Assessing the Performance of CareStart™ Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests in Northwest Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Dejazmach, Zelalem; Alemu, Getaneh; Yimer, Mulat; Tegegne, Banchamlak; Getaneh, Abel

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7919984

Journal of Parasitology Research

On this page

Abstract Background Methods and Materials Results Discussion Conclusions Abbreviations Data Availability Ethical Approval Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 7919984 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7919984

Assessing the Performance of CareStart™ Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests in Northwest Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Zelalem Dejazmach,¹Getaneh Alemu,²Mulat Yimer,^2,3Banchamlak Tegegne,⁴and Abel Getaneh³

Academic Editor: Eric Agola Lelo

Received05 Apr 2021

Accepted05 Oct 2021

Published23 Oct 2021

Abstract

Background. While rapid diagnostic tests are an alternative diagnostic tests for microscopy in the diagnosis of malaria in rural settings, their performance has been inconsistent. Performance of rapid diagnostic tests might be affected by manufacturing process, transportation and storage, parasitemia level, and skill of personnel who perform the tests. Therefore, periodic evaluation of the local field performance of rapid diagnostic tests is mandatory in order to make early corrections in case of decreased performance. Methods. A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from January to May 2020 among 257 malaria-suspected patients attending selected health centers in Bahir Dar Zuria district. Capillary blood was collected from each participant and tested for Plasmodium infection by CareStart™ rapid diagnostic test kit and thin and thick blood film microscopy. Data were analyzed using statistical software for social sciences version 20 and MedCalc software version 19.3. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and kappa value were calculated to evaluate the performance of rapid diagnostic tests against microscopy. Results. Among 257 study participants, 47 (18.3%) were tested positive for Plasmodium infection by at least one of the diagnostic methods. Rapid diagnostic tests revealed 3 false positive and 3 false negative results. The sensitivity and specificity of CareStart Malaria Pf/Pv Combo test were 93.2% and 98.6%, respectively (). Conclusion. CareStart™ rapid diagnostic test has comparable performance with microscopy for malaria diagnosis. We recommend continued use of CareStart Malaria Pf/Pv Combo test at health posts in Ethiopia where microscopy is not available.

1. Background

Malaria is a major global health problem which is caused by obligate intracellular protozoan parasites of the genus Plasmodium [1]. There are five distinct species that naturally cause malaria in human, namely, Plasmodium (P) falciparum, P. vivax, P. malariae, P. ovale, and P. knowlesi [2]. Malaria caused 228 million cases and 405,000 deaths worldwide in 2018, of which, 93% cases and 94% deaths were from African Region [3]. In Ethiopia, malaria also remains one of the major public health challenges. Approximately 68% of the population is at risk of the disease, and about 1–2 million confirmed cases are reported every year in the country [1, 4]. Among the Plasmodium species, P. falciparum and P. vivax are the two epidemiologically important species in Ethiopia comprising 60% and 40% of infections, respectively. Both species are prevalent in all malaria endemic areas with their relative frequency varying in time and place within a given geographical range [5]. Hence, multispecies rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) detecting both species have been used in the country.

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that antimalarial treatment should be initiated after laboratory confirmation of suspected cases [5–7]. Although microscopic diagnosis of malaria remains the “gold standard,” currently, the use of RDTs has gained major importance wherever microscopy is not available [8]. There are various malaria RDTs that are commercially available. All malaria RDTs detect antigens produced by Plasmodium species. Most RDTs are based on the detection of either histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2), a protein synthesized by P. falciparum and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) or aldolase, enzymes produced by all human Plasmodium species [9, 10].

Rapid diagnostic tests have a significant impact on the reduction of malaria burden in the world [11]. They are relatively simple to perform and interpret, and they rapidly provide results, require limited training, and allow for the diagnosis of malaria at the community level [9, 12] without the need of capital investment on electricity but with reasonable sensitivity and specificity [9]. Due to this simplicity, RDTs are being used by health extension workers (HEWs) at health post level in Ethiopia.

