradiation [8, 9].

Chronic inflammation and ongoing activation of NF-κB is linked to a variety of diseases including inflammatory bowel disease [10], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [11], and neuropathologies like Alzheimer’s disease [12] and epilepsy [13]. In addition, it has been shown that NF-κB is involved in the development and progression of cancer [14]. In this regard, NF-κB directly regulates cancer cell proliferation by upregulation of G1 cyclins, particularly cyclin D1 [15, 16]. Moreover, NF-κB positively modulates expression levels of several chemokines (e.g., MCP-1) [17], proangiogenic factors, for example, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [18], and cellular inhibitors of apoptosis [19].

The human cell line U251-MG was isolated from a 75-year-old male Caucasian patient by explant technique from brain tissue of a grade III-IV malignant astrocytoma tumour at the Wallenberg laboratory in Uppsala (Sweden) in 1973 [20–22]. Nonclonal U251-MG cells are highly heterogeneous and contain differentiated cells and cancer stem cell-like cells [23]. The U251 cell line represents an ideal tool to study inflammatory signalling pathways. Indeed, this cell line has been used previously to study inflammatory responses in vitro [24–27]. In contrast to many standard cell lines, for example, HEK 293 which do not express TLRs, U251 cells are characterised by the expression of TLRs (except TLR2) [26], TNF receptor 1 (TNFR) [28], and interleukin receptors [27]. Thus, these cells are suitable for studying proinflammatory signals, particularly those proposed as endogenous TLR4 ligands, without overexpression artefacts.

In this study, we describe the development and characterisation of a U251-derived cell line stably transduced with a lentiviral NF-κB-driven tandem reporter encoding for GFP and luciferase. We validated the cell line using established proinflammatory molecules including TNFα and bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS). Using this U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cell line, the NF-κB activating properties of proposed endogenous TLR4-ligands (amyloid-β peptide [1-42] or high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) and LPS chemotypes) were evaluated. Moreover, by using our reporter cell line, the anti-inflammatory potential and in vitro toxicity of anti-inflammatory drugs and biopharmaceuticals can be investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

All cell lines were cultivated in normal cultivation medium (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) High Glucose (Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd., Dorset, UK), 1% L-glutamine (200 mM, Sigma-Aldrich), 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS, lot:126K3398, Sigma-Aldrich)) in the absence of antibiotics and antimycotics in a humidified incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK) at 37°C and 5% CO₂ unless stated otherwise. Cells were provided with fresh medium every 2-3 days and passaged at 90% confluency.

2.2. Lentiviral Transduction

HEK293-FT cells were cultivated with normal cultivation medium containing polyethylenimine (PEI, 0.1%). Medium was discarded after 16 h, and cells were incubated in normal cultivation medium containing 25 μM chloroquine. Transfection was performed using 2 M CaCl₂, TE-buffer, and 2x HBS supplemented with lentiviral package plasmids (6 μg pCMV-VSV.G and 15 μg pCMV-dR8.91) and 20 μg pGreenFire-NF-κB-Puro (System Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA, USA) vectors. After 16 h, medium was discarded and the virus particles were harvested after 24 h in normal cultivation medium. The virus containing medium was centrifuged at 1985 for 10 min and filtered through a 0.45 μm filter (VWR International Ltd., Lutterworth, UK), prior to centrifugation (20000, 2 h 15 min, 4°C). The supernatant was discarded, and the virus particles were resuspended in DMEM containing 1% L-glutamine and stored at 4°C. For lentiviral transduction of U251 cells, the medium was replaced with the prewarmed virus particle solution mixed with 10% FCS and incubated for 8 h at 37°C and 5% CO₂ before normal cultivation medium was added. After 2 passages, cells were selected using 5 μg/ml puromycin (Apollo Scientific, Bredbury, UK). After 2 weeks, 12 single clones were generated using limited dilution under normal culture conditions. Finally, 4 clones were analysed in activity assays. The clone showing the highest dynamics of luciferase activity in response to TNFα was used for all experiments.

