Research Article

Comparison of Two Wavefront Autorefractors: Binocular Open-Field versus Monocular Closed-Field

Table 4

Intersession repeatability of vertical cylindrical vector (J0) obtained with both binocular open-field (eye refract) and monocular closed-field (VX110) autorefractors in terms of mean difference between sessions (bias), its standard deviation (SD), repeatability (Sr), and its 95% limit (r).

Wavefront autorefractorGroupJ0Session 1-session 2Session 1–session 3Session 2-session 3Repeatability [95% limit] (D)

Eye refractTotalBias ± SD (D)−0.04 ± 0.19−0.03 ± 0.120.02 ± 0.190.12 [0.34]
value0.0770.0591.000
TeenagersBias ± SD (D)−0.04 ± 0.10−0.03 ± 0.100.01 ± 0.090.07 [0.20]
value0.2760.7671.000
AdultsBias ± SD (D)−0.03 ± 0.09−0.04 ± 0.09−0.01 ± 0.100.06 [0.18]
P-value0.1710.0331.000
PresbyopesBias ± SD (D)−0.06 ± 0.27−0.02 ± 0.140.04 ± 0.260.16 [0.46]
value0.4781.0000.982

VX110TotalBias ± SD (D)0.02 ± 0.22−0.01 ± 0.10−0.04 ± 0.200.35 [0.98]
value0.9090.3550.196
TeenagersBias ± SD (D)−0.01 ± 0.09−0.02 ± 0.08−0.02 ± 0.080.26 [0.73]
value1.0000.5881.000
AdultsBias ± SD (D)0.02 ± 0.150.00 ± 0.10−0.02 ± 0.130.33 [0.92]
value1.0001.0001.000
PresbyopesBias ± SD (D)0.04 ± 0.29−0.02 ± 0.10−0.06 ± 0.270.40 [1.11]
value1.0000.5020.458