Research Article

Acute Neuromuscular Activity in Selected Injury Prevention Exercises with App-Based versus Personal On-Site Instruction: A Randomized Cross-Sectional Study

Table 2

Normalized EMG and kinematics during exercises presented as mean (95% CI) in APP (n = 23) and PHY (n = 24) group, respectively.

One-leg balance on AirexDrop jumpOne-leg jump on the floorOne-leg jump on AirexKettlebell swing
APPPHYAPPPHYAPPPHYAPPPHYAPPPHY

Biceps femoris (% EMGmax)2 (0–11)3 (0–12)10 (0–19)10 (1–19)21 (11–30)34 (25–43)38 (29–46)43 (34–51)49 (40–58)54 (46–62)
Semitendinosus (% EMGmax)2 (0–9)3 (0–10)10 (1–18)11 (3–18)20 (11–28)30 (22–38)§32 (24–39)49 (41–56)41 (28–53)60 (48–71)
Vastus lateralis (% EMGmax)5 (0–17)7 (0–19)29 (15–43)19 (7–31)32 (18–47)52 (39–65)39 (27–52)57 (45–70)56 (42–70)50 (38–62)
Vastus medialis (% EMGmax)4 (0–13)7 (0–15)18 (9–28)20 (11–28)33 (24–42)36 (27–45)30 (21–38)40 (32–49)§51 (42–59)50 (42–58)

Knee flexion angle at IC (°)24 (22–27)22 (20–25)10 (8–13)13 (10–15)11 (9–14)15 (12–17)
Knee flexion angle max (°)85 (81–90)90 (87–94)53 (49–57)57 (53–61)51 (48–55)55 (51–59)55 (49–61)42 (37–48)
Knee valgus angle at IC (°)5 (4–6)4 (3–5)4 (3–5)2 (1–3)3 (2–4)2 (1–3)
Knee valgus angle max (°)2 (1–3)0 (−1-1)4 (2–5)2 (1–3)3 (2–4)1 (0–2)
Hip flexion angle at IC (°)31 (27–35)32 (28–36)36 (32–40)41 (37–45)40 (37–44)44 (41–48)
Hip flexion angel max (°)81 (75–86)89 (85–94)55 (50–60)58 (53–63)54 (50–59)58 (53–62)80 (74–86)83 (78–89)
Hip internal rotation at IC (°)−3 (−6–0)−6 (−9–(−3))−1 (−4–3)−2 (−5–2)2 (−1–5)3 (−1–6)
Hip internal rotation max (°)12 (9–15)11 (8–14)4 (1–7)3 (0–6)5 (2–8)4 (2–7)

APP: group receiving app-based instruction. PHY: group receiving instruction from a physiotherapist. CI: confidence interval. IC: initial contact. Significance level at . §Significance level at .