2.3. Stimulation of Cells

For TNFα stimulation, cells were (unless otherwise indicated) treated with 10 ng/ml human recombinant TNFα (PeproTech EC Ltd., London, UK, in 0.1% BSA (cell culture grade, Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS (Sigma-Aldrich)) for 24 h. For immunocytochemical staining, cells were treated with TNFα for 15 min prior to fixation. All cells treated with TLR4 ligands (peptides and LPS) or NF-κB inhibitors were serum starved for 4 h before stimulation for 48 h with normal cultivation medium comprising respective ligands: 1 μg/ml (unless stated otherwise) ultrapure LPS derived from Salmonella minnesota (ultrapure S. minnesota R595 in endotoxin-free water, InvivoGen, Toulouse, France) or Escherichia coli (ultrapure E. coli LPS in endotoxin-free water, InvivoGen); 0.1–100 μg/ml fibrinogen from human plasma (50–70%, Sigma-Aldrich, dissolved in DMEM High Glucose and sterile filtered); 50–1000 ng/ml high mobility group box 1 (human recombinant, carrier-free HMGB1, BioLegend Ltd., London, UK, dissolved in 0.1% BSA in PBS); 0.001–10 μM amyloid-β peptide [1-42] (Aβ, rPeptide, Suffolk, UK, prepared in DMEM High Glucose) or heated Aβ (stock solution boiled at 90°C for 45 min); and 0.5–2.5 μM Bay11-7082 (Sigma-Aldrich, in DMSO (cell culture grade, Apollo Scientific)) or IMD0354 (10 mM, Sigma-Aldrich, in DMSO).

2.4. Immunocytochemistry

U251 cells were seeded on cell culture-treated coverslips in 12-well plates (Sarstedt, Leicester, UK) and treated with TNFα as described above. After 20 min fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich), cells were permeabilised using PBS containing 0.02% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) and 5% normal goat serum (Stratech Scientific Unit, Suffolk, UK) for 30 min. Cells were incubated with mouse anti-human p65 primary antibody (1 : 100 in PBS, sc8008, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 1.5 h at room temperature. Cells were exposed to secondary goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated to AlexaFluor555 (1 : 300 in PBS, Life Technologies Ltd., Paisley, UK) for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. Nuclear counterstaining was achieved using DAPI (1 : 2000 in PBS, Sigma-Aldrich).

2.5. Microscopy

Fluorescence microscopy of fixed samples was performed using AxioImager Epifluorence System (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Images of living cells (GFP and bright field images) were obtained using Nikon NIS Camera (Nikon, Surrey, UK) equipped with an A1 Inverted Epifluorence Microscope (Zeiss).

Image acquisition was performed using microscope-based analysis software (Axiovision4), and Fiji was used for pixel intensity measurement and further image processing [29].

2.6. Transfection of HEK293-MD2-CD14 and U251 cells

U251 cells (Cell Line Service, Eppelheim, Germany) or HEK293-MD2-CD14 cells (InvivoGen) were transfected with pRL-CMV (Promega Corporation, Southampton, UK), TK (NF-κB₆) LUC [30], TLR4-GFP (InvivoGen), or EGFP (after removal of endotoxins according to Ma et al. [31]) using Turbofect® Tranfection Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Transfection was assessed by expression of GFP using epifluorescence microscopy (A1 Inverted Epifluorescence Microscope, Carl Zeiss).

2.7. Luciferase Measurement

NF-κB-dependent firefly luciferase activity and NF-κB-independent Renilla luciferase activity were assessed using Dual-Luciferase® Reporter Assay System (Promega Corporation). Luciferase activity of U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells was analysed using firefly luciferase assay system (Promega Corporation), and all luciferase measurements were performed using a Lucy 1 microplate reader (Anthos Labtec, Salzburg, Austria).

2.8. Flow Cytometry

U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells were cultivated and treated for 24 h with TNFα or vehicle as described above. After Trypsin-EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich) treatment and centrifugation (300, 10 min), cells were resuspended in PBS. GFP fluorescence intensity (10⁵ events per sample) was measured using BD Accuri™ C6 plus flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, USA). Data were analysed using FlowJo (FlowJo LLC, Ashland, USA).

2.9. MTT Assay

U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells were serum-deprived for 4 h and exposed to LPS derived from E. coli and S. minnesota (10⁻², 10⁻¹, 1, 10¹, and 10² μg/ml) or left untreated for 68 h. MTT assays (Promega Corporation) were performed according to the manufacturer’s guidelines, and readout was carried out using Lucy 1 microplate reader (Anthos Labtec).

2.10. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA). Data were compared using either Student’s t-test (two-tailed, confidence interval 95%) or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction (CI 95%), where appropriate. At least 3 independent measurements were performed, and was considered statistically significant. Luciferase and MTT data are presented as mean ± SEM, and pixel intensity measurements are presented as mean ± SD.