Malaria-suspected patients should be confirmed by laboratory diagnosis and treated with efficacious antimalaria drugs within 24 hours of the onset of symptoms. Early diagnosis and immediate treatment is one of the strategies in malaria control and prevention [8]. Diagnosis using gold standard diagnostic technique (blood film microscopy) is indispensable in order to reduce transmission, morbidity, and death due to malaria. This can be done in health institutions equipped with clinical laboratory. In health posts, where there is no laboratory and laboratory professionals, the HEWs are given little training and screen febrile cases with RDT before prescribing antimalaria drugs. While RDTs are an alternative diagnostic tests for microscopy [13], their sensitivity has been inconsistent ranging from 20% to 99% [14]. A few studies have been conducted to assess the performance of RDTs in Ethiopia. The performance of RDTs might vary by lot number, manufacturer, disease transmission intensity, storage, transportation, and end-user performance [15]. Additionally, the accuracy of any RDT depends on concentration of the target antigens in blood [16]. Hence, previous study results do not help to infer for the present situation. Therefore, periodic evaluation of the field performance of RDTs is mandatory to early identify decreased performance and timely corrections. Therefore, the present study is aimed at assessing the performance of malaria RDTs in Bahir Dar Zuria district, where malaria is a public health problem.

2. Methods and Materials

2.1. Study Design, Area, and Period

A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Yinesa, Andasa, and Robit health centers in Bahir Dar Zuria district, northwest Ethiopia, from January to May 2020. The Bahir Dar Zuria district is one of the 14 districts of West Gojjam Zone, which is located at a distance of 560 km from capital city of the country, Addis Ababa, and the district is situated surrounding Bahir Dar city, capital of Amhara National Regional State. The altitude of the district ranges from 1700 to 2300 meters above sea level [17]. According to Bahir Dar Zuria district health office report for 2019, the district has a total population of 182,730, of whom 93,642 (51.2%) are men and 89,088 (48.8) are women. The district has thirty-six kebeles. In the district, there are 9 health centers and 36 health posts. The district receives an average annual rainfall of about 1035 mm. The minimum and maximum temperature lies at 10°C and 32°C, respectively [17]. Likewise, the major transmission season of malaria in the district occurs from September to December after major rainfalls followed by April to May with minor transmission [18].

2.2. Sample Size Determination and Sampling Procedure

Sample size for assessment of CareStart RDT performance was determined using the Buderer formula for diagnostic test studies [19].

where , (), from previous study from Sheraro, northwest Ethiopia [20], from previous study at Sheraro, northwest Ethiopia [20], (), and .

Therefore, a total of 257 malaria-suspected patients were included in the study to evaluate the test performance of CareStart™ RDTs against microscopy. Three health facilities, Andasa health center, Yinesa health center, and Robit health center, were selected using simple random sampling technique among nine health centers. On average, 214, 198, and 142 febrile patients visited the laboratory at Yinesa, Andasa, and Robit health center laboratories, respectively, per two months from January to March in 2019. Therefore, by proportional allocation, 100, 92, and 65 patients were allocated in Yinesa, Andasa, and Robit health centers, respectively. Then, systematic random sampling was used to select study participants, and the sampling interval ( value) was 2. Of the first two participants, one patient was randomly selected by lottery method, and then, every 2^nd patient was selected to participate in the study.

The study participants were all self-presenting clinically suspected malaria patients during data collection period, whose age were greater than or equal to 1 year old, who were attending at three randomly selected health facilities. Children below the age of one year, critically ill patients who were unable to respond to research questions, individuals who had taken antimalaria drugs within 4 weeks prior to data collection, and individuals who had taken antibiotic or any antipain drugs within 24 hours prior to data collection were excluded.

