Clinical Study
Associations of Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Fatness with Metabolic Syndrome in Rural Women with Prehypertension
Table 3
Logistic regressions predicting metabolic syndrome by unfit/fat and fit/fat categories using two body composition methods.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
“Fat” was defined as body fat cut-score ≥30% and as ≥25 kg/m2 for revised BMI obesity cut-score. “Fit” was >25 mL/kg/min. Both models were adjusted for age, education, and household income. Both models excluded women classified as “Not-Fat” as there were no cases of Metabolic Syndrome in women classified as “Not-Fat”. Nagelkerke R square was 0.07 and 0.11 for Models 1 and 2, respectively. |