3. Results

3.1. The Inflammatory Response in U251 Cells Is Heterogeneous

To assess TNFα-driven nuclear translocation of NF-κB in U251 cells, p65 subunit localization was assessed by immunofluorescence, followed by acquisition of its fluorescence intensity in the nucleus (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). Treatment with TNFα resulted in significantly increased nuclear p65 fluorescence compared to unstimulated cells (Figure 1(a) lower panel, Figure 1(b)). Notably, the TNFα-induced nuclear translocation in the nonclonal U251 population is heterogeneous with a highly responsive subpopulation (Figure 1(a), arrowheads), cells with intermediate levels of nuclear p65, and cells without nuclear translocation (Figure 1(a), asterisk).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 1

U251 cells respond heterogeneously to a proinflammatory trigger. (a) Immunocytochemistry of the NF-κB subunit p65 (magenta) shows nuclear translocation of NF-κB after stimulation with TNFα for 15 min (arrowheads). Note the heterogeneous response in p65 nuclear translocation in U251 cells (asterisk). Scale bar: 100 μm. (b) Quantification of nuclear p65 intensity showed significant increase of nuclear translocated NF-κB in TNFα-treated U251 cells compared to untreated U251-cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD from three different measurements (merged), compared using Student’s t-test (unpaired, two-tailed, CI 95%). . (c) Increased relative luciferase activity was observed in U251 cells transiently transfected with a NF-κB-dependent luciferase reporter. Mean ± SEM from three different experiments are shown, analysed using unpaired Student’s t-test (two-tailed, CI 95%). . (d) Schematic display of the lentiviral NF-κB-dependent luciferase reporter. NF-κB activation leads to binding of NF-κB to respective response elements, enhancing GFP and luciferase reporter gene expression through activation of the minimal CMV promoter.

Similarly, subpopulation of cells spontaneously translocating p65 into the nucleus was identified in nonstimulated cells (control, Figure 1(b)). In parallel experiments, U251 cells were cotransfected with a NF-κB-dependent luciferase reporter and a constitutively active Renilla luciferase construct (transfection control) (Figure 1(c)). Significantly increased NF-κB-dependent luciferase activity was observed after 24 h exposure to TNFα compared to the control (Figure 1(c)).

3.2. U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc Cell Line Combines Visual Readout and Quantification of NF-κB Activation

In order to combine both a visual and quantifiable readout without the influence of population heterogeneity, we lentivirally transduced U251 cells using the pGreenFire-NF-κB-Puro plasmid (Figure 1(d)). When stimulated with different concentrations of TNFα, clone A1 (U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc-A1) revealed the highest levels of luciferase luminescence and thus it was used in further experiments (Figure 2(a)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 2

GFP and luciferase expression is increased in U251-NFκB-GFP-Luc cells after activation of NF-κB signalling. (a) Stimulation with 10 ng/ml TNFα for 24 h significantly increases NF-κB-dependent luciferase activity in U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells. Mean ± SEM from three independent experiments are shown, compared using Student’s t-test (unpaired, two-tailed, CI 95%). . (b) Fluorescence microscopy and (c) flow cytometry was applied to visualize the increase of GFP expression in U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells after 24 h stimulation with 10 ng/ml TNFα. Scale bar: 100 μm. (d) U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells were triggered for 24 h with different concentrations of LPS derived from E. coli (LPS_{E. coli,} blue) or S. minnesota (LPS_{S. minnesota,} yellow) (0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 μg/ml), and NF-κB-dependent luciferase activity was analysed. A significantly higher luciferase activity was shown using E. coli LPS compared to S. minnesota LPS. (e) U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells were treated with different concentrations of S. minnesota LPS or (f) E. coli LPS for 3 days before analysis using an MTT assay. Note that 100 μg/ml S. minnesota LPS significantly decreased cell viability. The presented values are mean ± SEM from three different experiments, analysed using ANOVA with Bonferroni correction (, , and was considered significant, CI 95%) to compare between concentrations or an unpaired Student’s t-test (^###, two-tailed, CI 95%) to compare the two chemotypes at a specific concentration.

Next, U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc-A1 cells were exposed to TNFα, followed by an assessment of GFP fluorescence using fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry (Figures 2(b) and 2(c)). No GFP fluorescence was detected in control U251 cells, whereas low basal signal was observed in unstimulated U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc-A1 cells (Figure 2(b)). Notably, TNFα treatment significantly increased the levels of GFP in U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc-A1 cells compared to untreated reporter cells.