2.3. Data Collection

Sociodemographic and related data were collected through face to face interview before blood sample collection by trained laboratory technicians using semistructured questionnaires prepared in English and translated to Amharic. Each febrile patient was sampled with capillary blood and used for Plasmodium examination using RDT, thick and thin smear microscopy. Blood films were prepared, dried, stained, and examined for Plasmodium parasitemia following standard protocol [9, 12]. RDTs were also run following the manufacturer’s instructions. 5 μl of blood sample was added onto the test device window using the specimen transfer device (micropipette) provided with the kit, followed by adding 2 drops (60 μl) of reagent buffer on the buffer well. Results were read 20 mins after addition of the sample and buffer [21].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data were checked for completeness and entered and analyzed in Statistical Package for Social Science software version 20. Descriptive statistics was manipulated to explain the study participants and to show the malaria prevalence by CareStart™ RDT and microscopy. Performance of RDTs was measured by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) against microscopy result using MedCalc software version 19.3. Kappa value was also calculated to show the strength of test agreement between “RDTs and microscopy.” Kappa value was interpreted as follows: as indicating no agreement, 0.01–0.20 as none to slight, 0.21–0.40 as fair, 0.41–0.60 as moderate, 0.61–0.80 as substantial, and 0.81–1.00 as almost perfect agreement [22].

2.5. Ethical Considerations

The research was carried out after ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee of College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University. Additionally, supportive letters were obtained from Amhara Public Health Institute, West Gojjam Zone health department, and Bahir Dar Zuria district health office, and permission was obtained from each health center authority. Information obtained at any course of the study was kept confidential. Informed verbal consent was obtained from each participant and assent from guardians for children under 18 years old. Moreover, no personal and health facility identifier was included as participants were given a unique code. Malaria-suspected patients who were positive for malaria or other haemoparasites by any of the tests were linked to the respective health center for appropriate treatment.

3. Results

3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics of Study Participants

Among a total of 257 febrile patients participated in the present study, 151 (58.8%) and 106 (41.2%) were males and females, respectively. The participants’ age ranged from 1 to 82 years with mean age of 21.0 (±17.1 SD) years. All the study participants were rural inhabitants. Regarding to their educational status, 194 (75.5%) were unable to read and write and the rest 63 (24.5%) were able to read and write or have attended formal education (Table 1).

3.2. Malaria Prevalence and Parasitemia Level

Among 257 participants, 47 (18.3%) were tested positive for Plasmodium infection by at least one of the diagnostic methods (RDT or microscopy). Each test separately detected Plasmodium infections in 44 (17.1%) participants. Blood film microscopy results revealed that 30 (11.7%), 11 (4.3%), and 3 (1.2%) participants were positive for P. vivax, P. falciparum, and mixed infections, respectively. CareStart^TM RDT detected P. vivax, P. falciparum, and mixed infections in 32 (12.5%), 10 (3.9%), and 2 (0.8%) participants, respectively (Table 2). The mean asexual stage parasite density of microscopy-confirmed cases was 4557.29 (±4032.5 SD) with a range of 80 to 16480 parasites/μl, and 30 (68.2%) of the infections had parasite density greater than 2000 parasites/μl. There were two cases that had a parasitic load less than 200 parasites/μl, which were negative by RDTs.

3.3. Comparison of CareStart™ against Microscopy

Among 44 positive results by microscopy, CareStart™ malaria RDT detected 41 samples as positive. Three samples were false negative by RDT as 1 and 2 of them were positive for P. falciparum and P. vivax, respectively, by microscopy. On the reverse, 3 samples were false positive by RDT as microscopy results were negative (Table 3).

3.4. Diagnostic Performance of CareStart™ RDT versus Microscopy

The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of RDTs in detecting overall Plasmodium infection were 93.2%, 98.6%, 93.2%, and 98.6%, respectively. Almost perfect measure of test agreement was found between RDT and microscopy with kappa value of 0.918. However, the test agreement was 0.394 in detecting mixed infection (Table 4).

4. Discussion

Comparison of RDTs’ performance against blood film microscopy in the present study revealed sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 93.2%, 98.6%, 93.2%, and 98.6%, respectively. This result showed that the sensitivity of RDT in detecting Plasmodium infection was in line with findings from Kola Diba, northwest Ethiopia (95.0%) [23], Mayani hospital, northwest Ethiopia (95.4%) [20], Serbo, southwestern Ethiopia (95.8%) [24], Kenya (93.4%) [25], and China-Myanmar (89.7%) [26]. On the other hand, it was lower than reports from Wondogenet, northwest Ethiopia (99.4%) [27] and Felegeselam, northwest Ethiopia (99.8%) [28]. Such variations could be due to quality of different RDT products which may differ in detection limits, sometimes even within the same country [29], lot-to-lot variation [30], parasite load [31], observer variation, lower transmission intensities [32], mutation, or deletion in the HRP 2/3 genes [33]. The RDT performance would be higher if data was collected during the major transmission season.

