Research Article
Physician Review Websites: Understanding Patient Satisfaction with Ophthalmologists Using Natural Language Processing
Table 8
Clinically relevant bigram frequency in best and worst reviews.
| Best reviews | Worst reviews |
| “Friendly,” “helpful” | 135 | “Never,” “return” | 14 | “Kind,” “caring” | 113 | “Refused,” “see” | 10 | “Friendly,” “efficient” | 70 | “Staff,” “unprofessional” | 9 | “Truly,” “cares” | 64 | “Waiting,” “hours” | 9 | “Great,” “results” | 61 | “Billed,” “insurance” | 8 | “Staff,” “best” | 59 | “Condescending,” “rude” | 8 | “Everyone,” “friendly” | 51 | “Horrible,” “bedside” | 7 |
|
|