3.3. Biased Agonism Is Detectable in U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc Cells

In a recent study, we reported that LPS chemotypes with different acetylation patterns mediate differential levels of NF-κB activation in U251 cells [26]. To test if the newly developed cell line has sufficient sensitivity to detect broad ranges of LPS concentrations and ligand-dependent activation of NF-κB, we applied various concentrations of LPS derived from either S. minnesota or E. coli and analysed the NF-κB-dependent luciferase bioluminescence. In accordance with our previous findings obtained in untransduced U251 cells [26], we were able to detect concentration-dependent changes in NF-κB activation for both LPS chemotypes (Figure 2(d)). In addition, the assay was also able to detect ligand-dependent differences in NF-κB activation (E. coli versus S. minnesota LPS) (Figure 2(d)). Next, we investigated the viability of U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells using MTT assays. Cells were exposed to variable concentrations of E. coli or S. minnesota LPS, and viability was assessed after 3 days. We observed significantly decreased viability of the cells when treated with 100 μg/ml S. minnesota LPS after 3 days compared to nontreated cells (Figure 2(e)). In contrast, concentration of E. coli LPS had no effect on the viability of U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells (Figure 2(f)).

3.4. U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc Cells Can Be Used in Screening for Endogenous TLR4-Ligands

NF-κB is an important readout in TLR4 signalling, and we demonstrated that this reporter cell line can be used to distinguish between ligand-dependent and concentration-dependent effects of TLR4 ligands (Figure 2(d)). Therefore, we investigated NF-κB activation in response to the potential endogenous TLR4 ligands fibrinogen, HMGB1, and amyloid-β.

No activation of NF-κB was observed when U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells were treated with fibrinogen (Figure 3(a)). Next, we examined NF-κB-driven luciferase activity after exposure of the reporter cells to HMGB1. A significantly decreased luciferase activity was measured when cells were stimulated with 50 ng/ml HMGB1, compared to unstimulated controls (Figure 3(b)). At higher concentrations, no effect of HMGB1 treatment was detectable; however, a significant increase was observed in cells treated with the respective amount of vehicle alone (0.1% BSA in PBS) (Figure 3(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 3

Proposed endogenous TLR4-ligands can be tested using U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells (a). No changes in NF-κB-dependent luciferase activity were observed using 0.1, 1, 10, or 100 μg/ml fibrinogen. (b) 50 ng/ml high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) led to a slight decrease whereas vehicle (0.1% cell culture grade BSA in PBS) induced an increase in luciferase activity in U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells. (c) Evaluation of TLR4-dependence in response to HMGB1 using HEK293-MD2-CD14 cells transfected with a transient NF-κB-luciferase reporter and GFP or TLR4-GFP. 50 μM HMGB1 led to a significant decrease in cells transfected with GFP only. E. coli LPS: positive control. Control: nontreated. (d) 5 and 10 μM, but not 0.1 and 1 μM amyloid-β-peptide [1-42], significantly increased NF-κB-dependent luciferase in the U251 reporter cells. (e) HEK293-MD2-CD14 were cotransfected with a transient NF-κB-luciferase reporter and GFP or TLR4-GFP. 5 μM amyloid-β-peptide [1-42], but not heated amyloid-β (control for LPS contamination), significantly increased luciferase activity. E. coli LPS: positive control. Control: nontreated. Data are presented as mean ± SEM from at least 3 independent experiments. , , and were considered significant, ANOVA with Bonferroni correction, CI 95%.

To further investigate the effect of HMGB1, we used a TLR-deficient cell background. HEK293 cells stably expressing the TLR4 coreceptors MD2 and CD14 were transfected with a transient NF-κB-dependent luciferase reporter construct, a Renilla luciferase transfection control, and TLR4-GFP or GFP, respectively. Thus, it was expected that TLR4 ligands would promote an increase in luciferase activity in TLR4-GFP cells but not in cells expressing GFP alone. Here, 50 ng/ml HMGB1 also led to decreased NF-κB-dependent luciferase expression in TLR4-deficient cells (Figure 3(d)).

Amyloid-β [1-42] peptide promotes TLR4-mediated activation of NF-κB, often in association with TLR2 [32]. To investigate if amyloid-β [1-42] can activate NF-κB in the absence of TLR2, we exposed U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells to increasing concentrations of amyloid-β. Amyloid-β significantly increased NF-κB-dependent luciferase activity (Figure 3(e)). HEK293-MD2-CD14 cells were transfected with respective luciferase reporters and either TLR4-GFP or only GFP. Stimulation with 5 μM amyloid-β or 1 μg/ml E. coli LPS did not result in NF-κB activation in the absence of TLR4. However, in the presence of TLR4, amyloid-β significantly increased luciferase activity, comparable to E. coli LPS (Figure 3(f)). The amyloid-β peptide used here was an E. coli-derived recombinant protein, and thus LPS contamination could not be excluded. As LPS is not heat sensitive [33], we heat-inactivated the amyloid-β peptide (hAβ) for 45 min at 90°C, which has been reported to denaturate occurring oligomers and interfere with biological activity [34]. The relative NF-κB-dependent luciferase activity in the hAβ was significantly lower compared to the native amyloid-β peptide and not significantly different from the untreated control (Figure 3(f)).