The attempt to evaluate the performance of the CareStart Malaria Pf/Pv Combo test to diagnose P. falciparum infections indicated the low level of sensitivity (81.8%) which was comparable with previous report in Jimma, southwest Ethiopia (85.6%) [34]. However, this figure is lower than previous studies reported from Felegeselam Health Center, northwest Ethiopia (99.7%) [28], Mayani hospital, northwest Ethiopia (94.4%) [20], in Kola Diba, northwest Ethiopia (92.9%) [23], Serbo, southwest Ethiopia (96.4%) [24], and China-Myanmar (88.52%) [26]. The sensitivity of CareStart™ RDT for the detection of P. vivax (93.3%) was in consistent with the study conducted in Kola Diba, northwest Ethiopia (90.9%) [23], Serbo, southwest Ethiopia (95.3%) [24], and China-Myanmar (88.5%) [26]. Likewise, it was lower than results of a study from Felegeselam, northwest Ethiopia (99.7%) [28]. On the other hand, it was higher than findings from Jimma, southwest Ethiopia (85.0%) [34]. This difference might be due to the above aforementioned reasons for Plasmodium infections [30, 31, 33]. The sensitivity (33.3%), PPV (50.0%), and kappa value (0.394) of RDTs in detecting mixed infections in the present study is low. This might be due to low parasitemia level that two RDT negative samples had a while all positive samples by both RDT and microscopy had a parasitemia level of >4000/μl. Moreover, identification of mixed infection by microscopy is also prone to reader errors and needs microscopy experts. Hence, large-scale studies recruiting reasonable number of patient samples with mixed infection and including more sensitive molecular methods are recommended to give definitive conclusion on the performance of RDTs in detecting mixed infections.

Based on the WHO limit of detection (%), specificity of 98.6%, 99.6%, and 98.2% for overall Plasmodium, P. falciparum, and P. vivax, respectively, revealed that RDTs could be used for malaria diagnosis at health post and other public health facility levels in the absence of microscopy [35]. The specificity of the current study for P. falciparum and P. vivax (99.6% and 98.2%, respectively) was comparable with previous findings at Felegeselam in northwest Ethiopia (97.8% and 99.9%) [28], Serbo, southwest Ethiopia (100% and 100%) [24], and China-Myanmar (98.26% and 100%) [26]. The specificity of the present study for diagnosis of Plasmodium species was comparable with study done at Felegeselam in northwest Ethiopia (97.7%) [28], Kola Diba, northwest Ethiopia (94.2%) [23], Mayani hospital, northwest Ethiopia (99.3%) [20], and China-Myanmar (98.3%) [26]. Likewise, the finding of this study was found higher than study done in Butajira, southwest Ethiopia (82.7%) [16] and western Kenya (76.9%) [25]. Such variations in specificity within the same test could be explained by variation in species distribution across study sites, the persistence of P. falciparum-specific HRP2 in patients who had been treated [9], and the sequestration of the parasites in the deep organs to reduce circulating parasites [36].

The RDTs had high NPV (98.6%) and PPV (93.2%) in the present study, which was relatively consistent with a study conducted at Felegeselam Health Center in northwest Ethiopia (99.7% and 97.8%) [28], Kola Diba Health Center, northwest Ethiopia (96.7% and 91.3%) [23], and Mayani hospital, northwest Ethiopia (98.9% and 99.6%) [20], respectively. This indicates the ability of RDTs to correctly diagnose malaria negative and positive patients was high, meaning that it was reliable in ruling out malaria, and also, infected patients will be correctly diagnosed as positive for malaria and avoid unnecessary treatment.

5. Conclusions

CareStart™ RDT had very good sensitivity and specificity for malaria diagnosis with an excellent agreement with the reference blood film microscopy. We recommend continued use of CareStart Malaria Pf/Pv Combo test at health posts in Ethiopia where microscopy is not available. However, the test performance in detecting light infections should be evaluated against a more sensitive molecular technique.