3.5. U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc Cells Can Be Used as a Screening System for Anti-Inflammatory Compounds

To evaluate whether the moderate basal NF-κB activity of U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells is helpful in detection of anti-inflammatory molecules or drugs, we first tested a range of concentrations of Bay11-7082, a general IKK inhibitor (poorly selective for IKK1 or IKK2) proposed as a potential compound for glioma treatment [35] without an additional proinflammatory trigger. We detected a significant decrease of basal NF-κB activity at concentrations higher than 1.5 μM compared to DMSO-treated (vehicle) cells (Figure 4(a)).

(a)

(b)

Figure 4

U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells are suitable for testing the anti-inflammatory potential of drugs (a). The NF-κB-inhibitor Bay11-7082 significantly reduced NF-κB-dependent luciferase activity at concentrations higher than 1.5 μM. Vehicle: DMSO. (b) The IKKβ inhibitor IMD0354 diminished NF-κB-dependent luciferase activity at various concentrations (0.1, 1, and 10 μM) both in the presence or absence of 1 μg/ml E. coli LPS. Data are presented as mean ± SEM from at least 3 independent experiments. , , and were considered significant, ANOVA with Bonferroni correction, CI 95%.

In addition, the function of the IKKβ is essential for NF-κB-activation, as it phosphorylates the cytosolic inhibitor of NF-κB, IκB. Moreover, IKKβ is part of NF-κB activation in the MyD88-dependent signalling pathway triggered by E. coli LPS. We therefore examined IMD0354, an IKKβ inhibitor, in the absence and presence of E. coli LPS. 1 μM and 10 μM IMD0354 significantly decreased the NF-κB-dependent luciferase activity in U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells. When simultaneously stimulated with E. coli LPS, 0.1 μM IMD0354 slightly reduced NF-κB activity; however, 1 μM and 10 μM IMD0354 resulted in significant reduction of LPS-mediated activation of NF-κB (Figure 4(b)). In sum, the basal NF-κB activity of U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells is very valuable in detection of anti-inflammatory drugs.

4. Discussion

NF-κB plays a pivotal role in the development and homeostasis of the immune system, epithelium, and skeletal system (reviewed in [36]) as well as the central nervous system (reviewed in [37]). Due to this central physiological role, its dysregulation is associated with a range of pathological conditions, including autoinflammatory neurodegenerative disorders and cancer.

In this study, we describe a new NF-κB reporter cell line, suitable as a screening system to investigate pro- and anti-inflammatory biologicals and pharmaceutical compounds.

Several NF-κB reporter cells have been generated to date. The most common cells used for the generation of NF-κB reporter cell lines are HEK293 cells stably transfected with a NF-κB luciferase reporter (System Biosciences (NF-κB/293/GFP-Luc™) or SEAP (secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase, Invivogen (HEK-Blue™ Null cells)). However, a common drawback of HEK293-based reporter cells is the absence of endogenously expressed TLRs. Therefore, these receptors must be (stably or transiently) overexpressed resulting in potential overexpression artefacts (reviewed in [38]).

Other available NF-κB reporter cell lines include a colon carcinoma cell line (HCT116, Invivogen) and lung carcinoma cell line (A549, Invivogen). Both of these are dual reporter cell lines, generated for the simultaneous investigation of the activation of interferon regulatory factor (IRF3/7) [39] and NF-κB. These reporter systems are very valuable when studying TLR4-mediated signalling. However, these cells are not particularly useful when studying neuroinflammation.

The macrophage THP-1-NF-κB-Lucia cell line (Invivogen) can also be used for investigation of proinflammatory signalling mediated by TLR4. Importantly, immunomodulation and macrophage polarization (M1, M2) can be studied using these cells. However, THP-1-NF-κB-Lucia cells require a nonstandard luciferase substrate (for Lucia luciferase) and additional chemicals for cultivation (zeocin, normocin).

Until now, no NF-κB reporter cell line has been generated from a glioblastoma cell line. Constitutively active NF-κB is associated with invasive behaviour, increased proliferation, and inflammation of various cancers including glioblastoma [40]. In accordance to that, we observed a basal NF-κB-driven GFP expression in U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells (Figures 1, 2(a), 2(b), and 2(c)), indicating constitutively active NF-κB. When triggered with the proinflammatory cytokine, TNFα, both luciferase expression and GFP fluorescence intensity were increased (Figures 2(b) and 2(c)). The advantage of our cell line compared to others mentioned previously is that NF-κB activity can be monitored at both population (luciferase) and single cell (GFP) level.