5.1. What Is Already Known on This Topic

(i)Different factors affect performance of rapid diagnostic tests

5.2. What This Study Adds

(i)Previous study results do not help to infer for the present situation

Abbreviations

HEWs:	Health extension workers
HRP2:	Histidine-rich protein 2
LDH:	Lactate dehydrogenase
NPV:	Negative predictive value
PPV:	Positive predictive value
RDT:	Rapid diagnostic test
WHO:	World Health Organization.

Data Availability

The questionnaire and SPSS data used to support the findings of this study can be found from the corresponding author.

Ethical Approval

The research was carried out after ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee of College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University. Additionally, supportive letters were obtained from Amhara Public Health Institute, West Gojjam Zone health department, and Bahir Dar Zuria district health office, and permission was obtained from each health center authority.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

ZD designed the study, collected the data, and participated in data analysis and manuscript write-up. BT conceived the study. GA, MY, and BT involved in data analysis and manuscript write-up. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank Bahir Dar University for partially funding the project. We also thank West Gojjam Zone health department, Bahir Dar Zuria district health office, and health centers in Bahir Dar Zuria district for their permission and cooperation at the time of data collection. Finally, we also thank for those who gave blood samples for this study and HEWs who participated in the study.

References

WHO, World Malaria Report, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2017, Nov. 2019, http://www.gbchealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/World-Malaria-Report-2018.pdf.
A. S. Sastry and S. Bhat, Essentials of Medical Parasitology: Jaypee Brothers, Medical Publishers Pvt. Limited, 2018.
WHO, World Malaria Report, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2019, May 2020, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo.
Federal democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Health, Ethiopia National Malaria Indicator Survey 2011: Technical Summary Ethiopia, Ministry of Health of Ethiopia, 2012.
Ethiopian Public Health Institute Federal Ministry of Health, Malaria Laboratory Diagnosis External Quality Assessment Scheme Guidelines, Addis Ababa, 2nd Edition edition, 2017.
WHO, Guidelines for the Treatment of Malaria, World Health Organization, Geneva, 3rd edition edition, 2015, Nov. 2019, https://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/9789241549127/en/.
C. Mwanziva, S. Shekalaghe, A. Ndaro et al., “Overuse of artemisinin-combination therapy in Mto wa Mbu (river of mosquitoes), an area misinterpreted as high endemic for malaria,” Malaria Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 232, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Federal Ministry of Health, Guideline for Malaria Epidemic Prevention and Control in Ethiopia, Federal Ministry of Health, Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, 2nd edition edition, 2004.
A. Moody, “Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria parasites,” Clinical Microbiology Review, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 66–78, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Gillet, M. Mori, M. van Esbroeck, J. Van den Ende, and J. Jacobs, “Assessment of the prozone effect in malaria rapid diagnostic tests,” Malaria Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 271, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. H. Wernsdorfer, S. Muth, C. Wongsrichanalai, A. Sutamihardja, and M. J. Barcus, “A review of malaria diagnostic tools: microscopy and rapid diagnostic test (RDT),” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 77, 6_Suppl, pp. 119–127, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. M. Masanja, M. Selemani, B. Amuri et al., “Increased use of malaria rapid diagnostic tests improves targeting of anti-malarial treatment in rural Tanzania: implications for nationwide rollout of malaria rapid diagnostic tests,” Malaria Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 221, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Kyabayinze, J. K. Tibenderana, G. W. Odong, J. B. Rwakimari, and H. Counihan, “Operational accuracy and comparative persistent antigenicity of HRP2 rapid diagnostic tests for Plasmodium falciparum malaria in a hyperendemic region of Uganda,” Malaria Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 221, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Bell, “Malaria diagnosis: WHO guidelines and their implementation,” European commission research workshop, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
WHO, Malaria Rapid Diagnosis Making it works. Meeting report, World Health Organization–Regional Office for the Western Pacific, 2003, Nov. 2019, http://www.wpro.who.int/malaria/NR/rdonlyres/8FA4636C-E8E0-493B-A958-209C55584F3A/0/RDTsMakingItWork.pdf.
A. Woyessa, W. Deressa, A. Ali, and B. Lindtjørn, “Evaluation of CareStart™ malaria Pf/Pv combo test for Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria diagnosis in Butajira area, south-central Ethiopia,” Malaria Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 218, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Bureau of Finance and Economic Development of Amhara (BoFED), Support to Community-Led Accelerated WASH in Ethiopia Revised Project Document for COWASH Phase I, 6/2011-6/2013 Phase II, 7/2013-6/2016, FDRE and MoFED, 2011.
PMI, President’s malaria initiative Ethiopia, Malaria Operational Plan, FY. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2019.
N. M. F. Buderer, “Statistical methodology: I. Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity,” Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 895–900, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. G. Feleke, S. Tarko, and H. Hadush, “Performance comparison of CareStart™ HRP2/pLDH combo rapid malaria test with light microscopy in north-western Tigray, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study,” BioMedicalCenter Infectious Diseases, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 399, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Dejazmach, G. Alemu, M. Yimer, C. Muluneh, and B. Tegegne, “Evaluation of the performance of health extension workers on malaria rapid diagnostic tests and predictor factors in Bahir Dar Zuria district, northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 4, article e0249708, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Landis and G. G. Koch, “The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data,” Biometrics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 159–174, 1977.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Moges, B. Amare, Y. Belyhun et al., “Comparison of CareStart™ HRP2/pLDH COMBO rapid malaria test with light microscopy in north-west Ethiopia,” Malaria Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 234, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Mekonnen, S. Ali, G. Belay, S. Suleman, and S. Chatterjee, “Evaluation of the performance of CareStart™ Malaria Pf/Pv Combo rapid diagnostic test for the diagnosis of malaria in Jimma, southwestern Ethiopia,” Acta Tropica, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 285–288, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. W. Wanja, N. Kuya, C. Moranga et al., “Field evaluation of diagnostic performance of malaria rapid diagnostic tests in western Kenya,” Malaria Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 456, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Xiaodong, E. Tambo, W. Chun et al., “Diagnostic performance of CareStart™ malaria HRP2/pLDH (Pf/pan) combo test versus standard microscopy on falciparum and vivax malaria between China-Myanmar endemic borders,” Malaria Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 6, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Bekele Sharew, Mengistu Legesse, Abebe Animut, Daddi Jima, Girmay Medhin, and Berhanu Erko, “Evaluation of the performance of CareStart™ Malaria Pf/ Pv Combo and Paracheck Pf ^® tests for the diagnosis of malaria in Wondo Genet, southern Ethiopia,” Acta Tropica, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 321–324, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Hailu and T. Kebede, “Assessing the performance of CareStart Malaria Pf/Pv Combo test against thick blood film in the diagnosis of malaria in northwest Ethiopia,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 1109–1112, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Plucinski, R. Dimbu, B. Candrinho et al., “Malaria surveys using rapid diagnostic tests and validation of results using post hoc quantification of Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2,” Malaria Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 451, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
WHO, Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 8 (2016–2018), 2018, June 2020, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/276190/9789241514965-eng.pdf.
P. A. Zimmerman and R. E. Howes, “Malaria diagnosis for malaria elimination,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 446–454, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. J. Watson, K. M. Sumner, M. Janko et al., “False-negative malaria rapid diagnostic test results and their impact on community-based malaria surveys in sub-Saharan Africa,” BioMedical Journal of Global Health, vol. 4, no. 4, article e001582, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Baker, J. McCarthy, M. Gatton et al., “Genetic diversity ofPlasmodium falciparumHistidine‐Rich protein 2 (PfHRP2) and its effect on the performance of PfHRP2-based rapid diagnostic tests,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 192, no. 5, pp. 870–877, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Ashton, T. Kefyalew, G. Tesfaye et al., “Performance of three multi-species rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria in Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia,” Malaria Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 297, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
WHO, Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaira RDTs: round 7 (2016-2017), 2017, June 2020, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/255836/9789241512688-eng.pdf.
A. M. Dondorp, C. Ince, P. Charunwatthana et al., “Direct in vivo assessment of microcirculatory dysfunction in severe falciparum malaria,” Journal of Infectious Disease, vol. 197, no. 1, pp. 79–84, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Zelalem Dejazmach et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

872

Downloads

805

Citations