Previously, we have demonstrated that the response of U251 cells after exposure to bacterial LPS depends on the chemotype of the LPS [26]. TLR4-mediated signalling can lead to two different signalling pathways, dependent on the intracellular adapter protein. The MyD88-dependent pathway leads to an early NF-κB activation, whereas the MyD88-independent pathway leads to activation of interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3), and also to a later activation of NF-κB. As NF-κB is the common denominator in signalling mediated by TLR4, we investigated if biased signalling can be examined using U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells. We successfully demonstrated that our newly generated reporter cell line is suitable to investigate biased TLR4 signalling, in this case in response to E. coli or S. minnesota LPS (Figure 2(d)).

Although pathogen-associated inflammation has been intensely studied, sterile (nonseptic) inflammation due to endogenous molecules is not completely understood and even debated. Several studies suggest an involvement of TLRs in the occurrence of nonseptic inflammation. In this regard, most endogenous ligands studied until now seem to activate NF-κB signalling via TLR4 [41], particularly fibrinogen [42] and HMGB1 [43, 44]. U251 cells endogenously express proteins involved in the TLR4 signalling pathway and do not need to be transfected [25, 26]. In U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells, fibrinogen had no effect on NF-κB-activation whereas HMGB1 seemed to decrease the activity of NF-κB. The effect of HMGB1 was further verified using the commonly used HEK293-MD2-CD14 cells. Here, HMGB1 decreased the luciferase activity in both cells transfected with respective luciferase reporters and GFP and TLR4-GFP, showing that HMGB1 might not be a specific ligand for TLR4. Although we observed a slight increase in NF-κB-dependent luciferase activity with increasing HMGB1 concentrations in our reporter cells (Figure 3(b)), it is very likely that this response was due to the vehicle used as recommended by the manufacturer (0.1% BSA in PBS). Notably, we were able to detect an increase in luciferase activity when U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells were stimulated with increasing amounts of 0.1% BSA in the cultivation medium (Figure 3(b)).

Recently, TLR4 and TLR2 have been shown to play a significant role in neuroinflammation occurring during Alzheimer’s disease [12, 32]. By stimulating TLR2-deficient U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells and TLR4-transfected HEK293-MD2-CD14 cells with the amyloid-β peptide [1-42], we confirmed that amyloid-β signals through TLR4, leading to NF-κB activation in our NF-κB reporter cells (Figure 3(c)). Tsan and Gao [45] recently proposed that positive responses after exposure to endogenous protein ligands are due to LPS contaminations of the peptide solutions. They demonstrated that heat inactivation can be used to detect LPS contaminations in recombinant proteins produced in E. coli [45]. Heat-inactivated amyloid beta peptide did not promote a NF-κB-dependent response in our reporter cell line, indicating that our observations are not due to contaminations with endotoxins (Figure 3(e)).

We also tested if our reporter cells can be used as a pharmacological tool to identify anti-inflammatory compounds (Figure 4). In the present study, we also showed that our cell line can be used to investigate NF-κB inhibitors, as shown as using previously characterised inhibitors of the NF-κB signalling pathway, Bay11-7082, and IMD0354. Bay11-7082 has already been applied to U251 cells by Wang et al. to demonstrate the importance of NF-κB in the resistance to chemotherapy [46]. In our study, both inhibitors significantly reduced NF-κB-dependent luciferase activity independently of the presence of LPS, pointing out the benefits of the basal NF-κB activity when inhibitors are applied (Figure 4). Notably, stably transduced cells are known to undergo genotypic changes with increasing cultivation time even in the presence of selection antibiotics. Consequently, a prolonged cultivation of the U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells may result in a phenotypic shift and a potentially reduced responsiveness over time. In our hands, U251-NF-κB-GFP-Luc cells were phenotypically stable for up to 10 passages. However, we recommend to prepare an adequate number of frozen stocks at early passages.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we described the generation and characterisation of a stable NF-κB reporter cell line allowing the assessment of NF-κB activity based on the expression of GFP and luciferase activity. As aberrant regulation of NF-κB activation is associated with several diseases, for example, cancer, pharmacological tools for identification and cytotoxicity of NF-κB-inhibiting molecules are of medical interest. Our reporter cell line can be used for investigation of proinflammatory molecules and peptides. Moreover, cytotoxicity and mode of action of anti-inflammatory pharmaceuticals can be investigated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This study has been supported by a grant of the DFG (German Research Foundation) to Darius Widera (WI4318/2-1). The authors thank Barbara Kaltschmidt (Molecular Neurobiology, University of Bielefeld, Germany) and Christian Kaltschmidt (Cell Biology, University of Bielefeld, Germany) for the support. The authors also thank Philippa Darbre (School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, UK) for the help with luminescence assays and Mark Dallas (School of Pharmacy, University of Reading, UK) for providing amyloid-β [1-42].

References

R. Sen and D. Baltimore, “Multiple nuclear factors interact with the immunoglobulin enhancer sequences,” Cell, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 705–716, 1986.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Siebenlist, G. Franzoso, and K. Brown, “Structure, regulation and function of NF-kappa B,” Annual Review of Cell Biology, vol. 10, pp. 405–455, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Lieb, C. Kaltschmidt, B. Kaltschmidt et al., “Interleukin-1 beta uses common and distinct signaling pathways for induction of the interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha genes in the human astrocytoma cell line U373,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 66, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Viatour, M. P. Merville, V. Bours, and A. Chariot, “Phosphorylation of NF-kappaB and IkappaB proteins: implications in cancer and inflammation,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Karin and Y. Ben-Neriah, “Phosphorylation meets ubiquitination: the control of NF-[kappa]B activity,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 18, pp. 621–663, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. D. Jacobs and S. C. Harrison, “Structure of an IkappaBalpha/NF-kappaB complex,” Cell, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 749–758, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. Brasier, “The NF-kappaB regulatory network,” Cardiovascular Toxicology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 111–130, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Barnes and M. Karin, “Nuclear factor-kappaB: a pivotal transcription factor in chronic inflammatory diseases,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 336, no. 15, pp. 1066–1071, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Lawrence, “The nuclear factor NF-kappaB pathway in inflammation,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, vol. 1, no. 6, article a001651, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Schreiber, S. Nikolaus, and J. Hampe, “Activation of nuclear factor kappa B inflammatory bowel disease,” Gut, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 477–484, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Charokopos, N. Apostolopoulos, M. Kalapodi, M. Leotsinidis, N. Karamanos, and A. Mouzaki, “Bronchial asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and NF-kappaB,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 867–883, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Gambuzza, V. Sofo, F. M. Salmeri, L. Soraci, S. Marino, and P. Bramanti, “Toll-like receptors in Alzheimer’s disease: a therapeutic perspective,” CNS & Neurological Disorders Drug Targets, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1542–1558, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Gan, L. Yang, A. Omran et al., “Myoloid-related protein 8, an endogenous ligand of toll-like receptor 4, is involved in epileptogenesis of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy via activation of the nuclear factor-kappaB pathway in astrocytes,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 337–351, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Dolcet, D. Llobet, J. Pallares, and X. Matias-Guiu, “NF-kB in development and progression of human cancer,” Virchows Archiv: An International Journal of Pathology, vol. 446, no. 5, pp. 475–482, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. C. Guttridge, C. Albanese, J. Y. Reuther, R. G. Pestell, and A. S. Baldwin Jr., “NF-kappaB controls cell growth and differentiation through transcriptional regulation of cyclin D1,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 5785–5799, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Kaltschmidt, C. Kaltschmidt, S. P. Hehner, W. Droge, and M. L. Schmitz, “Repression of NF-kappaB impairs HeLa cell proliferation by functional interference with cell cycle checkpoint regulators,” Oncogene, vol. 18, no. 21, pp. 3213–3225, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Schwamborn, A. Lindecke, M. Elvers et al., “Microarray analysis of tumor necrosis factor alpha induced gene expression in U373 human glioblastoma cells,” BMC Genomics, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 46, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kaus, D. Widera, S. Kassmer et al., “Neural stem cells adopt tumorigenic properties by constitutively activated NF-kappaB and subsequent VEGF up-regulation,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 999–1015, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Y. Wang, M. W. Mayo, and A. S. Baldwin Jr., “TNF- and cancer therapy-induced apoptosis: potentiation by inhibition of NF-kappaB,” Science (New York, NY), vol. 274, no. 5288, pp. 784–787, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ponten and B. Westermark, “Properties of human malignant glioma cells in vitro,” Medical Biology, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 184–193, 1978.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Westermark, J. Ponten, and R. Hugosson, “Determinants for the establishment of permanent tissue culture lines from human gliomas,” Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavica Section A, Pathology, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 791–805, 1973.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Ponten and E. H. Macintyre, “Long term culture of normal and neoplastic human glia,” Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavica, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 465–486, 1968.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Qiang, Y. Yang, Y. J. Ma et al., “Isolation and characterization of cancer stem like cells in human glioblastoma cell lines,” Cancer Letters, vol. 279, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. T. Yeung, N. S. Bryce, S. Adams et al., “p38 MAPK inhibitors attenuate pro-inflammatory cytokine production and the invasiveness of human U251 glioblastoma cells,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 35–44, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Muller, J. F. Greiner, M. Zeuner et al., “1,8-Cineole potentiates IRF3-mediated antiviral response in human stem cells and in an ex vivo model of rhinosinusitis,” Clinical Science (London, England: 1979), vol. 130, no. 15, pp. 1339–1352, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. Zeuner, C. L. Kruger, K. Volk et al., “Biased signalling is an essential feature of TLR4 in glioma cells,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1863, no. 12, pp. 3084–3095, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Ma, S. Chen, X. Wang, M. Ba, H. Yang, and G. Lu, “Short-term interleukin-1(beta) increases the release of secreted APP(alpha) via MEK1/2-dependent and JNK-dependent alpha-secretase cleavage in neuroglioma U251 cells,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 683–692, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Chakraborty, L. Li, H. Tang et al., “Cytoplasmic TRADD confers a worse prognosis in glioblastoma,” Neoplasia (New York, NY), vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 888–897, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Schindelin, I. Arganda-Carreras, E. Frise et al., “Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis,” Nature Methods, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 676–682, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Bachelerie, J. Alcami, F. Arenzana-Seisdedos, and J. L. Virelizier, “HIV enhancer activity perpetuated by NF-kappa B induction on infection of monocytes,” Nature, vol. 350, no. 6320, pp. 709–712, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Ma, J. Zhao, H. C. Du, S. Tian, and L. W. Li, “Removing endotoxin from plasmid samples by Triton X-114 isothermal extraction,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 424, no. 2, pp. 124–126, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. G. Reed-Geaghan, J. C. Savage, A. G. Hise, and G. E. Landreth, “CD14 and toll-like receptors 2 and 4 are required for fibrillar A{beta}-stimulated microglial activation,” The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 38, pp. 11982–11992, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Majde, “Microbial cell-wall contaminants in peptides: a potential source of physiological artifacts,” Peptides, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 629–632, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Townsend, G. M. Shankar, T. Mehta, D. M. Walsh, and D. J. Selkoe, “Effects of secreted oligomers of amyloid beta-protein on hippocampal synaptic plasticity: a potent role for trimers,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 572, Part 2, pp. 477–492, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. E. Cahill, R. A. Morshed, and B. Yamini, “Nuclear factor-kappaB in glioblastoma: insights into regulators and targeted therapy,” Neuro-Oncology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 329–339, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Hayden and S. Ghosh, “NF-kappaB, the first quarter-century: remarkable progress and outstanding questions,” Genes & Development, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 203–234, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Kaltschmidt, D. Widera, and C. Kaltschmidt, “Signaling via NF-kappaB in the nervous system,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1745, no. 3, pp. 287–299, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Prelich, “Gene overexpression: uses, mechanisms, and interpretation,” Genetics, vol. 190, no. 3, pp. 841–854, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Ezzat, M. El Gaafary, A. M. El Sayed et al., “The cardenolide glycoside acovenoside a affords protective activity in doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in mice,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 358, no. 2, pp. 262–270, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Chaturvedi, B. Sung, V. R. Yadav, R. Kannappan, and B. B. Aggarwal, “NF-kappaB addiction and its role in cancer: ‘one size does not fit all’,” Oncogene, vol. 30, no. 14, pp. 1615–1630, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
Q. Lin, M. Li, D. Fang, J. Fang, and S. B. Su, “The essential roles of toll-like receptor signaling pathways in sterile inflammatory diseases,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1422–1432, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. P. Hodgkinson, K. Patel, and S. Ye, “Functional toll-like receptor 4 mutations modulate the response to fibrinogen,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 301–307, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Yang, H. S. Hreggvidsdottir, K. Palmblad et al., “A critical cysteine is required for HMGB1 binding to toll-like receptor 4 and activation of macrophage cytokine release,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 26, pp. 11942–11947, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fan, Y. Li, R. M. Levy et al., “Hemorrhagic shock induces NAD(P)H oxidase activation in neutrophils: role of HMGB1-TLR4 signaling,” Journal of Immunology (Baltimore, Md: 1950), vol. 178, no. 10, pp. 6573–6580, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
M. F. Tsan and B. Gao, “Pathogen-associated molecular pattern contamination as putative endogenous ligands of toll-like receptors,” Journal of Endotoxin Research, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 6–14, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, L. Jia, X. Jin et al., “NF-kappaB inhibitor reverses temozolomide resistance in human glioma TR/U251 cells,” Oncology Letters, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 2586–2590, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2017 Marie-Theres Zeuner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

3862

Downloads

1222

Citations